Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Tandem Cycling
Reload this Page >

AlphaQ fork longevity, any thoughts?

Search
Notices
Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

AlphaQ fork longevity, any thoughts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-18, 07:48 PM
  #1  
Used to be Conspiratemus
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times in 163 Posts
AlphaQ fork longevity, any thoughts?

Our tandem built in 2007 came with an AlphaQ X2 carbon fibre fork (with CF steeer), drilled for a short-reach rim brake. Several years ago we installed a disc-brake capable CF fork to give more confidence descending long curvy descents in Europe. (The bike already had a disc brake mount on the rear.) But for home here in Southern Ontario where one never brakes for more than 5 seconds, the rim brakes perform just fine (and my perception is they start stopping quicker than the discs do and they look nicer.) So the AlphaQ goes back on for all our local riding the rest of the season. The act of installing it allows for inspection to look for damage, although admittedly I do not pop the crown race to look under there.

So the question is, do any of you with Alpha Qs (or any other elderly carbon-fibre parts) worry about the risk of failure as the parts age? What do you do?


The AlphaQ was (and is) a highly regarded tandem fork and it was never clear to me why the manufacturer discontinued them (and all other composite products), other than the general rule that every business has to follow: "It's not how much it costs, it's how much it makes." Obviously the manufacturer is no help now for advice.

Anyway, on the advice of the bike-builder, we have decided to retire the AlphaQ, pristine and undamaged as it is, on the premise that once you start thinking about it, you're not fully enjoying riding any more. We're looking into having a steel rim-brake fork built or perhaps we'll just transition to full-time disc brakes (which latter was actually the builder's advice.)

Last edited by conspiratemus1; 12-18-18 at 07:49 PM. Reason: fixed punctuation
conspiratemus1 is offline  
Old 12-18-18, 10:47 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
I had to tear apart one of their seatposts lately. If the fork is anything like that post, ride it until it cracks.
See my Co-Motion post. I live in SoCal. I replaced front and rear disc brakes with rim brakes. I saved 2# on the front brake and fork replacement alone. I had a disc and wound-up. I went to the Enve. Tandem is about 400# riders and bike.
I'm not concerned.
I used to stand and sprint more, I might setup differently for that.
Doge is offline  
Old 12-27-18, 12:23 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 400

Bikes: Co-Motion tandem, Serotta, and Specialized mt. bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
In 2003 I bought a Co-Motion with a Wound Up carbon fibre fork. It had a rim brake as Co-Motion only put discs on the rear wheel at that time When the bike had about 25K miles and 6 years old the bike was overhauled. I asked about the life span of the fork. Wound Up did not give a definite answer but offered to sell me a new fork under their trade in crash replacement policy and I replaced the fork. Wound Up took the fork apart to inspect it and said it was structurally fine after 6 years and 25K. I'm not sure this answers your question as the rim brake probably puts less stress on a fork than a disc. It is also a different brand but maybe it says something about carbon tandem forks.
tandem rider is offline  
Old 12-27-18, 12:47 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Dave Mayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,499
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1369 Post(s)
Liked 475 Times in 277 Posts
Tru Temper (Alpha Q) made a great fork. However, they have to be setup and installed in a precise way. I've seen several serious screw-ups with the prep in these forks, some by pro mechanics.

On the versions with the carbon steerer tube, the 4" long alu insert has to be installed after the steerer is cut to size. The insert has to be carefully epoxied into place. The bottom of the insert has to extend below the level of the upper headset bearings.

​​​​​​​These forks should never be resold, given the risk of someone shortening the steerer, and installing on another bike, with the potential for serious injury.
Dave Mayer is offline  
Old 12-29-18, 12:59 AM
  #5  
Used to be Conspiratemus
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times in 163 Posts
Originally Posted by tandem rider
...but maybe it says something about carbon tandem forks.
It sure does! Thanks much.
Les
conspiratemus1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cajunpedaler
Tandem Cycling
6
05-12-17 08:26 AM
seth10015
Tandem Cycling
4
04-30-14 09:24 AM
Ritterview
Tandem Cycling
29
10-18-13 02:49 PM
calstar
Framebuilders
43
04-23-13 10:40 PM
bikerjj2003
Tandem Cycling
3
03-27-13 06:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.