Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

v-brake options for a touring bike

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

v-brake options for a touring bike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-15, 02:29 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,441
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by BigAura
Yes they do. The long pull is a mechanical advantage and easily perceived. It's like saying low mountain gearing has no additional hill climbing power because you could climb with higher gears.
Not with road levers they don't. There isn't any problem running vs and the intended levers, just not a good solution on drops. I think there is more coherence on brakes in CX threads, and from that I gather I need to get up to date on mini VS, though they seem to have enough disadvantages that there would be

little reason to shift from working Cants. They do make long pull road levers but they aren't efficient and have very bad ergo. And in any case there are smarter options like Discs or self energizing brakes.

I don't normally have problems with brakes on touring bikes. I normally am not going that fast, and I don't have trouble stopping, and there usually aren't a lot of people around. I have bought the best brakes I could get, dang the cost, just because I don't ever want to have problems. I am in the weight zone loaded where I have to consider tandem brake ideas.
MassiveD is offline  
Old 03-22-15, 06:03 AM
  #27  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Bend, IN (U.S.A.)
Posts: 476

Bikes: Priority Continuum Onyx; Hunter CX

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by MassiveD
They do make long pull road levers but they aren't efficient and have very bad ergo.
This has not been my experience with the linear-brake specific Tektro RL 520 levers. I think they are incredibly comfortable, the set up with my Avid Single Digit 5 linear-pull brakes was super easy, and the stopping power is fantastic.

On my CX bike I'm perfectly happy using them off road, which was never the case with the cantilevers with which I started*, but now I feel comfortable and confident braking from the drops or on the hoods.

As I've said, I wouldn't try to convince someone who is happy with cantilever brakes to switch to linear-pull, but for someone like myself who is interested in switching to linear-pull (and doesn't want to use brifters), I'd say the labor investment in changing to proper levers is well worth it. (And, I'd say the only real issue with switching levers is the need to rewrap the bars, but even that really isn't a big deal... especially if one is about due anyway.)

* I readily admit that my bad experience with cantilevers may have been due to not having the idea angle in the straddle cable. I was using Shimano cantis that came with two sets of pre-configured straddle cables (I believe as a precaution intended to make it harder for the straddle cable to disengage). Before I switched to linear-pull brakes I considered switching to standard straddle cables for which I could experiment with the angle more, but at that point I was frustrated, needed to rewrap my bars anyway, and decided to make the full switch to linear-pull brakes.

Last edited by Derailed; 03-22-15 at 09:10 AM.
Derailed is offline  
Old 03-22-15, 08:56 AM
  #28  
 
BigAura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chapin, SC
Posts: 3,423

Bikes: all steel stable: surly world troller, paris sport fixed, fuji ss

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 623 Post(s)
Liked 55 Times in 33 Posts
Originally Posted by MassiveD
Not with road levers they don't. There isn't any problem running vs and the intended levers, just not a good solution on drops. I think there is more coherence on brakes in CX threads, and from that I gather I need to get up to date on mini VS, though they seem to have enough disadvantages that there would be

little reason to shift from working Cants. They do make long pull road levers but they aren't efficient and have very bad ergo. And in any case there are smarter options like Discs or self energizing brakes.

I don't normally have problems with brakes on touring bikes. I normally am not going that fast, and I don't have trouble stopping, and there usually aren't a lot of people around. I have bought the best brakes I could get, dang the cost, just because I don't ever want to have problems. I am in the weight zone loaded where I have to consider tandem brake ideas.
These Tektro's are what I and others are talking about.

Last edited by BigAura; 03-22-15 at 04:36 PM.
BigAura is offline  
Old 03-22-15, 09:21 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ncscott
I am thinking about upgrading my brakes on my Surly LHT from cantilever to v brakes (linear pull). V's are easier to adjust is my reasoning. It appears that for 30 dollars I can either get v-brakes compatible with my levers or levers compatible with a set of cheap v brakes I already own. Both options would need new cables. The bike is primarily for commuting but I always want to keep it available for a tour.
Is there an advantage to mini-v's vs traditional v's?
Thanks,
While on the plus side the mini-Vs can be used with standard pull road levers per what I've read, both the mini-V and standard linear pull brakes can have interference problems with fenders and/or large tires at the cross over point and/or at the edge of a fender. I'm also considering changing to linear pull on one of my touring bikes.

My tandem used standard Ultegra STI road levers with Travel Agents mounted on the linear pull brakes and performance was flawless. Many don't like the looks of this arrangement.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 03-22-15, 08:26 PM
  #30  
www.Click-Stand.com
 
tomn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Posts: 374

Bikes: Owner built touring & tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have used XTR V-Brakes and V-Brake specific drop bar levers on my touring bikes for 9 years now. They stop well and a big plus is you can change the pads without removing the wheels. I installed in-line adjusters to I can close the gap with pad wear. My suggestion is to install zero compression brake housing. My current levers are Crane Creek.
tomn is offline  
Old 03-23-15, 09:18 AM
  #31  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Is there an advantage to mini-v's vs traditional v's?
probably have to define what advantage you are seeking..

mechanical advantage has 2 parts the brake lever , and the brake Caliper.

