![]() |
Originally Posted by nancyj
(Post 11162384)
Wow read through those threads about the woman wrecking and dying from shimmy.
|
Originally Posted by BengeBoy
(Post 11168343)
I was intrigued by this post, and just to clarify for anyone else -- I think it refers to a link in the Adventure Cycling thread referenced hear about a woman who died in 2004 after (apparently) suffering severe shimmy on a downhill descent on a road bike. It's a good reminder of the dangers of encountering shimmy on high speed descents, but not necessarily relevant to any of the particular bikes mentioned here.
The question i have is, why is this not an issue with MTB's loaded with panniers since most MTBs are not designed for loads like that? That's why I was going for a touring specific bike and making it more mountain bike like. The frame bag idea is great I just don't know if I would get my custom bag in time for touring, and it is more expensive than panniers from MEC (I sold my Arkel recumbent panniers last year). |
Originally Posted by Aquakitty
(Post 11168497)
I read that post as well, before I even posted this thread as it comes up on Google. Not sure what to make of it. The guy comes across as a whiny blow hard who can't get over it, but at the same time it could be a real issue. .
|
1 Attachment(s)
A '4130' 29er for the win. I'm slowly buying my gear. Unemployed in California sucks.
Attachment 161315 |
4 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Aquakitty
(Post 11167646)
That's he first time I heard of that as well, very interesting idea to use only frame bags, I will certainly look into that.
BikePacking http://www.CarouselDesignWorks.com http://www.adventurecycling.org/ its even becoming mainstream http://www.adventurecycling.org/stor...ack-medium.cfm lots of ways to tour/camp |
Originally Posted by Aquakitty
(Post 11168497)
I read that post as well, before I even posted this thread as it comes up on Google. Not sure what to make of it. The guy comes across as a whiny blow hard who can't get over it, but at the same time it could be a real issue.
The question i have is, why is this not an issue with MTB's loaded with panniers since most MTBs are not designed for loads like that? That's why I was going for a touring specific bike and making it more mountain bike like. The frame bag idea is great I just don't know if I would get my custom bag in time for touring, and it is more expensive than panniers from MEC (I sold my Arkel recumbent panniers last year). it was a Salsa Moto Rapido with a SID fork, OMM racks, CrossMax wheelset, SRAM X.O groupo it was a very nice XC bike! it totally kicked ass in the dirt. as a race bike. as a loaded touring bike... not so good. I'm not totally sure what the deal was with that bike, but I think it was the fact that I chose a front rack that placed the panniers up high now days, I have a front rack for The Hunter that has both options for the panniers, high and low. (ultimate low rider from Old Man Mountain) no shimmies |
Ha! On that other thread when you said "tipi with wood burning stove" I thought you were joking... that's hilarious!
Thanks for the links, I am feeling dumb now thinking I needed some "pannier loving" specific bike for touring so I could clamp them down and not have anything rattle loose. I think I am most certainly going to go the bike packing route. I hate pannier racks anyway, but at the same time I am not the biggest fan of trailers off roading. I have a 2 wheel trailer that is fantastic for groceries and errands (once I brought home a computer chair in it) but a huge pain to lift over obstacles. On the roads panniers are not an issue but I discovered from my previous touring that I enjoy going off the beaten path more often then not... who needs rattly bulky panniers! I guess it kind of opens up what bikes I can pick now.
Originally Posted by AsanaCycles
(Post 11168827)
there's a whole movement in that exact direction.
BikePacking http://www.CarouselDesignWorks.com http://www.adventurecycling.org/ its even becoming mainstream http://www.adventurecycling.org/stor...ack-medium.cfm lots of ways to tour/camp |
Originally Posted by Aquakitty
(Post 11168497)
The frame bag idea is great I just don't know if I would get my custom bag in time for touring, and it is more expensive than panniers from MEC (I sold my Arkel recumbent panniers last year).
