Go Back  Bike Forums > Community Connections > Regional Discussions > Southern California
Reload this Page >

Do we really need elevation gain to advertise a ride?

Notices
Southern California Southern California

Do we really need elevation gain to advertise a ride?

Old 09-16-07, 08:01 PM
  #1  
Spinning like a gerbel
Thread Starter
 
spingineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 7,960

Bikes: Seven

Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Do we really need elevation gain to advertise a ride?

I always thought it would be great to know how much climbing there would be on a ride. This way, it would give me a gauge on how tough the ride could be. However, there is another side to this. If you advertise a certain amount of climbing, you may not think you will be capable of completing this.

This was especially true on my last ride, where the century was advertised as 11,000 feet climbing. Now, I have never done any ride that was > 10,000 feet climbing (even after all the doubles I have done). It turned out the ride was 12,000+ feet climbing, and I did not die at the end. I still had enough to do some more climbing.

10,000 feet was what I had in my mind as the barrier to which I could climb. This prohibited me from doing some rides which I could have done, but thought I didn't have the strength, or the stamina to do. Now that I've done 12,000+ feet climbing, it's not all that bad.

I guess my point is, sometimes if you advertise a ride has so much amount of climbing, it discourages some from actually trying something that is within their reach. I'm glad I did it, because in the end, the rewards were out of this world views. I'm still not a fast climber, but as long as you don't time me, I'll be fine.
__________________
I'm in it to finish it.

My Cycling Blog
spingineer is offline  
Old 09-16-07, 08:08 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,698

Bikes: 1999 Norco ht mtb/2006 C'dale road bike/2007 Colnago CLX

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
For me I used it as a gauge for BF/group rides so I don't unnecessarily slow down the group.

On rides where I plan to do it solo, I find it a challenge (assuming I think I can finish before official/daylight cutoffs and don't get lazy).
DaveSANYYZ is offline  
Old 09-16-07, 08:09 PM
  #3  
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895

Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem

Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
So if you get 400 rides to register for a ride with 12k of climbing and the riders don't know it, the volunteers at the last couple of sag stops just might have to close shop early.
Mr. Beanz is offline  
Old 09-16-07, 08:16 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
ronjon10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Topanga, but I'm not a hippy
Posts: 2,820

Bikes: IF Club Racer, Bike Friday Pocket Rocket

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
In this case, I wouldn't distinguish any difference between a 10k and 12k event, that's a lot in both cases. Some people may opt of of tough rides they could actually finish, but having the elevation is a good thing.

Not everyone does these rides for the suffering like so many of us here.
__________________
just being
ronjon10 is offline  
Old 09-16-07, 08:43 PM
  #5  
Dagger Boy
 
Extort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,247

Bikes: 1999 GT 5.0i mountain, 2004 Basso Reef road

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sometimes we announce the elevation gain to DISCOURAGE people from attending... Sometimes, if people do not think that they can finish the event, it is better for them to choose a different ride.
__________________
Women think they're so clever because they can fake an orgasm for the sake of a relationship, but men can fake a whole relationship for the sake of an orgasm.
Extort is offline  
Old 09-16-07, 08:59 PM
  #6  
Spinning like a gerbel
Thread Starter
 
spingineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 7,960

Bikes: Seven

Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Well, in my case, this was an organized ride, so I did it, only knowing it is an official sag supported ride. I guess my body can handle a lot more than I thought it could ... just not as fast as everyone else.
__________________
I'm in it to finish it.

My Cycling Blog
spingineer is offline  
Old 09-16-07, 09:45 PM
  #7  
It is fantastic.
 
voltman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The OC
Posts: 7,977

Bikes: 05 Specialized Allez Elite; 06 Fuji Team Pro

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I wish I could do that. What was your previous best?
voltman is offline  
Old 09-16-07, 10:10 PM
  #8  
Powered by Borscht
 
ovoleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 8,342

Bikes: Russian Vodka

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd like an elevation profile.

