Reaching out for help.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: vermont
Posts: 3,091
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Reaching out for help.
I posted a couple of months ago about making some aluminum track frames. I have made some progress and Tubepro is drawing some tubes for me. I am building two frames for a customer and one for myself. Within a couple of weeks, I will be machining the dropouts and welding some frames.
I will be using removable track ends like the Tiemeyer frames. I would prefer to use his existing design for the interface so that replacements are interchangeable. I have a CNC mill and design stuff in CAD so coming up with something will be easy but they won't fit anything but my frames. I know the builder has retired.
If any of you have contact info for the designer/fabricator or a spare insert I could borrow to reverse engineer, it would benefit anyone that may need spares in the future. It really makes no difference to me either way.
Ill keep you posted on my progress. Thanks for any help you can offer!
Frank
I will be using removable track ends like the Tiemeyer frames. I would prefer to use his existing design for the interface so that replacements are interchangeable. I have a CNC mill and design stuff in CAD so coming up with something will be easy but they won't fit anything but my frames. I know the builder has retired.
If any of you have contact info for the designer/fabricator or a spare insert I could borrow to reverse engineer, it would benefit anyone that may need spares in the future. It really makes no difference to me either way.
Ill keep you posted on my progress. Thanks for any help you can offer!
Frank
#2
aka mattio
FTW, I know a couple people with crashed/ruined Tiemeyer frames. I'll see if any of 'em are willing to give or loan you the trackends.
edit: success! I PM'ed you an email address for a nice man named Andrew who lives in New Jersey.
edit: success! I PM'ed you an email address for a nice man named Andrew who lives in New Jersey.
Last edited by queerpunk; 09-27-13 at 11:57 AM.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: vermont
Posts: 3,091
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Thanks a ton! and a noreastr to boot! I sent an email.
I formed a couple of head tubes yesterday for the project. Both ends bulged to fit 44mm cups. I tried giving it a bit of an aero shape but the first two attempts failed. Ill be going at it again very soon.
Thanks again!
I formed a couple of head tubes yesterday for the project. Both ends bulged to fit 44mm cups. I tried giving it a bit of an aero shape but the first two attempts failed. Ill be going at it again very soon.
Thanks again!
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: vermont
Posts: 3,091
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Andrew came through for me BIG TIME and I got the first of the prototype frames done yesterday. I think it looks good but the second one will be a little better. Fun stuff.
It weighs 1.95kg with the steel track ends for this one with a 55tt and full seat mast. I made some head tubes to fit tapered forks. The bottom is zerostack 1.5 and the top is integrated. The bottom bracket is euro and the frame fits the omni cranks with no spacers.
It should be ready to ride next week.

frames 023 by frankthewelder, on Flickr

frames 022 by frankthewelder, on Flickr

frames 019 by frankthewelder, on Flickr

frames 016 by frankthewelder, on Flickr
It weighs 1.95kg with the steel track ends for this one with a 55tt and full seat mast. I made some head tubes to fit tapered forks. The bottom is zerostack 1.5 and the top is integrated. The bottom bracket is euro and the frame fits the omni cranks with no spacers.
It should be ready to ride next week.

frames 023 by frankthewelder, on Flickr

frames 022 by frankthewelder, on Flickr

frames 019 by frankthewelder, on Flickr

frames 016 by frankthewelder, on Flickr
Last edited by ftwelder; 11-08-13 at 02:30 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,200
Bikes: Pinarello Montello, Merckx MX Leader, Merckx Corsa Extra, Pinarello Prologo, Tredici Magia Nera, Tredici Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Nice fit. Where in VT ?
#7
aka mattio
Frank, I've been following the progress on instagram. I'm really glad you and Andrew were able to connect, and it's been exciting to see these frames in development. Let me know if you need any a test pilot to take one of these frames to elite track nationals next year

