![]() |
Originally Posted by staehpj1
(Post 22991902)
... but if interested you might want to snag one soon. ....
The problem I see is that a sack gets smaller as you eat the food that was in it, and that aluminum sheet would keep the sack big. Thus, one of the big advantages of the Ursack over a hard canister disappears. If I traveled to some places where the aluminum was needed for regulatory purposes, I would have bought it years ago. I have no such plans. If I need it later and they are no longer available, I would probably rent or buy a hard canister then. I use an Ursack primarily for protection against smaller critters, like mice, raccoons, and chipmunks that can get into your food. And also because if a bear gets my Ursack, they might crush my food, but I am not training the bear to go to campsites for a source of food. In that case, my crushed food that a bear did not get to eat is a benefit to future campers, not me. There is no question, a hard canister is better protection, but I have never had a bear get to my food yet, so I only would get a canister if regulations required it. I am packing for a backpacking trip, leave in about a week. Yesterday, my Ursack (XL size, 15 liter), a REI brand 15 liter drybag, and six days of food weighed 5.29 kg, or about 11.7 pounds. The bag had a little empty space in it, could hold more than six days. When I have used that Ursack for a nine day canoe trip, the Ursack held about 7 or 8 days of the food. Theses quantities are all for a solo trip. Backpacking, I carry food that just needs to be heated. Butane stove, minimal fuel weight or use. And light weight foods. That said, my Dr has cautioned me that I need to get adequate protein on such trips, so I have a couple small packets of meat every day too. Along with a 20 gram protein bar per day. Canoeing or bike touring, besides dehydrated foods, I am more inclined to carry food that uses a fry pan (eggs, fried meat), or maybe pasta that needs extended boiling. Liquid fuel stove on those trips if I did not fly somewhere. Bike touring, might buy canned foods too, such as a can of soup or chili, etc. The weight and bulk rises for such trips compared to backpacking. Packed up my backpack yesterday to wear on a three mile hike, about half of that was through a hilly park. To get the food to fit well in my backpack, I had to take about a third of the Ursack contents out to pack elsewhere in the pack. A canister would not fit well in that pack, and the aluminum sheet in the Ursack would not fit well either if I had that. On my trip, I have one resupply at a mid point, so about a week and a half long backpacking trip. |
Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
(Post 22992003)
A canister would not fit well in that pack, and the aluminum sheet in the Ursack would not fit well either if I had that. On my trip, I have one resupply at a mid point, so about a week and a half long backpacking trip.
BTW, as far as the Ursack not gettin smaller with the liner... You could do what some canister users do and pack it full of other gear as it gets empty. Some even routinely leave the food out during the day and carry gear in it then. |
Originally Posted by staehpj1
(Post 22992019)
...
BTW, as far as the Ursack not gettin smaller with the liner... You could do what some canister users do and pack it full of other gear as it gets empty. Some even routinely leave the food out during the day and carry gear in it then. Planning out these resupply points is a big enough hassle that I am limiting it to one. And that impacts my pack size. Lock up my bike at end point, I then drive to the resupply point, get a shuttle ($110, reservation made weeks ago) to where my hiking starts. Hike to my vehicle where my re-supply stuff is stored and resupply. Then hike to the end point. Next day ride my bike to my vehicle to retrieve it. |
Here's my setup with the Bear Keg (11.7 L). It'll hold food, the clothes used for meals and toiletries.
Kitchen stuff is in one stuffsack that can be hung up if necessary. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...8a0b3c5c00.jpg |
Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
(Post 22992098)
Planning out these resupply points is a big enough hassle that I am limiting it to one.
Water resupply can be a bigger problem than food in many places. There are quite a few arid routes that I'd really like to ride but water is heavy and you can't go far without it. I don't think that there are the same issues with bears and water as there is with food, although we do have raccoons that will tear into our fresh water jugs when we are canoe camping in some places in the everglades. |
Just speak firmly to a misbehaving bear as if it's a bad dog and escort it away from your stuff...I think the fellow could have pulled it off if he hadn't stuck out his arm to point out the gate, and the bear was reluctant to cross under that threatening sword of Damocles.
https://boingboing.net/2023/09/07/pe...tch-video.html |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.