![]() |
Originally Posted by Walter S
(Post 15843675)
I don't have any empirical data to reference but I'd have to guess "professional" bike thieves like that are rare. Used bicycles just don't bring enough money.
|
Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets
(Post 15843740)
They exist in big cities. NYC, Chicago, Atlanta, Miami, Los Angeles, SF, Portland, Seattle.
I doubt it's all that difficult to average a couple hundred a day if you know which bikes to target. Unfortunately police departments barely have the resources to care much about car theft, let alone bicycle theft. My faith in the judicial system went down a few notches after all that. |
Originally Posted by Walter S
(Post 15843180)
This looks like a promising device. http://www.gizmag.com/spybike-gps-tracker/22999/
Just read the web page, that's all I know. If the bike is hidden in a van/other, true you can't get a track on it. But presumably the thief won't leave it out of gps coverage permanently. Once they get out the street again, you've got the ability to track it. The device notifies via SMS when it detects vibrations. I wonder how proven this is. I'll look for testimonials... If you're looking at low-end bikes stolen by a casual thief it's probably not worth the expense, and high end bikes are likely to be stolen by sophisticated thieves who would be on the lookout for tracking devices. |
Originally Posted by wahoonc
(Post 15843541)
I consider that an oxymoron...
All bicycle thieves I have come up against were not particular smart, in most cases they were opportunists looking for a quick buck. Aaron :) I'm sure once in a while a casual opportunist does manage to make off with a Trek Project One or an S-Works Venge or something. I suspect most of the time the casual opportunist would look at the funny pedals on such a bike and leave it alone, and steal something with regular platforms so they know they can ride off on it, and in the process restrict themselves to the lower end of the market. The more organised thieves are unlikely to bother with a $200 bike because there's more money to be made targetting the high-end stuff, and I'd imagine they'd look to move in cycling circles for a while so they didn't look too conspicuous admiring high end bikes, or even riding a high-end bike they had stolen. Even if they just ride it round the corner before chucking it in the back of a van it looks less unusual to see someone in full cycling kit riding a decent bike then putting it in the van and driving off, than it does to see a guy in regular clothing pushing something high end. |
Originally Posted by contango
(Post 15843918)
The thief who chucks it in a van could take a look over it at their leisure to see if there's anything on it that could be a GPS tracker, or just leave it trying to find a mobile signal until the battery is dead (looking for a signal seems to be particularly bad for mobile device batteries).
If you're looking at low-end bikes stolen by a casual thief it's probably not worth the expense, and high end bikes are likely to be stolen by sophisticated thieves who would be on the lookout for tracking devices. A sophisticated thief won't bother with anything but high end bikes. But sophisticated thieves are not as common as casual thieves. So the owner of a high end bicycle is subject to theft most commonly by casual thieves, and then sometimes by sophisticated thieves. No? |
Originally Posted by Walter S
(Post 15843996)
I'm not sure I accept that. A casual thief might steal any bicycle, not just a high end bike. But they won't reject a high end bike. They just don't limit themselves to high end bikes.
A sophisticated thief won't bother with anything but high end bikes. But sophisticated thieves are not as common as casual thieves. So the owner of a high end bicycle is subject to theft most commonly by casual thieves, and then sometimes by sophisticated thieves. No? If a casual thief is just looking for some free transport home, or a way to get $50 for his next fix or some such he's unlikely to be bothered about what he steals as long as he's unlikely to get caught. If he's not sure about riding the bike with funny pedals he's perhaps thinking he might get caught, in which case riding the bike nearby with the nice flat pedals he knows how to work probably seems like a safer bet. If all he wants is a free ride home or $50 for some drugs or whatever it's not like he needs to steal a decent bike for the extra reward. |
I do have this great idea for a product. I have not even touched how it works but more like day dreaming about it.
Think about it..... you buy this unit, stash it where ever you want on your bike and when you go into a store for example, you will click a button, the GPS will turn on but not at 100%, and you can go into the store. Say someone comes out and steals your bike then the vibration turns on the GPS 100% and sends you a text to your phone to let you know. Damn, it could work! |
Perhaps you need to find out what the police use and buy that. But, I suspect that they are not going to tell you since they do not know if you are a thief trying to learn more about the technology.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...ieves/2351903/ http://www.uwpd.wisc.edu/crime-preve...ke-program.htm Alternatively, get a good lock. |
Originally Posted by chefisaac
(Post 15844616)
I do have this great idea for a product. I have not even touched how it works but more like day dreaming about it.
Think about it..... you buy this unit, stash it where ever you want on your bike and when you go into a store for example, you will click a button, the GPS will turn on but not at 100%, and you can go into the store. Say someone comes out and steals your bike then the vibration turns on the GPS 100% and sends you a text to your phone to let you know. Damn, it could work! |
Originally Posted by contango
(Post 15844808)
I'd still rather use a decent lock to stop the scumbag stealing it in the first place, than hoping I can get it back once it's gone.
|
Originally Posted by chefisaac
(Post 15845067)
In Europe they have this cool that that connects somewhere under the back breaks. I've only seen on pick of it but it locks the back tire so you cannot move it. I love the idea.
