Go Back  Bike Forums > Community Connections > Regional Discussions > Southern California
Reload this Page >

Interesting blog post from the SD County Bicycle Coalition

Notices
Southern California Southern California

Interesting blog post from the SD County Bicycle Coalition

Old 11-14-13, 08:30 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
CbadRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the bridge with Picard
Posts: 5,932

Bikes: Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus

Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Interesting blog post from the SD County Bicycle Coalition

https://sandiegocountybicyclecoalitio...ith-north.html

They spoke with NCTD about their training of bus drivers after a cyclist was killed when hit by a bus while riding through Camp Pendleton.
__________________
Originally Posted by Xerum 525
Now get on your cheap bike and give me a double century. You walking can of Crisco!!

Forum Guidelines *click here*
CbadRider is offline  
Old 11-14-13, 09:30 PM
  #2  
SuperGimp
 
TrojanHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Whittier, CA
Posts: 13,346

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix

Liked 64 Times in 47 Posts
Is there any concern that training was the cause of the Pendleton accident? It seems like the driver was just flat out distracted or otherwise not paying attention.

Alternately, is there any concern that insufficient training is a cause of other bicycle-bus "interactions?"
TrojanHorse is offline  
Old 11-14-13, 09:59 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Chaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Encinitas CA
Posts: 865

Bikes: Scott CR1 Team

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TrojanHorse
Is there any concern that training was the cause of the Pendleton accident? It seems like the driver was just flat out distracted or otherwise not paying attention.

Alternately, is there any concern that insufficient training is a cause of other bicycle-bus "interactions?"
I saw the photos from the video system on the bus. It sure looked like there was no attempt whatsoever to avoid the cyclists. He just plowed right into them. Tragically, there are only 4 or 5 places on the entire Pendleton route where there is not a wide shoulder, and none of those sections is longer than a couple hundred yards. So waiting until it was safe to pass would have delayed him by about 2 seconds.

Bus drivers, especially the ones who drive double buses, need extra training. I have almost been killed by one who was making a right turn and didn't allow enough room. Fortunately, I was able to stop before she squeezed me out of the lane entirely, but it was apparent to me she had no idea where the back of the second section of the bus would end up as she went around the right turn.

Last edited by Chaco; 11-14-13 at 10:01 PM. Reason: added comment
Chaco is offline  
Old 11-15-13, 09:59 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
CommuteCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern CaliFORNIA.
Posts: 3,079

Bikes: KHS Alite 500, Trek 7.2 FX , Masi Partenza, Masi Fixed Special, Masi Cran Criterium

Liked 24 Times in 13 Posts
"(a) Mike commented that SD County Sheriffs aren’t supportive of the sharrows lane because they believe the markings conflict with Calif. Vehicle Code sections 21202 and 21208, which he said mandates bicyclists ride as “far to the right.” Nevertheless, NCTD drivers are told to surrender the lane to the bicyclists and wait to pass them."

The sheriff needs training in reading critically. It does not say "as far to the right as possible". It says "as far to the right as Practacable", which means practical and safe.
CommuteCommando is offline  
Old 11-15-13, 10:19 AM
  #5  
SuperGimp
 
TrojanHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Whittier, CA
Posts: 13,346

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix

Liked 64 Times in 47 Posts
And since when do Sheriffs gets to develop their own interpretation of the state vehicle code anyway?

"they believe the markings"
TrojanHorse is offline  
Old 11-15-13, 03:05 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
ahultin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bonsall, Ca
Posts: 681

Bikes: 2003 Cannondale Jekyll 1000, 2014 Fuji Finest 1.5 (wife), 2008 Fuji Finest 1.0 (Daughter), 2012 Fuji Cross 2.0 (son), 2011 Cannondale Road Tandem 2

Liked 27 Times in 17 Posts
That whole line is crap given that most of the sharrows I encounter are on roads which would meet the 21202 section 3 Exception for a lane of insufficient width to safely be shared by car and bike.
ahultin is offline  
Old 11-16-13, 12:06 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
There was a cyclocross race last week at Lake Hodges renamed in Udo's honor.
There will be a memorial ride leaving from SPY this weekend, I think Sat morning.
I met him a few times racing against him. He will be missed, especially by his family.
All because of an ahole driver.
Rumpled is offline  
Old 11-16-13, 10:36 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
CommuteCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern CaliFORNIA.
Posts: 3,079

Bikes: KHS Alite 500, Trek 7.2 FX , Masi Partenza, Masi Fixed Special, Masi Cran Criterium

Liked 24 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by ahultin
That whole line is crap given that most of the sharrows I encounter are on roads which would meet the 21202 section 3 Exception for a lane of insufficient width to safely be shared by car and bike.
This is absolutly true, and what I believe the beauty of the whole sharrow thing is. It is taking something that is already in the CVC, and applying clear signage to educate motorists and cyclists on the law in areas where it applies most, like Coast Higway in Leucadia, for example. So far, is isn't working all that well. It needs to be backed up now by PSA's that spell it out in plain language to the public.
CommuteCommando is offline  
Old 11-16-13, 06:25 PM
  #9  
GP
Senior Member
 
GP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,630
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Rumpled
There will be a memorial ride leaving from SPY this weekend, I think Sat morning.
Good turnout, good route.
GP is offline  
Old 11-16-13, 06:27 PM
  #10  
GP
Senior Member
 
GP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,630
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ahultin
That whole line is crap given that most of the sharrows I encounter are on roads which would meet the 21202 section 3 Exception for a lane of insufficient width to safely be shared by car and bike.
The problem with exception 3 is that it is open to interpretation.
GP is offline  
Old 11-16-13, 06:51 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
ahultin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bonsall, Ca
Posts: 681

Bikes: 2003 Cannondale Jekyll 1000, 2014 Fuji Finest 1.5 (wife), 2008 Fuji Finest 1.0 (Daughter), 2012 Fuji Cross 2.0 (son), 2011 Cannondale Road Tandem 2

Liked 27 Times in 17 Posts
Originally Posted by GP
The problem with exception 3 is that it is open to interpretation.
Actually the beauty of it is that it is not. Federal Highway administration Guidelines as well as OSHA define it. A car requires 9 feet of width and a bike requires 5 feet of width (inclusive of the gutter area or 4 feet exclusive) . This will be further cemented once ab1371 is implemented (VC21750) requiring a 3ft min safe passing vs todays subject to interpretation "safe passing distance" (VC21760)
Source:
AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, 1991

Mitigation Strategies for Design Exceptions - July 2007
ahultin is offline  
Old 11-16-13, 11:33 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by GP
Good turnout, good route.
Nice to hear.
Rumpled is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nostalgic
Advocacy & Safety
33
08-22-17 12:45 PM
joejack951
Advocacy & Safety
167
07-22-14 02:57 PM
Angio Graham
Advocacy & Safety
63
02-06-13 03:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.