Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Is the Surly LHT fun/fast unloaded???

Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Is the Surly LHT fun/fast unloaded???

Old 08-14-07, 08:55 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is the Surly LHT fun/fast unloaded???

Someone has just written about their first ride impressions of a Trek 520

https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=332075

What are people's impressions of the Surly Long Haul trucker when it is ridden unloaded.

I'm buying one and I hope that my impression is every bit as good as Jignell with his 520.
StuckInMud is offline  
Old 08-14-07, 09:30 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 642

Bikes: 2015 Rivendell Clementine, 2019 Rivendell Clem Smith jr, 1988 Mikado DeGasep, Custom Marino SSFGMTB, Marinoni Track, In Progres Clive Stuart

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
My LHT is pretty fast. It isn't nearly as nimble as my Steamroller was, but it's like comparing a Corvette to a Volvo Wagon. Both can be as fun as you make it, but one is 100 times more practical.
sprintcarblue is offline  
Old 08-14-07, 11:25 PM
  #3  
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
mine weighs, like 42 pounds, with tool kit and pump. it's a tank. two front racks.

but still fun to ride. did a 115 mile day on it, loaded with overnight gear, last weekend.
Bekologist is offline  
Old 08-14-07, 11:45 PM
  #4  
dbg
Si Senior
 
dbg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Naperville, Illinois
Posts: 2,669

Bikes: Too Numerous (not)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 8 Posts
A regular on our annual Wisconsin trip showed up with a brand new Surley LHT this year. He mostly rode it unloaded and on the fast days he was pulling more lead time in the pace line than I was. I think he was having fun.
dbg is offline  
Old 08-14-07, 11:53 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: N. California
Posts: 1,410
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The LHT's strength is when it is loaded. It is very stable...With just rear panniers it is really hard to remember they are there. Add the front panniers and obviously the steering has more weight but with a low-rider rack (like the Tubus Tara) it is easy to get used to.

Downhill at high speeds (40+ mph) it is absolutely stable loaded or not.

Uphill is not a relative strength (even unloaded at 32 lb without water or bags) because of the base weight. Still, in a low enough granny gear it will get you up faster than walking.

The extreme smoothness, stability and comfort (including Brooks B17 saddle) make all-day rides the greatest of any bike I've ever had.

A century is easy and pleasurable on this bike.
The Smokester is offline  
Old 08-15-07, 06:59 AM
  #6  
GATC
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: south Puget Sound
Posts: 8,728
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 49 Times in 27 Posts
I think mine is fast and fun, but maybe I don't know what is fast and fun. I had a twitchy race-y bike at one point, just plain didn't like it.
HardyWeinberg is offline  
Old 08-15-07, 08:06 AM
  #7  
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It is not fast like a road bike. But it is faster than my old hybrid with slicks. When I get back from tour, I plan on searching out some skinnier wheels to make it more of a road bike.
audsnico is offline  
Old 08-15-07, 08:58 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i finally got mine built up from my lbs, and it's a great bike. i think it's a bit slow though because mine is built with 26" rims and has 1.5" tires on it. it's a lot different than my track frame with 23cm tires to say the least. but it is so comfortable that i feel i can ride it for days without a break.
fishigator is offline  
Old 08-15-07, 09:14 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
duppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 525
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I can't compare it to a 520, but I can compare it to my two other bikes, a Trek 4500 with suspension fork and somewhat knobby tires and a 1989 DiamondBack Ascent MTB, no suspension but superslick tires
I have had my LHT only for a week or so and have done less than 30 miles on it, none of it loaded.
It was a custom build with most of the components one step up from the standard build. It has 700x38C Specialized Nimbus Amradillo tires.
So far what I notice most is the quietness. Quiet when riding over pavement, quiet when shifting gears. Also, the riding is very smooth, with the steering being very responsive. My posture is fairly upright, but I had a longer stem with a steeper angle installed. I do notice bumps in the road much like my do on my DB Ascent
I plan to take it out this week for it first 50-miler. I am looking forward to it

Duppie
duppie is offline  
Old 08-15-07, 06:52 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,293
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Touring bike wheels generally have more rolling resisistance and are weigh more than road bike wheels. If you want your LHT to be more peppy, put a set of Shimano roadbike wheels on it with 700X23c tires on it.

Most of us, however, do fine with our stock touring bikes. heavy wheels and all.
tacomee is offline  
Old 08-15-07, 08:22 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
tpelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,068
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have had my new LHT for about a month now. I have two other bikes - an old 10-speed, and a new TREK 820 mountain bike. When I was shopping, I started running the gear-inch calculations. The LHT has a slight lower low gear than the TREK, and it has a significantly higher high gear than my old 10-speed.

