Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

ortlieb rollers: ql-1 vs. ql-2?

Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

ortlieb rollers: ql-1 vs. ql-2?

Reply

Old 09-06-08, 07:13 PM
  #1  
hornytoad
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hornytoad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: petit valley, rotat
Posts: 125

Bikes: cervelo r3, cervelo team soloist, yeti 575, bianchi san jose

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
ortlieb rollers: ql-1 vs. ql-2?

would someone please direct me to a url or bf thread that describes the difference b/w these mounting systems. i believe i will be purchasing the tubus luna or tubus carry. just not sure which works best with which rack; and would like to determine advantages and disadvantages of either mounting system??? thank you
hornytoad is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-08, 10:30 PM
  #2  
mattlavallee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PaGrove
Posts: 88

Bikes: '07 Giant Talon, '08 Bike Friday Pocket Rocket 16

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
http://www.thetouringstore.com/ORTLI...101%20PAGE.htm

i've got 2 pairs of ortliebs, the roller classics for the rear (ql-1) and the sport packer plus for the front (ql-2). if you will be using the bags on the same rack most of the time, it doesn't really matter which one you get. if you will be using the bags on different models of rack on a regular basis, the ql-2 is quicker to adjust. the only real difference is that the ql-1 requires an allen wrench to adjust the spacing of the 2 plastic hooks that hang on the rack, while with the ql-2 you just flip up a little plastic tab to adjust spacing. the lower hook is the same for both plus and classic panniers, but it's apparently a ql-2 part. i don't know what the ql-1 lower hook was like. both systems are very easy to remove from your bike by just pulling up on the carry handle, which unlocks the latch from around the bar on your rack.

i use the sport packer plus bags on my rear rack everyday for the commute. the only reason i wanted the plus over the classic is because only the plus has external mesh pockets, which are very useful for carrying change for the ferry or keys, etc. BTW, i've ordered all my bags and racks from the link above, and he provides great service & the best prices i've ever seen. highly recommended.
mattlavallee is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-08, 07:03 AM
  #3  
hornytoad
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hornytoad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: petit valley, rotat
Posts: 125

Bikes: cervelo r3, cervelo team soloist, yeti 575, bianchi san jose

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
bingo! thanks for the info and providing the link.
hornytoad is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-08, 08:51 AM
  #4  
spinnaker
Every day a winding road
 
spinnaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,218

Bikes: 2005 Cannondale SR500, 2008 Trek 7.3 FX, Jamis Aurora

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3158 Post(s)
The Plus bags might not be that easy to switch from bike to bike as advertised. Both versions of the bag use the QL2 system for the lower connector. It is easy to adjust unless you need to move the bracket from the bottom slider to the top slider. You will then need a screw drive or Torx to move the fastener. I have no idea why Ortlieb just did not include the fastener for both sides of the bracket.
spinnaker is offline  
Reply With Quote

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service