Touring pics
Likes For djb:
Likes For str:
Likes For str:
#1934
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 15,871
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10277 Post(s)
Liked 6,720 Times
in
3,805 Posts
str - keep the pics of random rural towns in Spain and whatever eastern euro countries you visit. Its just a really cool to see the more analog lifestyle you capture.
Likes For CMAW:
#1936
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,882
Bikes: 1996 Trek 970 ZX 2x11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Liked 528 Times
in
401 Posts
str, I'd buy the coffee table book if you'd ever have your best pics of Spain printed 

- Ciclismo en España: Caminos de Tierra y Grava del Campo (Cycling in Spain: Dirt and Gravel Roads of the Countryside)
- Ciclismo en España: Mil Fotografías del Campo de España (Cycling in Spain: A thousand pictures of the Countryside of Spain)
- Ciclismo en España: Lejos de Las Cosas del Hombre (Cycling in Spain: Away from the Things of Man)
So long as it contains all those wonderful photos, it sounds like a winner.

#1938
Full Member
#1941
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
str - keep the pics of random rural towns in Spain and whatever eastern euro countries you visit. Its just a really cool to see the more analog lifestyle you capture.
#1942
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,807
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 573 Post(s)
Liked 256 Times
in
172 Posts
They are quite similar in design but I give the edge to the Nemo Dagger 2 person. I was torn between which of the two to buy at the time but was leaning towards the Nemo because of a few subtle differences, and then caught a nice sale making the Nemo more affordable. I've been very happy with my decision.
Likes For Doug64:
#1945
Full Member
They are quite similar in design but I give the edge to the Nemo Dagger 2 person. I was torn between which of the two to buy at the time but was leaning towards the Nemo because of a few subtle differences, and then caught a nice sale making the Nemo more affordable. I've been very happy with my decision.
#1946
Senior Member
A box with a lens with film in the back or a sensor in the back is just a tool in the end. Neither guarantees the ability to take strong images, so to me is not about real or fake, it's only about the image.
And I come from the era of working with film and going through the transition to digital in a working environment.
Do I miss working with film? Not really, but it had its own specific parameters, but again, it was what it was. Spent half my life in darkrooms, b+w , so can be nostalgic about the process. The skills I developed as a professional printer and photographer are still in my head, but do I miss the hours and hours of dodging, burning, changing contrast filters, manipulating the paper in trays of chemicals, washing, drying...,.? A little bit for "the process" and decades of getting really good at it, but not really.
And anyway, we just learned a whole new set of skills with digital and got good with that.
Just a tool though. A mediocre photo is still a mediocre photo.
And I come from the era of working with film and going through the transition to digital in a working environment.
Do I miss working with film? Not really, but it had its own specific parameters, but again, it was what it was. Spent half my life in darkrooms, b+w , so can be nostalgic about the process. The skills I developed as a professional printer and photographer are still in my head, but do I miss the hours and hours of dodging, burning, changing contrast filters, manipulating the paper in trays of chemicals, washing, drying...,.? A little bit for "the process" and decades of getting really good at it, but not really.
And anyway, we just learned a whole new set of skills with digital and got good with that.
Just a tool though. A mediocre photo is still a mediocre photo.
#1947
I don't know.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Meriden, CT
Posts: 1,727
Bikes: '90 B'stone RB-1, '92 B'stone RB-2, '89 SuperGo Access Comp, '03 Access 69er, '23 Trek 520, '14 Ritchey Road Logic, '09 Kestrel Evoke, '17 Surly Wednesday, '89 Centurion Accordo, '15 CruX, '17 Ridley X-Night
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 556 Times
in
303 Posts
thanks everybody for your touring pictures. They are quite enjoyable.
#1948
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Universe Spain
Posts: 909
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 210 Post(s)
Liked 403 Times
in
182 Posts
A box with a lens with film in the back or a sensor in the back is just a tool in the end. Neither guarantees the ability to take strong images, so to me is not about real or fake, it's only about the image.
And I come from the era of working with film and going through the transition to digital in a working environment.
Do I miss working with film? Not really, but it had its own specific parameters, but again, it was what it was. Spent half my life in darkrooms, b+w , so can be nostalgic about the process. The skills I developed as a professional printer and photographer are still in my head, but do I miss the hours and hours of dodging, burning, changing contrast filters, manipulating the paper in trays of chemicals, washing, drying...,.? A little bit for "the process" and decades of getting really good at it, but not really.
And anyway, we just learned a whole new set of skills with digital and got good with that.
Just a tool though. A mediocre photo is still a mediocre photo.
And I come from the era of working with film and going through the transition to digital in a working environment.
Do I miss working with film? Not really, but it had its own specific parameters, but again, it was what it was. Spent half my life in darkrooms, b+w , so can be nostalgic about the process. The skills I developed as a professional printer and photographer are still in my head, but do I miss the hours and hours of dodging, burning, changing contrast filters, manipulating the paper in trays of chemicals, washing, drying...,.? A little bit for "the process" and decades of getting really good at it, but not really.
And anyway, we just learned a whole new set of skills with digital and got good with that.
Just a tool though. A mediocre photo is still a mediocre photo.


here some "real" stuff if you feel like https://www.stefan-rohner.net/portfo...trait/001.html
all Kodak Trix 400 printed on Agfa MCC 111
#1949
Senior Member
quoting myself because I want to make it abundantly clear that I have in the past, do presently, and will in the future always take so so photos, that's just part of taking photos.
I wanted to add this because I realize it didnt sound very polite what I wrote before.
I wanted to add this because I realize it didnt sound very polite what I wrote before.
#1950
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 37,537
Mentioned: 208 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17420 Post(s)
Liked 13,488 Times
in
6,409 Posts
great!
) I spent approx 20 years in the darkroom. nothing beats a well made black and white barita (for example Agfa MCC111) print! 
here some "real" stuff if you feel like https://www.stefan-rohner.net/portfo...trait/001.html
all Kodak Trix 400 printed on Agfa MCC 111


here some "real" stuff if you feel like https://www.stefan-rohner.net/portfo...trait/001.html
all Kodak Trix 400 printed on Agfa MCC 111

Likes For indyfabz: