Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

touring on MTB: front suspension fork vs. rigid fork

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

touring on MTB: front suspension fork vs. rigid fork

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-05, 02:04 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
touring on MTB: front suspension fork vs. rigid fork

Hi,

Re: MTB used for touring, fork selection?

Background:
I am about to purchase my very first MTB, beside the usual commuting, part of the intended purpose is also to use the bike for some loaded touring (3-4 weeks at a time). So, I'd say 70% of the riding would be on usual road conditions and the rest as off road (trails and gravel roads)

I have narrowed my bike selection down to either:

05 Marin Bear Valley U.S model: Steel frame, front suspension, mostly shimano Deore

or

the Marin Bear Valley 'German edition' (don't ask me the story behind it, it is advertised like that):
Steel frame, steel rigid fork, mostly shimano Deore

So, the main difference is the fork, I don't have any experience using suspension, and I would like to know for my style of riding, touring, is front suspension needed? Or is it something nice to have just in case?
erli is offline  
Old 12-01-05, 02:47 AM
  #2  
imminent danger
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 739
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I took a front sus MTB on tour through France Belgium and Holland. The only time that it became an issue was on the one proper hill of the ride. Leeched the power out of me quite badly.

On the other hand it was a godsend on the European love of cobbles and the occasional but of track riding that we did. Think about the terrain of the ride that your doing and then decide on knees or wrists.
The Seldom Kill is offline  
Old 12-01-05, 02:56 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by erli
Hi,

Re: MTB used for touring, fork selection?

Background:
I am about to purchase my very first MTB, beside the usual commuting, part of the intended purpose is also to use the bike for some loaded touring (3-4 weeks at a time). So, I'd say 70% of the riding would be on usual road conditions and the rest as off road (trails and gravel roads)

I have narrowed my bike selection down to either:

05 Marin Bear Valley U.S model: Steel frame, front suspension, mostly shimano Deore

or

the Marin Bear Valley 'German edition' (don't ask me the story behind it, it is advertised like that):
Steel frame, steel rigid fork, mostly shimano Deore

So, the main difference is the fork, I don't have any experience using suspension, and I would like to know for my style of riding, touring, is front suspension needed? Or is it something nice to have just in case?
Suspension fork is not needed on a tourer that will be used exclusively on-road. The bump-dampening aspect of a suspension fork will just serve to rob you of straightahead speed, and some of the energy that you apply to your pedals will be dissipated by the suspension fork. Also a suspension fork is not light and thus mean more weight on your tourer than you should tolerate. In other words, get the rigid-forked bike, if you do not plan to spend a lot of your touring time off-road.

Regards
Jed19 is offline  
Old 12-01-05, 06:23 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LUCAS
Suspension fork is not needed on a tourer that will be used exclusively on-road. The bump-dampening aspect of a suspension fork will just serve to rob you of straightahead speed, and some of the energy that you apply to your pedals will be dissipated by the suspension fork.

Regards

Thanks, this is a point I did not consider. Is there a way to swich off the supspension when riding on asphalt and turn it on again in off road riding? Stupid question, but I never had a MTB or suspension before.
erli is offline  
Old 12-01-05, 07:10 AM
  #5  
Too Much Crazy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,660

Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
^^some forks come with a lockout feature that reduces travel to 5-10mm or so. Basically a no travel setting.

some forks come with a lockout feature that you don't have to switch on or off, they just do it automatically.

Achtung erli,

I would stick with 'german' rigid fork model for your anticipated riding. Don't believe people when they tell you you need a suspension fork for xc riding. you don't. I think you be happier in the long run with a rigid fork than a low end suspension fork, which is what Marin put on that 05 bear valley.
C Law is offline  
Old 12-01-05, 09:31 AM
  #6  
Hooked on Touring
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,859
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Liked 143 Times in 93 Posts
You never say how you plan to load your gear. Suspension forks make front panniers difficult to use. There are some special racks for shock forks out there but I am suspicious about how stable they are. Trailers cost more and usually cost extra to ship.

I have found that a standard fork with a stem shock works great in taking out just enough of the bumps. I ain't no youngster and I ride a lot of serious dirt/gravel loaded for touring. Buy whichever bike you like best regardless of fork and then get a standard fork if you choose the bike with the shock.

I agree that front shock forks will reduce your climbing power significantly because you use your upper body thru the handlebars.

Best - J
jamawani is offline  
Old 12-01-05, 10:27 AM
  #7  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,362

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6218 Post(s)
Liked 4,217 Times in 2,364 Posts
Originally Posted by unsuspended
^^some forks come with a lockout feature that reduces travel to 5-10mm or so. Basically a no travel setting.

some forks come with a lockout feature that you don't have to switch on or off, they just do it automatically.

Achtung erli,

I would stick with 'german' rigid fork model for your anticipated riding. Don't believe people when they tell you you need a suspension fork for xc riding. you don't. I think you be happier in the long run with a rigid fork than a low end suspension fork, which is what Marin put on that 05 bear valley.
You don't "need" front suspension for xc riding but it sure makes the ride better. Control is improved also. Having ridden many, many miles off-road (single track to dirt roads), I'd suggest a front shock for a mountain bike - if you are using it as a mountain bike! If you plan on riding it as a touring bike, Erli, you can and should get by without the suspension. Or buy another bike for touring. There are lots of good touring bikes out there that would do the job far better than a mountain bike. And get a mountain bike for fun riding
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 12-01-05, 03:12 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Sebach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 325

Bikes: Surly Long Haul Trucker

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I love suspension, but I don't really think it's needed for loaded touring as long as you're not going too hard off road. I did a 500km MTB tour with about the same 70on/30off ratio you're planning and it was fine with a rigid fork. Thinking about it, there were far more hills that would have really sucked to have suspension on than sections of trail where I missed having squish. Off road in gravel and dirt without any suspension, I was fairly surprised by how much "suspension" I got out of my frame and wheels when my bike was loaded. It wasn't as harsh as I expected it to be.

I would put suspension in the "would be nice sometimes... but not nice most of the time" category.
Sebach is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.