Travel bike with hydraulic disc brakes; how do you make that happen?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Travel bike with hydraulic disc brakes; how do you make that happen?
Hello, I was interested in building a cyclocross/gravel grinder style travel bike (either Ritchey breakaway style or with S&S couplers) that takes hydraulic disc brakes. I was directed towards Formula's Speed Lock valve system as a good means of being able to take apart a bike yet still use hydraulic disk brakes without having to bleed them. This seems to make sense, but my online searches have not been able to find examples of people who have actually successfully done this.
A few bike shops said that the hydraulic brakes may be affected by the high altitudes/flying as well as there may still be a chance of needing to bleed the system when you disconnect/connect.
Can you point me to examples where the Speed Lock systems has been used on travel bikes with hydraulic disk brakes? I really want to make this happen, but I honestly can't afford to be the first to experiment with this.
Thank you,
-Nick
A few bike shops said that the hydraulic brakes may be affected by the high altitudes/flying as well as there may still be a chance of needing to bleed the system when you disconnect/connect.
Can you point me to examples where the Speed Lock systems has been used on travel bikes with hydraulic disk brakes? I really want to make this happen, but I honestly can't afford to be the first to experiment with this.
Thank you,
-Nick
#2
.
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Posts: 240
Bikes: 04 Giant TCR Composite 0, Public r16; old Raleigh 10sp; Felt fixie
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
doing the same thing, with S&S, and that's what my builder is planning on using. Can't say how well it works, obviously.
#3
Senior Member
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Edit- I tried to send you a PM, but I can't because my post count is so low.
-Nick
Last edited by brownnugen; 03-06-16 at 11:22 AM.
#6
Senior Member
re altitude, and pressure, or less of it. I can always remember going with a friend on a backpacking trip, leaving in a car from near sea level up to somewhere around 10000ft or so, and opening the cars trunk and seeing our 1 litre nalgene bottles all ballooned up like marshmellows. Amazing they didnt split, but I imagine this could be an issue with a closed fluid system--although I freely admit that I do not have the experience to know how much space is available for expansion in a closed braking system.
This of course is dependant on the pressure in a hold, and when you think about it, we take shampoo and stuff in our checked luggage all the time without things bursting, so these concerns may be completely unfounded.
and yes, it would seem to me the easiest way to go is to simply disconnect the piping from the frame and without kinking it, pack it carefully along with the bike. This must be a viable option.
This of course is dependant on the pressure in a hold, and when you think about it, we take shampoo and stuff in our checked luggage all the time without things bursting, so these concerns may be completely unfounded.
and yes, it would seem to me the easiest way to go is to simply disconnect the piping from the frame and without kinking it, pack it carefully along with the bike. This must be a viable option.
#7
Senior Member
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
re altitude, and pressure, or less of it. I can always remember going with a friend on a backpacking trip, leaving in a car from near sea level up to somewhere around 10000ft or so, and opening the cars trunk and seeing our 1 litre nalgene bottles all ballooned up like marshmellows. Amazing they didnt split, but I imagine this could be an issue with a closed fluid system--although I freely admit that I do not have the experience to know how much space is available for expansion in a closed braking system.
This of course is dependant on the pressure in a hold, and when you think about it, we take shampoo and stuff in our checked luggage all the time without things bursting, so these concerns may be completely unfounded.
and yes, it would seem to me the easiest way to go is to simply disconnect the piping from the frame and without kinking it, pack it carefully along with the bike. This must be a viable option.
This of course is dependant on the pressure in a hold, and when you think about it, we take shampoo and stuff in our checked luggage all the time without things bursting, so these concerns may be completely unfounded.
and yes, it would seem to me the easiest way to go is to simply disconnect the piping from the frame and without kinking it, pack it carefully along with the bike. This must be a viable option.
#10
Senior Member
I know that I've had seals go on a motorcycle stored outside in winter, but I imagine that was water in the brake fluid that froze, expanded and buggered the seals over the winter.
#11
Banned
Bike Friday travel bikes would be no problem, since rear section folds rather than needing to separate.
They pack smaller too , Into a Suitcase .
Regular Bikes, plastic C clips come off zip tie hose guides and can be reused . not that cutting and replacing zip ties is a chore .
They pack smaller too , Into a Suitcase .
Regular Bikes, plastic C clips come off zip tie hose guides and can be reused . not that cutting and replacing zip ties is a chore .
#12
Senior Member
Why do you need hydraulic disc brakes on a touring bike? Does your tour include lots of technical downhill singletrack? Do you have weak hands from a past injury?
As suggested by others, removing the caliper and coiling it up with its hose will be a lot simpler. That is unless you're buying a frame with internal routing. I'd rather spend my money on building better wheels than messing around with finicky hydros for a machine whose first priority should be reliability.
Also, that Formula system would most likely require that you run Formula brakes. Brake hoses aren't necessarily interchangeable among brands. Unless your gravel bike is going to run flat bars, it might not be possible to do this.
As suggested by others, removing the caliper and coiling it up with its hose will be a lot simpler. That is unless you're buying a frame with internal routing. I'd rather spend my money on building better wheels than messing around with finicky hydros for a machine whose first priority should be reliability.
