Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Ortlieb Back Roller Classic vs. Bike Packer Classic

Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Ortlieb Back Roller Classic vs. Bike Packer Classic

Old 09-04-07, 08:05 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BigBlueToe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 3,392

Bikes: Surly LHT, Specialized Rockhopper, Nashbar Touring (old), Specialized Stumpjumper (older), Nishiki Tourer (model unknown)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Ortlieb Back Roller Classic vs. Bike Packer Classic

I want to replace my old, ratty REI panniers. I've pretty much settled on Ortlieb, and I like the classic rather than the plus. But I can't decide between the rollers and packers. I was leaning towards the rollers, but then I thought it might be a hassle to always have to unroll them to get in, and roll them up after. I use dry bags for kayaking and canoeing. The rolling/unrolling thing is a hassle, though not a deal breaker per se.

A complete set is a big investment. I hate to have regrets after spending so much money. Any input?
BigBlueToe is offline  
Old 09-04-07, 11:58 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SF Bay
Posts: 505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have the roller ones, and i don't think they are a hassle at all. My only beef with them, is the buckle for the compression strap sometimes gets stuck in the rear rack or under my dry bag (strapped on top of the rear rack). And it's annoying having to 'fish' this buckle out.
For this reason alone, if i were to buy new ones today, i'd prolly go for the non-rolling ones.
bokes is offline  
Old 09-04-07, 06:16 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
LindaB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I bought 2 sets of Back Packer Plus panniers for our trip to Spain, which starts in just 2 days. We've been using them around town for several months to get used to them, and so far my biggest complaint is all the straps and cords hanging around! They just seem to have a "messy" look to them, especially when not packed full. The straps just don't pull down tight, and there isn't any way that we've found to tuck in the extra strap length so it doesn't fall out as you ride. I've been wondering if I'd have been happier with the rollers, myself. We tried them in a store, but liked the closures on the Packers better. I'll be interested to hear what others have to say... and I'll know a lot more about how they perform for us in a month!
LindaB is offline  
Old 09-04-07, 08:28 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: N. California
Posts: 1,410
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have the packers and they are easier to get into, and especially to close, than my roller dry bags for Kayaking. It's true that the straps can flap around but there are ways to tuck them in or tie them off. I am pleased with the Packer Plus'.

I would think that the Rollers would survive total emersion in a stream, though, so if you absolutely positively need the waterproofness of a dry bag then that would be a driving factor in favor of the Rollers.
The Smokester is offline  
Old 09-04-07, 08:39 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Depends

I own the packers. I think if you're using a handlebar bag, either Ortlieb style will work for you. I left my handlebar bag at home for a short tour this summer, so I was very happy to have the zip mesh pockets on the outside of my panniers. They gave me easy access to things I always wanted when I got off the bike.
spike57 is offline  
Old 09-04-07, 09:29 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've used rollers for years happily, with a medium rack pack for sleeping bag, etc. You are right, they look the best fully loaded. Good excuse for more stuff.
jjones is offline  
Old 09-04-07, 09:41 PM
  #7  
Zen Master
 
Miles2go's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 999

Bikes: Cervelo R5 - SuperSix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked 89 Times in 42 Posts
I have rollers and packers, though mine are of the plus variety. I'm not sure I care so much between the closure methods. I'd probably go with the rollers because I like their shape.

What I like about the packer plus (beyond the QL2 mounting) is the little mesh pocket on the outside. It's the perfect place for my waterproof socks, bug juice and such.

Cheers,
__________________
Ron - Tucson, AZ
Miles2go is offline  
Old 09-05-07, 06:56 AM
  #8  
gnz
Being there, doing that
 
gnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 141

Bikes: Avanti Pioneer Hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've been using rollers for some five years now and I decided to buy bike packers plus to replace my small front rollers. I've just started a trip with the packers and I think I've used them enough now to make a good comparison... Here is what I like/dislike of each design:

ROLLERS
What I Like:
  • sturdy fabric, it is more like thick PVC, practically indestructible.
  • can be filled to the very top giving almost another 50% capacity (but without closing it)
  • when closed you can use the outer strap to fix yet some other thing on top of it, this is handy to attach last minute stuff without having to open the bag

What I Dislike:
  • they're heavier because of the pvc construction.
  • they have the older hooking mechanism which doesn't work as well as the new one on the packers. Actually, I have to pass a rope trough one of my older rollers because when heavily loaded it tends to unhook from the rack when I pass over a bump at high speed.
  • they aren't very comfortable to carry by hand because the handle is on the very edge and the bag weight is always off center.
  • really hard to close them without both hands and your full attention (having to get off the bike)


