Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Tandem Cycling
Reload this Page >

Opinions on first tandem

Search
Notices
Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

Opinions on first tandem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-10, 12:21 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
brockd15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 1,620
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times in 14 Posts
Opinions on first tandem

I know these threads show up all the time and get old real quick to the regulars...so I'm gonna do another one.

My wife and are looking at getting our first tandem to try it out and see how we like it. I've ridden/ride a lot but she hasn't. She'd like to do some longer rides with me (eventually leading to 1200k brevets, hopefully), but at this point I just don't see it happening on singles. That got me thinking about a tandem, which I think would greatly increase our chances of actually riding together.

That being said, we're looking at some used tandems and have a couple prospects I'd like to get thoughts on from people with more experience than I.

First up is an early 2000s Burley Duet for sale by an individual, with a mix of 105 and Deore I believe. It's a 9 speed with brifters and looks to be in very good shape. The asking price is $800...not sure about wiggle room on it, I haven't asked yet.




The other bike is a mid to late 90s (just guessing, maybe early 90s?) Santana Arriva. It has bar end shifters, Deore XT, and is a 7 speed. It's at a bike shop and had an original price of about $980, but they'll take $660 for it, which means ~$715 with tax (they're holding it for me for now until my wife can come check it out). I think I'd eventually want to upgrade it to 9 speed. It's the blue one below (I also looked at the red Arriva next to it, which is older and has an asking price of $540, but it's too small).








What do you think?
brockd15 is online now  
Old 01-08-10, 02:40 AM
  #2  
Full Member
 
jim_pridx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 262

Bikes: 2010 Bob Brown Cycles tandem, 2019 Co-Mo Carrera tandem, 1980 Richardson tandem, 2014 Cervelo R3, 2018 Specialized Roubaix, 1985 Bianchi Campione, 1983 Trek 720, 2020 Trek Fuel EX8, 2021 Salsa Mukluk

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 70 Posts
First and foremost, I'd look to be certain that the bike you're considering fits both you and your wife comfortably. If one or both of you aren't comfortable, it could mean disaster. Perhaps the second thing to consider (and this may well indeed be the first thing to consider) is whether or not the two of you are compatible on a tandem. Some folks just aren't cut out to be stokers, and while I've never experienced being in that position, I would probably fall into the category of someone who wouldn't care being a stoker. When my wife and I first considered the purchase of a tandem, we were fortunate enough to take our bike in question for a test ride, not only for the sake of comfort, but for the sake of compatibility, too. Fortunately, my wife felt very much at ease being the stoker from the very first ride, so we learned early on that we'd probably not have any problems.

While I certainly can't help much in giving you any advice as to which of the two bikes to buy that you've presented here, and aside from proper fit, I'd be inclined to think in terms of what bike is most capable in terms of upgrading. In other words, I might ask questions such as "which bike has the potential to upgrade to a 10-speed without too many modifications?" Or, "which bike most accomodates any type of drive train upgrades that'll be best suited for our needs?" Or, how about components? Are they in good enough condition or to quality standards so that you won't want to swap them out later? In a nutshell, there are a lot of questions to be asked that most of us probably won't be able to answer without seeing the bikes or knowing about individual heights or frame sizes. If it were me, I'd ask my wife to ride both of them to see how they feel. While I've generally favored Santana tandems over Burleys, it's really going to be up to the two of you to decide whether or not one bike or the other works for you. You may even find that you'll want to check out other bikes as well. About the only advice I can really give is to be patient and to be sure you purchase a bike you fully feel comfortable with. Price and quality and features are all really subjective but, in the end, the important thing is that the two of you are going to enjoy the experience of riding a tandem. Hope this helps!

Last edited by jim_pridx; 01-08-10 at 03:00 AM.
jim_pridx is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 07:02 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 378

Bikes: Co-Motion Mocha, Trek T100, Schwinn Fastback Comp, Specialized Stumpjumper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Never having ridden either bike I could not say, but the drive train of the Santana is obsolete, so on that score I would take the Duet. An upgrade of the Arriva drive train would be expensive. I have full 2003 Shimanno 105's on my road single and I am very pleased with them. Either bike however will do for your first bike, give them both a ride with your stoker and see which one feels better.

