![]() |
I have both a Crosscheck and a Double cross, and they ride just about the same to me. If anything, the CC rides a bit smoother, but that may just be psychological (I've had the CC longer and generally like it better). The finish work on the CC (braze ons, finish) is a bit nicer as well.
|
Double Cross wouldn't work for me. But it was due to big feet (size 13/48) and the wheelbase wasn't long enough for me to not strike the panniers. Otherwise it's a fantastic frame.
|
Originally Posted by seat_boy
(Post 15562571)
I have both a Crosscheck and a Double cross, and they ride just about the same to me. If anything, the CC rides a bit smoother, but that may just be psychological (I've had the CC longer and generally like it better). The finish work on the CC (braze ons, finish) is a bit nicer as well.
Virtually everything else I've read indicates the Double Cross frame is a bit better. Supposedly, the tubing and finish is a bit nicer. I'd be curious to hear other comparisons between the two... |
Originally Posted by AlanK
(Post 15573203)
Hmm, that's interesting. I compared the geometry of the two bikes, and the Double Cross seemed a bit more relaxed; it has a longer wheel-base and head-tube - not a huge difference, but that would seems to make it a bit more stable, with a more upright riding position.
Virtually everything else I've read indicates the Double Cross frame is a bit better. Supposedly, the tubing and finish is a bit nicer. I'd be curious to hear other comparisons between the two... That was why I went with the DoubleCross instead of the Crosscheck. |
You didn`t misread about the cranks, Alan. It`s in the FAQ, and thanks for reporting cause I was kind of wondering why also.
Originally Posted by robow
(Post 15534748)
I only wish Soma didn't use such long effective top tubes on most of their frames which makes it tough on guys like me who have longer legs and shorter upper torsos and arms.
|
I love my soma double cross. It's a rock solid bike. While I haven't toured on it, I have done a lot of touring and I wouldn't hesitate to use it on a tour if it were properly set up.
|
Originally Posted by rodar y rodar
(Post 15574996)
You didn`t misread about the cranks, Alan. It`s in the FAQ, and thanks for reporting cause I was kind of wondering why also.
Originally Posted by Shimagnolo
(Post 15573228)
I absolutely detest semi-horizontal dropouts.
That was why I went with the DoubleCross instead of the Crosscheck. In terms of the geometry, the differences are pretty negligible. As far as I can tell, the only differences are the wheelbase and head-tube lengths - they're both about 1/2" on the dbl X. This wouldn't seem to make much difference as far as I can tell, but I'd love to hear from someone with a more informed perspective... |
Originally Posted by Shimagnolo
(Post 15573228)
I absolutely detest semi-horizontal dropouts.
That was why I went with the DoubleCross instead of the Crosscheck. |
Originally Posted by robow
(Post 15575838)
I'm glad I'm not the only one here that feels this way. Mine is a paranoia of the rear axle slipping and/or poor alignment adding something else that can go wrong to Mr. Murphy here.
|
Originally Posted by robow
(Post 15575838)
I'm glad I'm not the only one here that feels this way. Mine is a paranoia of the rear axle slipping and/or poor alignment adding something else that can go wrong to Mr. Murphy here.
I wouldn't use a horizontal dropout frame for a derailleur-geared bike unless I had no alternative, and then I'd use a Surly Tugnut or similar device to prevent rear wheel slipping. The short-lived Salsa Casseroll had this problem. I remember reading multiple complaints of rear wheel slipping on a forum, where the Salsa reps blamed it on weak QR skewers, and nothing to do with horizontal dropouts, as it was never mentioned. |
Originally Posted by Shimagnolo
(Post 15575993)
The gap would appear; I would stomp on the pedals; And find myself stuck in the middle of the intersection, because the drive side of the axle had slipped forward, wedging the tire against the frame. And this was an *internal* cam skewer tightened to the max.:mad:
I had a Schwinn Le Tour that would do this to me in busy University rush-hour traffic. I jury-rigged a fix with an additional bolt and nut as an axle position lock. |
Never been an issue on my CC. I really like the dropouts on it, but then again, I run it fixed quite a bit of the time. Still, it's nice to be able to easily throw on a downtube shifter, a geared wheel, and have a different bike.
Originally Posted by robow
(Post 15575838)
I'm glad I'm not the only one here that feels this way. Mine is a paranoia of the rear axle slipping and/or poor alignment adding something else that can go wrong to Mr. Murphy here.
|
I`m with the vertical lovers for fender reasons, too. Not a deal killer, though- just preference. I had one bike wih semi horizontals + fenders, and was able to remove and install the wheel with inflated tire, but had to keep the fender bolted tightly to the back of the CS bridge rather than a nice uniform distance all the way around the wheel, so just an asthetic quibble for that setup.
