Truth in Advertising: Dry bags vs panniers
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Truth in Advertising: Dry bags vs panniers
I have the ortlieb sportpacker plus's. One pair: 30 L
I just picked up a Sea-to-Summit eVAC dry bag: 35L.
And yet, I can fit more in a single pannier than in the dry bag. I understand they must be quoting volume before rolling the top, but still, this is pretty horrendous. Despite claiming a volume of 17% more, the bag at most seems to have only half the volume of the ortlieb pair.
I just picked up a Sea-to-Summit eVAC dry bag: 35L.
And yet, I can fit more in a single pannier than in the dry bag. I understand they must be quoting volume before rolling the top, but still, this is pretty horrendous. Despite claiming a volume of 17% more, the bag at most seems to have only half the volume of the ortlieb pair.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,237
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18413 Post(s)
Liked 15,536 Times
in
7,328 Posts
Sure it's the size you wanted? Where did you pick it up?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vermont
Posts: 747
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I just looked at both the Ortlieb and Sea to Summits web sites and their spec/dimensions appear to supoort their claimed volumes. So is you STS bag 28-13-8 in size? I have some STS bags (compression) and they measure as list by the manuf.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,237
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18413 Post(s)
Liked 15,536 Times
in
7,328 Posts
Yeah. I am wondering whether the OP bought the wrong size or was sold something by a seller that was not as advertised. (The eVAC comes in several sizes.) That's why I asked where he purchased it. I find it hard to believe that a company with the reputation of STS would grossly overstate the capacity of a product.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
I just went through buying panniers, an comparing them to backpacks and such I already have, I can't find a general consensus on who is right and who is wrong (or how one measures such things), but I can guarantee you that the 30L Nashbar panniers I went with are not 60% of the size of my 50L Kelty backpack I was using as a benchmark.
#6
Full Member
Fill it with water and weigh it.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times
in
707 Posts
To expand:
Weigh both dry and full, then subtract the dry weight from the full weight.
The rest is water, which is 1kg/L.
You can hold it on a bathroom scale and of course, subtract your own weight as well.
Weigh both dry and full, then subtract the dry weight from the full weight.
The rest is water, which is 1kg/L.
You can hold it on a bathroom scale and of course, subtract your own weight as well.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,441
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
It is to some extent interesting... But the fact is you determine what you want to take; you decide on bags that will carry that load; you find racks that are a proper fit for those bags, then you get a bike that carries the gear you need to take through a combo of BOs and rack mountings.
Normal process is to buy a bike one likes; struggle to find racks that fit; hope to find bags that fit the racks; start packing.
Either way I have never really cared how many liters they were supposed to hold. That is an abstraction that even if reliably calculated is not how it works.
Normal process is to buy a bike one likes; struggle to find racks that fit; hope to find bags that fit the racks; start packing.
Either way I have never really cared how many liters they were supposed to hold. That is an abstraction that even if reliably calculated is not how it works.
Last edited by MassiveD; 04-26-16 at 11:06 PM.
#9
Senior Member
depends how you define rolling. does folding over one time count
if it seals the bags? how many times are you folding over before
you calculate the volume? one time? two times? until bag top
is even with top of rack? as many times as possible?......
if it seals the bags? how many times are you folding over before
you calculate the volume? one time? two times? until bag top
is even with top of rack? as many times as possible?......
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,204
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3459 Post(s)
Liked 1,465 Times
in
1,143 Posts
I would be hesitant to fill a 30 liter dry bag with water and try to weigh it. That might be so heavy that it would break the dry bag.
If the dry bag is cylindrical, what is the length and diameter? It is pretty easy to calculate the volume of a cylinder to get a close approximation. If you do not remember your high school algebra, that is what Google is for.
The weight of one half of 35 liters of water in one pannier would probably not do damage since Ortliebs are pretty robust. If you want to keep the pannier dry, put a garbage bag in it first before you get out the garden hose. But a garbage bag might leak, so be prepared for a wet pannier.
I have a 31 liter Ortlieb dry bag and it by far is bigger than one of my Ortlieb back loaders that are rated for 40 liters for the pair.
If the dry bag is cylindrical, what is the length and diameter? It is pretty easy to calculate the volume of a cylinder to get a close approximation. If you do not remember your high school algebra, that is what Google is for.
The weight of one half of 35 liters of water in one pannier would probably not do damage since Ortliebs are pretty robust. If you want to keep the pannier dry, put a garbage bag in it first before you get out the garden hose. But a garbage bag might leak, so be prepared for a wet pannier.
I have a 31 liter Ortlieb dry bag and it by far is bigger than one of my Ortlieb back loaders that are rated for 40 liters for the pair.
Last edited by Tourist in MSN; 04-27-16 at 09:10 AM.
#11
aka Timi
I think the "standard" rolling of a dry bag is.... 1 and 2 and 3 and Snap!
#12
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's the STS evac Drysack, oval base, ostensibly 13x8x28 inches. If rectangular, this would equate to 47 liters. It's oval, so 35 sounds reasonable.
However.....
1) Measuring from *top* of the roll top (not rolled) to where the base begins, it's 26".
2) It might be 28" if the base extends down 2". However, if full, the base pulls taut and flat. So this is 26" at best.
3) STS specifies rolling the top down a minimum of 3 times to make it watertight. When I do this, assuming a flat base, I get 17" of useable height, at best.
Here I'm defining "rolling" as one turn, 180 degrees. Not sure if this is what they mean. If they mean one roll is 360 degrees, you are closer to 15" tall.
So the dimensions are bogus. It's possible it might hold 35L if you use it complete open.
Bottom line is that this is really about the size of one big pannier. This is what I had expected (friend has one), I just wanted to warn folk (and let off a bit of steam).
However.....
1) Measuring from *top* of the roll top (not rolled) to where the base begins, it's 26".
2) It might be 28" if the base extends down 2". However, if full, the base pulls taut and flat. So this is 26" at best.
3) STS specifies rolling the top down a minimum of 3 times to make it watertight. When I do this, assuming a flat base, I get 17" of useable height, at best.
Here I'm defining "rolling" as one turn, 180 degrees. Not sure if this is what they mean. If they mean one roll is 360 degrees, you are closer to 15" tall.
So the dimensions are bogus. It's possible it might hold 35L if you use it complete open.
Bottom line is that this is really about the size of one big pannier. This is what I had expected (friend has one), I just wanted to warn folk (and let off a bit of steam).
Last edited by northerntier; 04-27-16 at 02:51 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,204
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3459 Post(s)
Liked 1,465 Times
in
1,143 Posts
#14
40 yrs bike touring
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Santa Barbara,CA.
Posts: 1,021
Bikes: Bruce Gordon Ti Rock N Road [1989], Fat Chance Mountain Tandem [1988], Velo Orange Neutrino (2020)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
I use the identical Evac Drybag on top of my rear rack. Excellent product. From kayak and canoe touring experience I use the roll down method mentioned above: " 1 and 2 and 3 and Snap!"
Usable volume depends on your number of roll down folds. Companies do not know what your method will be but seem to err in their favor when specifying volume. I have a 50L drybag for when I misjudge the volume of equipment I intended to fit in a 35L one.
Usable volume depends on your number of roll down folds. Companies do not know what your method will be but seem to err in their favor when specifying volume. I have a 50L drybag for when I misjudge the volume of equipment I intended to fit in a 35L one.