Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Already own a Cross Check: Should I bother getting a touring bike?

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Already own a Cross Check: Should I bother getting a touring bike?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-09, 07:16 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Already own a Cross Check: Should I bother getting a touring bike?

I'm a bike commuter who does occasional longish (40-70 miles) single-day road trips in the spring and summer. Right now I own an 09 Cross Check, a 2010 Giant Rincon, and an 05 Trek 2100c.

I'm thinking of selling off my Trek and buying a road bike that's more dedicated to touring, not racing. I plan on doing a couple of substantial tours this upcoming summer, including Ragbrai, and I want a bike that'll hold a lot of gear while riding comfy and fairly fast.

My question, though, is whether I really need to buy a whole new bike when I already own a Cross Check. The Cross is my commuter and a real workhorse--I put about 50 miles on it a week. If I'm not looking to break any landspeed records, might I be better off putting thinner tires on my Check and trading in my old Trek for a speedier road bike, to use on single day trips? Or is the difference in ride between the Check and a dedicated touring bike enough to justify forgoing a really light, fast bike?

For reference, I figure I could probably get 500-650 out of the old Trek, and I'd be willing to spend up to an additional 1000 or so on a new bike.
mynie is offline  
Old 12-01-09, 09:47 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A lot of people have successfully toured with bikes less suitable than the Cross Check. Why not try it, since you own the Cross Check already? When you commute, add a few extra items to your load and see how it works for you. A dedicated touring bike will be more truck like, more suitable for hauling lots of gear without worry, but a Cross Check will do just fine. Particularly for RAGBRAI, where you don't have to haul substantial amounts of food and water with you.
ploeg is offline  
Old 12-01-09, 10:09 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 81 Times in 64 Posts
I honestly don't understand your decision making issues regarding the Trek but I've got a CC and LHT. If I was in your shoes I'd set up the CrossCheck for the tours and if you need the money more than the Trek sell it. The only reason to get the LHT is if you see yourself carrying two sets of loaded panniers or you're especially heavy. If pedaling fast with a loaded bike is your goal then load it very light with minimal windage.
LeeG is offline  
Old 12-01-09, 10:32 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Cyclebum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NE Tx
Posts: 2,766

Bikes: Tour Easy, Linear USS, Lightening Thunderbolt, custom DF, Raleigh hybrid, Felt time trial

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mynie
and I want a bike that'll hold a lot of gear while riding comfy and fairly fast.
Your CC will do all that and do it well. Mine has/does.

You may want to tweak it a bit to suit yourself after giving it a long test ride loaded with about 40 pounds of stuff to simulate a tour. If possible, check the gearing suitability with some long, steep climbs.
Cyclebum is offline  
Old 12-01-09, 11:47 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
c_m_shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,087

Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times in 166 Posts
You can tour on a Cross Check.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Loaded Cross Check.jpg (96.9 KB, 165 views)
c_m_shooter is offline  
Old 12-01-09, 11:58 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
cyclezealot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Fallbrook,Calif./Palau del Vidre, France
Posts: 13,230

Bikes: Klein QP, Fuji touring, Surly Cross Check, BCH City bike

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1485 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times in 64 Posts
I own a Cross Check and A tourer.. My Cross Check would work for heavy touring just fine. But, I would recommend you beef up the wheels and spokes and then off you go.
__________________
Pray for the Dead and Fight like Hell for the Living










^ Since January 1, 2012
cyclezealot is offline  
Old 12-02-09, 02:31 AM
  #7  
Je pose, donc je suis.
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Back. Here.
Posts: 2,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by c_m_shooter
<loaded CC pic>.
...and half-loaded.

https://lh5.ggpht.com/_5RyCPiv-PA4/Su...0/DSC_1146.JPG

The short answer has already been given: you have the CC. Try it out.

I use my CC for touring, commuting and winter training with the club, and it does mostly fine.**

Things to think about:

-- you could get another set of dedicated, rock solid touring wheels (**swapping wheels with different widths requires brake adjustment, which isn't hard, but sometimes annoying)
-- mounting a front rack requires an adapter, since there are no rack mounting eyelets. Alternatively, you could buy a LHT fork separately and swap when needed (others have done this -- a search should find them)
-- there is more toe-overlap on the CC. Mount your fenders close to the tire. (**Otherwise, you may get your fender sucked up into the fork, freezing your front wheel. This is somewhat less than "fine". Trust me.)
Pedaleur is offline  
Old 12-02-09, 04:43 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
meanwhile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As said, try out the Cross Check. But why put thinner tyres on it? If you are carrying more weight then you'd be more likely to need wider. If your current tyres are slow that's probably because they are made out of the wrong type of compound - this has a huge effect on rolling resistance. Go to Schwalbe's site and read their tech docs and read their tyre application guides. Your CC'd probably handle better for commuting and touring with something like 40mm Marathon Supremes.
meanwhile is offline  
Old 12-02-09, 05:51 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,868
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1251 Post(s)
Liked 755 Times in 561 Posts
The Cross Check looks like a great bike for the use your purpose. Obviously some of this is personal preference, but I think it is likely to be more fun to ride and maybe more suitable than the LHT for your intended use.