And my motor doesn`t yank a wheel from where it`s clamped, so no worries for me there unless somebody spikes my Wheaties :) |
I am riding a pake c'mute and have never had this issue happen to me. my frame as well as the cross-check allow for adjustment screws to be inserted into the frame so its as simple as butting the axle to the screws and clamp down your skewer... and I would assume this would help prevent what your guys are talking about.
I love the dropouts and although regular vertical dropouts are easier and more care free, I like the ability to adjust my wheelbase according to the riding im doing. |
Originally Posted by RyeRey521
(Post 15578474)
I love the dropouts and although regular vertical dropouts are easier and more care free, I like the ability to adjust my wheelbase according to the riding im doing.
I think if chain torque pulls a wheel, it`d pull it forward, so those adjustment screws are probably the wrong direction to prevent that issue. |
Originally Posted by rodar y rodar
(Post 15578722)
I think if chain torque pulls a wheel, it`d pull it forward, so those adjustment screws are probably the wrong direction to prevent that issue. |
Well that is more about simple and consistent setting of the rear wheel in the dropouts... Being able to properly align the rear wheel will give you a more positive grip when tightening your rear skewer... If your rear wheel is askew (even a little) than you really only have the friction holding your wheel in place at two points on both sides of the skewer, whereas when it is properly aligned wheel will have the entire circumference of the skewers nuts and hub making positive contact with the dropouts.
Who knows though, maybe I'm just not manly enough to pull my hub loose lol.. (FYI I’m a 235lbs guy keeping up with A rides on my steel commuter..) |
Originally Posted by rodar y rodar
(Post 15578722)
I never thought of that. Do you do it often?
But hey, if your riding style/ alignment methods/ or whatever cause your rear hub to slip, they hell, go for the vertical dropout, I'm mearly explaining how they work for me.. |
Originally Posted by RyeRey521
(Post 15578474)
I like the ability to adjust my wheelbase according to the riding im doing.
|
Whoa whoa whoa.... were talking more along the lines of 3cm lol, and all i can say is that I felt the bike being a bit more livley beneath me with it closer to the front.. Not saying that it wasn't purely in my mind , but thats the conclusion I came to....
|
ANYWAY....... lets get back on topic. When choosing my frame (upgrading from a SS cross bike), The Double cross, Cross Check, and C'mute were all on my list. I had access to Cross Check and C'mute in my size and rode both of them and although I dreamed of a disc brake double cross as my ideal commuter/ Light tourer, I chose the C'mute for the longest headtube out of the bunch and price that I wouldnt mind chaining it to things when I wanted to head into the city.
|
Originally Posted by RyeRey521
(Post 15580260)
Whoa whoa whoa.... were talking more along the lines of 3cm
|
Lol guess you didn’t catch the humor in my post (I know we are only talking about a small amount of play)... And it's not the adjustment screws that matter, it’s the dropouts themselves... My frame did not come with screws and springs, so I sourced them from a local hardware store and bought ones that could allow for my axle to be placed in the full length of the dropouts... Now that I am set where I want them for now, I have bought more appropriately sized ones that do not have as much waste hanging out the back end...
|
RR (the other RR), do you just set the B-screw with the wheel all the way back and leave it alone when you move the wheel forward?
Originally Posted by RyeRey521
(Post 15580120)
(FYI I’m a 235lbs guy keeping up with A rides on my steel commuter..)
Originally Posted by RyeRey521
(Post 15580172)
But hey, if your riding style/ alignment methods/ or whatever cause your rear hub to slip, they hell, go for the vertical dropout, I'm mearly explaining how they work for me..
|
Originally Posted by RyeRey521
(Post 15580304)
When choosing my frame (upgrading from a SS cross bike), The Double cross, Cross Check, and C'mute were all on my list.
|
Originally Posted by rodar y rodar
(Post 15581720)
RR (the other RR), do you just set the B-screw with the wheel all the way back and leave it alone when you move the wheel forward?
|
Originally Posted by rodar y rodar
(Post 15581737)
Similar here. I`m patiently watching my local Craigslist for any DC, CC, Pacer, ES, Volpe, Casseroll, Aurora, or any other "pseudo cross" or fat friendly road sport in my size while I hoarde parts for the build. If I end up with all the parts before I find a good deal on the frame, I might end up buying a C`mute to hang everything from.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:53 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.