Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

STI 105 levers with SLX crankset. It work! (With some mods)

Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

STI 105 levers with SLX crankset. It work! (With some mods)

Old 12-02-14, 04:59 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
STI 105 levers with SLX crankset. It work! (With some mods)

If you want drop bar STI shifter with a super low ratio, this post here may catch your attention. I've tested it for a week by now and the shifting is as crisp as with my 105 crankset. I still can't believe it is working so well. I was expecting some lag while changing gear but no.

I'll still solder a little plate between the two fork of the derailleur just for safety, but my chain never dropped for the week I've used it.

Mountain Crankset vs STI Groupset / It?s Alive! | Cycle/Naturel
Carlp is offline  
Old 12-02-14, 05:39 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Doug64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,485
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 830 Times in 433 Posts
I believe that one of the posible reasons you had to cut your derailleur is because of the increased chainline whern installing the mtn crankset on the bike. Road bikes are usually set up with a 45 mm chainline and mountain cranks with a 50 mm chainline. The usual method of putting mtn cranks on a road or touring bike is to use a shorter bottom bracket to maintain a 45-46 mm chainline. That is the reason a lot of us use square taper bottom brackets; there are more choices of bottom bracket length.

However, I think the primary reason for needing to cut the derailleur is a 42/32/24 crank combination. That derailleur will not take less than an 11 tooth difference between the big and middle chainrings without the backplate rubbing on the middle ring when shifting to the big gear. If you would have gone to a 44/32/22 it would have worked well, with a 12 tooth difference, and would not require cutting the derailleur.

However, you did get it to work

I've put this combination, 44/32/22 with an 11-34 cassette, on several bikes and it works well with both 105 and Tiagra shifters. IMO the Tiagra 4503 front derailleur is probably the most versatile FD out there. All this may not be too relevant because I'm basing my opinions on 9 speed setups, and I believe your setup is a 10 speed. I think I'd have fallen out of love with the Hollowtech bottom bracket or see if the large chainring could have been replaced with a 44 T.


Last edited by Doug64; 12-02-14 at 07:16 PM.
Doug64 is offline  
Old 12-02-14, 05:56 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times in 861 Posts
The Ka thunk throw of front S-T-I between shifts is what it is.. , then relies on cage shape to not drag cross chaining, if you stay within the limits set out for You.

as -T,-I, stands for total integration breaking up the package was not what they had in Mind.

Enjoy your experimentation.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 12-02-14, 09:34 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I did shave off some of the cage to be able to get it lower on the seat tube. It was touching the chainstay. The derailleur was to high. I'm mad they haven't thought about people like me who want to do that... Even with 44, the cage would have been about half of a inch to high to shift properly. The capacity, as the chain line wasn't that bothering to me. I adjusted the line with spacer on the crank axle and the capacity of the front wasn't that far from spec. And a poor shifting shimano is always better than a very good 10spd Sram red 2011
Carlp is offline  
Old 12-03-14, 07:43 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
edthesped's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 745
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
That looks to be an AWOL. I tried to make the Tiagra 4503 work on my AWOL and eventually threw in the towel. I think the seat tube angle and chainline both combine to make the set up difficult. I'm thinking a braze on FD with a SRAM wide spacing adapter would help, see Amazon link below. I am now running a 105 triple on a 45 mm chainline and all is fine with one exception, if I run 2" 29'er tires I only have a few mm clearance between the derailleur and the sidewall of the tire when in the lowest gear, not a problem unless I have a truing issue on the road. I'm really starting to feel the bike is designed for a 47.5 mm minimum chainline and a double crankset.

Amazon.com : Sram Mountain Bicycle Front Derailleur Braze-on Wide Spacing Adaptor : Sports & Outdoors
edthesped is offline  
Old 12-05-14, 08:43 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's definitely an Awol Comp frame. I'm pretty sure the only way to make it work well is to shave of the excess of derailleur fork in order to not interfere with the chainstay. Also, since it's the Comp, I could extend the dropout far enough to clear the front derailleur and avoid rubbing when my bike was "all 105". Now it should only be better.

I'm getting my derailleur brazed. stay tune for the update
Carlp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crandolph
Bicycle Mechanics
13
07-23-18 09:55 AM
mstateglfr
Touring
17
04-14-16 11:22 AM
yipyipyip
Bicycle Mechanics
5
04-09-15 03:04 PM
justin70
Bicycle Mechanics
5
01-22-12 12:31 AM
metalheart44
Bicycle Mechanics
5
05-08-11 12:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.