Bike Forums > Power File Analysis for Sprinters??
 Register All Albums Elite Membership Forum Rules Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area Looking to enter into the realm of track racing? Want to share your experiences and tactics for riding on a velodrome? The Track Cycling forums is for you! Come in and discuss training/racing, equipment, and current track cycling events.

 11-22-13, 03:49 PM #3 carleton Elitist     Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA Bikes: Posts: 14,239 Mentioned: 30 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 564 Post(s) Analyzing files... In an effort to compare apples to apples, always select a 12" slice from your files. This is so that you can compare the averages of multiple efforts from multiple days or same day using different gears. How do you know what 12" to grab? Well, assuming that you stop pushing on the pedals as you cross the finish line, count 12" backwards from where the power line in the graph takes a nose dive. Here is a good example: You can see is averages in the upper left of each segment (the multi color numbers). Also, don't get thrown off. SRM software does this thing where it will truncate the numbers on the left of the graph. So, "000" means 1,000W. "500" means 1,500W. After you mark off the 12" of the timed part, mark off 30" before that, so you can see how much energy you spent getting up to speed. Now start comparing the averages. In the file above, you can see that he averaged 138RPM for the effort. This is good. That's sort of right in the middle of two schools of thought on the subject. Basically, the million dollar question for Sprinters is: What gear should I use for my flying 200M? My answer has always been: The biggest one that you can spin an average 140RPM. Old school guys (from back when 94" was a sprinters race gear) say that 150 should be the target to average. New school guys (modern big gear advocates) say 135-ish should be the target. Fact: Many of the qualifiers of the London Olympics clocked MAX RPMs between 130-140. That means that their averages were lower. But, they are not mortals. They rode gears of 104" or bigger.
 11-22-13, 03:54 PM #4 carleton Elitist     Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA Bikes: Posts: 14,239 Mentioned: 30 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 564 Post(s) Regarding Match Sprinting numbers vs F200M numbers: Match Sprints are more like Standing Starts than they are like Flying 200s. Typically, you don't spend as much energy before the jump of a match sprint as you do before the jump of a F200M. Adrenalin also plays a factor. In 2012, I clocked my season best max wattage at Masters Nationals in the first round of sprints during the jump. It was a number that wasn't matched in my F200M or Team Sprint during the same peak week. Many coaches yell, "UP UP UP!!!!!" for a reason...it works I once had a teammate do that to me when I was just practicing rolling starts...boom, extra 100W out of nowhere. The body and mind are weird, man. Weird. Last edited by carleton; 11-22-13 at 04:07 PM.
 11-22-13, 03:57 PM #5 Impreza_aL Senior Member     Join Date: May 2009 Bikes: yellow tricycle di2 grip shifters Posts: 436 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 4 Post(s) i know my 200 has improved from just riding more. i started riding a bike around this time last year and did a 12.6(94gi). I then hit a 12.1 (101gi) during our velodrome challenge. I then participated in the districts sprints and hit a 11.9 (96gi). No lifting, no specific sprint work just riding (looking at my data i did the volume of a track sprinter lol) and racing. this year i plan to do specific workouts. i've already put in two huge blocks for base. probably more riding than i have done all year. i know my 200 is probably capped maybe i can knock out a few more tenths. i would probably have to do a lot more sprint specific work outs (lift weights ewww) if i ever want to see the 10s. as for your question, it would of probably helped if you had a pm at the start to just look at the numbers. but i feel as you gain aerobic power it'll increase your 200. it isn't really 200m anyway since you have to ramp it up. there are also other factors to the 200. your line, wind, humidity, blah blah blah... Last edited by Impreza_aL; 11-22-13 at 04:03 PM.
 11-22-13, 04:03 PM #6 carleton Elitist     Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA Bikes: Posts: 14,239 Mentioned: 30 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 564 Post(s) Key metrics to note from your 12" slice: - Average speed: this is your flying 200 time: time = 200M/(avg velocity) - Average cadence (key indicator. You want to define a sweet spot and run the biggest gear that keeps you in that sweet spot) - Average power: this will go up as you get stronger and use bigger gears - Max speed: Directly related to your time, and a GREAT indicator of what it will be. Use the max speed from 100M test jumps to learn what is working without killing yourself doing a full on 200M. On a test day, you can do 3 full-gas flying 200s before getting weak...or you can do 6 full-gas flying 100s and note the top speeds. More opportunity to fool around with windups, jump spots, and gears. This is no less precise than coaches timing F100M splits, doubling the time and adding 0.1" which is a tried and true way of evaluating how fast a guy is on the day. - Max cadence: Too low and you are missing your "wheelhouse" of power. Too high and you are spinning out and not able to give lots of torque. - Max power: Not really a key indicator here. This can vary due to gearing, jump location, and/or windup style (slow or hot) Last edited by carleton; 11-22-13 at 04:27 PM.
11-22-13, 04:07 PM   #7
queerpunk
aka mattio

Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,293
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Quoted: 192 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by carleton Many coaches yell, "UP UP UP!!!!!" for a reason...it works I once had a teammate do that to me when I was just practicing rolling starts...boom, extra 100W out of nowhere. The body and mind are weird, man. Weird.
People are susceptible to suggestion when fatigued. I tell people I'm racing against to "go!" when a good-looking move goes off, and fairly often they do. they think i'm saying it for the benefit of all of us but really i'm just doing it to get a free ride up to the front.

11-22-13, 04:15 PM   #8
carleton
Elitist

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Bikes:
Posts: 14,239
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Quoted: 564 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Impreza_aL i know my 200 has improved from just riding more. i started riding a bike around this time last year and did a 12.6(94gi). I then hit a 12.1 (101gi) during our velodrome challenge. I then participated in the districts sprints and hit a 11.9 (96gi). No lifting, no specific sprint work just riding (looking at my data i did the volume of a track sprinter lol) and racing. this year i plan to do specific workouts. i've already put in two huge blocks for base. probably more riding than i have done all year. i know my 200 is probably capped maybe i can knock out a few more tenths. i would probably have to do a lot more sprint specific work outs (lift weights ewww) if i ever want to see the 10s. as for your question, it would of probably helped if you had a pm at the start to just look at the numbers. but i feel as you gain aerobic power it'll increase your 200. it isn't really 200m anyway since you have to ramp it up. there are also other factors to the 200. your line, wind, humidity, blah blah blah...
You are right...but for different reasons than you might think

First, load up the stopwatch app on your phone and start it. See how fast 1, 2, 5 tenths of a second can zip by. Fast.

The Flying 200M is a very nuanced event. I've seen guys shave off more than 0.8" between efforts on the same gear just by changing where on the track they rise out of the saddle to stand on the pedals.

And "The Line". Wow. That is so track specific.

Here's a story for you. Mike Baranoski brought Matt down to DLV for one of our big events and they were at the track the day before working out. Part of the workout was Matt doing Flying 100s and 200s. I was like, "This guy is riding the wrong line. Everybody at DLV knows that the right line is different than that..." So, I do my Flying 100 or 200 and come off the track and, being the super generous guy he is, Mike asked me why I rode the line that I did and I told him that that's how we were all advised to do it. He suggested that I try the line that Matt was using and explained why. Being open-minded, I did. BOOM -0.3" off of the previous effort. I repeated the same the next day in the event using the new line.

 11-22-13, 04:22 PM #9 Impreza_aL Senior Member     Join Date: May 2009 Bikes: yellow tricycle di2 grip shifters Posts: 436 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 4 Post(s) sprinter vs me. please don't laugh.
11-22-13, 04:32 PM   #10
carleton
Elitist

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Bikes:
Posts: 14,239
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Quoted: 564 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Impreza_aL sprinter vs me. please don't laugh.
Haha, don't be discouraged! This guy used to be the fastest sprinter in the world:

Theo Bos

Also, I see that he (I think that is Farioletti) is checking his blood glucose. Either he's diabetic or simply monitoring his blood sugar to keep it from dropping due to the crazy exertion that sprinters do. This is why we can eat chocolate and sweets...to keep glucose levels high enough for gluconeogenesis (that's what I tell myself anyway, hahaha)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluconeogenesis

Last edited by carleton; 11-22-13 at 04:35 PM.

