Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

What Kind of Bike for Rails to Trails- Long Ride

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

What Kind of Bike for Rails to Trails- Long Ride

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-09, 09:38 AM
  #1  
Groucho in Altoona
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What Kind of Bike for Rails to Trails- Long Ride

I'm planning on doing some long rides this summer. Rails to Trails, Cumberland to DC maybe. What kind of bike would be best? Currently doing road riding with a nice Canondale Synapse but don't want to take it on the rails to trails. Should I go hybrid, Cyclocross, touring or what?
Groucho01 is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 09:43 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: upper devonian
Posts: 894
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Depends what you'd use the bike for the rest of the time. All-rounder I'd go cross. Commuter would probably be hybrid. If you get bit by the touring bug, you'll appreciate a tourer. Or go with whatever you like best and make it fit everything else, bikes are pretty adaptable.
dewaday is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 10:20 AM
  #3  
Neil_B
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by Groucho01
I'm planning on doing some long rides this summer. Rails to Trails, Cumberland to DC maybe. What kind of bike would be best? Currently doing road riding with a nice Canondale Synapse but don't want to take it on the rails to trails. Should I go hybrid, Cyclocross, touring or what?
A hybrid or rigid mountain bike works fine on the C & O. Here's my Trek 7.5 fx and Yakima Big Tow trailer.

 
Old 01-18-09, 11:30 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times in 194 Posts
Use whatever style bike that you feel comfortable with, but I would suggest making sure the bike will accept larger tires than a 23 or 25. ....................Pause.............................

OK, now this is where someone steps up and states they rode 800 miles of rails to trail on their 700x20mm and loved it and wouldn't dare slow themselves down with a 28 or 32 tire or God forbid larger yet.
.........
robow is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 11:42 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,293
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Touring bikes are naturally slow. After riding a C'dale Synapse, a touring bike will feel like a tank.

Most of the posters here are like me-- we love our tanks! You might like the slow roll as well if you give it a try. So roadies never do, however. Test ride a touring bike or two.

Do you have a hardtail MTB? or can barrow one? that might be a cheaper option.
tacomee is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 11:56 AM
  #6  
Membership Not Required
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by robow
Use whatever style bike that you feel comfortable with, but I would suggest making sure the bike will accept larger tires than a 23 or 25. ....................Pause.............................

OK, now this is where someone steps up and states they rode 800 miles of rails to trail on their 700x20mm and loved it and wouldn't dare slow themselves down with a 28 or 32 tire or God forbid larger yet.
.........
I won't ride a bike with tires under 30's

In response to the OP. Depends on what you want and how you will use the other bike. FWIW I ride my fairly short R to T on all of my bikes, but usually my 1972 Raleigh Superbe with the 1-3/8" (35mm) tires. A wider tire is going to improve comfort and provide "float" over a very narrow road tire. I would recommend a relaxed geometry bike; old rigid MTB, sport touring, hybrid, touring bike or cyclocross bike will all work fine. Fenders will be a plus if the weather is at all messy.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 12:30 PM
  #7  
just pokin' along
 
desertdork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the desert
Posts: 1,095
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Groucho01, I've been going over the same question in anticipation of a possible GAP/C&O ride in Sept. I'll be following this topic.

At the top of my concerns is I don't know what it's like to ride on crushed limestone and just how important that should be regarding bike choice.

I enjoyed the Historian's thread on his GAP/C&O adventure. IIRC, his only issues involved a less than adequate rear wheel and a troublesome trailer linkage, neither of which I'd say were due to the type of bike he rode.

dewaday's advice seems practical and honest...even if that means less reason to get another bike.
desertdork is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 12:38 PM
  #8  
Uber Goober
 
StephenH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas area, Texas
Posts: 11,758
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 190 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Around here, there's a couple of Rails-to-Trails that are smooth fine gravel, and you could pretty much ride anything on them, but some others are pretty rough, and you'd want a mountain bike or equivalent- so it's a question of what the trails are like, not just what bike to use.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
StephenH is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 01:07 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Most rails to trails have little significant grade change so for years I have been enjoying my rides with a single speed cyclocross geometry bike (on one pompino)with 35mm tires. It is simple, there isn't much to tear up with all the rock dust and I was never shifting on the trail much anyhow. That being said I have been leaving the trail for some of the towns or some of the newly built connector trails and there can be some hills.I am also thinking about some longer rides including some camping. Because of the fun I have had on the single speed I am having built for me a surly crosscheck with an 8 speed redbrand internally geared hub(hoping for the simplicity and ruggedness of the single speed but with a few gears) some touring brakes and I am going to try some albatross bars. This bike is not being built with speed or aerodynamics in mind. I am too busy enjoying the scenery to worry about how aero I am. There are enough mounts for my fenders and some racks for the occasional camp as well.Hoping to pick it up later this week, and if weather permits I'll let you know how it did!
fixiehorse is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 01:14 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: upper devonian
Posts: 894
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by desertdork
Groucho01, I've been going over the same question in anticipation of a possible GAP/C&O ride in Sept. I'll be following this topic.

