![]() |
First Step in creating. Custom tandem
|
I hope you tandem building is more successful than your thread creation.
|
Originally Posted by racefacelefty
(Post 19508321)
I hope you tandem building is more successful than your thread creation.
https://ibb.co/nrOYVk |
That geometry looks mighty racy for a tandem. Is this for Wednesday Night Worlds? Also, are you getting the awesome looking aero downtubes?
|
Originally Posted by Trsnrtr
(Post 19508330)
No reason to be snarky. His image can't seem to be direct linked. You can see it here:
https://ibb.co/nrOYVk |
Originally Posted by racefacelefty
(Post 19508321)
I hope you tandem building is more successful than your thread creation.
|
Originally Posted by OneIsAllYouNeed
(Post 19508366)
That geometry looks mighty racy for a tandem. Is this for Wednesday Night Worlds? Also, are you getting the awesome looking aero downtubes?
|
How long did the process take from initial conversation to deposit to frame delivery?
|
Originally Posted by Bad1
(Post 19509200)
To late for Richards new aero tubes, they are impressive though. Frame fits us perfectly, its is very comfortable to ride, it is so responsive it's like riding a half bike.
I realize that you're using eTap. Have you considered adding internal routing for Di2 compatibility, just in case? |
Originally Posted by OneIsAllYouNeed
(Post 19510798)
How long did the process take from initial conversation to deposit to frame delivery?
|
https://imgur.com/gallery/yGSPtOne of the 1st things I did in regards to building the tandem was to contact Tim at Lightning Dymanics and provided him with my design for a right side drive system. They did a great job in manufacturing the parts and tolerances need.
https://imgur.com/a/oa12g |
Originally Posted by Trsnrtr
(Post 19508330)
No reason to be snarky.
|
Originally Posted by Bad1
(Post 19511010)
https://imgur.com/gallery/yGSPtOne of the 1st things I did in regards to building the tandem was to contact Tim at Lightning Dymanics and provided him with my design for a right side drive system. They did a great job in manufacturing the parts and tolerances need.
https://imgur.com/a/oa12g |
Originally Posted by Leisesturm
(Post 19511023)
I don't know... had I seen the o.p. when that other poster did I might have been inclined to be snarky too. I mean... what kind of cyber sleuth should one have to be to determine an o.p.'s message? No text even? Just a link? An invisible link? And not even an accurate thread title since it seems like the project has been completed.
As far as not being a accurate title I totally disagree with you, myself when ever I'm having a custom frame built the first phases is getting the geometry and design dialed in to my specific needs, which doesn't happen overnight. Where ever did you get the idea that it seems like the project has been completed? The bike is rideable but I'm still sourcing parts and waiting for release of components from SRAM. So "First Step in creating. Custom tandem" are in play. |
Originally Posted by twocicle
(Post 19511636)
Glad to see you took the spacer/offset ring idea to heart in order to provide a stronger and stable base for the timing ring. Plus you use that as a Compact 110bcd -> 130bcd adapter for the gates timing ring. Unusual, but it appears to work.
|
Originally Posted by Trsnrtr
(Post 19508330)
No reason to be snarky. His image can't seem to be direct linked. You can see it here:
https://ibb.co/nrOYVk |
Originally Posted by racefacelefty
(Post 19512644)
Snarky has nothing to do with it. A blank thread was what my comment was about. Thanks for posting the hidden link.
Being retired, I had the time to scavenge the link form his blank post. Besides, I wanted to see the pic! |
Originally Posted by Bad1
(Post 19511010)
https://imgur.com/gallery/yGSPtOne of the 1st things I did in regards to building the tandem was to contact Tim at Lightning Dymanics and provided him with my design for a right side drive system. They did a great job in manufacturing the parts and tolerances need.
https://imgur.com/a/oa12g |
Originally Posted by mtseymour
(Post 19510918)
Did you finish the build already? If so, please post some photos. I would like to know more about the rear flat mount. for the disc brake. Did the chainstay require reinforcement?
I realize that you're using eTap. Have you considered adding internal routing for Di2 compatibility, just in case? |
Originally Posted by racefacelefty
(Post 19512650)
That crank looks seriously nice. Could you please explain the respective BCD, as twocircle pointed out, there appears to be a combination of 110 for middle and inner and 130 for the Gates. What does the spider look like?