Aaron :) |
Originally Posted by wahoonc
(Post 15845246)
It has a variety of names but it usually known as a ring lock or frame lock. I use the Axa Defender on my city bikes with the optional chain. If the bike is going to be left for long length of time or I am uncomfortable with the area I may add a second heavy chain lock or a U-lock. They are great for a quick stop.
Aaron :) |
Originally Posted by wahoonc
(Post 15845246)
It has a variety of names but it usually known as a ring lock or frame lock. I use the Axa Defender on my city bikes with the optional chain. If the bike is going to be left for long length of time or I am uncomfortable with the area I may add a second heavy chain lock or a U-lock. They are great for a quick stop.
Aaron :) |
Originally Posted by chefisaac
(Post 15845946)
Aaron: Where does it attach to? Any drawbacks at all?
Aaron :) http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8497/8...a0c445e4_c.jpg http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8227/8...8f04f811_z.jpg |
Originally Posted by contango
(Post 15844808)
I'd still rather use a decent lock to stop the scumbag stealing it in the first place, than hoping I can get it back once it's gone.
|
Originally Posted by Walter S
(Post 15848901)
Having a good lock is definitely a must. But we all know locks can be defeated. Multiple lines of defense can help. So in spite of all the good suggested alternatives to something like a BikeSpy, there is still a role for such a device. When the thief thinks they are home free because they defeated the lock, there's another surprise waiting - like me showing up and stealing the bicycle back.
Going to steal the bicycle back is great in theory but I don't know I'd want to be hanging around trying to figure out which of a few bikes was mine so I could cut a new lock and steal it, knowing the person who had it was likely to be a criminal. |
Originally Posted by Walter S
(Post 15848901)
Having a good lock is definitely a must. But we all know locks can be defeated. Multiple lines of defense can help. So in spite of all the good suggested alternatives to something like a BikeSpy, there is still a role for such a device. When the thief thinks they are home free because they defeated the lock, there's another surprise waiting - like me showing up and stealing the bicycle back.
The community I live in licenses bicycles. I license mine as proof of ownership. I do not need to show documentation when I buy the license, I do not know if they are checking against a database or not. But, if it is stolen, that is pretty good evidence that it was mine at one time. When the license expires, I do not bother to renew it as I think that once licensed, that is adequate. A friend of mine, his daughter's bike was stolen. She found it the next day listed on Craigs list with a few accessories like the rack changed. Since she had no proof of ownership, the police would not assist her. Years ago my dad's bike was stolen, the police found it and returned it to him because the license on the bike told the police whom to return it to. |
Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
(Post 15851463)
The thief may have already sold it to an unsuspecting new owner, they will consider you a thief if you find it and steal (or attempt to steal) it back. It is much better to have proof of ownership and contact police first.
The community I live in licenses bicycles. I license mine as proof of ownership. I do not need to show documentation when I buy the license, I do not know if they are checking against a database or not. But, if it is stolen, that is pretty good evidence that it was mine at one time. When the license expires, I do not bother to renew it as I think that once licensed, that is adequate. A friend of mine, his daughter's bike was stolen. She found it the next day listed on Craigs list with a few accessories like the rack changed. Since she had no proof of ownership, the police would not assist her. Years ago my dad's bike was stolen, the police found it and returned it to him because the license on the bike told the police whom to return it to. If they could prove ownership of it to my satisfaction then I'd accept I'd been ripped off. That standard would be very high. If they brought a police officer who was willing to give me a detailed receipt for the bike they'd get it back. Anything less than that and I'd regard them as some lowlife trying to steal my new bike. |
Originally Posted by contango
(Post 15852149)
Good points here. If I'd bought a bike and a couple of days later some random person turned up claiming it was theirs I'd want a lot more than their word before handing it over.
If they could prove ownership of it to my satisfaction then I'd accept I'd been ripped off. That standard would be very high. If they brought a police officer who was willing to give me a detailed receipt for the bike they'd get it back. Anything less than that and I'd regard them as some lowlife trying to steal my new bike. When I do heavy maintenance/tear downs I add personal information to a variety of hidden locations. Aaron :) |
Originally Posted by wahoonc
(Post 15854636)
How about a picture of the serial number with EXIF info? I log ALL of my bikes with pictures.
When I do heavy maintenance/tear downs I add personal information to a variety of hidden locations. Aaron :) Hidden personal information in hidden locations would be more convincing but you'd still have to cover the base of proving it was stolen from you. If you did a major teardown of the bike, left your information in a variety of locations, then sold the bike you'd potentially have a situation where someone else was riding a bike with your personal information hidden throughout it despite them being the lawful owner as they bought it from you. It would be a pretty easy scam to hide personal information about an accomplice throughout the bike, then sell the bike, then have your accomplice turn up with a police officer describing all the places he had hidden his personal information as "proof" it had been stolen from him. |
Originally Posted by contango
(Post 15855547)
A photo would indicate you had had the bike in your possession at some point, the EXIF is easily falsified. It wouldn't prove you were ever the lawful owner of it - a thief could flip the bike over, take a picture, change the date in the EXIF to several months previously and claim to be the owner.