Without racks and panniers, but including a frame pump, a seat bag loaded with two spare tubes, a patch kit, tire tools, and a multi tool, and two bottle cages and bottles, it weighs about 25 pounds (weight obtained by the scientific method of standing on the bathroom scale and noting my weight, then picking up the bike, noting the weight again, and calculating the difference).

Mine is a 60cm frame, and is equipped with 700c x 28 tires, and Deore components.

I was surprised at how "sporty" my LHT feels. By comparison, my old 10-speed feels like it's on rails. The LHT really turns easily, and it took me a ride or two to feel comfortable with the steering. I notice the fork angle is actually steeper than my old 10-speed, which accounts for this.

The LHT climbs better than my TREK 820. On the TREK, when really stomping up a steep hill, the front suspension gets into a kind of sympathetic oscillation with the downstroke of the pedals. Eventually the front wheel comes off of the ground when the oscillation gets large enough. The LHT just climbs smoothly.

I bought the LHT because I wanted a steel-frame bike with traditional controls, and able to carry heavy loads - I'm about 255 lbs myself, about 6' - 2-1/2" tall with size 14 feet. I figure the weight difference between the LHT and a typical aluminum/carbon-fiber bike is less than the weight of one of my shoes. I have no real intention of touring, and use my LHT exclusively as a road bike - it's always unloaded. I ride the bike as exercise - when I lose enough weight (my goal is to get down to under 200 lbs) I may just reward myself with a new Surly Pacer.

I am quite satisfied with it.

Last edited by tpelle; 08-15-07 at 08:31 PM.
tpelle is offline  
Old 08-15-07, 09:11 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Spencer, IN
Posts: 689

Bikes: Trek 5200

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've owned my LHT for two months, and have put 1400 miles on it so far. I bought it for use as a long-distance, loaded commuter. I may tour someday... but I have no plans to any time soon.

Regarding the feel of the LHT when unloaded... it handles differently than a road bike, that's for sure. Steering is slow compared to my Trek 5200, but that's the way I want it for everyday riding. In my opinion, fast steering is a PITA for non-competitive riding. The "touring" gearing ratios make it a bit more difficult to find the right ratio when leading a paceline; etc, but I wouldn't change the cassette because, when the bike is loaded, I feel that the extra range is necessary. The frame rides really nice... small imperfections in the road are simply soaked up by the frame, and larger bumps don't seem so bad, but, for large bumps, the frame tends to transfer more impact to the rider than lighter, springier steel frames.

With its oversized tubing, the frame has tons of bottom-bracket and rear triangle stiffness. I can barely feel flex when I stand and hammer up hills, even when the bike is loaded. This attribute made me pretty much fall in love with the bike because I HATE the way less rigid steel frames flex. That's what drove me to buy the Trek 5200 over a steel bike a couple of years ago, even though I like the way steel rides better.

Overall, I would rate the LHT as adequate for unloaded riding, but not inspiring. The LHT is more like a truck... enjoyable to ride, in it's own way, but built to haul things over being "zippy" to ride. But if you're an especially heavy or strong rider that hates frame flex, the LHT may be the bike for you. I feel that my LHT is one of the best buys I ever made. I never regret having purchased it.

My LHT is a 58cm frame "complete", with folding 28mm Panaracer T-serv tires (basically, they are identical to the popular Panaracer Pasela Tourguard, but have a strengthened sidewall and wire bead is not available). I swapped the stock stem for an Easton EA-50, and flipped the stem, so the riding position is quite low. I swapped the stock saddle out for a Brooks B-17. Rack is a Topeak Explorer (aluminum). Unloaded weight (with rack and fenders) is 27-lbs.

Just for reference - I am 30-years old, 6-feet tall, 170lbs, sprinter/weightlifter-type build.
matthew_deaner is offline  
Old 08-16-07, 08:49 AM
  #13  
The Rock Cycle
 
eofelis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 1,690

Bikes: Salsa Vaya Ti, Specialized Ruby, Gunnar Sport, Motobecane Fantom CXX, Jamis Dragon, Novara Randonee x2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 6 Posts
I say that my LHT is as comfortable as a couch and almost as fast!
__________________
Gunnar Sport
Specialized Ruby
Salsa Vaya Ti
Novara Randonee x2
Motobecane Fantom CXX
Jamis Dakar XCR
eofelis is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.