I would not think too much whether or not the tandem will work for you, jump into it and start riding it, start with short pleasure rides, go out for a coffee or whatever your stoker desires, build up over time, don't rush it, one bad ride in the first few tries and you can loose your stoker. The tandem for us is a pleasure bike. Though pleasure does take us pretty darn far when we feel like it.
Xanti Andia is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 07:20 AM
  #4  
hors category
 
TandemGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,231
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
If it fits and the color is OK, the Burley... by a landslide. But that's just my opinion based on the options you've presented us with.
TandemGeek is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 08:25 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
WebsterBikeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Just outside Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 623

Bikes: Nishiki Continental, Bilenky custom travel tinker, home built winter bike based on Nashbar cross frrame

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You could go with either one. If you're hoping to make that the bike that will take you on the 1200 km brevets, it should probably be the Burley. If you're thinking of riding it for a season or more, and then replacing it, the Santana might do the job. Upgrades and replacements on the Santana will be harder. [search "Santana Proprietary".]

As others have said, the fit is very important. And if it's a little thing like stem height/angle, the Santana will be harder to change (non-standard stem size). But if you can just ride it as is the Santana would save you some $$.

If you're looking to ride long distances, the next challenge will be the search for the right saddle for her...
WebsterBikeMan is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 10:32 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
gpelpel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Grass Valley, CA
Posts: 2,544

Bikes: Time RXRS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Both seem to have the same size (medium) although the Santana could be a large, difficult to say from the photos. I would say that frame quality is equal for both. They are steel frames but the Burley could be lighter because of the age difference; total tandem weight is probably around 40 lbs for the Santana and less than 35 lbs for the Burley.

Granted they fit you and your stoker the Burley seems to be a much better deal. Upgrading the Santana to 9 speed will cost you a new wheelset, a new cassette, and new brifters.

Prices are fine for both but at $800, and may be less, the Burley is a 'GO FOR IT' deal.
gpelpel is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 10:46 AM
  #7  
Riding Heaven's Highwayson the grand tour
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tehachapi Mtns, Calif.
Posts: 737

Bikes: '10 C'Dale Tandem RT2. '07 Trek Tandem T2000, '10 Epic Marathon MTB, '12 Rocky Mountain Element 950 MTB, '95 C'dale R900, "04 Giant DS 2 '07 Kona Jake the Snake, '95 Nishiki Backroads

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Burley for all the reasons already stated...the Santanna is a bit to dated and expensive to update. Good luck
....actually at those prices you have pretty low risk here....either bike will get you the answer to your question of if a tandem will work for you guys...then you can sell either for about the same money to upgrade or bailout.

Bill J.
specbill is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 10:57 AM
  #8  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,302

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times in 371 Posts
Our first tandem was a Burley Duet, a few years older, and not as nice as the one you're considering.

We got 14 good years of riding out of it.

I would therefore second the Burley reccomendation.

Assuming its in good shape, $800 is a reasonable price, even if you can't get the seller to move down any.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 11:20 AM
  #9  
Oldie. Boy, howdy!
 
Onegun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shady Hills, Fl.
Posts: 1,002

Bikes: 2005 Trek T2000 tandem, Giant TCR, Eddie Merckx Majestic Ti, Fuji Team, Giant Revel 29er, Windsor Clockwork (Orange) fixie, and a BikTrix Juggernaut Ultra 1000 fat tire eBike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
It's been said several times, just not with dollar signs attached. So ....

Tandem wheelsets, (in case you're not familiar), are far more expensive than single bike wheels. THEN you have the cost of the brifters, a new drive-side crank arm and rings, (probably have to change them due to spacing issues), a chain and cassette, and front and rear derailleurs.

Buying it all new? Figure $1000 or more to change the Santana.
__________________
BICYCLE - [[I]bahy-si-kuhl] - Noun :> A medical device used to correct the common geriatric condition of OFS, (Old, Fat & Slow), in a manner that does not induce brain-decaying boredom like walking or running.