At the top of my concerns is I don't know what it's like to ride on crushed limestone and just how important that should be regarding bike choice.

I enjoyed the Historian's thread on his GAP/C&O adventure. IIRC, his only issues involved a less than adequate rear wheel and a troublesome trailer linkage, neither of which I'd say were due to the type of bike he rode.

dewaday's advice seems practical and honest...even if that means less reason to get another bike.
Oh dear, that certainly wasn't my intention .
FWIW, I happen to ride a Synapse as well, great bike. Between a cyclocross and a hybrid, you'd probably feel more at home on a cross, I rarely ride my hybrid anymore for that reason.

As far as crushed limestone, it's basically a very hard pack surface that ruts up some during rainy season, and gets dusty as heck during drought. Not at all gravelly, it's more like really poorly poured asphalt. Any bike that takes 32 tires would be comfortable. Aside from that, fenders are real handy, and hi spoke count wheels are good. We do an annual early spring and late fall 74 mile crushed limestone ride, and one of our female participants rides a skinny wheel aluminum race bike. She survives and has a blast.
dewaday is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 01:18 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,867
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1251 Post(s)
Liked 754 Times in 560 Posts
It depends on which trails you will ride and what you want. I rode the who Northern Central Railroad Trail combined with whatever they call it in PA. The round trip was 84 miles and it was a day ride. I did it a few times on skinny road tires. I also rode on the C&O towpath with 2.1" tires. Both were OK for what I wanted on those trips. Some places there are paved rail trails where skinny tire win hands down (Western Maryland Rail Trail for example).

For touring on the C&O... If you go when the trail is in good shape 28mm tires are OK. Other times a mountain bike is the best. On average I'd say 32mm is a good compromise for the C&O. Will you be loaded touring? Will you want to do more touring down the road? Some find a touring bike to be a great all around bike. I have come to prefer a road bike for everything but loaded touring and mine now mostly sits when I am not on tour.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 01:23 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
z415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gainesville/Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,343

Bikes: Trek 1000, two mtbs and working on a fixie for commuting.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by robow
OK, now this is where someone steps up and states they rode 800 miles of rails to trail on their 700x20mm and loved it and wouldn't dare slow themselves down with a 28 or 32 tire or God forbid larger yet.
.........
Sounds like torture. At Guantanamo.
z415 is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 01:31 PM
  #13  
Neil_B
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by desertdork

I enjoyed the Historian's thread on his GAP/C&O adventure. IIRC, his only issues involved a less than adequate rear wheel and a troublesome trailer linkage, neither of which I'd say were due to the type of bike he rode.
Thanks. The rear wheel was supposed to be an upgrade from the stock 28 spoke rear wheel. It wasn't. The 28 might have been OK.

Which thread was that? My thread here, or the 'real time' one in the Clydesdale forum? The Clydesdale thread is here:

https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...urgh+historian

Note how different the tone of that thread is compared to another two in this forum.
 
Old 01-18-09, 01:50 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,867
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1251 Post(s)
Liked 754 Times in 560 Posts
Originally Posted by desertdork
At the top of my concerns is I don't know what it's like to ride on crushed limestone and just how important that should be regarding bike choice.
I should mentioned that unless they have been doing some resurfacing in the last few years that some to the C&O is not crushed limestone. Some substantial portions are more like dirt, mud when it is wet enough. If that isn't the case anymore someone please correct me.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 01:51 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
bhchdh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hampton Roads VA
Posts: 1,787

Bikes: '07 Trek 520, '09 Gary Fisher Triton, '04 Trek 8000, '85 Trek 500, '84 Trek 610, '85 Trek 510, '88 Trek 660, '92 Trek 930, Trek Multitrack 700

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've riden my Trek 520 on the New River Trail and the Virginia Creeper Trail, both in western Virginia. I would recomend at least 32's due to the crushed rock surfaces on many Rails To Trails trail.
__________________
"When I hear another express an opinion, which is not mine, I say to myself, He has a right to his opinion, as I to mine; why should I question it. His error does me no injury, and shall I become a Don Quixot to bring all men by force of argument, to one opinion? If a fact be misstated, it is probable he is gratified by a belief of it, and I have no right to deprive him of the gratification."

