Canti Question?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 156
Bikes: 1978 Motobecane Le Champion Fixed Conversion, 2009 Surly Long Haul Trucker
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Canti Question?
So I have the 09 Surly LHT complete and it came with Tektro Oryx brakes, and I really don't like these. They aren't as smooth or reliable as I would like. What are some good touring cantis? I've been looking at the Avid Shorty 6's OR the Paul Touring or Neo-Retro Canti. What are your opinions? thanks!
Last edited by patgoral; 03-18-09 at 10:11 AM.
#2
The Dude Abides
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 84
Bikes: Dawes Horizon 2007, Claud Butler Roubaix 2008, Dawes Sardar 2003
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I wasn't really a fan of the Oryx either. For this year's tour I've opted for Tektro CR520's. They sound pretty promising from this review https://www.zepnat.com/images/cr520review.jpg
Setting them up was a pretty simple affair, but I haven't yet tested them out on the road yet.
Setting them up was a pretty simple affair, but I haven't yet tested them out on the road yet.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 156
Bikes: 1978 Motobecane Le Champion Fixed Conversion, 2009 Surly Long Haul Trucker
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hm, those do look promising and ALOT cheaper than going for the Paul brakes!
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
tektro cr 720 are the best currently available and cheap design. Im speaking just in terms of leverage here....
https://www.evanscycles.com/product_i...ever-brake.jpg
As an aside, I was thinking on my commute in this morning, that tektro is probably one of my favorite component companies right now. The campag. copy drop bar levers for 25 bucks, the r556 brake for 55 bucks, and the cr 720 brakes for 30 bucks are all great quality parts at rock bottom prices. Pauls are nice as hell, I used to have some, but they really are about the cache of the brand. not worth the money, unless you have the money to spare....
I have a set of machine tech zeroflex 2 cantilevers https://www.bikepro.com/products/brak...ach_tech.shtml
simply because I like vintage MTB stuff and they were 40 bucks, but if I were buying new, tektro cr720s for sure.
https://www.evanscycles.com/product_i...ever-brake.jpg
As an aside, I was thinking on my commute in this morning, that tektro is probably one of my favorite component companies right now. The campag. copy drop bar levers for 25 bucks, the r556 brake for 55 bucks, and the cr 720 brakes for 30 bucks are all great quality parts at rock bottom prices. Pauls are nice as hell, I used to have some, but they really are about the cache of the brand. not worth the money, unless you have the money to spare....
I have a set of machine tech zeroflex 2 cantilevers https://www.bikepro.com/products/brak...ach_tech.shtml
simply because I like vintage MTB stuff and they were 40 bucks, but if I were buying new, tektro cr720s for sure.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fife Scotland
Posts: 2,053
Bikes: Airnimal Chameleon; Ellis Briggs; Moulton TSR27 Moulton Esprit
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3291 Post(s)
Liked 827 Times
in
583 Posts
I wasn't really a fan of the Oryx either. For this year's tour I've opted for Tektro CR520's. They sound pretty promising from this review https://www.zepnat.com/images/cr520review.jpg
Setting them up was a pretty simple affair, but I haven't yet tested them out on the road yet.
Setting them up was a pretty simple affair, but I haven't yet tested them out on the road yet.
These are the best cantis presently available for my money.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"... aren't as smooth or reliable as I would like..."
How so?
Might want to check the levers and cables for smoothness of action. Pad toe-in for braking smoothness.
Reliable? Have pads seated in? Cables stretched and readjusted?
How so?
Might want to check the levers and cables for smoothness of action. Pad toe-in for braking smoothness.
Reliable? Have pads seated in? Cables stretched and readjusted?
#8
Professional Fuss-Budget
I went for the Avid Shorty 4's on my Cross Check. They helped a little bit, but I still don't quite feel like I've got the same stopping power as I do with the caliper brakes on my road bike. I may try to tweak 'em a little bit more, see if I can get a little more oomph out of them. Otherwise they work well.
#9
Senior Member
So I have the 09 Surly LHT complete and it came with Tektro Oryx brakes, and I really don't like these. They aren't as smooth or reliable as I would like. What are some good touring cantis? I've been looking at the Avid Shorty 6's OR the Paul Touring or Neo-Retro Canti. What are your opinions? thanks!