2005 Trek T2000 tandem, Giant TCR, Eddie Merckx Majestic Ti, Fuji Team, Giant Revel 29er, Windsor Clockwork (Orange) fixie, and a BikTrix Juggernaut Ultra 1000 fat tire eBike
Onegun is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 11:27 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Stray8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nueva York
Posts: 647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post


I'd choose the Burley simply because it already has the brifters and just looks nicer.

Ditto on riding it first with your wife to see about fit and to see how well the 9 speed gearing works together.

Good Luck!
.
Stray8 is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 11:37 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
DCwom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 427

Bikes: Burley Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
When compared to the cost of a new bike, $660 vs $800 is a wash in my mind, so I'd definitely go with the best fit, and given your wife/stoker is the "lesser" rider (based on miles, don't flame me) I would tend to compromise towards her comfort & fit, an unhappy stoker makes an unhappy team.

As Burley owners we are partial to the Burley, but the name is not important if you don't ride it.
DCwom is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 11:57 AM
  #12  
I'd rather be riding
 
DKMcK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Denver NC
Posts: 173

Bikes: Santana Team Ti 700 S&S, Trek Madone 6, Omega Ti,Klein Palamino, Trek 510

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
+1 on the Burley. If it fits, you can ride it as is, without any upgrades. If the tandem thing is a hit for you and your stoker, you can get many more years of service out of it or upgrade to a high $ Calfee or something. You could then get your money out of it or keep it as a backup and recruiting tool for other cycling friends.

Keep us informed on what you eventually do!
DKMcK is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 01:28 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
brockd15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 1,620
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times in 14 Posts
Thanks for all the opinions. I've got a lot of parts on hand that I could use to upgrade the Santana, but there are still things I'd need, like a new rear wheel, or at least a new rear hub. The cost of upgrading is a small factor but not huge; I'd pick up parts as needed as I find deals and upgrade at some point down the road.

I was able to take a look at the Burley today (didn't plan to until tomorrow) and it looks nice...better cosmetically than the Santana, and I do like that it doesn't need any upgrading. It seems like it might be a better fit for my wife (biggest factor of course), but we'll find out tomorrow. We're going to test ride each, but as of now I'm leaning towards the Burley. Turns out that the price can come down to be about the same as the Santana. The seller also has a couple of Selle Anatomicas that can be negotiated into the deal, so we'll test them out with that as well.

All in all, it looks like the Burley might be the way to go.
brockd15 is online now  
Old 01-08-10, 01:33 PM
  #14  
Full Member
 
jim_pridx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 262

Bikes: 2010 Bob Brown Cycles tandem, 2019 Co-Mo Carrera tandem, 1980 Richardson tandem, 2014 Cervelo R3, 2018 Specialized Roubaix, 1985 Bianchi Campione, 1983 Trek 720, 2020 Trek Fuel EX8, 2021 Salsa Mukluk

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 70 Posts
Good deal! Be sure to let us know the outcome! Good luck!
jim_pridx is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 08:05 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
zonatandem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 11,016

Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Burley built the biggest bang for the buck.
Santana, while a good tandem, has always been over-priced. They also have too much 'unique to Santana' stuff': wider rear dropout spacing, over sized headsets, wheelsets, etc.
Have ridden several thousand miles on Santanas and Burleys so do have some actual real-time riding in.
Just our experience/opinion.
Suggest you ride the Burley and see if you two are compatible. In a year or so, you'll be more tandem savvy and you can always upgrade or get a new tandem.
Pedal on TWOgether into 2010!
Rudy and Kay/zonatandem
zonatandem is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 06:53 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Don't listen to ANYONE here until you RIDE THE BIKES. A tandem is like a single bike in that you CAN feel a difference between the way frames feel. A beginning team can feel the difference. After you've ridden them both, then make a decision.
professorbob is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 06:59 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
azbackpackr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Flagstaff, Arizona and Needles, California
Posts: 101