Hidden personal information in hidden locations would be more convincing but you'd still have to cover the base of proving it was stolen from you. If you did a major teardown of the bike, left your information in a variety of locations, then sold the bike you'd potentially have a situation where someone else was riding a bike with your personal information hidden throughout it despite them being the lawful owner as they bought it from you. It would be a pretty easy scam to hide personal information about an accomplice throughout the bike, then sell the bike, then have your accomplice turn up with a police officer describing all the places he had hidden his personal information as "proof" it had been stolen from him. Aaron :) |
Originally Posted by wahoonc
(Post 15855600)
I would be hard pressed to provide full receipts for most of my bikes. I primarily ride vintage that were purchased from a variety of sources; private party, ebay, auctions, and thrift stores. Most of my bikes are very distinctive compared to what is out there today. And most have been customized. I seldom sell bikes. But as I stated earlier I log all of my serial numbers. By EXIF data I meant more than just the date, to include the camera and location. FWIW if someone is willing to go to the level of scamming you describe there isn't much that can be done about it.
Aaron :) Fiddling EXIF information really is child's play. It's easy enough to add or edit the EXIF using Photoshop or any number of other software packages. You could add or remove location information, change the camera, do all sorts of stuff, within just a few seconds. If you'd added location data then assuming the background was easily identifiable in the picture it would at least suggest the picture was relatively unaltered - it would at least provide some convincing evidence that the bike had been photographed at the claimed location at some point in time (and depending on things like vegetation, tree sizes etc) you could possibly suggest the year was genuine. But all this goes way past any proceedings likely to be considered for a low value bike, and unless there's a background that could be used to support the date information you could put anything you wanted in there. If you'd had a $10,000 bike stolen and could provide a pile of pieces of circumstantial evidence that it was yours then hopefully they would all add up and you'd get the bike back. If it was a $500 bike in question it's hard to see courts having enough interest in the proceedings to look over the evidence in such great detail. The quality of the evidence might be the same but getting the police to pursue a lower value theft could be the tricky part. |
If you do do that and it does happen PLEEEEEEEASSEEEE don't be a hero and try to do your own spec-ops mission in the middle of the night trying to get it back because the police aren't in a hurry to help you :crash:
You'd probably be better off throwing that money in the bank for the day you will have to buy a new one because it got stolen..... |
Originally Posted by contango
(Post 15855687)
And therein lies the problem. I suspect most people don't keep the receipts for their bikes forever so proving current ownership becomes all but impossible. If it's a very distinctive bike you could end up with little more than one man's word against another's over who owns the bike, but getting the police involved in a he-said-she-said situation could prove tricky.
Fiddling EXIF information really is child's play. It's easy enough to add or edit the EXIF using Photoshop or any number of other software packages. You could add or remove location information, change the camera, do all sorts of stuff, within just a few seconds. If you'd added location data then assuming the background was easily identifiable in the picture it would at least suggest the picture was relatively unaltered - it would at least provide some convincing evidence that the bike had been photographed at the claimed location at some point in time (and depending on things like vegetation, tree sizes etc) you could possibly suggest the year was genuine. But all this goes way past any proceedings likely to be considered for a low value bike, and unless there's a background that could be used to support the date information you could put anything you wanted in there. If you'd had a $10,000 bike stolen and could provide a pile of pieces of circumstantial evidence that it was yours then hopefully they would all add up and you'd get the bike back. If it was a $500 bike in question it's hard to see courts having enough interest in the proceedings to look over the evidence in such great detail. The quality of the evidence might be the same but getting the police to pursue a lower value theft could be the tricky part. I have managed to recover a few of my stolen bikes over the years, in all the cases I had a police report with the serial numbers listed from the original theft. One was at a pawn shop, one I caught the brat that probably stole it riding it, the other I found along side an empty house several blocks away from mine. The pawn shop had to return the bike because they did not want to get stuck with a receiving stolen property charge. The brat made the mistake of parking the bike at the local stop and rob store and I slapped a lock on it and called the cops. He claimed that some man gave it to him. The other one I called the police department and told them that I had recovered it, I doubt they even made a note on the file. Aaron :) |
Originally Posted by wahoonc
(Post 15857834)
I have yet to have the police interested in much of any type of theft... :notamused: I gave them pictures of the clowns that stole a bunch of stuff out of our barn, some of which ended up at the local scrap yard. The cops knew who they were and seemed to care less. I think the eventually ended up in jail because they broke into the wrong house and the owner put one of them in the hospital with a bullet wound.
I have managed to recover a few of my stolen bikes over the years, in all the cases I had a police report with the serial numbers listed from the original theft. One was at a pawn shop, one I caught the brat that probably stole it riding it, the other I found along side an empty house several blocks away from mine. The pawn shop had to return the bike because they did not want to get stuck with a receiving stolen property charge. The brat made the mistake of parking the bike at the local stop and rob store and I slapped a lock on it and called the cops. He claimed that some man gave it to him. The other one I called the police department and told them that I had recovered it, I doubt they even made a note on the file. Aaron :) Sadly the police seem disinterested in "low level crime", presumably because it makes their stats look better. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.