Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-01-09, 10:34 PM   #1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
hodadmike's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wenatchee, WA
Posts: 172
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Full campground in National Parks?

Over the years I've heard (and read) from other touring folks that bikers who roll into a National Park to camp for the night will not be turned away even if the campground is full. I've heard that they will put you somewhere, maybe not the most scenic or convenient place, but at least a place to crash for the night. I guess the motive is that we can't exactly jump back on the bike after a long day and grind out another 30 miles to get to the next campground.

Does anybody know if there is any truth to this? Is it NPS policy, or just a recycled story of a lucky biker crossing paths with a sympathetic ranger?
hodadmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-09, 10:44 PM   #2
Look brakes!
Accident's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tallahassee
Bikes: Locally built track bike, Kona mtb, Giant Road Bike, Soon to be Surly LHT Tourer!
Posts: 399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I hope it's true
Accident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-09, 02:00 AM   #3
40 yrs bike touring
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Santa Barbara,CA.
Bikes: Bruce Gordon Ti Rock N Road [1989], Fat Chance Mountain Tandem [1988]
Posts: 1,013
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Although I have never seen such a helpful policy in writing, I have benefitted often from NP rangers offering options when campgrounds are full. They may suggest a walk-in campsite, sharing a site with others, or turn a blind eye after mentioning a closed campground undergoing repair or an area that goes unpatrolled.

They are stuck with some rigid rules and limited discretion most of the time yet empathize with bike tourers stuck with few options other than a long ride in the dark.

Anyone with direct knowledge of such a policy in writing?
arctos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-09, 06:47 AM   #4
Senior Member
staehpj1's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
It was definitely the case in Yellowstone. I can't say for sure it is true in all National Parks, but I thought it was.
staehpj1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-09, 07:45 AM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 290
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It sure was for me at several site along the Pacific Coast. But usually I just opt to sneak off and camp somewhere else out of sight. Can't stand a noisy campground with tents within a few yards of each other.
mooncricket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-09, 08:29 AM   #6
Uber Goober
StephenH's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas area, Texas
Posts: 11,463
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 80 Post(s)
Some of the national parks (RMNP, for example) are conveniently surrounded by National Forests or BLM lands which allow camping just about anywhere.
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
StephenH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-09, 08:49 AM   #7
totally louche
Bekologist's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
many of the National PArks allow dispersed camping away from roads, etc. under a 'backcountry' permit.

you would be hard pressed to show you were hiking with your bike thru the woods, but with a free backcountry permit you might be able to get away with being found. anytime i intend to just camp in a national park i have one of these at hand.

in the 80's a buddy and i were kicked out of a picnic area in Grand Teton Nat'l Park one night, guess we didn't squirrel ourselves away enough (and didn't have a permit)

Last edited by Bekologist; 08-02-09 at 09:29 AM.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-09, 09:46 AM   #8
Neil G.
Senior Member
Neil G.'s Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Suburban Chicago, USA
Posts: 88
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think there are two distinct situations: parks that have designated hiker/biker campsites, and parks that don't. For those with hiker/biker sites (Yellowstone, Glacier, Grand Canyon, probably some others) it basically is a written policy that that hikers and bikers won't be turned away. The hiker/biker sites are essentially "group camping" areas that you share with all the other hiker/bikers, so it's really just a formalized arrangement for site-sharing.

For parks without a published policy declaring hiker/biker sites, I would say that there is likely no unpublished written policy, and perhaps not even an unwritten one.

At Arches, campground availability/reservations are dealt with at the entrance, some 20 miles (and three major climbs) from the campground. When we arrived at the entrance, the campground was full, but I had a reservation, though I didn't remember at which site. When I asked some questions about this, the ranger was none-too-friendly, presuming (understandably) that I was lying about having a reservation and then forging on like a jerk anyway to "force" them to take pity on us once I reached the campground. If we arrived late without a reservation, the campground host may have found a place for us (though there isn't a lot of obvious overflow area), but surely not without a scolding.

At Natural Bridges (a National Monument, not a National Park, but close enough), which was also full, they gave two suggestions: try to find someone who wanted to share, or head back out of the park and camp on BLM land. Even when we whined about how riding back out 5 miles uphill would pretty much eliminate any chance for us to actually see the park, they didn't offer any other hints or suggestions. Luckily just as we were heading out, a wonderful couple came by and asked *us* if we would like to share with them.

At Capitol Reef (full again), we were lucky enough to have our newfound friends from Natural Bridges there ahead of us so we could share with them again. But on our way into the campground loop, there was a stern ranger guarding the entrance who tried to demand our proof of reservation before we told him we were staying with friends. On the other hand, later on we saw another tourist who we had met earlier in the day end up with a spot on the outer edge of the campground, so either she just snuck in and found some people willing to share, or found a less-surly ranger to sweet-talk.

At Zion, despite the "campground full" signs, I pulled up to the entrance station anyway, and was told that a reserved site had just been left early, so I was able to get that. That wasn't any special treatment for the bicycle though, and it meant I didn't get a chance to see what would have happened there if I attempted to seek pity. But I would guess they don't have much pity at that park, since the town of Springdale (with plenty of lodging) is so close and accessible.

So in general I think National Parks without designated hiker/biker sites are just like anywhere else: you have to rely on the kindness of individual rangers/hosts/campers if you want get a site there.

Neil G. is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 AM.

  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.