#12
Acetone Man
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wide profile cantilever brakes such as the CR-720 are only still made for cyclocross because they have excellent mud clearance. The CR-720 also seems to be quite popular with the retro grouches, but really now. That style's stopping power is inferior to refined low profile cantilevers such as the oryx or shorty. They also require a much firmer squeeze at the lever, which makes braking from the hoods almost useless.
I have older shorty 6s; they squeal. The redesigned version should be fine though. I hear very good things about the IRD Cafam, which is a ripoff of the Paul Touring canti at 30% cost. But if I were you I would switch to V-brake levers as I have found the newish Tektro RL520 drop bar V-brake lever to be VASTLY more comfortable than the standard pull R200 lever that comes stock on the LHT. YMMV of course, but with a swap to that lever, you could then run Avid Single Digit 7 v-brakes, which are widely heralded as one of the finest caliper brakes ever made.
I have older shorty 6s; they squeal. The redesigned version should be fine though. I hear very good things about the IRD Cafam, which is a ripoff of the Paul Touring canti at 30% cost. But if I were you I would switch to V-brake levers as I have found the newish Tektro RL520 drop bar V-brake lever to be VASTLY more comfortable than the standard pull R200 lever that comes stock on the LHT. YMMV of course, but with a swap to that lever, you could then run Avid Single Digit 7 v-brakes, which are widely heralded as one of the finest caliper brakes ever made.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times
in
2,856 Posts
#14
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Add another hearty endorsement - Shimano BR-R550s for the win!
#16
just pokin' along
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the desert
Posts: 1,095
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The repeated endorsements by Bekologist...and others...on this forum prompted me to give the 550s a try. A reasonable investment in time for proper setup has resulted in brakes that truly perform better than I expected. The braking is reliable and smooth with STI, and they haven't shuddered or squealed (with Kool Stops) in 2k miles.
That said, I suspect a common reason for the varying performance issues with canti brakes is a function of how well they were set up initially. I made numerous adjustments before they felt just right. Though my experience with the 550s has been great, I've had no experience with the Oryx model. Since others have made positive statements about the Oryx brakes, is it possible yours are not adjusted as well?
That said, I suspect a common reason for the varying performance issues with canti brakes is a function of how well they were set up initially. I made numerous adjustments before they felt just right. Though my experience with the 550s has been great, I've had no experience with the Oryx model. Since others have made positive statements about the Oryx brakes, is it possible yours are not adjusted as well?
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,293
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I think there are better cantilever brakes than the Oryx, but not a whole lot better. I'd mess with the pads (get new ones) and straddle cables until the brakes work better.
I like the Shimano BR 550s as well. Not that they are better than other cantilevers, but they seem not squeal as much and they are the easiest cantis to set up.
I like the Shimano BR 550s as well. Not that they are better than other cantilevers, but they seem not squeal as much and they are the easiest cantis to set up.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 818
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have some Nashbar deluxe cantis that I think are really Oryxs (Nashbar doesn't sell them anymore). Anyway, they perform terrifically. I do think that setup is vital, but also throw in the levers and pads you use as other factors. I have some old style canti levers that are really full handles that seem to be perfect for the setup (I also use the Shimano supplied straddle wire, not an adjustable one and find I don't need to get one that is adjustable.)
You might have to experiment to get the brake setup that works.
You might have to experiment to get the brake setup that works.
The repeated endorsements by Bekologist...and others...on this forum prompted me to give the 550s a try. A reasonable investment in time for proper setup has resulted in brakes that truly perform better than I expected. The braking is reliable and smooth with STI, and they haven't shuddered or squealed (with Kool Stops) in 2k miles.
That said, I suspect a common reason for the varying performance issues with canti brakes is a function of how well they were set up initially. I made numerous adjustments before they felt just right. Though my experience with the 550s has been great, I've had no experience with the Oryx model. Since others have made positive statements about the Oryx brakes, is it possible yours are not adjusted as well?
That said, I suspect a common reason for the varying performance issues with canti brakes is a function of how well they were set up initially. I made numerous adjustments before they felt just right. Though my experience with the 550s has been great, I've had no experience with the Oryx model. Since others have made positive statements about the Oryx brakes, is it possible yours are not adjusted as well?
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fife Scotland
Posts: 2,053
Bikes: Airnimal Chameleon; Ellis Briggs; Moulton TSR27 Moulton Esprit
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3291 Post(s)
Liked 827 Times
in
583 Posts
I've had both and you couldn't be more wrong. The mechanical advantage enjoyed by the wider profile arms is very obvious and these brakes are now rapidly becoming the brakes of choice for experience tourists.