Also, that Formula system would most likely require that you run Formula brakes. Brake hoses aren't necessarily interchangeable among brands. Unless your gravel bike is going to run flat bars, it might not be possible to do this.
Last edited by niknak; 03-06-16 at 07:42 PM.
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why do you need hydraulic disc brakes on a touring bike? Does your tour include lots of technical downhill singletrack? Do you have weak hands from a past injury?
As suggested by others, removing the caliper and coiling it up with its hose will be a lot simpler. That is unless you're buying a frame with internal routing. I'd rather spend my money on building better wheels than messing around with finicky hydros for a machine whose first priority should be reliability.
Also, that Formula system would most likely require that you run Formula brakes. Brake hoses aren't necessarily interchangeable among brands. Unless your gravel bike is going to run flat bars, it might not be possible to do this.
As suggested by others, removing the caliper and coiling it up with its hose will be a lot simpler. That is unless you're buying a frame with internal routing. I'd rather spend my money on building better wheels than messing around with finicky hydros for a machine whose first priority should be reliability.
Also, that Formula system would most likely require that you run Formula brakes. Brake hoses aren't necessarily interchangeable among brands. Unless your gravel bike is going to run flat bars, it might not be possible to do this.
My current bike has avid BB7's, but I was never really satisfied in the 4 years I've had them and I heard good things about hydraulic brakes. I thought that if I am building my "dream" bike, I might as well dream big and consider what would be the best and future-proof. I didn't consider that the Formula Speed Lock may not be compatible with Shimano hydraulic brakes (STI shifters).
-Nick
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,406
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1138 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
388 Posts
You need to find someone who has actually packed a S&S, hydro-disc brake bike. My experience with uncoupling my wife's non-disc, S&S bike and trying to make it fit into a small package, is that it takes a lot of gyrations to accomplish. This may be hampered by the Hydraulic line. If you are shooting for the 26"x26"x10" packing container, you also have to think about how you handle your racks and fenders.
Even though we travel quite a bit with our bikes, I would not spend the extra $500-$700 if I were building up a bike for myself. Her bike has a custom built 47 cm frame(Co-Motion)and it was cheaper, and a better installation to have them installed when the frame was built, e.g., double butted tubing used at the coupler connection joints. In retrospect, I don't think it was that good of an idea. Her bike runs 700c wheels, and the 32 mm tires have to be removed from the rim to even get close to fitting a 26"x 26" box. Then we have to figure out how to carry the racks, fenders, and tires.
The couplers do save money when shipping UPS or FedEx, but that isn't your intention. If your bike is fit with 26" wheels, and does not have racks and fenders you might find it more feasible.
Even though we travel quite a bit with our bikes, I would not spend the extra $500-$700 if I were building up a bike for myself. Her bike has a custom built 47 cm frame(Co-Motion)and it was cheaper, and a better installation to have them installed when the frame was built, e.g., double butted tubing used at the coupler connection joints. In retrospect, I don't think it was that good of an idea. Her bike runs 700c wheels, and the 32 mm tires have to be removed from the rim to even get close to fitting a 26"x 26" box. Then we have to figure out how to carry the racks, fenders, and tires.
The couplers do save money when shipping UPS or FedEx, but that isn't your intention. If your bike is fit with 26" wheels, and does not have racks and fenders you might find it more feasible.
Last edited by Doug64; 03-06-16 at 11:19 PM.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 10,087
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2988 Post(s)
Liked 1,091 Times
in
880 Posts
re altitude, and pressure, or less of it. I can always remember going with a friend on a backpacking trip, leaving in a car from near sea level up to somewhere around 10000ft or so, and opening the cars trunk and seeing our 1 litre nalgene bottles all ballooned up like marshmellows. Amazing they didnt split, but I imagine this could be an issue with a closed fluid system--although I freely admit that I do not have the experience to know how much space is available for expansion in a closed braking system.
This of course is dependant on the pressure in a hold, and when you think about it, we take shampoo and stuff in our checked luggage all the time without things bursting, so these concerns may be completely unfounded.
and yes, it would seem to me the easiest way to go is to simply disconnect the piping from the frame and without kinking it, pack it carefully along with the bike. This must be a viable option.
This of course is dependant on the pressure in a hold, and when you think about it, we take shampoo and stuff in our checked luggage all the time without things bursting, so these concerns may be completely unfounded.
and yes, it would seem to me the easiest way to go is to simply disconnect the piping from the frame and without kinking it, pack it carefully along with the bike. This must be a viable option.
...Her bike runs 700c wheels, and the 32 mm tires have to be removed from the rim to even get close to fitting a 26"x 26" box. Then we have to figure out how to carry the racks, fenders, and tires.
The couplers do save money when shipping UPS or FedEx, but that isn't your intention. If your bike is fit with 26" wheels, and does not have racks and fenders you might find it more feasible.
The couplers do save money when shipping UPS or FedEx, but that isn't your intention. If your bike is fit with 26" wheels, and does not have racks and fenders you might find it more feasible.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bicyclehub
General Cycling Discussion
30
04-22-16 04:33 PM
KonaRider125
Bicycle Mechanics
14
02-18-16 03:43 AM