Even for extended touring with a light-ish load it might be preferable and if not at least OK. If you are of the everything but the kitchen sink persuasion and want to carry 50 + pounds of gear the LHT would be likely to be preferable, but with 20-35 pounds of gear and panniers you are likely to find the CC more suitable and more fun to ride.

To my way of thinking since you already have the CC it is a no brainer.

My personal preference on the tires would be 28 - 32 mm tires if fully loaded and 25 - 28 mm if credit card touring or supported. I am thinking 20 - 35 pounds for the loaded touring of gear and panniers and 10 - 20 pounds or less for the credit card or supported touring.

Last edited by staehpj1; 12-02-09 at 05:57 AM.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 12-02-09, 10:21 PM
  #10  
More Energy than Sense
 
aroundoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 718

Bikes: Co-Motion Divide

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Cross Check is a proven tourer. I just built up one and man is it fun to ride. I owned a LHT a couple years ago and I find the CC quicker and not so tank-like as the LHT. I am sure the LHT would handle the load better but after a few miles on the CC, you will be used to it's load handling characteristics and won't look back.
aroundoz is offline  
Old 12-03-09, 12:24 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Yan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,942
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1960 Post(s)
Liked 647 Times in 443 Posts
Here's my Cross Check:

Yan is offline  
Old 12-03-09, 03:41 AM
  #12  
Je pose, donc je suis.
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Back. Here.
Posts: 2,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Yan
Here's my Cross Check:

[IMG]...[/IMG]
What front rack are you using?
Pedaleur is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 10:41 AM
  #13  
artesc all the way.
 
artesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 263

Bikes: 2008 Redline 925 (bleh!)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pedaleur
...and half-loaded.

https://lh5.ggpht.com/_5RyCPiv-PA4/Su...0/DSC_1146.JPG

The short answer has already been given: you have the CC. Try it out.

I use my CC for touring, commuting and winter training with the club, and it does mostly fine.**

Things to think about:

-- you could get another set of dedicated, rock solid touring wheels (**swapping wheels with different widths requires brake adjustment, which isn't hard, but sometimes annoying)
-- mounting a front rack requires an adapter, since there are no rack mounting eyelets. Alternatively, you could buy a LHT fork separately and swap when needed (others have done this -- a search should find them)
-- there is more toe-overlap on the CC. Mount your fenders close to the tire. (**Otherwise, you may get your fender sucked up into the fork, freezing your front wheel. This is somewhat less than "fine". Trust me.)
Question for you good sir, what racks are you using on your cross check? Are you using a LHT fork or using an adapter? Thanks a billion!
artesc is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 11:16 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Cyclebum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NE Tx
Posts: 2,766

Bikes: Tour Easy, Linear USS, Lightening Thunderbolt, custom DF, Raleigh hybrid, Felt time trial

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just in case you don't get an answer from the poster, I have used this rack for 4 years of extensive touring. When mounted correctly it is rock solid. And very cost effective.

https://www.nashbar.com/bikes//Produc...2_167572_-1___
Cyclebum is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 12:38 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 81 Times in 64 Posts
don't think the CC has more overlap than the LHT. To my 200lb weight it feels like a tank, albeit a more nimple handling tank than the LHT.
LeeG is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 01:38 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Yan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,942
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1960 Post(s)
Liked 647 Times in 443 Posts
Originally Posted by Pedaleur
What front rack are you using?
I'm using an Old Man Mountain AC Lowrider front rack and a Jandd Expedition rear rack (great racks: no complaints so far). I'm using a pair of Tubus clamps on the Cross Check fork.
Yan is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 02:38 PM
  #17  
artesc all the way.
 
artesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 263

Bikes: 2008 Redline 925 (bleh!)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cyclebum
Just in case you don't get an answer from the poster, I have used this rack for 4 years of extensive touring. When mounted correctly it is rock solid. And very cost effective.

https://www.nashbar.com/bikes//Produc...2_167572_-1___
I like the cut of your jib; I'm all for inexpensive, rock solid things. Out of curiosity, what rear rack are you using?

And Pedaleur, thanks for the info. How long you been using the Expedition? Do you get plenty of clearance with it?
artesc is offline  
Old 01-11-10, 03:34 AM
  #18  
Je pose, donc je suis.
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Back. Here.
Posts: 2,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by artesc
I like the cut of your jib; I'm all for inexpensive, rock solid things. Out of curiosity, what rear rack are you using?

And Pedaleur, thanks for the info. How long you been using the Expedition? Do you get plenty of clearance with it?
For the record, I think you have me confused with Yan. I only have a rear rack on my CC (Topeak somethingorother). But Yan has come through with the info.
Pedaleur is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crandress
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
13
06-23-13 12:42 PM
mvallejo
Touring
48
05-14-13 12:16 PM
Fernankd
Touring
56
05-03-13 01:17 PM
Addison
Fifty Plus (50+)
26
01-18-11 02:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.