The Annual Tandem Cyclists Survey (Winter 2010, Part Deux)
 

Ok, it's been a really long and somewhat more wintery-winter this year in most parts of North America. While my 2010 Survey was interesting as always, it wasn't really FUN.

So, here's a bonus survey that looks at what we ride: tandem stuff. You know, what do you ride, what kind of computer (if any) do you use, do you buy into (literally) the high-tech cycle racing stuff or is it all a bunch of hooey.

Here is the link to this year's 2nd survey: The Annual Tandem Cyclists Survey (Winter 2010, Part Deux)
Graphed results for Questions #1 - #9 will appear at this link as they come in.

Question #10's write-in comments and my feedback are being compiled as they come in and can be downloaded in an Excel file at this Link. There are additional URLs provided in the spreadsheet that will take readers to previous polls that contain some of the information they expressed an interest in.

Mind you, if you are one of the first to submit instead of the 150th the results page / graphs won't be all that revealing. Therefore, and in the mean time, if you'd like to see the results from the eight (8) previous year's surveys, you can find them HERE.

NOTE: The server will only register one survey submittal per computer and, as before, let me remind you that these surveys are intended for entertainment purposes only and responses are not being collected for commercial purposes. Additionally, no names or identifies are collected or associated with the completion of the surveys on the OpinionPower.com website or by me.

Update: Question #10's write-in comments and my feedback are being compiled as they come in and can be downloaded in an Excel file at this Link. There are additional URLs provided in the spreadsheet that will take readers to previous polls that contain some of the information they expressed an interest in.

Given that I never know what might show up in the raw inputs, and because there are always a lot of open-ended questions or inquires I opted to not post a link to the raw data. So, my apologies for the somewhat low-tech approach to providing that information. However, I think it will ultimately prove to be more useful than an unedited compendium of the raw comments.