Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

TREK 520 Fan Club

Old 08-02-14, 07:20 PM
  #126  
DVC45
Senior Member
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,867
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Today, I start saving.

Some details here 2015 Trek 520 Disc | Buckingham Bikes
DVC45 is offline  
Old 08-04-14, 05:54 PM
  #127  
Lanovran
Senior Member
 
Lanovran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 472

Bikes: 2013 Trek 520, 2014 Trek Stache 8, 1985 Nishiki Team Issue, 2014 Dahon Vigor P9, State Vice 2.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Looks like the non-disc version of the 520 will still be going strong as well, and in that gorgeous "deep evergreen" color!

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
520green.jpg (83.8 KB, 567 views)
Lanovran is offline  
Old 08-06-14, 07:00 PM
  #128  
KFC
Alpha Bean
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Reston Virginia
Posts: 48

Bikes: Trek 520, GT Flat Bar road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I sure love mine. It's a 2010 metallic 'Root Beer',and I have put 19,400 miles on it. I ride it in all conditions and all road surfaces. I wore out the original wheels at 18,000 miles and replaced them with a Mavic A-719 set. I'am on my third cassette and chain, and recently replaced the crank assembly. The frame still looks and rides like new. It been a great investment. It is comfortable, stable, durable and very forgiving. Steel is real!
KFC is offline  
Old 08-09-14, 07:17 PM
  #129  
TrekCommuter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 158

Bikes: 7.2 FX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Does anyone know what year the frames stopped being manufactured in the US? I would really like to find a USA made Trek 520 at some point.
TrekCommuter is offline  
Old 08-10-14, 08:10 PM
  #130  
DVC45
Senior Member
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,867
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by TrekCommuter View Post
Does anyone know what year the frames stopped being manufactured in the US? I would really like to find a USA made Trek 520 at some point.
2003, I think.
DVC45 is offline  
Old 08-10-14, 08:25 PM
  #131  
TrekCommuter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 158

Bikes: 7.2 FX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks! Now to find one...seems hard to do. Especially in 54 or 56 CM.
TrekCommuter is offline  
Old 08-26-14, 05:32 PM
  #132  
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mint 1991.

I have a mint 1991 520 with under 5 miles on her. Hoping I can figure outhow to post pics.
amarok54 is offline  
Old 08-27-14, 06:26 PM
  #133  
Marc40a
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: North Shore, MA
Posts: 206

Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Rivendell Sam Hillborne, Surly ECR, Serotta CSI

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by crankin360 View Post
Rode my first 520 today. It was a 2008, 58cm frame. I found it to be too small and have confirmed I need a 60cm.

I have read alot of impressions of this bike. Coming from a racing style bike, I enjoyed the stability as opposed to the twitchy feel of a racing bike. Barcons were not too bad, would take some getting used to.

It would be interesting to ride a newer 520 and get a feel for the lower gearing.

The hunt continues!

Can I ask your height and inseam? I'm curious as to how a 520 fits. I'm ride a 57cm bike with a non sloping top tube and was wondering if I'd go up or down a cm on a 520.
Marc40a is offline  
Old 08-27-14, 07:30 PM
  #134  
crankin360
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am 6'1" and have a 33 1/2" inseam. Originally, after riding a 58cm, I thought the 58cm was too small. Then I rode a friends 60cm and I did not have any top tube clearance. So I went with a 58cm and swapped out the handlebar stem.
crankin360 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 07:08 AM
  #135  
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
CAM02235.jpg (98.4 KB, 540 views)
amarok54 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 07:10 AM
  #136  
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
CAM02222.jpg (98.6 KB, 528 views)
amarok54 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 07:11 AM
  #137  
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
CAM02190.jpg (100.6 KB, 512 views)
amarok54 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 07:15 AM
  #138  
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
CAM02151 (1).jpg (95.2 KB, 510 views)
amarok54 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 07:16 AM
  #139  
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
CAM02151.jpg (95.2 KB, 239 views)
File Type: jpg
CAM02184.jpg (99.2 KB, 515 views)
amarok54 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 07:17 AM
  #140  
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
CAM02147.jpg (91.1 KB, 502 views)
amarok54 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 08:04 AM
  #141  
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
CAM02142.jpg (98.1 KB, 504 views)
amarok54 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 08:05 AM
  #142  
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
CAM02141.jpg (97.1 KB, 494 views)
amarok54 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 08:10 AM
  #143  
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
CAM02147.jpg (91.1 KB, 485 views)
amarok54 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 08:26 AM
  #144  
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Still having problems posting pics,sorry about that folks. This is an all original 1991 520 in pristine condition. It's such a nice example that I don't want to ride it which seems crazy! Been thinking of letting the bike go to someone who would ride her.
amarok54 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 08:46 AM
  #145  
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
CAM02235.jpg (98.4 KB, 246 views)
File Type: jpg
CAM02194.jpg (96.9 KB, 497 views)
amarok54 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 08:48 AM
  #146  
amarok54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
CAM02145.jpg (90.9 KB, 517 views)
amarok54 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 11:20 PM
  #147  
MAK
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,377

