Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
Reload this Page >

Ask your small, random, track-related questions here

Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area Looking to enter into the realm of track racing? Want to share your experiences and tactics for riding on a velodrome? The Track Cycling forums is for you! Come in and discuss training/racing, equipment, and current track cycling events.

Ask your small, random, track-related questions here

Old 10-24-17, 10:26 AM
  #4601  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,588
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1215 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by bartek. View Post
You get some examples from me and @divebrain why numbers matters. I like numbers, you don't need them. It's fine.


I got SRM files older than you.

Originally Posted by bartek. View Post
Never heard this statements before Actually, electrical guitar and bass guitar are more comparable in reference to road/track bikes.
No. My analogy stands as is.

You know a little about a little and think you know a lot about a lot.

Have you noticed that you aren't adding anything to the conversations or collective knowledge.

Originally Posted by bartek. View Post
(I played on bass guitar in the past and released few records, I wasn't talented player but got good technical background about equipment)
Why would I expect any less?

Last edited by carleton; 10-24-17 at 10:33 AM.
carleton is offline  
Old 10-24-17, 10:48 AM
  #4602  
Divebrian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bartek. View Post
You get some examples from me and @divebrain why numbers matters. I like numbers, you don't need them. It's fine.
Hey, don't drag me into your pissing match.....I was simply saying that what works best for one, may not be best for another. If you are of similar size and style, you may want to mimic their position or equipment as a starting point, but it's ultimately about what works best for you. A number is a number, but how that number effects people with different height, weight, anatomical abnormalities and riding styles is not the same.
Divebrian is offline  
Old 10-24-17, 10:56 AM
  #4603  
queerpunk
aka mattio
 
queerpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,502
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 304 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
b o r i n g
queerpunk is offline  
Old 10-24-17, 12:18 PM
  #4604  
gl98115
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 631
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Divebrian View Post
Hey, don't drag me into your pissing match.....
Seriously, dude, it's obviously a penis measuring contest. Every deviation from dogma turns into one.
gl98115 is offline  
Old 10-24-17, 12:18 PM
  #4605  
defspace
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by queerpunk View Post
b o r i n g
Good god, yes.

The off season... Brutal.

Take it to PMs, guys.
defspace is offline  
Old 10-24-17, 12:20 PM
  #4606  
bartek. 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Dude, again? Seriously? It's really childish. Please, relax, go for biking, get some positive vibes. If all you want to do is offending me, quoting only less important parts of my posts and using GIF animations as arguments, I am ok with this, just please use Private Message and don't make a garbage here. It is not constructive. I understand that you like to be in center of universe but seriously, nobody cares about others ambitions on the Internet. This forum has some really nice atmosphere compared to many others and I am really sorry to others and feel guilty that you didn't impress myself when you presented your photography/iOs portfolio when nobody asked for it. I do not feel better than you, in fact I don't care about my ambitions, I know my value and I don't look for any applause. All I was doing is answering to your attacks all the time. Now, I know it wasn't smart. I should simply ignore this self-glorification and let you keep yourself on the top. People make mistakes. I did it to. I am sorry for it. This is why I asked to stop this. This is why I ask again. I even purchased your paid application on iPhone mainly as a good sign from my side (and I still miss this Head to Head TT feature though!).

I guess sometimes there can be some misunderstanding due to fact that English is not my native language and I write sometimes in more direct way. But seriously there was not offense from me, I am here in the defense mode ;-)

Best regards,
Bart
bartek. is offline  
Old 10-24-17, 01:34 PM
  #4607  
JimiMimni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 112
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Speaking of data requests:

Does anyone know of, or have comparison data for bar width vs shape? Specifically, and I realize this is a specific use case, can you compare a 38cm round aluminum bar vs. a 40cm 3T Aeronova bar? I have the Fairwheel data set that compares stiffness measured by deflection, but nothing about actual savings in drag. Watching the Euros, and most of the high level track bunch races I see a mix of narrow bars and aero bars.

I've been told that in regards to track cycling, narrow is aero, but in this specific case, is it?

