26 inch tires for tandem
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 31
Bikes: Santana Fusion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
26 inch tires for tandem
I haven't seen a recent discussion on 26 inch tandem tires. My preferred 26 inch tire is no longer available. We ride a 26x1.5 tire on asphalt and crushed gravel. Please let me know what 26 inch tires you are running and what you like about them. Thx.
#2
Bad example
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,050
Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 820 Post(s)
Liked 184 Times
in
86 Posts
We have Serfas Drifter tires on our 26" wheel bikes. They were chosen as standard tires by Rodriguez and Erickson (R&E Cycles) in Seattle, which is experienced in using stuff that is good for its price.
If it were up to ME, though, I would get Compass tires in the appropriate width. Phenomenal.
If it were up to ME, though, I would get Compass tires in the appropriate width. Phenomenal.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
Long ago (okay, thirty years back) in a state not far away, Specialized made the original Fat Boy. It came in two flavors, one about two inches in width and the other either 1.25 or 1.5. They weren't kevlar lined and were very soft, fast tires. Eventually, those disappeared and then reappeared as stiff, slow kevlar-lined tires only available at one and a quarter inches wide; tried 'em, didn't like 'em.
Thankfully, someone eventually convinced Compass to make a few supple 26" tires. Initially, to avoid the cost of having Panaracer make new molds for them, they used existing molds that laid on a lot of rubber, but the tires were still supple and fast, though heavy, and available in 1.5" or 1.75" widths.
Compass eventually had Panaracer make some new molds for true performance tires in 26", and those are available at 2.3", 1.8" and 1.25", with their heavier proto-type still available at 1.5". I agree with Jan Heine's research that wider is indeed faster, so we roll the 2.3" tires on and off-road. Our off-road riding is mostly on gravel logging roads with a few of them being formerly gravel (long abandoned and pretty much 6" of dirt over the gravel).
I ride stoker (6'2", 180#) and love the slightly cushy ride. My captain (5'6" 128#) likes the front tire a bit firmer than I like the rear, but it's a far cry from those near-solid things so many riders roll on (typically we're around 40-55 psi, rear-front). We've found that the rolling resistance with these tires is dramatically lower than what we had with 1.25" tires pumped to 100 psi. Short flat spots we used to have to pedal on to get to the next drop are now places we have to brake; it's really noticeable. Then there's that whole lack of road vibration in the handlebars and saddle that we get with the softer tires. That really makes a difference at the end of a consecutive days of riding (or just the end of one day, depending on your roads and sensitivity).
The darned things are expensive, though. Thankfully, we get several thousand miles out of a tire, but I'd use them even if I only got 2000 miles out of each tire.
Thankfully, someone eventually convinced Compass to make a few supple 26" tires. Initially, to avoid the cost of having Panaracer make new molds for them, they used existing molds that laid on a lot of rubber, but the tires were still supple and fast, though heavy, and available in 1.5" or 1.75" widths.
Compass eventually had Panaracer make some new molds for true performance tires in 26", and those are available at 2.3", 1.8" and 1.25", with their heavier proto-type still available at 1.5". I agree with Jan Heine's research that wider is indeed faster, so we roll the 2.3" tires on and off-road. Our off-road riding is mostly on gravel logging roads with a few of them being formerly gravel (long abandoned and pretty much 6" of dirt over the gravel).
I ride stoker (6'2", 180#) and love the slightly cushy ride. My captain (5'6" 128#) likes the front tire a bit firmer than I like the rear, but it's a far cry from those near-solid things so many riders roll on (typically we're around 40-55 psi, rear-front). We've found that the rolling resistance with these tires is dramatically lower than what we had with 1.25" tires pumped to 100 psi. Short flat spots we used to have to pedal on to get to the next drop are now places we have to brake; it's really noticeable. Then there's that whole lack of road vibration in the handlebars and saddle that we get with the softer tires. That really makes a difference at the end of a consecutive days of riding (or just the end of one day, depending on your roads and sensitivity).
The darned things are expensive, though. Thankfully, we get several thousand miles out of a tire, but I'd use them even if I only got 2000 miles out of each tire.
#4
Bad example
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,050
Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 820 Post(s)
Liked 184 Times
in
86 Posts
I totally agree.
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 171
Bikes: Merlin Road, Rivendell Road, Arvon custom tandme, Hi-Light G-7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
we use Schwalbe Kojak 50x559 slick for touring and daily riding on pavement and hardpack. Enough volume to handle anything we want to or have to ride on. A bit noisy but otherwise I like them.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 855
Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Ribble Nero Corsa, Surly Karate Monkey, Surly Ice Cream Truck, Cannondale MT800, Evil Insurgent
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I find it hard to believe anything could be better than the 26x1.6 Schwalbe Marathon Supreme I'm using on my Disc Trucker.