Bikes: Yes, I have bikes.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
I've decided to replace the cranks on my 2004 520. I'd be going from a 105 crankset that's 52-39-28 (the small ring was replaced) to either the Deore M590 at 48-36-26 or the Deore XT M770 at either 48-36-26 or 44-32-22. Everything is 9 speed.

The M590 is standard on current 520s. Are those of you who ride with the 590's satisfied or would you recommend an upgrade to the 770? There's a slight weight difference and supposedly the 770 is a bit stiffer. I believe that the 770 comes with a tad better bottom bracket too. The price difference is +/- $100.00.

Also is the 3.2 gear inch difference in the 26 v. 22 small ring minor or significant? BTW...I'm not a fan of hills.

You opinions please.
Thank you.
MAK is offline  
Old 08-30-14, 12:29 AM
  #148  
digibud
Senior Member
 
digibud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Further North than U
Posts: 1,994

Bikes: Spec Roubaix, three Fisher Montare, two Pugs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by amarok54 View Post
I have a mint 1991 520 with under 5 miles on her. Hoping I can figure outhow to post pics.
what size is it? beautiful bike
digibud is offline  
Old 08-30-14, 12:37 AM
  #149  
digibud
Senior Member
 
digibud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Further North than U
Posts: 1,994

Bikes: Spec Roubaix, three Fisher Montare, two Pugs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MAK View Post
Also is the 3.2 gear inch difference in the 26 v. 22 small ring minor or significant? BTW...I'm not a fan of hills.
Under the right circumstances a small difference can be huge but whether it's meaningful to you...dunno. If you found yourself on a long hill that you could barely climb in a 26 ring but could just make it on a 22...it could be a big deal. Or you may be able to do the 26 at 40rpm straining your knee when the 22 allowed you to spin. If you ride lightly loaded on major highways that don't get over 6% then it's probably meaningless. If you ride heavily loaded and aren't in great shape and tackle steeper inclines then that difference can indeed be a big deal. For touring, most folks could care less about the high gear and the low end can hardly be too low. It's not uncommon for tourers to set up for an 18" gear. That's pretty darned low but many find it useful. If your 22 up front was mated to a 28 in the rear then yeah...really necessary. If you have a 36 in back then maybe it's overkill. You really can only know this by experience but for touring look to get a low gear from 18-22" or so and you'll at least be in a reasonable ballpark.
digibud is offline  
Old 08-30-14, 12:47 AM
  #150  
MAK
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,377

Bikes: Yes, I have bikes.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by digibud View Post
Under the right circumstances a small difference can be huge but whether it's meaningful to you...dunno. If you found yourself on a long hill that you could barely climb in a 26 ring but could just make it on a 22...it could be a big deal. Or you may be able to do the 26 at 40rpm straining your knee when the 22 allowed you to spin. If you ride lightly loaded on major highways that don't get over 6% then it's probably meaningless. If you ride heavily loaded and aren't in great shape and tackle steeper inclines then that difference can indeed be a big deal. For touring, most folks could care less about the high gear and the low end can hardly be too low. It's not uncommon for tourers to set up for an 18" gear. That's pretty darned low but many find it useful. If your 22 up front was mated to a 28 in the rear then yeah...really necessary. If you have a 36 in back then maybe it's overkill. You really can only know this by experience but for touring look to get a low gear from 18-22" or so and you'll at least be in a reasonable ballpark.
Yes I do have a 36 rear so the gear inches would be 17.6" v. 20.8" both pretty low.

Thanks for your response.
MAK is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.