Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Touring (https://www.bikeforums.net/touring/)
-   -   Yet another saddle question! (https://www.bikeforums.net/touring/628341-yet-another-saddle-question.html)

nancy sv 03-15-10 07:52 PM


Originally Posted by Machka (Post 10527029)
Anyway, Nancy ... can you tell where your sitbones are located by looking at your Brooks? I can very easily tell with mine. If you can tell, measure the distance between the divots. If you really feel like you've been sitting on your soft bits, you will need to ensure that you get a saddle wide enough so that your sitbones will sit on the saddle.

No, I can't. My saddle looks exactly like it did new. John has the little indentations on his, but mine doesn't have any at all.

nancy sv 03-15-10 07:56 PM


Originally Posted by antokelly (Post 10525030)
nancy are you wearing bike padded cycling shorts and im talking the best like assos .i had a french guy stay with me last summer great cyclists anyway his saddle had no nose basically a half saddle i never seen the like before ,but he reckoned it was fantastic no discomfort at all.sorry i've no idea what make it was but try the google trick and see if you can find it.
oh yeah he use's assos shorts and assos cream great stuff.hope you find a saddle really soon.

No - I discovered right away (like within 5 miles on my Brooks!) that the edge of the pad cut into my like crazy and hurt! I am using wool running shorts from Ibex and have been happy with that choice.

ddez 03-15-10 10:17 PM

The little indents usually start to show pretty quick,certainly should have them with miles you have on it. Sounds like you havent been sitting on the back part where sit bones are supposed to sit,either that or your saddle is too narrow,with sit bones off the sides.(that would be painful, ask me how i know). Only other thing i can think of is that your bars are way lower than saddle,so that your not putting weight on back wide part, cause you should definately have indents.

Carbonfiberboy 03-15-10 11:03 PM

My wife rides only Specialized Jett, a woman's saddle with a major cutout. It's a hard saddle, so it's great for LD, and doesn't seem to change over time. Went through a number of saddles to find this one. Everyone's different.

Machka 03-16-10 04:01 AM


Originally Posted by nancy sv (Post 10531183)
No, I can't. My saddle looks exactly like it did new. John has the little indentations on his, but mine doesn't have any at all.

Maybe it is way too narrow for you and your sitbones are hanging off the sides. I've got a brand new Brooks which I've put maybe 5 km on so far, and I've got scuff marks where my sitbones sit on the saddle.

chrisch 03-16-10 04:14 AM

Nancy,

Another setting to adjust is the angle of the seat. I had to adjust my B17 a few times until I found an angle that worked for me. Try tilting it upwards slightly; those few degrees can make a considerable change to how your weight is distributed.

Good luck!

nancy sv 03-16-10 08:04 AM

If I sit far enough back to be on my sit bones, I'm right on the metal bar and that hurts. There just doesn't seem to be any way to get on the saddle so my sit bones are supported. I think it is just too narrow, pure and simple.

GeorgePaul 03-16-10 08:46 AM


Originally Posted by nancy sv (Post 10522270)
I've now swapped saddles with my son and I'm doing a lot better - but he wants his saddle back eventually.

Well, you could just get a saddle like your son's.

Competetive Cyclist has a a saddle demo program (see http://www.competitivecyclist.com/ro...es/demo-saddle). Also, some bicycle shops have demo saddles.

nancy sv 03-16-10 09:35 AM


Originally Posted by GeorgePaul (Post 10533006)
Well, you could just get a saddle like your son's.

We thought about that option, but this saddle isn't perfect either. I have to sit way back on the seat in order to get my sit bones on it - but at least I can do that on this saddle without sitting on that bar across the back of the Brooks.

Torrilin 03-16-10 10:38 AM

B-67 time maybe? There aren't a whole lot of saddles wider than 170mm, and most of 'em are Brooks.

The Smokester 03-17-10 06:55 PM

How about a Sel-Anatomica Titanico? It is waterproofed leather and has a cut out and makes it sort of like your "cheeks" are each riding on their own hammock. It was designed for long-distance riding. I have used it with good results.

I agree with those who say you just have to try a bunch. In the end, everyone is different and a saddle that looks comfortable often isn't.

hopperja 03-17-10 11:39 PM


Originally Posted by ddez (Post 10531789)
The little indents usually start to show pretty quick,certainly should have them with miles you have on it. Sounds like you havent been sitting on the back part where sit bones are supposed to sit,either that or your saddle is too narrow,with sit bones off the sides.(that would be painful, ask me how i know). Only other thing i can think of is that your bars are way lower than saddle,so that your not putting weight on back wide part, cause you should definately have indents.

