Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Wider Tires for Trek 520

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Wider Tires for Trek 520

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-12, 01:03 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Trek_geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, VA to Fort Belvoir by VRE and bike
Posts: 117

Bikes: 2006 Trek 1000 SL, 1995 Performance 505 MTB, 2012 Trek 520 (my daily commuter)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wider Tires for Trek 520

The 520 comes with 700x32. Wonder how wide I could go with if I plan on more dirt roads and hard packed rail-trails (like the GAP and C&O together). I've ridden with my pressure down at 60 psi with the 32s on crushed lime stone rail-trail but didn't have a load.
Trek_geek is offline  
Old 07-25-12, 01:48 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Trek_geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, VA to Fort Belvoir by VRE and bike
Posts: 117

Bikes: 2006 Trek 1000 SL, 1995 Performance 505 MTB, 2012 Trek 520 (my daily commuter)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Looking on Sheldon Brown bicycle page and researching my Bontrager 622x18 rims I found a chart that
17mm rim - tire widths of 25 28 32 35 37
19mm rim - tire widths of 28 32 35 37 40 44
So it looks like I could go all the way to 700x42s if they would fit under my Planet Bike Fenders
Might be better to try 38s first.
Trek_geek is offline  
Old 07-25-12, 06:06 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Jim Kukula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 589

Bikes: Thorn Nomad Mk2, 1996 Trek 520, Workcycles Transport, Brompton

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The tire width to rim width relationship seems to be shifting territory:

https://www.schwalbetires.com/tech_in...dimensions#rim

One important thing with fat tires on narrow rims is that you really have to keep the pressure down. I have 50mm tires on 19mm rims but I only put about 50 psi in them. A fat tire is basically pulling narrow rims apart and with enough pressure you can actually split the rim.
Jim Kukula is offline  
Old 07-25-12, 06:54 PM
  #4  
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
Originally Posted by Trek_geek
Looking on Sheldon Brown bicycle page and researching my Bontrager 622x18 rims I found a chart that
17mm rim - tire widths of 25 28 32 35 37
19mm rim - tire widths of 28 32 35 37 40 44
So it looks like I could go all the way to 700x42s if they would fit under my Planet Bike Fenders
Might be better to try 38s first.
Just remember that Sheldon Brown uses inside rim width, not the more common outside dimension.
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 07-25-12, 06:59 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Jim Kukula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 589

Bikes: Thorn Nomad Mk2, 1996 Trek 520, Workcycles Transport, Brompton

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Yeah the outer width of my rims is 25mm, it's the inner width that is 19mm.

https://www.komponentix.de/onlineshop...dra_301629.htm

Definitely a crucial distinction!
Jim Kukula is offline  
Old 07-25-12, 11:18 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern VT
Posts: 2,200

Bikes: recumbent & upright

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 73 Post(s)
Liked 40 Times in 31 Posts
ride on dirt roads a lot - have 37 mm Marathons on my 520, they fit fine and are comfortable at 60 psi (probably depends upon your load). not sure a wider tire would fit and allow for stone clearance.
martianone is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 01:32 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Trek_geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, VA to Fort Belvoir by VRE and bike
Posts: 117

Bikes: 2006 Trek 1000 SL, 1995 Performance 505 MTB, 2012 Trek 520 (my daily commuter)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Barrettscv
Just remember that Sheldon Brown uses inside rim width, not the more common outside dimension.
So the designator 622x18, is the 18 the inside dimension?
Trek_geek is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 01:39 PM
  #8  
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
Originally Posted by Trek_geek
So the designator 622x18, is the 18 the inside dimension?
In this case, yes.

Most road bikes in the showroom have 17mm inside and 19mm outside. Most touring bikes and hybrids have 18-21mm inside and 20-24mm outside.
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 01:42 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times in 2,342 Posts
isn't all that width gonna slow you down?
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 02:57 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Jim Kukula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 589

Bikes: Thorn Nomad Mk2, 1996 Trek 520, Workcycles Transport, Brompton

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
On a very smooth road, or a track, it's most efficient to run a skinny tire at high pressure. But as the surface gets rougher, it is actually more efficient to get some suspension from lower tire pressure. Wider tires are actually more efficient at a given pressure, but they can't handle the higher pressures that skinny tires can. But once you want suspension & therefore lower pressure, wider tires are what you want. The suspension keeps the bike and rider and any luggage from bouncing around and absorbing energy. Of course you can use arms and legs to provide suspension too and still have high pressure tires. But that gets to be a lot of work, i.e. not so efficient.
Jim Kukula is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 03:06 PM
  #11  
Collector of Useless Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The other consideration is how wide the space between your chainstays is- I like about 5 mm on each side of the tire of clearance, minimum, so a small wobble in the rim or tire won't cause the tire to rub on the chainstay.
cycle_maven is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 03:19 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
tarwheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 8,896

Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 196 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
I rode on the C&O with 700x32 cross tires (Ritchey Cross Max Pro) and felt that they were perfectly suited for the terrain and surface. If your frame will fit wider tires, go for it but I don't think 32s are too narrow for the C&O or the GAP. More important, IMHO, is having some tread in case the trail gets wet or muddy.
tarwheel is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 03:27 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 8,546
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I rode the C&O fully loaded with 28s.

I've had Conti TravelContact 35s on my 2006 Trek 520 with fenders.

Hope those random data points help!
valygrl is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 03:38 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Thulsadoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cape Vincent, NY
Posts: 1,392

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac Expert, 2002 TREK 520, Schwinn Mesa WINTER BIKE, Huffy Rock Creek 29er, 1970s-era Ross ten speed. All my bikes are highly modified(except the Tarmac) yet functional, and generally look beat to ****. .

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Liked 88 Times in 51 Posts
I had a set of Schwalbe Marathon Plus 32s on my 520 and they just barely fit with fenders, but those tires are big. I don't know if I'd want to try and go bigger than 35s in any tire though, if you are running fenders.
Thulsadoom is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 03:52 PM
  #15  
-
 
seeker333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,865

Bikes: yes!

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Liked 38 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Barrettscv
...Most road bikes in the showroom have 17mm inside and 19mm outside. Most touring bikes and hybrids have 18-21mm inside and 20-24mm outside.
Generally there is a 4-5mm difference between inside and outside width, since the rim walls are >2mm thick.

Measure a few rims, road or mtb, you'll see this is true.
seeker333 is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 10:15 PM
  #16  
Road Trekker
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NW WA
Posts: 40

Bikes: Bike Friday

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I wonder if the amount of tire clearance depends on the age of the 520? Mine was a 2004, and Pasela 35s barely fit under the fenders. I would occasionally have problems with gravel getting caught on the rear.
trek2 is offline  
Old 07-27-12, 12:09 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Trek_geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, VA to Fort Belvoir by VRE and bike
Posts: 117

Bikes: 2006 Trek 1000 SL, 1995 Performance 505 MTB, 2012 Trek 520 (my daily commuter)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for all your insight and experience. I am going to stick with the Bontrager 700x32 that came with the bike when I ride the High Bridge Rail Trail later this fall. It's a 32 mile crushed stone surface. I'll just lower the tire pressure a bit to start and see how that works. It will be an out and back overnight with a friend so I won't to loaded to heavy.
Trek_geek is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pistard
Bicycle Mechanics
6
01-31-16 06:52 PM
SkylarG
General Cycling Discussion
4
06-24-15 10:47 AM
mstraus
Commuting
21
03-25-14 07:52 PM
billydonn
Fifty Plus (50+)
12
06-08-10 07:38 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.