11-22-13, 04:39 PM   #11
Impreza_aL
Senior Member

Join Date: May 2009
Bikes: yellow tricycle di2 grip shifters
Posts: 436
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by carleton You are right...but for different reasons than you might think First, load up the stopwatch app on your phone and start it. See how fast 1, 2, 5 tenths of a second can zip by. Fast. The Flying 200M is a very nuanced event. I've seen guys shave off more than 0.8" between efforts on the same gear just by changing where on the track they rise out of the saddle to stand on the pedals. And "The Line". Wow. That is so track specific. Here's a story for you. Mike Baranoski brought Matt down to DLV for one of our big events and they were at the track the day before working out. Part of the workout was Matt doing Flying 100s and 200s. I was like, "This guy is riding the wrong line. Everybody at DLV knows that the right line is different than that..." So, I do my Flying 100 or 200 and come off the track and, being the super generous guy he is, Mike asked me why I rode the line that I did and I told him that that's how we were all advised to do it. He suggested that I try the line that Matt was using and explained why. Being open-minded, I did. BOOM -0.3" off of the previous effort. I repeated the same the next day in the event using the new line.
yes it's hard to compare all the 3 because i'm pretty sure i approached (where i kicked, rolling in speed, line...) them differently. i just don't practice it enough. i love doing these sprint events especially the keirin and i feel i'm better suited to doing them but mass start racing is what's offered more at my velodrome. so i'm trying to better myself at that. hopefully get my 2 on the track.

Last edited by Impreza_aL; 11-22-13 at 04:52 PM.

11-22-13, 04:46 PM   #12
Impreza_aL
Senior Member

Join Date: May 2009
Bikes: yellow tricycle di2 grip shifters
Posts: 436
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by carleton Haha, don't be discouraged! This guy used to be the fastest sprinter in the world: Theo Bos Also, I see that he (I think that is Farioletti) is checking his blood glucose. Either he's diabetic or simply monitoring his blood sugar to keep it from dropping due to the crazy exertion that sprinters do. This is why we can eat chocolate and sweets...to keep glucose levels high enough for gluconeogenesis (that's what I tell myself anyway, hahaha) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluconeogenesis
oh man theo bos! well he's 6'3 i'm 5'8 lol. i don't keep up with professional cycling but has he won anything on the road? i wonder how his transition from track to road has worked for him. he left because there wasn't much money in track? if he didn't leave would he still have been dominate?

yes that's farioletti. i didn't notice he was checking his glucose level. i thought he was playing with his phone charger. i'm always eating chocolate during race nights =)

here's my new hero in the track cycling world. brown pride!

sorry for taking this thread off topic.

Last edited by Impreza_aL; 11-22-13 at 04:52 PM.

11-22-13, 04:52 PM   #13
carleton
Elitist

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Bikes:
Posts: 14,239
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Quoted: 564 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Impreza_aL yes it's hard to compare all the 3 because i'm pretty sure i approached (where i kicked, rolling in speed, line...) them differently. i just don't practice it enough. i love doing these sprint events especially the keirin but mass start racing is what's offered more at my velodrome so i'm trying to better myself at that. hopefully get my 2 on the track.
Practice is the key to doing better flying 200s. Like, having an entire session dedicated to Flying 100s and Flying 200s every so often.

My buddy (ATRA CAT A; all-around type of racer) called me once after the monthly sprint night:

Buddy: "Man, I can't get my flying 200M under 13 seconds."
Me: "Have you practiced it since last month?"
Buddy: "No."
Me: "There you go."

Fast forward 1 month and I get a text:

Buddy: "Still over 13 seconds :("
Me: "Have you practiced it since last month?"
Buddy: "No."
Me: "There you go."

A month later...