After thousands of miles, I've decided there are two myths when it comes to Brooks saddles:
1- they break in in short mileage. At 4000 miles mine begin to break in, though they've always been at least as comfortable as any other seat I've used.

2- they develop sit bone indents in short order. While this may be true in some cases, it's certainly not true in my personal experience. I've got three Brooks B17s with miles ranging from 500 to 5100. I'm a clyde (my Cross Check is 56cm, so you know I'm not all that tall and I'm over 200 lbs), and NONE of them show sit bone indents. There are darker spots where my sitbones contact on the saddle (the one with 5100 miles) but NO indents. Because of the dark spots, I know I'm contacting the saddle in the right places. The other two (1200 miles and 500 miles) have no dark spots yet and no indents.

I have a Fisik Nisene on one of my mountain bikes, and like it a lot. It's light and comfortable. I think it would be too narrow for me for long rides though. The most time I've spent on it in one day was 2 hours.

Machka 03-18-10 01:42 AM


Originally Posted by hopperja (Post 10541938)
After thousands of miles, I've decided there are two myths when it comes to Brooks saddles:
1- they break in in short mileage. At 4000 miles mine begin to break in, though they've always been at least as comfortable as any other seat I've used.

2- they develop sit bone indents in short order. While this may be true in some cases, it's certainly not true in my personal experience. I've got three Brooks B17s with miles ranging from 500 to 5100. I'm a clyde (my Cross Check is 56cm, so you know I'm not all that tall and I'm over 200 lbs), and NONE of them show sit bone indents. There are darker spots where my sitbones contact on the saddle (the one with 5100 miles) but NO indents. Because of the dark spots, I know I'm contacting the saddle in the right places. The other two (1200 miles and 500 miles) have no dark spots yet and no indents.

How is that possible? Do you only ride it short distances on nice sunny days?

eofelis 03-18-10 12:07 PM

I have been using a Terry Liberator Ti Race saddle on my touring bike for about 5 years and I've been happy with it.

nancy sv 03-18-10 04:33 PM

Thanks all!

Road Fan 03-18-10 07:45 PM


Originally Posted by The Smokester (Post 10540716)
How about a Sel-Anatomica Titanico? It is waterproofed leather and has a cut out and makes it sort of like your "cheeks" are each riding on their own hammock. It was designed for long-distance riding. I have used it with good results.

I agree with those who say you just have to try a bunch. In the end, everyone is different and a saddle that looks comfortable often isn't.

There's also a new model available with no cutout. I like the Selle AnAtomica cutout, but I like the B17N Imperial, too.

hopperja 03-20-10 12:22 AM


Originally Posted by Machka (Post 10542082)
How is that possible? Do you only ride it short distances on nice sunny days?

Machka, first, I have a great amount of respect for you and value your opinion. Based on the dozens, possibly hundreds, of posts I've read of yours, you sound like you have a ton of knowledge gained from experience. I know I've said in other threads that I respect what you have to say. Given that, I have no idea how it's possible. I'm only conveying my observations from my own experience...

I live in the Pacific Northwest. I ride several days per week, rain or shine, year around. And, anyone who knows the PNW, they know it's wet here more often than not. So, I think it's fair to say over half of my miles (which I know aren't even in the same ballpark as the riding you do) are in the rain/drizzle.

As for short distances, that is relative. Compared to you, yes, my rides are very short. My typical ride is around 10 miles, with the longest being around 35 miles.

As for my Brooks: I have fenders, I use Sno Seal, and cover the saddle when it's raining (for a long time I used a plastic grocery bag, but recently I bought a Jandd cover that works nicely). I have never let them get wet intentionally (other than sweat),

George 03-20-10 07:30 AM

Just for the heck of it I thought I would try a different saddle. I got a Fizik Aliante and I put next to the B17 and it had the same curve in it. Then I flipped it over and it was the same size as the B17 minus rivets. I only have about 2000 miles on it and I don't know how long it will last, but it sure is comfortable. My longest day riding it is 3.5 hours and it still feels great. I talked to a lot of people who own the Aliante and they put centuries on the saddle with no problems at all. That's what made up my mind in buying one. I still have the B17 on my touring setup, but I believe I could put the Aliante on the bike and be just as comfortable. Dare I say, more comfortable. I think the Brooks may last longer, but I figure tires wear out, as saddles do and it's part of the maintenance.YMMV


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.