While this implementation cantilevers a lot of stuff on the outside of the spider tab (more so than when using a triple spider), with the spacer ring mated next to the big ring it makes for a solid spider connection and a good foundation for the gates timing ring. It must have been tricky to figure out the fitment of the chainring bolts attaching the gates ring to the spider and not hitting the 52t chainring. Perhaps the inside of the spacer ring has counter sinking for the bolt heads? Then for the captain's timing ring to align with the rear, guessing that it has an extra thick spacer ring mounted directly to the front spider? |
[QUOTE=twocicle;19513177]I think he is actually using a compact 110bcd double spider with the 52/36 chainrings mounted in the normal positions, then tacking on the spacer ring to the outside + the gates ring.
While this implementation cantilevers a lot of stuff on the outside of the spider tab (more so than when using a triple spider), with the spacer ring mated next to the big ring it makes for a solid spider connection and a good foundation for the gates timing ring. It must have been tricky to figure out the fitment of the chainring bolts attaching the gates ring to the spider and not hitting the 52t chainring. Perhaps the inside of the spacer ring has counter sinking for the bolt heads? twocicle nice description of the process with a few different caveats, the spacing ring is 6mm wide and machined perfectly to mount the Gates ring 130bcd so it would be supported by the spacing ring and the chain ring bolts, the spacing of the Gates chain ring bolts where centered between 110bcd spacing where the chain ring is relieved upwardly which created space for the chain ring bolts, no counter sinking. Also had to use longer chainring bolts to put it all together. For the stroker crankset the chain centerline line was set to 45mm which allowed me not to use the 5mm Torx spacer that Lightning provides, which also gave a smaller Q factor. To alignment the captains timing ring with the rear it worked out quite well all I had to do was add the torx 5mm spacer to the front crankset and a couple bearing cup shims to have equal spacing of the crank arms and a good alignment with he rear. Also using 110bcd spider from Lightning. https://imgur.com/a/dH0fz |
https://imgur.com/a/yq6zGSo after the plans were agreed upon and signed off, Filament got busy and built the frame, as shown the tubes have been cut and assembled, pictures show the fillet work that had been done for smooth transition between tubes, and the pre peg wrap after coming out of the oven which cures all joints and gives strength to the frame. Very happy with the frame weight at that point!
https://imgur.com/a/yq6zG |
[QUOTE=Bad1;19513350]
Originally Posted by twocicle
(Post 19513177)
I think he is actually using a compact 110bcd double spider with the 52/36 chainrings mounted in the normal positions, then tacking on the spacer ring to the outside + the gates ring.
While this implementation cantilevers a lot of stuff on the outside of the spider tab (more so than when using a triple spider), with the spacer ring mated next to the big ring it makes for a solid spider connection and a good foundation for the gates timing ring. It must have been tricky to figure out the fitment of the chainring bolts attaching the gates ring to the spider and not hitting the 52t chainring. Perhaps the inside of the spacer ring has counter sinking for the bolt heads? twocicle nice description of the process with a few different caveats, the spacing ring is 6mm wide and machined perfectly to mount the Gates ring 130bcd so it would be supported by the spacing ring and the chain ring bolts, the spacing of the Gates chain ring bolts where centered between 110bcd spacing where the chain ring is relieved upwardly which created space for the chain ring bolts, no counter sinking. Also had to use longer chainring bolts to put it all together. For the stroker crankset the chain centerline line was set to 45mm which allowed me not to use the 5mm Torx spacer that Lightning provides, which also gave a smaller Q factor. To alignment the captains timing ring with the rear it worked out quite well all I had to do was add the torx 5mm spacer to the front crankset and a couple bearing cup shims to have equal spacing of the crank arms and a good alignment with he rear. Also using 110bcd spider from Lightning. https://imgur.com/a/dH0fz I have done a similar configuration with DA7800 cranks but with a timing chain. There was barely enough room to fit a 10sp timing chain in between the crank arm and large chainring. |
[QUOTE=Dean V;19538805]
Originally Posted by Bad1
(Post 19513350)
What is the Q factor for the stoker? I have done a similar configuration with DA7800 cranks but with a timing chain. There was barely enough room to fit a 10sp timing chain in between the crank arm and large chainring. Totally enjoying the response feel of a right side drive. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:16 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.