Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Tandem Cycling
Reload this Page >

Type A or Type B chainrings?

Search
Notices
Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

Type A or Type B chainrings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-08, 12:37 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
antiquepedaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In the airstream above
Posts: 72

Bikes: Santana, Ventana, Rivendell, Giant

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Type A or Type B chainrings?

Does anyone know if there is any difference in using either Shimano Ultegra Type A or Type B chainrings as replacements on the idler side of a tandem? In shopping around I see both but no explanation of the difference.
antiquepedaler is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 01:42 PM
  #2  
hors category
 
TandemGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,231
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by antiquepedaler
Does anyone know if there is any difference in using either Shimano Ultegra Type A or Type B chainrings as replacements on the idler side of a tandem? In shopping around I see both but no explanation of the difference.
It hardly even matters on the drive side.

In Shimano's pursuit of "perfect shifting" it created matched sets of chainrings for it's STI bikes, e.g., 52/39 A-type rings and 53/42 B-type rings or something like that... I'm going from memory here. The ramps and pins are positioned to optimize the upshifts and downshifts for the different pairs but, in practice, folks have mixed and matched A-type and B-type rings with no perceived difference in shifting performance, perhaps even less dramatic than using a SRAM chain on a Shimano drive train.
TandemGeek is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 02:00 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
antiquepedaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In the airstream above
Posts: 72

Bikes: Santana, Ventana, Rivendell, Giant

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TandemGeek
It hardly even matters on the drive side.

In Shimano's pursuit of "perfect shifting" it created matched sets of chainrings for it's STI bikes, e.g., 52/39 A-type rings and 53/42 B-type rings or something like that... I'm going from memory here. The ramps and pins are positioned to optimize the upshifts and downshifts for the different pairs but, in practice, folks have mixed and matched A-type and B-type rings with no perceived difference in shifting performance, perhaps even less dramatic than using a SRAM chain on a Shimano drive train.
Thanks, Mark!

Jay
antiquepedaler is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.