T. Jefferson
bhchdh is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 01:53 PM
  #16  
Neil_B
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by staehpj1
I should mentioned that unless they have been doing some resurfacing in the last few years that some to the C&O is not crushed limestone. Some substantial portions are more like dirt, mud when it is wet enough. If that isn't the case anymore someone please correct me.
The C & O is not crushed limestone, save in a few spots and close to DC. The bulk of it is gravel and dirt. And mud when it's wet.
 
Old 01-18-09, 04:41 PM
  #17  
.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 3,981

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Comp, Soma ES

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've ridden a lot of rail-to-trail routes on my cyclocross bike. Change out the tires from road to actual 700x35/38 cyclocross or even hybrid tires and it's a great ride. This Spring, I'm planning on doing some of the Oregon Trail on my 29er which I have some Schwalbe Big Apples. That should be a fun ride on those tires.
__________________
Demented internet tail wagging imbicile.
knobster is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 04:48 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
JimF22003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,654

Bikes: 2008 Trek Madone 5.5, 2009 Cervelo R3SL tdf edition, Cervelo R5 with Di2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I rode 50 miles (out and back) the day after Christmas on the C&O from Georgetown on a Specialized Tri-Cross. I love that bike for commuting, but it was still a bit bone-jarring. I think I lost a couple of fillings. If I ride it again (when it's warmer) I think I'll take a hybrid. The suspension would have helped I think.
JimF22003 is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 05:04 PM
  #19  
Older than dirt
 
CCrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,342

Bikes: Too darn many.. latest count is 11

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Juat a FYI though. DC to Cumberland isn't a "Rails to Trails". It's basically a 2 track tow path. WMRT, and the GAP *are* Rauils to Trails, and there is a night and day difference. C&O is best on a Cyclocross bike if you're looking for speed, a MTB or Hybrid if you're looking for comfort. No way I'd do the C&O on a road bike.

-Roger
CCrew is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 05:05 PM
  #20  
Older than dirt
 
CCrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,342

Bikes: Too darn many.. latest count is 11

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by staehpj1
I should mentioned that unless they have been doing some resurfacing in the last few years that some to the C&O is not crushed limestone. Some substantial portions are more like dirt, mud when it is wet enough. If that isn't the case anymore someone please correct me.
No correction, it's still that way!
CCrew is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 05:51 PM
  #21  
just pokin' along
 
desertdork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the desert
Posts: 1,095
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by The Historian
Which thread was that? My thread here, or the 'real time' one in the Clydesdale forum? The Clydesdale thread is here:

https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...urgh+historian
That's it
desertdork is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 06:16 PM
  #22  
just pokin' along
 
desertdork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the desert
Posts: 1,095
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by staehpj1
I should mentioned that unless they have been doing some resurfacing in the last few years that some to the C&O is not crushed limestone. Some substantial portions are more like dirt, mud when it is wet enough. If that isn't the case anymore someone please correct me.
Thanks to everyone for clarifying this.

I shouldn't have mentioned crushed limestone. My apology to the OP for diverting this thread.

With the rough surface of the C&O, how many here would steer the OP away from choosing a carbon fork for this ride? The Historian and JimF22003 had carbon forks on their respective FX and Tricross, but I didn't note any concern stated by either.
desertdork is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 06:24 PM
  #23  
Neil_B
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by desertdork
Thanks to everyone for clarifying this.

I shouldn't have mentioned crushed limestone. My apology to the OP for diverting this thread.

With the rough surface of the C&O, how many here would steer the OP away from choosing a carbon fork for this ride? The Historian and JimF22003 had carbon forks on their respective FX and Tricross, but I didn't note any concern stated by either.
If that's what he has on his bike, I don't see any reason he couldn't use it. That said, if I owned another hybrid without a carbon fork, I might have used it instead. The big drawback to the carbon fork, IMO, is that you can't put a front rack on it.
 
Old 01-18-09, 06:40 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times in 194 Posts
Originally Posted by The Historian
The big drawback to the carbon fork, IMO, is that you can't put a front rack on it.
There are front racks that can be used with a carbon fork like the one below but you're definitely more limited in choices.


Last edited by robow; 01-18-09 at 06:57 PM.
robow is offline  
Old 01-18-09, 06:58 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
downtube42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,842

Bikes: Trek Domane SL6 Gen 3, Soma Fog Cutter, Focus Mares AL, Detroit Bikes Sparrow FG, Volae Team, Nimbus MUni

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 896 Post(s)
Liked 2,063 Times in 1,081 Posts
Riding a muddy C&O last summer, I found the gravel to be sparse and the trail-wide puddles common. Either plan around the weather, plan to hose down every night, or have fenders. I rode a rigid mtn bike with 1.75" tires and full fenders - it was great.

I'll be back this summer.
downtube42 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.