for me it was a process that is: touring often goes like this 1. pick the gear, and find the bags to cram it into 2. pick the bags, and find the gear to fit the bag. that is to say, you will probably always fill what baggage you choose. if you have 4 panniers, you will probably fill them with the "BikePacking" method, you have to be much more discriminate with what you choose. these days, lets say for instance touring Portland to LA in the next month, I'm pretty sure I could do that trip with just a front handle bar bag, and the big seatpost bag. maybe a backpack... thats a big maybe because the reality of that route and time of year is that there are towns every 30 miles or so, water is pretty much everywhere, Big Sur could pose some issues... but i live in this section, so its easy enough for me to simply ride 125 miles and go Monterey to Morro Bay... so gear, and packing comes down to time and resource management + ability & knowledge explicit and tacit reasoning... |
if you haven't already found this...
here's a big long Salsa Fargo thread: http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.ph...16#post7147916 |
Originally Posted by Aquakitty
(Post 11168855)
Ha! On that other thread when you said "tipi with wood burning stove" I thought you were joking... that's hilarious!
Thanks for the links, I am feeling dumb now thinking I needed some "pannier loving" specific bike for touring so I could clamp them down and not have anything rattle loose. I think I am most certainly going to go the bike packing route. I hate pannier racks anyway, but at the same time I am not the biggest fan of trailers off roading. I have a 2 wheel trailer that is fantastic for groceries and errands (once I brought home a computer chair in it) but a huge pain to lift over obstacles. On the roads panniers are not an issue but I discovered from my previous touring that I enjoy going off the beaten path more often then not... who needs rattly bulky panniers! I guess it kind of opens up what bikes I can pick now. he lives in Banff and makes bags! his part time biz is called Porcelain Rocket http://theporcelainrocket.wordpress.com/ http://www.orangegirlphotographs.com...ket-frame-bags http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Qk3citGkIY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPKVX...eature=related there is a ton of this kind of stuff some on my website too http://www.AsanaCycles.com no joke... tipi and stove http://www.youtube.com/user/SelfProp.../0/8dJtY1rsPXc and thats the 4 man I have an 8 man that I lived out of for 1.5yrs while using a BOB trailer I was working at the local hospital working the graveyard shift 7 days in a row with 7 days off during those 7 days I'd ride in one direction, then turn around and go back to work... |
Originally Posted by Aquakitty
(Post 11168855)
I hate pannier racks anyway.
Just sayin'. I'd be interested in your perspective. |
Originally Posted by chasm54
(Post 11169020)
Just as a matter of interest, why? My racks weigh hardly anything, and certainly don't compromise handling, or portability, etc. I can see how you might find panniers a bind, but I've never found that they actually impede my progress. Yes, you can't easily lift a bike loaded with 40lbs of gear, but that is a function of weight rather than the conformation of the bags. And I hate riding with a backpack...
Just sayin'. I'd be interested in your perspective. yes, it is a very interesting proposition and yes, I'll have to side with the BikePacking technique as to panniers and yes, I'd stand firm on my personal bias of the movement from 29er MTB to touring vs a Touring Bike to a MTB or in that matter a 29er period! why? I've grown up car less with a hippie dad on schwinn's and Ciocc's from hoboing around SoCal, Ventura, etc... to simply going to work, laundry, groceries, etc... generator lights baskets, et al... so here it is... frame bags are all about the way the weight is distributed and LIMITING you to not carrying too much ??? ya...the weight is up high stupid right? its the worst possible place right? typically, yes... but... the reality is that when you pick up a MTB with frame bags, you only have to pick it up just a few inches and let the top tube rotate into your hip ??? really... simply put; the bike lays into your side when you stop to get off of your bike to go over a log, or up a set of stairs... whatever you only have to pick the bike up a few inches and the bike rotates into your side the wheels simply splay out to the side pick up bike with right hand over toptube left hand on left handle bar pick up bike and push left hand side of handlebar the weight of the bike is in your hip, and the wheels have very little weight to leverage outward. bcz the weight goes into your hip try hoisting a loaded touring bike over something that is hip high the panniers, being low, make it almost impossible to leverage the wheels away from your side you literally have to pick the whole bike up and go over something another technique is to simply reach all the way down to the down tube and grab it with your right hand while you place the top tube into your arm pit pick up bike