Buddy: "12.7!"
Me: "Have you practiced it since last month?"
Buddy: "Yes"
Me: "There you go."

11-22-13, 04:55 PM   #14
carleton
Elitist

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Bikes:
Posts: 14,239
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Quoted: 564 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Impreza_aL oh man theo bos! well he's 6'3 i'm 5'8 lol. i don't keep up with professional cycling but has he won anything on the road? i wonder how his transition from track to road has worked for him. he left because there wasn't much money in track? if he didn't leave would he still have been dominate? yes that's farioletti. i didn't notice he was checking his glucose level. i thought he was playing with his phone charger. i'm always eating chocolate during race nights =) here's my new hero in the track cycling world. brown pride! sorry for taking this thread off topic.
Hahaha, to keep it on track, Njsane's top cadence during his Olympic Flying 200M was 140RPM according to a photo of his SRM head from Turn 1 during the event. (max speed/cadence happens in turn 1 on a 250M track).

11-22-13, 06:49 PM   #15
Quinn8it
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hollywood
Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Bianchi Vigorelli
Posts: 956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Lots of responses... But
I'm not sure you guys understood the question.

I'm not looking for advice on how to run a 200 (I'm actually pretty good at them)
And I feel that I know what I'm looking for in a power file- so I'm not really looking for power file 101

My take on power file data for a 200 is that max watts and max speed are important metrics- but the real determining factor for a 200 is something closer to 30" power.. I don't really see how super high sample rates of power data change the reading of a 30" chunk of data...

I get that it's more data- but i suspect it's just more of the same data

So my original question again:
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Quinn8it can anyone educate me as to why the shorter duration numbers and the higher rate sample to analyze these numbers is so popular among sprinters?

 11-23-13, 04:07 AM #16 carleton Elitist     Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA Bikes: Posts: 14,239 Mentioned: 30 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 564 Post(s) I've explained a lot. Now it's time for you to ask SRM and Stages why they offer it
11-23-13, 10:16 AM   #17
Quinn8it
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hollywood
Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Bianchi Vigorelli
Posts: 956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by carleton I've explained a lot. Now it's time for you to ask SRM and Stages why they offer it
Carleton,
i appreciate your lengthy responses, but i don't think you touched on data sample rate in any of them. I understand that faster rate of sample is State Of The Art and that manufactures will always be looking to advance their products. And i don't doubt that faster rate of sample is better.

im asking you, or anyone else on this forum, how the faster rate of sample changes your data and how these changes benefit your analysis and training?
the price difference in the Garmin 500 with 1sec sample and the SRM with (i forget how much higher) much higher rate of sampling is about 400%-
im just wondering what a 40-something masters hack like myself will see for my money... this is an honest quest for education.

 11-23-13, 11:02 AM #18 Velocirapture Senior Member     Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: South Africa Bikes: S-1 :-D Posts: 429 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 17 Post(s) The faster rate of sampling simply gives you more data, and more data allows more precise analysis of the data, and a better understanding. if you are not interested in more precision analysis, and averages/ max number etc are good enough for you, then faster sampling wont benefit you. The converse also applies
11-23-13, 08:42 PM   #20
Quinn8it
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hollywood
Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Bianchi Vigorelli
Posts: 956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Slindell- thank you for that reply! there is some really interesting stuff in there.

this is basically what i was thinking:
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Slindell So it is somewhat of a lossy protocol with the expectation that the values are not that different and it all works out in the averages.
any idea where the tipping point is? at what interval size is 1" sampling sufficient?
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Slindell As the intervals get smaller the samples in the average go down so the reliability of the numbers goes down too
what would be the symptom of missed data in a short interval that was collected at 1"? im assuming that for most applications we are talking about showing slightly lower peak power data?

Last edited by Quinn8it; 11-23-13 at 08:54 PM.