#7
Senior Member
If my tandem used 26" wheels, I'd opt for these:
Compass Rat Trap Pass 26 x 2.3
Compass Naches Pass 26 x 1.8
Panaracer Pasela 26 x 1.75
Panaracer Pasela PT 26 x 1.75
My current favorite tandem road (good pavement, bad pavement, gravel, damp dirt, NOT muddy, NOT rutted) tires are Panaracer Pari Moto 650b x 42mm (1.75in). The Compass Naches Pass is really close.
Compass Rat Trap Pass 26 x 2.3
Compass Naches Pass 26 x 1.8
Panaracer Pasela 26 x 1.75
Panaracer Pasela PT 26 x 1.75
My current favorite tandem road (good pavement, bad pavement, gravel, damp dirt, NOT muddy, NOT rutted) tires are Panaracer Pari Moto 650b x 42mm (1.75in). The Compass Naches Pass is really close.
#8
Senior Member
Not sexy, probably not cool, and definitely not expensive: we've used the Performance Bike Forte Metro-K 26x1.25 tire for years with very good results. Almost never get a flat, handles well, etc. Not the supplest or lightest, but a great all-around tire. And only $15-$20 usually. We've done loaded touring on them, metric centuries, bike paths, rail-trails, you name it.
Product: Forté Metro-K Road and Mountain Tires
Product: Forté Metro-K Road and Mountain Tires
#9
Rod & Judy
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montrose, CO
Posts: 567
Bikes: Specialized S-works E-5, Davinci joint venture , CoMotion Pangea
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
We prefer a narrower tire,like 1.125 to 1.250, started with Schwalbe Durano, liked the performance but switched to gatorskins, mostly for flat protection, didn't help, and disliked handling performance, went to Paneracer ribmo, not bad on rear but didn't like front handling, had 3 failures of the cord rubbing a hole in my tube, went back to Duranos!
Might try the Philly recommendation??
R&J
Might try the Philly recommendation??
R&J
#10
Senior Member
We no longer have a 26" tandem (still have a great set of wheels though, hanging on hooks). Still have 1-1/8" Gatorskins on the wheels. We ran Kenda Quest 1.5" also, and I still have a set of those that were only on the ground once. The Kenda tires are 100 psi rated.
__________________
#11
rebmeM roineS
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Metro Indy, IN
Posts: 16,216
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 347 Times
in
226 Posts
Not sexy, probably not cool, and definitely not expensive: we've used the Performance Bike Forte Metro-K 26x1.25 tire for years with very good results. Almost never get a flat, handles well, etc. Not the supplest or lightest, but a great all-around tire. And only $15-$20 usually. We've done loaded touring on them, metric centuries, bike paths, rail-trails, you name it.
Product: Forté Metro-K Road and Mountain Tires
Product: Forté Metro-K Road and Mountain Tires
__________________
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
#12
Full Member
I've put hundreds of miles of rail trail (crushed limestone, gravel) riding on a set of Specialized Infinity Armadillo Reflect tires.
They aren't the lightest tire ever, but I have yet to get a flat with them. I got flats fairly routinely before putting them on. Zero since. Mine are the 26x1.75. They are rated to handle fairly high pressure, too, if that matters to you. The things are tough.
They aren't the lightest tire ever, but I have yet to get a flat with them. I got flats fairly routinely before putting them on. Zero since. Mine are the 26x1.75. They are rated to handle fairly high pressure, too, if that matters to you. The things are tough.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
I've put hundreds of miles of rail trail (crushed limestone, gravel) riding on a set of Specialized Infinity Armadillo Reflect tires.
They aren't the lightest tire ever, but I have yet to get a flat with them. I got flats fairly routinely before putting them on. Zero since. Mine are the 26x1.75. They are rated to handle fairly high pressure, too, if that matters to you. The things are tough.
They aren't the lightest tire ever, but I have yet to get a flat with them. I got flats fairly routinely before putting them on. Zero since. Mine are the 26x1.75. They are rated to handle fairly high pressure, too, if that matters to you. The things are tough.
They didn't get flats, though. I'm not sure anything short of a small nuclear device could have gotten through them.
#14
Full Member
We tried an early version of the Armadillos a decade ago. They rolled like they were a concrete core with some rubber glued onto the outside. Also, the rubber tended to delaminate and come off; I brought a set in that did that and the shop manager said, "Oh yeah, that happens all the time."
They didn't get flats, though. I'm not sure anything short of a small nuclear device could have gotten through them.
They didn't get flats, though. I'm not sure anything short of a small nuclear device could have gotten through them.
The Infinity line seems to be much improved, with no such issues. I think there are a fairly wide range of tires with the Armadillo feature, and they might not be necessarily related. I think Armadillo just is Spec's way of saying puncture resistant, and they use it on several different tires.
I took the Infinities off and put on some Panaracer Tour Guard Plus the other day. Only two rides in so far, but they seem slighly more compliant than the Spec tires. Efficiency, I can't tell, maybe they roll a hair easier. Can't say whether they are as tough, yet.
If I had to ride my bike in a situation where my life depended on not getting a flat, I'd put the Infinity tires back on.
#15
Rod & Judy
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montrose, CO
Posts: 567
Bikes: Specialized S-works E-5, Davinci joint venture , CoMotion Pangea
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
We have to agree with carfree about wider, softer, easier rolling, but darn, most of those weigh nigh double and not so nice for pulling hills.Another gram counter.
R&J
R&J
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,678
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Street riding using Schwalbe Stelvio 26" tires great tire
__________________
It may not be fancy but it gets me were I need to go.
https://www.jtgraphics.net/cyclist_bicycles.htm
It may not be fancy but it gets me were I need to go.
https://www.jtgraphics.net/cyclist_bicycles.htm
#18
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times
in
1,366 Posts
I went with Kojaks but Marathons might be better
I have nothing nice to say about Nimbus or Armadillos... I had them on my commuter and moved them briefly to the tandem. Yuck.
I have nothing nice to say about Nimbus or Armadillos... I had them on my commuter and moved them briefly to the tandem. Yuck.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Last edited by Darth Lefty; 09-19-17 at 10:48 PM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Kentucky
Posts: 59
Bikes: TREK Stache 5, 2013 Cannonade Carbon 1, DaVinci In2Ition tandem, RANS Screamer, Giant Expressway 1, 1975 Crescent Mark XX, Tern Link 7, Montague Paratrooper, Raleigh Talus 29, Trek LIFT, Novara Randonee, Specialized Fatboy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times
in
6 Posts
We use Schwalbe Marathon Plus 26 x 1.35 (35X559) for pavement and firm packed rail trails.At 95 psi, they are reasonably fast and handle well. We have Schwable Marathon 26 x 1.75 (47x559) at 70 psi for softer trails. The 26 x 1.75s are E-BIKE rated. Bike is a DaVinci In2ition, carrying about 340#.
Last edited by fitlerbend; 09-27-17 at 08:32 PM.
#20
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 27
Bikes: Co-Motion Mocha Custom
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Schwalbe Marathon Supreme! Great handling, 5 years no flats, won't ride anything else.
Last edited by dmhaero; 09-28-17 at 12:55 PM. Reason: Add stuff
#21
Jedi Master
I use Pasela 26x1.75 on my tandem because the Naches Pass wasn't available the last time I bought tires for that bike, and I wasn't sure if the the Rat Trap Pass would fit. My wife and I only ride a few hundred tandem miles a year, so it may be a while before the Paselas need replacing.
#22
Jedi Master
I just noticed that the max pressure printed on the 26x1.75 pasela sidewall is 65 psi, and my tire pressure calculator calls for 75 psi unloaded and 85 psi loaded for the rear tire.
#23
Junior Member
We use the Kenda Kwest Tandem tire on our quad. Max pressure 100 lbs.
https://www.niagaracycle.com/categories/tires-ken-kwest-26x1-5-bk-bsk-tandem-100lb-k193
Not a lot of 26" tires are rated for higher pressures, which we need for the quad. So we use these, we'd rather be safe than have maybe a little less weight or more supple tire.
https://www.niagaracycle.com/categories/tires-ken-kwest-26x1-5-bk-bsk-tandem-100lb-k193
Not a lot of 26" tires are rated for higher pressures, which we need for the quad. So we use these, we'd rather be safe than have maybe a little less weight or more supple tire.
Last edited by WheelsNT; 09-30-17 at 12:40 PM.
#24
Jedi Master
I run my tires at whatever the calculator says and ignore the sidewall.
#25
Full Member
We are using Schwalbe Supreme 2.0" and have been finding them great for road and ok for gravel paths. They are much more comfortable than the Continental gatorskin 1.5" tyres we used to use.
They also roll a lot faster than the Marathons. With Marathons we seem to ride at about 27-28km/hr on a flat paved road whereas we are doing 31-33km/hr on the Supremes when we are touring with rear panniers.
I'm in the process of building some lighter wheels for around town and will be interested to try the Compass Naches Pass
They also roll a lot faster than the Marathons. With Marathons we seem to ride at about 27-28km/hr on a flat paved road whereas we are doing 31-33km/hr on the Supremes when we are touring with rear panniers.
I'm in the process of building some lighter wheels for around town and will be interested to try the Compass Naches Pass