large messenger bags >> panniers, why not?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
large messenger bags >> panniers, why not?
I'm looking at turning a pair of 41L and 32L messenger bags that I'm confident I could convert into a pair of panniers for the front or rear wheel, by using the designs of previous folks. Practically, however I'm curious how that kind of load distribution would affect how the it rode and handles, as on the rear theyd be completely above the rear seat stay and extending a bit behind the wheel, and on the front theyd cover the wheel pretty extensively. Conversely, the largest panniers I've seen via searches so far are around half of the capacity of this pair of bags, and are generally much longer vertically, whereas a messenger bag is horizontally much longer.
To summarize, will messenger bags (70L total) work well as panniers if they
(1) are twice as big as a normal pannier set (40L max by my est) and
(2) much longer than they are tall?
To summarize, will messenger bags (70L total) work well as panniers if they
(1) are twice as big as a normal pannier set (40L max by my est) and
(2) much longer than they are tall?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: minneapolis
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I imagine "longer than they are tall" will cause problems with heel and toe strike.
Panniers are tall and skinny for a reason, and that's to keep them out of the rotation of your feet.
Panniers are tall and skinny for a reason, and that's to keep them out of the rotation of your feet.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
my panniers are 80L total (front and rear)
if you are talking about one pair of 70L panniers, its a bit excessive I think. At that point you should look into something like an xtracycle...
carradice super c- 52L rear, 28L front.
if you are talking about one pair of 70L panniers, its a bit excessive I think. At that point you should look into something like an xtracycle...
carradice super c- 52L rear, 28L front.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yea im sure id have to angle them backwards and overall position much farther backward or higher on the bicycle than normal. and im really curious how a load like that would handle. i assume not well.
just realized the thread title will be read by most as a 'greater than' symbol rather than a 'convert into' type of meaning...
just realized the thread title will be read by most as a 'greater than' symbol rather than a 'convert into' type of meaning...
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 866
Bikes: LHT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
hmm, i think it depends on what you want to use them for, for touring, i would feel more comfortable with panniers that are made for the job. that being said, i do think it could work if you rigged it up right, i would try to mount them a little farther back than normal panniers and hang a bit off the back side of the rack more to account for the extra length
you don't want too much weight too high either, so if you could mount them on the front wheel (to keep them lower and more accurate to what real panniers would feel like) i would
you don't want too much weight too high either, so if you could mount them on the front wheel (to keep them lower and more accurate to what real panniers would feel like) i would
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 23
Bikes: Jamis Aurora
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My first question would be to ask why you would possibly need a capacity that great?! If I read correctly, you are planning to affix a pair of 41L AND 32L bags to your bike, meaning 41+41+32+32?!?!
I hope I am mistaken in that assumption because that is a lot of storage! 146 LITERS! My Ortliebs come in at about half that and I sometimes cannot manage to fill them without adding unnecessary items.
I cannot see why you would need that much room and cannot imagine any safe way to mount them without severely hurting your handling and/or causing foot strike issues.
If I am mistaken and one pair is 41L and the other is 32L, then those aren't that large and are comparative to the size of my Ortliebs....but the fact that you say yours are twice the size of normal panniers leads me right back to my first point...
I hope I am mistaken in that assumption because that is a lot of storage! 146 LITERS! My Ortliebs come in at about half that and I sometimes cannot manage to fill them without adding unnecessary items.
I cannot see why you would need that much room and cannot imagine any safe way to mount them without severely hurting your handling and/or causing foot strike issues.
If I am mistaken and one pair is 41L and the other is 32L, then those aren't that large and are comparative to the size of my Ortliebs....but the fact that you say yours are twice the size of normal panniers leads me right back to my first point...
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
oh sorry, the two bags together come in at about 70L, I've only got two, and I'd ideally put them on the front. I'm just trying to re-use the bags I already have, and not buy more stuff as I'm a fairly broke college student about to graduate and the outlook on jobs is grim to say the least.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I guess I also have no experience with what sort of weight a high quality rack would hold, ill utfse but opinions are welcome there too... thanks!
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 23
Bikes: Jamis Aurora
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ah i see. One bag in each size. That isn't nearly as extreme as I thought above! Sorry for freaking out.
Would you be able to post a pic of these bags? If they are so large that they are nearly the size of a wheel, mounting could still be troublesome.
Would you be able to post a pic of these bags? If they are so large that they are nearly the size of a wheel, mounting could still be troublesome.
#10
Caffeinated.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Waltham, MA
Posts: 1,541
Bikes: Waterford 1900, Quintana Roo Borrego, Trek 8700zx, Bianchi Pista Concept
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Before you damage your messenger bags, have you thought about selling (or donating) them?
If you are near a city with a descent Craigslist user population, then you mmight have luck selling your bags then buying panniers.
..I can carry a 3" adjustable spanner which weighs 7lbs as my bike tool. I can also carry the proper tools for the job, weighing about a pound.
If you are near a city with a descent Craigslist user population, then you mmight have luck selling your bags then buying panniers.
..I can carry a 3" adjustable spanner which weighs 7lbs as my bike tool. I can also carry the proper tools for the job, weighing about a pound.