TREK 520 Fan Club
Likes For M Rose:
#427
I don't know.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Meriden, CT
Posts: 1,830
Bikes: '90 B'stone RB-1, '92 B'stone RB-2, '89 SuperGo Access Comp, '03 Access 69er, '23 Trek 520, '14 Ritchey Road Logic, '09 Kestrel Evoke, '08 Windsor Tourist, '17 Surly Wednesday, '89 Centurion Accordo, '15 CruX, '17 Ridley X-Night
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 262 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
348 Posts
^^ thank you.
Likes For M Rose:
#429
Junior Member
My Trek 520 is the best go-anawhere bike I have ever owned: Poncha Springs, CO to Del Norte, CO on the Great Divide Mountain Bike Route





#430
Newbie
Family of four with four 520's:
My wife has a 1989 that she bought new.
My son bought a mid-90's 520 a couple years ago.
I bought a 2017 520 disc a few months ago.
We just bought a 2012? for our daughter.
Definitely in the fan club!
My wife has a 1989 that she bought new.
My son bought a mid-90's 520 a couple years ago.
I bought a 2017 520 disc a few months ago.
We just bought a 2012? for our daughter.
Definitely in the fan club!
Likes For JimQPublic:
#431
Coquetdale Pagans
Hi there, this is my first post on this forum. I've just obtained a 1991 520 (the penultimate (EDIT off by one error, 1993 was the last year) lugged year, with True Temper AVR tubeset), one owner, well loved but well used. I am in the process of restoring it and rebuilding it as a drop bar tourer, as it had been set up with flat bars by the shop when it was new.
I've been down a lot of 520 rabbit holes recently, but I haven't found any discussion about why the bottom bracket drop shrank (higher BB) to about 48mm between 1990 and 1992. Lugged 520 frames before that and TIG frames after that had a 20mm lower BB. This 'small' 19"/48cm frame actually has the same 55.5 cm top tube and because of the high BB, standover height that is close to my much newer 56cm steel gravel frame.
Does anyone with more 520 experience have insight why the BB was so high in those years? Was it an attempt to make handling more lively even when fully loaded? Or was it simply an economic decision, saving money by sharing the high BB cast lugs for the chromoly road bikes with the mountain bikes?
I've been down a lot of 520 rabbit holes recently, but I haven't found any discussion about why the bottom bracket drop shrank (higher BB) to about 48mm between 1990 and 1992. Lugged 520 frames before that and TIG frames after that had a 20mm lower BB. This 'small' 19"/48cm frame actually has the same 55.5 cm top tube and because of the high BB, standover height that is close to my much newer 56cm steel gravel frame.
Does anyone with more 520 experience have insight why the BB was so high in those years? Was it an attempt to make handling more lively even when fully loaded? Or was it simply an economic decision, saving money by sharing the high BB cast lugs for the chromoly road bikes with the mountain bikes?
Last edited by wstephenson; 09-29-23 at 08:28 AM. Reason: call out error
#432
I don't know.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Meriden, CT
Posts: 1,830
Bikes: '90 B'stone RB-1, '92 B'stone RB-2, '89 SuperGo Access Comp, '03 Access 69er, '23 Trek 520, '14 Ritchey Road Logic, '09 Kestrel Evoke, '08 Windsor Tourist, '17 Surly Wednesday, '89 Centurion Accordo, '15 CruX, '17 Ridley X-Night
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 262 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
348 Posts
#434
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,126
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10492 Post(s)
Liked 6,932 Times
in
3,911 Posts
#435
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,470
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5863 Post(s)
Liked 3,393 Times
in
2,038 Posts
I'm curious are the lugged Trek 750s from the 90s allowed into this club? I know that they're hybrids but at least for a few years they had the same tubing and geometry spec of a 520; or at least that is my understanding.
#436
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,830
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times
in
177 Posts
Does anyone with more 520 experience have insight why the BB was so high in those years? Was it an attempt to make handling more lively even when fully loaded? Or was it simply an economic decision, saving money by sharing the high BB cast lugs for the chromoly road bikes with the mountain bikes?
Likes For M Rose:
#440
Coquetdale Pagans
I'm not qualified to make a ruling here, but are you aware of the dedicated "Show your Trek Multitrack!" thread in the Hybrids section? Or if you're using a 750 for touring, maybe it should be in this forum...
#441
Coquetdale Pagans
Now I can post pics, here's my 520 project. 1991 19" in purple white and conch. Obtained from a retired lady teacher and former tourer in the Upper Palatinate. It had some too-narrow straight bars on it when I got it, it was covered in a 30 year thick layer of grunge and Ballistol, and gear shifts took about a week. The frame still needs a proper detailing but it's clean, the parts on it all work now and it's a fun and comfortable ride:

Nitto Grand Randonneur B135 bars, Panaracer Gravelking Slicks 40mm on Wolber M59 on Deore XT hubs, XT/DX drivetrain and brakes.





Nitto Grand Randonneur B135 bars, Panaracer Gravelking Slicks 40mm on Wolber M59 on Deore XT hubs, XT/DX drivetrain and brakes.





Likes For wstephenson:
Likes For Bill1227:
Likes For M Rose:
#444
Coquetdale Pagans
Looks good! How does it handle without a load? There was some discussion on r/x-biking recently about the new 520s having a slacker head angle and more trail than the 90s ones and whether this was noticeable when trying to ride fast and hard.
#445
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Northeastern Oregon
Posts: 280
Bikes: 2021 Trek Verve 2 Disk
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times
in
79 Posts
it handles extremely well without any weight. I was cutting and carving the corners during the race with ease. I didn’t notice any ill effects in handling at all.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
powermatt99
Classic & Vintage
35
09-03-11 12:37 AM