place nose of saddle ontop of your right shoulder hold bike with 1 hand yes... 1 hand stand up right and walk ??? really... its the craziest thing the backpack issue yes, I'll concede to that much and yes more storage is... or is not a solution typically on a paved ride, from town to town, I'm not too hot on a back pack but... offerings from WingNut Design, Ergon, etc... quiet honestly is a viable solution case in point, take for instance how many riders were using hydration packs during the Tour Divide obviously you'd try to limit the weight you put in your pack, as that weight transfers directly to your perineum packs are kind of cool there are things that I often times like to have on me, and in immediate grasp nutritionals, electronics... cell phone? <--- i.e. Portland to Ventura (i know it sucks, and I do dislike having my cell phone on tour, but often times, while on a Civil Tour, I end up taking calls. Simply put, sometimes I have to have those phone calls) its a major reason why I choose paved tours, vs something like the TDR. TDR... if you have biz that you have to tend to, its going to be very limited while en route. at least, on a paved tour, you can make those absolutely necessary calls, while en route. hands free while I've never broken a rack or wrecked a pannier on the TDR a buddy's rack did break off and go tumbling down the fire road at about 30mph... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-0YrbkCNJ4 (at the 5 min mark) racks and panniers never have a 100% solid connection neither do frame bags. panniers will have a small gap at the interface with the rack... in that gap, the panniers will "slap" back and forth a million little times on pavement, its usually not a big deal, as the smoothness of pave reduces the slapping as soon as you hit a fire road, its going to be smacking around over and over and over is that Morse Code coming from the panniers and racks? tick, tick, tick, tick... if it doesnt break, it will be a small miracle the BikeBacking Technique is soft the bags are soft the mountings are typically straps everything is soft basically everything conforms to shape(s) compression etc... so the bags squish against things. for the handlebar bag, typically it will rub against the headtube so every time you move the steertube the handlebar bag will rub, thats a hot spot the straps on the bike's frame, mud and grit collect... likely will rub the paint off of your bike. maybe apply electrical tape to those spots I'm not sure what else to parallel racks and panniers are like external frame packs of the 70's + boots and primus stoves? frame bags are like... bags without frames, and keens? on the pavement, a 29er shod in any kind of tyre in the "roadie"/700c realm is really fast. last year I rode Portland to Ventura on a set of Schwalbe Marathon Cross in 37c plus along the way, when I got to Arcata, I did the 12hrs of Humboldt and place 3rd with 12 laps, about 92 miles and over 10,000 of climbing obviously took off the bags I've done a bunch of rides to Ventura and LA (family) shod in WTB Vulpines (my favorite tyre), I can make it to Morro Bay (about 125 miles) in 9hrs. not busting my ass in the effort on a 29er with a 2.1' tyre and 48x11t gearing = about 127 gear inches compared to a road bike 53x11t 700x23c tyre = 116 gear inches so the 29er has more top end gear and being a MTB obviously has much lower gear plus its obviously a MTB so it can actually withstand the rigors of being in the dirt on the road at 50mph on a descent, like Devil's Slide on HWY 1, or coming down off of Liggett Pass the 29er with a 203mm front disc brake... and frame bags not panniers this set up is actually really fast light enough to bunny hop ??? ya... bunny hop things like uneven pavement cracks, etc... brakes big enough to simply put the binders on, and trail brake yup... like a motorcycle I use X.O gripshift with Avid BB7's this allows the rider to brake and shift at the same time so you can go down something really steep on the brakes, and shift downshift when you get to the bottom and have to go up i.e. gully, stream crossing, draw, etc... frame bags... AMTRAK everything fits inside the Amtrak Bike Box yes the Amtrak Bike Box is huge frame bags... no racks to deal with. simply put racks and panniers are more hardware hardware is a liability 1" wide nylon strap is very strong its just a different technique everything is strapped down vs everything is held up i.e. metal rods for rack tubing my brother works at PowerPlant Choppers in LA one of his favorite things to talk about is "Push and Pull" everything is push or pull at any given moment a lever is either push or pull push or pull racks are push frame bags are pull racks hold things up frame bags pull things in nylon strap vs metal rods holding things up + mounting hardware = slap = snap pulling things in = no slap = no snap metal vs nylon heavy vs light big vs small complex vs simple racks = hard angles bags = soft rounds crashing with racks is more apt to bend/break something crashing with frame bags, is usually not an issue |
Do any of you who use packs and not panniers use wildland fire fighting packs?