Thus, it happens, as you Increase the MA on one end , you must Decrease the MA on the Other.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 03-23-15, 10:07 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by Doug64
Is fender clearance with the mini's a problem?
With an LHT, almost certainly.

Which is too bad, because I actually prefer minis to conventional v-brakes. You get a bit more pad clearance.
grolby is offline  
Old 03-23-15, 11:07 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 307
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by grolby
Which is too bad, because I actually prefer minis to conventional v-brakes. You get a bit more pad clearance.
Has anyone tried using mini v's with long-pull levers? Seems like you could get tons of pad clearance, and in my experience the mini v's have leverage to spare.

I have a pair of long reach levers in my parts bin but I swore off bar end shifters so I don't have any bikes that would take them.
kpfeif is offline  
Old 03-23-15, 01:40 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,195

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3458 Post(s)
Liked 1,465 Times in 1,143 Posts
Originally Posted by kpfeif
Has anyone tried using mini v's with long-pull levers? Seems like you could get tons of pad clearance, and in my experience the mini v's have leverage to spare.
...
I have not, but on my foldup bike on the back I use a mini-V with regular levers. The brake feels spongy but the brake also is too strong, it will easily lock up the wheel if I am not careful. Fortunately my front brake, a cantilever, is normal so it is unlikely that I will fly over the handlebars while braking.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 02:04 PM
  #35  
cyclist
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: vermont
Posts: 352

Bikes: road bike, mountain bike, touring bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
"I thought about converting the brakes on my bike, but I use CX interrupter brakes levers, and they are not recommended with V-brakes."
I did not think about this. I do use these. So if I use cx interrupter levers then I can not use the long pull levers, correct?
I do have the Tektro long pull levers for another bike set up with disks and enjoy them very much so I have no problems using them, but they would need to be compatible with the interrupter levers, which are not coming off.
In the end, I will probably just break down and spend some time adjusting the canti's, especially now that I'm coming up with another bike related money pit in my head right now...
Thanks all
ncscott is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 02:09 PM
  #36  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
So if I use cx interrupter levers then I can not use the long pull levers, correct?
PaulsComp makes one that by moving the Pivot pin , changes the cable pull ratio. CNC in California so not as low cost as Taiwan's Stuff.

I have a Pair to resell I didnt Use ..
fietsbob is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 09:22 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,441
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob

mechanical advantage has 2 parts the brake lever , and the brake Caliper.

Thus, it happens, as you Increase the MA on one end , you must Decrease the MA on the Other.
That is my premise also, but the responses so far are ecstatic as though no compromise exists.
MassiveD is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 09:27 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,441
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by kpfeif
Has anyone tried using mini v's with long-pull levers? Seems like you could get tons of pad clearance, and in my experience the mini v's have leverage to spare.

I have a pair of long reach levers in my parts bin but I swore off bar end shifters so I don't have any bikes that would take them.
Mechanical advantage works such that if you are geared so that you move a lot of cable with a small hand movement, you have less leverage. And if you require a small v-brake arm movement to close the same degree of pad to rim gap, you have less leverage. So long reach with short arms is the worst of both worlds for mechanical advantage.
MassiveD is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 09:38 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,441
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Wow, the Tektro are a lot cheaper than the DiaComp.





So in this picture you are looking at long (top), and short reach levers, and you can see the pivot points of both as the shiny dots. If you operate the levers from the drops, you hands position is placed low enough that you will work as efficiently on either lever, except that the long reach moves more cable but with less mechanical advantage. Depending on your hand size, off the tops you could essentially be unable to place your hands below the pivot bolt on the long reach at all. And in that position would have zero capacity to move the lever. But the real point is that you will even with normal size hands loose mechanical advantage very considerably off the hoods. This happens regardless, with either, but the effect starts to get significantly worse with long pulls.
MassiveD is offline  
Old 03-25-15, 08:38 AM
  #40  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
FWIW, longer , middling pull/MA are the non aero cable straight up levers.

I have Modolo's levers on one of my Bikes , Scott-Petersen SE cantilevers ..

the combination stops super well ..

Last edited by fietsbob; 03-25-15 at 12:39 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 03-25-15, 10:52 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 307
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MassiveD
Mechanical advantage works such that if you are geared so that you move a lot of cable with a small hand movement, you have less leverage. And if you require a small v-brake arm movement to close the same degree of pad to rim gap, you have less leverage. So long reach with short arms is the worst of both worlds for mechanical advantage.
Yes, short arm cantis with long pull levers would give you less mechanical advantage. In my experience, short arm cantis with road levers have plenty of stopping power but are lacking in pad clearance. It would be fun to see how the performance is with the short arm/long pull combo. You should get plenty of clearance but less power.
kpfeif is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MickeyKriza
Touring
9
10-20-13 11:47 AM
Fallingwater
Bicycle Mechanics
11
07-18-11 04:07 AM
RuggerJoe
Bicycle Mechanics
6
05-06-11 10:01 PM
HandsomeRyan
Touring
29
12-12-10 04:47 PM
TurbineBlade
Bicycle Mechanics
5
07-18-10 10:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.