I dont like 15k+ climbing for a 30-50mile ride...but thats just me lol.

If its like 100+mi then I dont really care unless its everest challenge or death ride...whatever they advertise isn't bad
ovoleg is offline  
Old 09-16-07, 10:11 PM
  #9  
Spinning like a gerbel
Thread Starter
 
spingineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 7,960

Bikes: Seven

Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Previously, the most elevation gain I did was about 9200 feet at Grand Tour.
__________________
I'm in it to finish it.

My Cycling Blog
spingineer is offline  
Old 09-16-07, 11:41 PM
  #10  
powerfully luxurious
 
chimivee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 2,423
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't like surprises.
__________________
- James
chimivee is offline  
Old 09-17-07, 12:59 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
StrangeWill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fallbrook, CA.
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Being as I'm not really up to pace with most of the rides here, elevation is going to be really important when I do meet up for a BF ride, being as I'll probably be pushing near my limit for a BF ride.
StrangeWill is offline  
Old 09-17-07, 07:02 AM
  #12  
Powered by Borscht
 
ovoleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 8,342

Bikes: Russian Vodka

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would rather know what kind of food they are giving out so I know what I'm paying for
ovoleg is offline  
Old 09-17-07, 08:07 AM
  #13  
www.ocrebels.com
 
Rick@OCRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 6,186

Bikes: Several bikes, Road, Mountain, Commute, etc.

Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Well Ron . . .

It's ALL important information to have going in (or deciding not to go in!) to a ride/event.

The total elevation (and profile), the kind of food, the level of SAG support, temperatures expected, miles and milage options, etc. I've never read a ride description with too much information!

Having said that, you should still go to any ride expecting surprises. I've had occasions where rain and fires (not on the same ride!) have dramatically changed the course, plus obviously, the weather.

So, on one hand, the more information I have the better prepared I can be. On the other hand, the more surprises along the way, the better the "adventure."

Sorry Ron, there's just no easy answer to this one!

Best Regs,
Rick / OCRR
Rick@OCRR is offline  
Old 09-17-07, 08:56 AM
  #14  
Spinning like a gerbel
Thread Starter
 
spingineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 7,960

Bikes: Seven

Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Dauphin twisted my arm to do this ride, and I'm glad he did. I really enjoyed this ride (even though, for the most part, I rode it by myself, because everyone was either passing me, or they were way behind me).

BTW, Dauphin, what happened? Woke up late?
__________________
I'm in it to finish it.

My Cycling Blog
spingineer is offline  
Old 09-17-07, 11:06 AM
  #15  
Scum, Freezebag!
 
Mo'Phat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Poway, CA
Posts: 4,546

Bikes: 2007 Leader 796R w/ 10sp DA and 2005 Jamis Dakar XLT FS MTB

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The last couple of rides I planned, I advertised how many feet we'd be descending. Seemed to work out okay.
Mo'Phat is offline  
Old 09-17-07, 11:54 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,851
Liked 9,713 Times in 4,756 Posts
I think I'll bring back the Mountaingate Century; 35,000 feet in 100 miles.
big john is offline  
Old 09-17-07, 11:56 AM
  #17  
Spinning like a gerbel
Thread Starter
 
spingineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 7,960

Bikes: Seven

Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
__________________
I'm in it to finish it.

My Cycling Blog
spingineer is offline  
Old 09-17-07, 12:08 PM
  #18  
got the climbing bug
 
jsigone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,215

Bikes: one for everything

Liked 935 Times in 282 Posts
I don't really worry about climbing gain unless it goes over 7k feet. Closer to 10 gets me iffy a bit as well.

I can handle 5-7K feet of climbing pretty good at my self pace (8-10mph), anything more I tend not to have anything left in the tank at the end.
__________________
Rule #10 // It never gets easier, you just go faster.
jsigone is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.