BIKE PACKERS PLUS
What I like
  • Theyr'e light and compress better when empty because a much thiner plastic coated fabric.
  • The new hooking mechanism which can be adjusted without using the hex wrench.
  • They have a centered handle allowing for a comfortable carrying by hand
  • They look really nice when full and closed
  • The internal mesh bags are handy and don't get in the way if you don't have to use them
  • I haven't used the external bags yet but they'll be handy whenever I need them

What I dislike:
  • The fabric is way more fragile than the rollers's.. I already tore a small hole in one of them when it rubbed against the floor.
  • The closing mechanism doesn't allow you to fill them as much as the roller's

Okay hope that helps
gnz is offline  
Old 09-05-07, 09:01 AM
  #9  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 40
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
We have the Bike Packers. Before we purchased them, everybody told us to get them instead of the rollers because they could still be closed when 100% full. We never heard any advantages of the rollers, but now that we are on the road we've thought of a few. The rollers are bug-proof. There is no way to complete seal up the packers from insects, so you have to keep food in sealed plastic bags if you don't want ants eating it. The other advantage to the rollers (if you are not carrying an additional dry bag) is that they can be used to wash clothes or carry water. You can't do that very well with the packers.

James
https://www.erck.org
jameswelle is offline  
Old 09-05-07, 09:03 AM
  #10  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 40
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
We have ripped a hole in one of our packers too (after crashing) so that may be one more vote that the rollers are more durable.

James
https://www.erck.org
jameswelle is offline  
Old 03-23-19, 06:55 PM
  #11  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 406

Bikes: Cannondale Carbon Synapse Road, Cannondale T2000 Touring, Vintage Mongoose IBOC Pro MTB, Vintage Peugeot 12spd racer, Old rusty Schwinn Manta Ray I neglected as a child, Diamondback Haanjo EXP Carbon & Metro, Specialized Roubaix Pro, RaleighSC Tandem

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 225 Post(s)
Liked 39 Times in 29 Posts
Originally Posted by jameswelle
We have ripped a hole in one of our packers too (after crashing) so that may be one more vote that the rollers are more durable.

James
Erck.org - Newlyweds Cycle the World
I think you mean the "Classics" as the Bike Packers and Sport Packers are available in the classic PVC coated fabric...
michaelm101 is offline  
Old 03-23-19, 07:21 PM
  #12  
 
BigAura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chapin, SC
Posts: 3,423

Bikes: all steel stable: surly world troller, paris sport fixed, fuji ss

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 623 Post(s)
Liked 55 Times in 33 Posts
Originally Posted by michaelm101
I think you mean the "Classics" as the Bike Packers and Sport Packers are available in the classic PVC coated fabric...
Just to let you know he wrote that 12 years ago!

I wonder how the marriage is going?
BigAura is offline  
Old 03-23-19, 11:03 PM
  #13  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,210
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2735 Post(s)
Liked 969 Times in 792 Posts
Originally Posted by BigAura
Just to let you know he wrote that 12 years ago!

I wonder how the marriage is going?
I hope they worked out together long term.

Last edited by djb; 03-24-19 at 08:27 AM.
djb is offline  
Old 03-24-19, 10:55 AM
  #14  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
EU has a lot of heavy goods trailers, with side curtains , fork lifts easily loading from the sides..
that is the source of the inspiration to originally make panniers out of it

there are smaller shops sewing bags from this truck tarp, some of it still has the logos
from the trucking company on it..




....
fietsbob is offline  
Old 03-24-19, 01:16 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 81 Times in 64 Posts
$.02 using Classic, Plus, Rollers, Packers. The Packers have two snap/Fastek buckles for top closure and the rollers one. For some reason on my two pair of Plus Packers, front and back, I’ve managed to break half the snaps by jamming the buckles together without checking they were lined up correctly thereby breaking off one of the male prongs. Havent done that with two other pairs of rollers. Operator error obviously but consistent.
LeeG is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5kdad
Touring
26
12-19-18 08:15 AM
azza_333
Touring
31
09-05-17 05:45 PM
bikiola
Touring
17
05-16-14 10:35 AM
somegeek
Touring
20
01-11-13 08:51 AM
Altair 4
Touring
10
07-25-11 01:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.