#20
Acetone Man
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
“There is no question an Empella or a Spooky brake - if you are looking at sheer stopping power - are not as powerful as an Avid or Shimano brake,”
-Stu Thorne, owner of cyclocrossworld.com
Avid's newest top of the line cantilever for cx racing can actually transform from a wide profile to a low profile in about ten minutes. Why would they suffer the headaches of engineering that if wide profile cantilevers had both greater mud clearance and greater power? They wouldn't. The design is so that cx racers can have a wide profile for mud clearance in wet races, but still be able to switch to a more powerful brake when it's dry.
#21
hello
Lever choice is just as important when talking about mechanical advantage. Combining to two to achieve ideal lever action (firm, crisp action vs mushiness) and good stopping power is sometimes difficult.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
194 Posts
Thasiet:
"V brakes have the lowest mechanical advantage and the softest feel of all caliper brakes, yet are the most powerful."
A very nice article from Sheldon, dispelling a lot of myths.
https://sheldonbrown.com/cantilever-geometry.html
"Direct-pull cantilevers have a very high mechanical advantage, which makes them unsuitable for use with conventional levers."
"V brakes have the lowest mechanical advantage and the softest feel of all caliper brakes, yet are the most powerful."
A very nice article from Sheldon, dispelling a lot of myths.
https://sheldonbrown.com/cantilever-geometry.html
"Direct-pull cantilevers have a very high mechanical advantage, which makes them unsuitable for use with conventional levers."
Last edited by robow; 03-20-09 at 12:50 PM.
#23
Acetone Man
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thasiet:
"V brakes have the lowest mechanical advantage and the softest feel of all caliper brakes, yet are the most powerful."
A very nice article from Sheldon, dispelling a lot of myths.
https://sheldonbrown.com/cantilever-geometry.html
"Direct-pull cantilevers have a very high mechanical advantage, which makes them unsuitable for use with conventional levers."
"V brakes have the lowest mechanical advantage and the softest feel of all caliper brakes, yet are the most powerful."
A very nice article from Sheldon, dispelling a lot of myths.
https://sheldonbrown.com/cantilever-geometry.html
"Direct-pull cantilevers have a very high mechanical advantage, which makes them unsuitable for use with conventional levers."
All can provide adequate power for touring, even wide profiles, though once again, their near complete lack of give and large lever forces makes solid braking from the hoods nearly impossible. As to your deleted request for further explanation that v-brakes are the most powerful, at 240lbs, with new brake pads, clean rims, and perfect setup, the Shorty 6 on my touring bike fork could probably send me over the handlebars. The v-brake on my ill-maintained mountain bike, on the other hand, will do it with gusto.
#24
Real Men Ride Ordinaries
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,723
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
What is obvious is that wide profile brakes have a terribly firm lever feel, and that many people associate that lack of sponginess with greater power. Nothing could be further from the truth. Mechanical advantage is only part of the equation. V brakes have the lowest mechanical advantage and the softest feel of all caliper brakes, yet are the most powerful.
“There is no question an Empella or a Spooky brake - if you are looking at sheer stopping power - are not as powerful as an Avid or Shimano brake,”
-Stu Thorne, owner of cyclocrossworld.com
Avid's newest top of the line cantilever for cx racing can actually transform from a wide profile to a low profile in about ten minutes. Why would they suffer the headaches of engineering that if wide profile cantilevers had both greater mud clearance and greater power? They wouldn't. The design is so that cx racers can have a wide profile for mud clearance in wet races, but still be able to switch to a more powerful brake when it's dry.
“There is no question an Empella or a Spooky brake - if you are looking at sheer stopping power - are not as powerful as an Avid or Shimano brake,”
-Stu Thorne, owner of cyclocrossworld.com
Avid's newest top of the line cantilever for cx racing can actually transform from a wide profile to a low profile in about ten minutes. Why would they suffer the headaches of engineering that if wide profile cantilevers had both greater mud clearance and greater power? They wouldn't. The design is so that cx racers can have a wide profile for mud clearance in wet races, but still be able to switch to a more powerful brake when it's dry.
It may well be true that wide profile brakes are inferior, but why then were they the standard for cantilever brakes for so long?
#25
Acetone Man
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts