![]() |
Originally Posted by spinnaker
(Post 20175977)
Not sure where you were looking at camping. Most of the GAP / C&0 is free camping. The KOA in Connelsville used to be very reasonable though there is free camping there too. Husky Haven in Rockdale has decent prices. YMCA in Cumberland is only $20 a person.
Lots of free camping on the C&O though the mosquitoes are a good reason to take a hotel along that stretch. ;) |
I remember when rustic sites in Michigan parks were $7 a night. Now, they are over $20 if you want to reserve ahead of time, and that gets you pit toilets and a hand pump water supply (and remember not to sleep in the site that has the hand pump, unless you want to hear it creaking all hours). I'm not even that old.
I'm a big advocate of doing tent camping Europe style: a grassy area that one pays a set cheap rate for, and pitches anywhere. No designated sites, not exclusive use firepits. You can always add more campers if you hit a busy time, and I don't have to pitch my tent in a virtual trailer park. |
Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
(Post 20177119)
I doubt it fell on deaf ears. Even if you talked to the head of that particular forest, they would have had no ability to go out and hire more staff.
They should have told you to contact your congressman and/or senator. That is where changes are made. I am an environmental historian. I have studied and been involved in forest service policy for decades. The relative important of front country camping/picnicking sites has diminished in the mix of forest service goals. 50 years ago, it was a primary means of public outreach and interaction. Also 50 years ago, logging - even if unsustainable - provided a steady revenue stream. Today, the core missions have changed - with habitat management and preservation taking precedence. Hundreds of small campgrounds have been eliminated. Water availability has been curtailed. Road access has been curtailed, with thousands of miles of forest roads eliminated, system-wide. There are compelling reasons for these changes. Also, strong counter-arguments. But they reflect internal policy of the USFS - something well beyond a call to your congress person. |
Originally Posted by jamawani
(Post 20177705)
I disagee.
I am an environmental historian. I have studied and been involved in forest service policy for decades. The relative important of front country camping/picnicking sites has diminished in the mix of forest service goals. 50 years ago, it was a primary means of public outreach and interaction. Also 50 years ago, logging - even if unsustainable - provided a steady revenue stream. Today, the core missions have changed - with habitat management and preservation taking precedence. Hundreds of small campgrounds have been eliminated. Water availability has been curtailed. Road access has been curtailed, with thousands of miles of forest roads eliminated, system-wide. There are compelling reasons for these changes. Also, strong counter-arguments. But they reflect internal policy of the USFS - something well beyond a call to your congress person. I am not convinced that a conversation with local Forest Service staff is more important than a conversation with a congressman. But I am not going to get into a long argument with you as it is clear that you and I are unlikely to convince the other to change any opinions. Have a nice day. |
Originally Posted by jamawani
(Post 20175797)
I though places charging $30 to $40 were bad.
Check out these rates at Yellowstone Grizzly RV Park - - https://grizzlyrv.com/rates/ Of course, $89.25 is for RVs only - no tents allowed. Cyclists would have to opt for a cabin without bath for $109.95. Cabins with bath go for the low nightly price of $179.95. (Sales tax and lodging tax not included) Why do they charge this much? Because they can. this seems to be a private park unaffiliated with the national park. you're looking at the prices of an rv park developed for rv campers to park their rvs with rv services, charging rv prices ....and complaining they don't cater to you specifically - dude on a bike wanting cheap camping? if you don't want the kitchenette and jacuzzi and steam room and fitness center, don't ***** about the cost of the hilton and wonder why they don't have 12-bunk backpacker rooms. go and stay at the motel 6, or a hostel if you don't want to pay $39.95. mr. googles tells me jellystone has 2000 campsites in 12 campgrounds with sites starting at $15. (not including backcountry camping sites) https://www.nps.gov/yell/planyourvisit/campgrounds.htm but you're looking at basically a private luxury campground for monster rv's with wifi and cable tv, outside the park..... jinkies, look at the photos on the site! it's like a suburban trailer park. why do they charge this much? because they are providing a service for which some want to pay. https://grizzlyrv.com/wp-content/upl...ng-Sites-9.jpg |
$100/night is about right for an RV space at a nice park here in Southern California. I walk my dog near one and they have a pool, movie nights, game room, etc.
I work for a hotel chain and checked rates after spending close to $50 for a tent only space at a state park for next Sunday, I could have gotten a room at one of our less expensive brands for the same price. |
Originally Posted by Brian25
(Post 20176306)
Yea, I really miss the old days when hiker/ biker sites cost .50c per person around California. Just has me doing more wild camping.
|
Originally Posted by indyfabz
(Post 20176818)
Have you seen this handy guide?:
https://gaptrail.org/system/resource...guide_2018.pdf Don't know why Husky Haven isn't listed. It was $10/night with free firewood when I stayed there in 2012. I don't need to see the guide. I know most of the campsites first hand. I have ridden the trail a number of times. IMHO it is worth it just to stay at the hostel in Rockwood for another $15 or $20. The noise from trains at Husky Haven can be tremendous. |
Never got the point of campsites. If I need to shower and do laundry, I pay for a room. If I'm camping, I find a hidden location or ask permission to camp on someone's property. I've also camped next to gas stations or convenient stores plenty of times.
What's the point of paying >$50 to camp when a room costs the same or less? |
Originally Posted by Rob_E
(Post 20177692)
Yep. I rode the GAP twice last year. Once on my own, camping, and once with family, without camping. Far more expensive to get a room than camp. In a trip that went from Cleveland to Cumberland, incorporating the whole GAP, the most expensive place I camped was Ohiopyle at 20-something dollars. In retrospect, I would have paid double to not have to hike up that hill into camp, but I'm not sure even double would get you a room in Ohiopyle.
We Robo, another friend and I made that climb up that horrible trail one year. Once we got to the top, we realized we would need to make it again after dinner. We went back down the trail and took a hotel room. Never again. :mad: I fail to understand why the parks service can't open a small hiker / biker campsite down by the river. That would be awesome. |
More than the high prices, what pisses me off is campsites that don't have a hiker biker policy. I would think a number of campsites would have a small unused section that they can dedicate to hiker biker.
I asked about the policy in a state park. They had none. The would turn you away if there was no space. But there is an unofficial policy. Just be there after the man leaves at 6PM and be gone by 9AM when he arrives for work. ;) |
Originally Posted by spinnaker
(Post 20178544)
We made Robo, another friend and I mad that climb up that horrible trail one year. Once we got to the top, we realized we would need to make it again after dinner. We went back down the trail and took a hotel room. Never again. :mad:
I fail to understand why the parks service can't open a small hiker / biker campsite down by the river. That would be awesome. When I got to the GAP turn off to Ohiopyle park, it was getting dark, and I figured the climb would be faster than pushing on to Confluence. I probably should have timed it, because it may have been a wash. On the plus side: beautiful campground and very clean bath houses. But for all that, I don't expect to go there again. |
Originally Posted by Yan
(Post 20178528)
Never got the point of campsites. If I need to shower and do laundry, I pay for a room. If I'm camping, I find a hidden location or ask permission to camp on someone's property. I've also camped next to gas stations or convenient stores plenty of times.
What's the point of paying >$50 to camp when a room costs the same or less? Also, I like sleeping outside in my hammock. I'd do more but I think it would offend my wife and annoy the other people in my apartment complex. I look at bike trips as an excuse for some hammock camping, but that doesn't mean I don't want a shower at the end of the day. Sometimes a fire is nice, too, but I would never do that if I wasn't at an actual campground. |
The best deal we ever had for a camping spot was the municipal campground in Serpa, Portugal. I believe this site cost us the equivalent of $8.40 in 2011.
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4610/...76339e4a_c.jpg The bathrooms and showers: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4667/...5d1ebd52_c.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4678/...940f4a10_c.jpg |
No showers and a bit toilet but the best deal I ever had was the city park in Marlinton, WV. A bath in the river was better than any shower, I HATE pit toilets so I rode into town, had breakfast at the restaurant and used their facilities. ;)
|
Our $5 room with a $500 view:) Lime Kiln SP Campground, Hiker/Biker site, under Highway 1 in southern CA.
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4664/...4f7b7d2c_c.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4695/...e2e22345_c.jpg |
Originally Posted by Doug64
(Post 20178713)
Our $5 room with a $500 view:) Lime Kiln SP Campground, Hiker/Biker site, under Highway 1 in southern CA.
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4664/...4f7b7d2c_c.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4695/...e2e22345_c.jpg |
Originally Posted by DropBarFan
(Post 20177298)
Last fall I stayed nearby at Chickahominy State Park, ~$33 for a tent +elec site, non-elec was only a bit cheaper. OTOH they gave me the best site with a 1/2 acre to myself & right next to a spectacular river view. Well the only consolation is that it's still a lot cheaper than motels.
|
Originally Posted by spinnaker
(Post 20178525)
IMHO it is worth it just to stay at the hostel in Rockwood for another $15 or $20. The noise from trains at Husky Haven can be tremendous.
|
1 Attachment(s)
If you ever do ACA's Trans Am route, the Bike Camp in Twin Bridges, MT is a great spot. It's close to town and free (donations requested) with a screened in shelter with lounge furniture and power outlets, lots of lush grass the pitch your tent, shower, flush toilet, cooking area and picnic table shielded from the wind and nice camp sink. And you might see a beaver wander out of the..wait for it...Beaverhead River.
|
Originally Posted by indyfabz
(Post 20178890)
|
Originally Posted by thumpism
(Post 20178840)
We were both wrong. Chickahominy Riverfront Park is not state and not commercial; it's a county park. I knew it was not a state setup but it's surprising since I don't know of any other county parks around here that offer camping, although I have stayed in them in other states. While it gets good reviews and evidently has some nice facilities, I still think it's too much to pay for an overnight camping space when cycletouring.
|
VT state parks last year. Hiker/ biker rate at Hapgood pond? $ 2.00. Nice. Warm showers, nice pond to swim in too. Lots places in the woods to hang a hammock.
|
Originally Posted by spinnaker
(Post 20178739)
One wrong step when you get up to pee in the middle of the night and SPLASH! :eek:
|
Originally Posted by NoControl
(Post 20180299)
Was there a lot of road noise from the highway above? :foo:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.