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Salsa Journeyman, 05 specialized stumpjumper full susp.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You said you wanted opinions, right? Here's mine:

''Daisy, daisy, give me your answer true,
I'm half crazy all for the love of you'
It won't be a stylish marriage, I can't afford a carriage,
But I'll be d*mned if I'll be crammed on a bicycle built for two!!"
azbackpackr is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 07:52 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
zonatandem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 11,016

Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
With all due respects to "Daisy, Daisy . . . "
Been riding 32 years on tandems; married only 55 years; still getting in 100 miles a week in Tucson. Eagar, AZ is another story; been there in the summer on a tandem and got hailed on while climbing up to Sunnrise ski lodge!
zonatandem is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 08:18 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
jnbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 1,291
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 133 Post(s)
Liked 95 Times in 52 Posts
Excuse me for asking. But how does somebody go from "not riding much" to 1200K (744 Miles).
Is that all in one shot?
I have done plenty of centuries but wouldn't even think of 1200K.
jnbrown is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 08:28 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
azbackpackr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Flagstaff, Arizona and Needles, California
Posts: 101

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Salsa Journeyman, 05 specialized stumpjumper full susp.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zonatandem
With all due respects to "Daisy, Daisy . . . "
Been riding 32 years on tandems; married only 55 years; still getting in 100 miles a week in Tucson. Eagar, AZ is another story; been there in the summer on a tandem and got hailed on while climbing up to Sunnrise ski lodge!
I do a lot of solo mtn. biking and solo road biking, hiking and cross country skiing, and I am pretty used to not having someone else around when I'm out there. I have heard they make tandems where the weaker smaller (usually female--that would be ME) person is in the front. I can't imagine being in the back and not being able to steer. Oh, yes I can: the times I've ridden on a tandem and the times I've sat behind someone on a motorcycle...no thanks, not for me. I don't trust anyone that much!
azbackpackr is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 08:40 PM
  #21  
hors category
 
TandemGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,231
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Rudy, you know better...


Last edited by TandemGeek; 01-09-10 at 08:44 PM.
TandemGeek is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 08:41 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
brockd15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 1,620
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by jnbrown
Excuse me for asking. But how does somebody go from "not riding much" to 1200K (744 Miles).
Is that all in one shot?
I have done plenty of centuries but wouldn't even think of 1200K.
Definitely not in one shot. That's the eventual goal, whether we'll get there or not, we'll see. The 1200k has been my goal for a while now, and she'd like to do it too, but right now I just really can't see it happening on singles. To be clear, I have no doubt she could do it, I just don't think she's into it enough to right now. I hope, and so does she, that getting some longer rides in (starting with 20-30 miles probably) on a tandem will do the trick.

Last edited by brockd15; 01-09-10 at 09:01 PM.
brockd15 is online now  
Old 01-09-10, 09:00 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
brockd15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 1,620
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times in 14 Posts
The plan today was to ride both bikes and most likely end up with the Burley, as long as we liked the fit and feel. We rode the Santana first and I thought it felt good, but my wife didn't like it all. I think it had more to do with it being our first ever ride on a tandem and being a little shaky than the actual bike, but I can't convince her of that. We were already scheduled to go see the Burley so we headed that way, called to let the seller know we were coming, and were told somemone else was coming, who ended up buying it .

So now we've got another we're looking at tomorrow, a mid 90's Burley Rumba with a Softride beam for the stoker. It's got an 8 speed STI drivetrain and looks to be in great shape and in the right size...and we'd save about $200 on it. We'll take a look at it tomorrow and see how it rides. My wife really likes the look of it, so we're on the right foot so far. If that doesn't work then I guess we'll just keep looking.

brockd15 is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chukbacca
Tandem Cycling
19
06-27-19 08:00 PM
detroitjim
General Cycling Discussion
4
01-16-16 04:54 AM
Baldy1953
Tandem Cycling
16
10-07-15 12:05 PM
lsberrios1
Tandem Cycling
19
08-19-14 04:25 PM
jensprincess
Tandem Cycling
8
09-07-12 10:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.