I know a lot of K9 Search dog handlers like packs like these instead of those that sit higher on the back. More weight on hips, less on shoulders - more stable and very comfortable. http://www.truenorthgear.com/product...g.php?path=0_1 |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by nancyj
(Post 11169456)
Do any of you who use packs and not panniers use wildland fire fighting packs?
I know a lot of K9 Search dog handlers like packs like these instead of those that sit higher on the back. More weight on hips, less on shoulders - more stable and very comfortable. http://www.truenorthgear.com/product...g.php?path=0_1 http://www.wingnutgear.com/press.cfm?id=16 I've also been using a Platypus gravity filter but I'm very much inclined to change to a Sawyer filter http://www.sawyerproducts.com/images/SP161p-hr.GIF another decent little filter is Clear2Go http://www.clear2o.com/ with Clear2Go, there is almost no reason to never have a water filter with you water filters.... a game changer... not doubt |
a piece on my buddy Jeff Boatman of Carousel Designs
http://mysierramountaintimes.com/?p=3276 |
Originally Posted by chasm54
(Post 11169020)
Just as a matter of interest, why? My racks weigh hardly anything, and certainly don't compromise handling, or portability, etc. I can see how you might find panniers a bind, but I've never found that they actually impede my progress. Yes, you can't easily lift a bike loaded with 40lbs of gear, but that is a function of weight rather than the conformation of the bags. And I hate riding with a backpack...
Just sayin'. I'd be interested in your perspective. Well, my last panniers were Arkles. The panniers were great, I should say its the racks that are annoying. For some reason I have been using the term interchangeably. On paper it seems a lot simpler to have frame bags and less weight for offroading. I would think panniers offroad on trails trying to haul your bike up hills would be a bit of a pain in the rear compared to a lighter bike frame setup. |
Originally Posted by Aquakitty
(Post 11170718)
On paper it seems a lot simpler to have frame bags and less weight for offroading. I would think panniers offroad on trails trying to haul your bike up hills would be a bit of a pain in the rear compared to a lighter bike frame setup. |
As I look back at the thread which is interesting to me because I used to do touring on "civilized roads" (though maybe the animals in the woods are really much more civilized) but really liked the offroad stuff and am planning on buying a frist mtn bike soon...........anyway.........it sounds like the OP is not talking about too many situatoin where the loaded bike would have to be carried.
I do recall some times when we had to carry our loaded touring bikes short distances and they went over our shoulders with the hand grabbing the downtube but not sure the mtn bike type of frame could "fit" there. I carried a toe clip strap to keep the front wheel from turning under some parking/carrying situations |
Originally Posted by Aquakitty
(Post 11168497)
The question i have is, why is this not an issue with MTB's loaded with panniers since most MTBs are not designed for loads like that? That's why I was going for a touring specific bike and making it more mountain bike like.
I had the shimmy problem with my old road bike and the knees grasping the top tube worked in my case. All we had available were rim brakes back then and the issue was overheating and blowing the tires so you sucked it in flew. I think everyone on that route in the old 70s bikes who also had front panniers was dealing with similar issues. I gather disc brakes may be better for this but that you still can't use them as a drag brake like you could a drum brake. No disc brake experience but I would put that into consideration. I think I would want them anyway. |
Originally Posted by Aquakitty
(Post 11164581)
Actually i was indeed eying the pug up, I have wanted one of those since I first saw them. My only concern is that it would be rather complicated to get built and theres zero tire choice with the large marge (to me the point of the pugsley is to use those rims). What is the deal with the special dishing required? is that for any pugsly frame or is it just if you use disk brakes.
You can use Endomorphs, Larry's [both Surly 4" tires] as well as a number of other tires [Big Apples, Marathon XRs, Extremes] on Large Marge rims. I started with Endos and have a set of Larry's to put on this winter. The tire selection issue really isn't one...quite a few good choices. You need offset wheels to match the chainline of the Pugsley. Not a big deal...your LBS will handle that when they build your hoops. |
Surly Pugsley.
Our regular poster Vik has one and gone from BC to Mexico - all offroad on 4" wide Endos! ;) |
And hey, Surly now sells complete builds...
|
The Surly Forum
http://forums.mtbr.com/forumdisplay.php?f=111 |
Trekking bike, trekking Bars.. IG hub drivetrain Magura Hydrostop brakes
http://www.cyclofiend.com/working/20...clark1008.html |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.