#9
Fixie Infamous
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SF
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 2007 CAAD Optimo Track, 2012 Cannondale CAAD10, 1996 GT Force restomod, 2015 Cannondale CAADX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Damn, that rear tire clearance is pretty.
These look great. Tiemeyer round 2.
Great job, keep at it.
These look great. Tiemeyer round 2.
Great job, keep at it.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#11
Fixie Infamous
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SF
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 2007 CAAD Optimo Track, 2012 Cannondale CAAD10, 1996 GT Force restomod, 2015 Cannondale CAADX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 149
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The credit card rule is still in effect - see page 72 of https://www.uci.ch/includes/asp/getTa...=FILE&id=34033
#13
VeloSIRraptor
FTW - I'm SUPER stoked that you are making some killer track frames.
What are you sourcing for tapered forks?
The bike looks 100% killer.
What are you sourcing for tapered forks?
The bike looks 100% killer.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The credit card rule is still in effect - see page 72 of https://www.uci.ch/includes/asp/getTa...=FILE&id=34033
"A fairing shall be defined as the use or adaptation of a component of the bicycle in such a fashion
that it encloses a moving part of the bicycle such as the wheels or the chainset. Therefore it should
be possible to pass a rigid card (like a credit card) between the fixed structure and the moving part."
JMR
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: vermont
Posts: 3,091
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
I wasn't aware of that! There is actually about 2mm between the tire and the back of the seat tube (which is flat/curved). I knew better than to make the cover concave!
It sounds like one of those "starting gate rules" that can cause a lot of confusion. I have seen frames with tire rub marks on the back of the seat tube and made certain assumptions.
We haven't ordered forks yet but Serenity Bikes has offered to sell us a few of theirs to try out.
Thanks for the compliments. I don't really know what the track market is or what custom frames are available and how they compare. I think these are quite stiff but it would be interesting to know if the additional frame width at the bottom and top of the tubes is good or bad in the wind. We have 50% less BB shell showing which is good. Since I am a machine shop, I am not limited to off the shelf parts.
I don't know a lot about aerodynamics except you that can't see it without the right tools. I don't have those tools.
It sounds like one of those "starting gate rules" that can cause a lot of confusion. I have seen frames with tire rub marks on the back of the seat tube and made certain assumptions.
We haven't ordered forks yet but Serenity Bikes has offered to sell us a few of theirs to try out.
Thanks for the compliments. I don't really know what the track market is or what custom frames are available and how they compare. I think these are quite stiff but it would be interesting to know if the additional frame width at the bottom and top of the tubes is good or bad in the wind. We have 50% less BB shell showing which is good. Since I am a machine shop, I am not limited to off the shelf parts.
I don't know a lot about aerodynamics except you that can't see it without the right tools. I don't have those tools.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 149
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I wasn't aware of that! There is actually about 2mm between the tire and the back of the seat tube (which is flat/curved). I knew better than to make the cover concave!
It sounds like one of those "starting gate rules" that can cause a lot of confusion. I have seen frames with tire rub marks on the back of the seat tube and made certain assumptions.
We haven't ordered forks yet but Serenity Bikes has offered to sell us a few of theirs to try out.
Thanks for the compliments. I don't really know what the track market is or what custom frames are available and how they compare. I think these are quite stiff but it would be interesting to know if the additional frame width at the bottom and top of the tubes is good or bad in the wind. We have 50% less BB shell showing which is good. Since I am a machine shop, I am not limited to off the shelf parts.
I don't know a lot about aerodynamics except you that can't see it without the right tools. I don't have those tools.
It sounds like one of those "starting gate rules" that can cause a lot of confusion. I have seen frames with tire rub marks on the back of the seat tube and made certain assumptions.
We haven't ordered forks yet but Serenity Bikes has offered to sell us a few of theirs to try out.
Thanks for the compliments. I don't really know what the track market is or what custom frames are available and how they compare. I think these are quite stiff but it would be interesting to know if the additional frame width at the bottom and top of the tubes is good or bad in the wind. We have 50% less BB shell showing which is good. Since I am a machine shop, I am not limited to off the shelf parts.
I don't know a lot about aerodynamics except you that can't see it without the right tools. I don't have those tools.
I like the use of the tapered fork as that seems to be the major flex area for most frames that you feel as a rider. Having stiff chainstays and downtube will help with bottom bracket flex during starts.
For aero putting an airfoil shape on the head tube would seem like a winner especially for larger frame as that is in clear air. Fitting it around the top and down tubes might be more work than it is worth.
At some point the UCI will come looking for the certification fee if these are going to be used at the top levels - the classic barrier to entry protecting existing competitors.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 956
Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Bianchi Vigorelli
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The frame looks great FTW... just watch this rule regarding fairing on the rear wheel.
"A fairing shall be defined as the use or adaptation of a component of the bicycle in such a fashion
that it encloses a moving part of the bicycle such as the wheels or the chainset. Therefore it should
be possible to pass a rigid card (like a credit card) between the fixed structure and the moving part."
JMR
"A fairing shall be defined as the use or adaptation of a component of the bicycle in such a fashion
that it encloses a moving part of the bicycle such as the wheels or the chainset. Therefore it should
be possible to pass a rigid card (like a credit card) between the fixed structure and the moving part."
JMR
Since you need enough chain to get around the cog/ring and then tention it..
My Tiemeyer looked a lot like this frame- the section of the seat tube opposite the wheel was "V" shaped and the tire would rest against the seat tube when slid all the way in the dropout...
Great job on the frame!
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: vermont
Posts: 3,091
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
As long as you are not concave and have horizontal dropout the fairing rule is not a problem. As you said the pulled wheel is more of an issue on the seat tube or chain stay.
I like the use of the tapered fork as that seems to be the major flex area for most frames that you feel as a rider. Having stiff chainstays and downtube will help with bottom bracket flex during starts.
For aero putting an airfoil shape on the head tube would seem like a winner especially for larger frame as that is in clear air. Fitting it around the top and down tubes might be more work than it is worth.
At some point the UCI will come looking for the certification fee if these are going to be used at the top levels - the classic barrier to entry protecting existing competitors.
I like the use of the tapered fork as that seems to be the major flex area for most frames that you feel as a rider. Having stiff chainstays and downtube will help with bottom bracket flex during starts.
For aero putting an airfoil shape on the head tube would seem like a winner especially for larger frame as that is in clear air. Fitting it around the top and down tubes might be more work than it is worth.
At some point the UCI will come looking for the certification fee if these are going to be used at the top levels - the classic barrier to entry protecting existing competitors.
Certification fees don't sound like fun. I see how that could dampen enthusiasm if the fee was an exclusionary device.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 956
Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Bianchi Vigorelli
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tiemeyer sent my UCI sticker along with a letter announcing that he had closed his shop.. from what i understand he had worked on getting his bikes approved for a long time.
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: vermont
Posts: 3,091
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Wow, that is something I didn't consider. I think i had read something about this a couple of years ago, I think builders had or were joining as some type of group to get methods certified rather than builders. I may be mistaken.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#22
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
Made for a really fast bike that you could not race in UCI sanctioned events.
During this period the local builders and designers were putting together the team bike for the '84 Olympics which drew from a number of local builders and fabricators.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: vermont
Posts: 3,091
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Interesting, I work on Rory O'reilly's bike many years ago and he had lots of odd race bikes. I am not sure how many were accepted.
#24
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I snapped a couple of pictures before I tossed the frames in my car to take them down to heattreat

pretty cool in real life.

pretty cool in real life.
Last edited by mickey@spooky; 11-14-13 at 08:35 PM.