 11-24-13, 03:07 AM #21 slindell Senior Member   Join Date: Oct 2013 Bikes: Posts: 149 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s) If you miss a reading you might miss a peak pedal stroke or two. but odds are you catch in the next time you jump and most of the time you will have a few revolutions at close to peak power. It is getting to the fine grain 1-3 second measurements when the 10-20 second average is what matters. For fun going the other way SRMs have a min cadence of 30 RPM so there is 2 seconds before finding out you stopped pedaling. Try going hard then coast suddenly and there will be 3 seconds of the same reading. Calibrate the meter and use the same type and it all works out close enough until you are at the point where others are doing all the analysis for you.
 11-25-13, 11:40 AM #22 carleton Elitist     Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA Bikes: Posts: 14,239 Mentioned: 30 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 564 Post(s) Thanks Velocirapture and Slindell for expressing what I had a hard time expressing. Quinn, I think you are asking, "Where is the point of diminishing returns in the increased frequency of the samples?" I think that the value of the data is "good enough" at 2/second (every .5 seconds) and great at anything faster than that. In my experience, every one second is not good enough for accurately measuring sprint efforts (Standing 1/4, 1/2, full laps, Flying 200M, etc...). Also, when comparing 2 files of the same effort (let's say a Kilo), with higher resolution, you can more easily line up the files for comparison. Back when I ordered my current Track SRM (early 2011), Wired Track SRMs came with 2 Reed switches. Wireless Track SRMs only come with 1 Reed switch. You can have two Reed switches custom installed into just about any SRM crank. The Reed switch is the switch inside the crank that responds to a magnet on the bicycle frame. Everytime the Reed switch passes the magnet, the switch closes and data is transmitted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_switch So, Quinn, I think you'll see the benefits of the higher resolution when you get deeper into analyzing the files...you get to ENHANCE.
 11-25-13, 12:27 PM #23 carleton Elitist     Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA Bikes: Posts: 14,239 Mentioned: 30 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 564 Post(s) Quinn, what software do you use to analyze your files? Also, I should have mentioned this earlier. Turn off any and all data smoothing. Smoothing is useful for analyzing a file from a 2-3 hour road ride. Not useful for analyzing short spurts of data as with track files (sprint or endurance).
11-25-13, 04:30 PM   #24
Quinn8it
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hollywood
Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Bianchi Vigorelli
Posts: 956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by carleton Quinn, I think you are asking, "Where is the point of diminishing returns in the increased frequency of the samples?
Not exactly. I'm more asking at what length interval is 2x per second not necessary?

Last edited by Quinn8it; 11-25-13 at 05:00 PM. Reason: Clarity

11-25-13, 05:50 PM   #25
carleton
Elitist

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Bikes:
Posts: 14,239
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Quoted: 564 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Quinn8it Not exactly. I'm more asking at what length interval is 2x per second not necessary?
Ah.

OK. Let's assume that we are going to use the software to section off splits. No one takes a file from a F200M, Standing Lap, 500M, 1K, 2K, 3K, or 4K and just looks at the average of the entire event.

Well, in general, the longer the event, the longer the interval can be to get a statistically significant number of samples when you start sectioning off the splits.

In my opinion, I think that sprint events (1K and shorter) should be recorded at least every 0.2 to 0.5 seconds. I think that pursuit events (2-4K) should be recorded at least every 0.5 seconds. I think that mass start events (points, scratch, madision, etc...) should be recordedat least every 0.5-1 second. Anything longer than that (The Hour) should be recorded at least every 1 second. That's just my opinion.

Storage is cheap. Batteries last longer. So, why not store all the data we can?

BTW, it should be noted that data file analysis is a thing that teams are taking more and more seriously. There is/was a guy on the British team's staff whose job it was to do just that, analyze all of the files.

Here's a great example that may illustrate why a faster sampling rate gives more insight:

Imagine that you are trying to analyze your athlete's Standing Start. You have an old digital camera that can only take continuous photo every 1 second. Now imagine getting one that took frames every 0.5 seconds. THEN you got one that took 30 frames per second (video quality). Which one would you like to use?

Then what if you had a camera that could do this...filming arguably the best Man 1 in the game:

Last edited by carleton; 11-25-13 at 05:56 PM.