My bike has hand built 32 spoke wheels and in 30+ years of recreational riding and some loaded touring, I only have to "true" the wheels every couple of years. True is in quotes because a 1/4 turn on two or three spoke nipples hardly counts.
If I were in your place, I would go for it. Although there is a wealth of terrific advice available here, the best tutor is your bike. Riding it will teach you what you want in terms of spokes, gearing, color etc.

My analysis of the Domane wheelset for touring is: they're not great.

The main issue is low spoke count. All other factors being equal, low spoke count wheels are always going to be weaker than higher spoke count wheels. It is possible to make a low spoke count wheel much stronger by 1) increasing rim height and 2) using butted spokes.

Which brings us to the secondary issues.

1) the rim doesn't seem to be particularly high profile. The rim is probably not stiff enough to properly counter the low spoke count, which will make the wheel inherently weak.

2) the spokes are straight gauge. Double (or triple) butted spokes (ie. thinner in the middle) are stronger than straight gauge spokes which have a constant cross section along the length of the spoke. The added strength of thinned spokes is counter intuitive, but thinner spokes stretch more, which give the wheel resiliency against loading. Even a high spoke count wheel can fail surprisingly easily if it is built with straight gauge spokes.

But in the end no one can say whether the Domane stock wheels will be ok or not. Personally I wouldn't trust them though.

that fork is most likely the exact same as on my bike, and at least has a steel (I think) steerer tube, and mine is now 15 years old and I have no concerns about it. I noticed you've done your signature red accents thing everywhere, including the nipples, which is fun. I like 32mm supremes, on the front I can run them at low 60s psi with a very light load (I'm about 135-140), so combined with the fork and tires, the bike has a really nice ride to it, while still rolling super well.

Despite your comment, if looking at other bikes, at least consider lower gearing that what is on this bike, which with a 50/34 and 11-34, lets say with 35mm tires, gives a low gear of a bit over 27 gear inches, which is not pleasant when carrying stuff on a bike and encountering hills.
There are some gravel type bikes with compact doubles, but only you know what sort of low gears you've used in the past when carrying 20-30lbs of stuff on a bike.
From lots of light touring to heavy touring experience over the years, I know what me and my knees prefer, and from what you described what trips you'd like to do, closer to 20 gear inch low is just so much more versatile and pleasant--no real downside to having lower gears--you use 'em when needed.

My bad. Swing and a miss on the joke. I wasn’t talking about the carbon fork causing an asplosion but the mixing of Trek and Specialized parts. The fork has an aluminum steer tube but I don’t have any concerns.

Thank you on the color compliment. I try.

the mix of components would only be noticed by folks like me who know that era of Spesh cross bikes that had that fork, in fact the black fork looks really nice on that frame. Very classy.

Did you have concerns about how the bikes geometry would be with the fork change? I never pay attention enough to recall trail and whatnot terms, but was this fork fairly close to the original in those tech terms? It must be as I know you wouldn't put on a fork on a bike for your daughter that brought in wonky handling.