Better still, does anyone know of an aero-profile bar that's 38cm? I'm sure Scattos would be a better purchase, but: having a bit more versatility, and price are arguments against them. (See: No sphinx/alternate hand positions)
JimiMimni is offline  
Old 10-24-17, 01:38 PM
  #4608  
topflightpro
Senior Member
 
topflightpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,352
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1274 Post(s)
Liked 40 Times in 28 Posts
Zipp SL comes in a 38. Granted, it flares out to 40cm at the drops.
topflightpro is offline  
Old 10-24-17, 02:00 PM
  #4609  
bartek. 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton View Post
Nobody asked you what you do for a living. You kept volunteering it, "I'm a photographer.", "I'm an engineer.", "I'm a programmer.", "I'm a guitarist". So?
Please don't pick up single words/sentences from posts. Read the context first!
Example:
Ok. I have never introduced myself but... I am news photographer. I know what parallax is. In fact each picture you posted has this issue. I was actually aware of it but decided not to go with details as if you use bad samples I was sure you will not notice wrong angle on my picture(...)In fact, I used a spirit level for measurement but since I don't have more than 2 hands I took a picture without it cause it was easier to do it and I thought nobody will notice it ;-) Anyway, I just retried it with homemade "piece of proof". Again, the contact points are NOT behind the front axle.
I have a low tolerance for bull****. If my bull**** meter needs calibration, then somebody let me know.
I don't mind, seriously. Everyone makes mistakes. In the same post I quoted above you can find some bull**** from your side that I pointed out, you just simple ignored it and focused on "I am news photographer" in the reply. This is populism. I have a right to defend myself. I think there is nothing more to add here.

Cheers.
bartek. is offline  
Old 10-24-17, 03:19 PM
  #4610  
taras0000
Senior Member
 
taras0000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 43.2330941,-79.8022037,17
Posts: 1,674
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Divebrian View Post
This is true to a point, but what works for Rider A (more powerful) is not always a good choice for Rider B. Not trying to be nit picky, but there are difference between each rider. Now, if your looking for the strongest or most durable, then Rider A to B comparison will work. However, something that is better for Rider A, may be stronger, stiffer, etc and may work for Rider A as their weight gives it a different characteristic that may not be so good for Rider B. Think of shocks for vehicles. If I take the shocks off my 1 ton truck and put them on your passenger car, then they will not work well...they will be too stiff and not forgiving enough.

With bikes, with me weighing well over 200 lbs, my set up may be wary too harsh for a 150 lb rider and they may end up being slower as the bike is too twitchy and moves all over the track on them, which makes them slower in the end as "smoother is faster" and they can't be smooth on my bike. What is best for one track will not necessarily be best for another track due to track construction materials, radius of turns, bumps, etc.
This is true. These are also things that can be determined using anecdotal experience. Although the point I was trying to make is not inclusive of every choice that can be made, I was referring to the example given of pedal release tensions, where something like that would apply (if the pedal retains a stronger rider, then it will be strong enough for a weaker rider, regardless of knowing it's actual retention value).

As with all things cycling related, we invest a lot of time and money into our choices. It's good to have information, and more information helps us to make educated decisions. Information also needs to be looked at in it's proper context. Different parameters will apply to differing pieces of equipment, as well as how and who they are for. It's important to keep in mind what matters to whom and when. Some things can be true for everyone across the board. It's been mentioned before, just because something isn't the strongest, doesn't mean it's not strong enough. Then again, strongest is still strongest. How you use the information is up to you.
taras0000 is offline  
Old 10-26-17, 07:22 PM
  #4611  
pierrej
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 119
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JimiMimni View Post
Speaking of data requests:

Does anyone know of, or have comparison data for bar width vs shape? Specifically, and I realize this is a specific use case, can you compare a 38cm round aluminum bar vs. a 40cm 3T Aeronova bar? I have the Fairwheel data set that compares stiffness measured by deflection, but nothing about actual savings in drag. Watching the Euros, and most of the high level track bunch races I see a mix of narrow bars and aero bars.

I've been told that in regards to track cycling, narrow is aero, but in this specific case, is it?

Better still, does anyone know of an aero-profile bar that's 38cm? I'm sure Scattos would be a better purchase, but: having a bit more versatility, and price are arguments against them. (See: No sphinx/alternate hand positions)
I think it was Zipp that came out with some data that suggested a 40cm round bar is more aerodynamic as package (with rider) than an wing shaped 44cm bar. Going from an aero 40cm bar to a round might be reasonably similar as you would possibly gain more from the positional change that what you're losing with the bar shape.

As mentioned the Enve aero bars are quite narrow towards the front of the drops, Almost the same width as the considerably cheaper Zipp 36cm bars https://www.pushys.com.au/zipp-servi...hed-black.html
pierrej is offline  
Old 10-27-17, 09:06 AM
  #4612  
JimiMimni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 112
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pierrej View Post
I think it was Zipp that came out with some data that suggested a 40cm round bar is more aerodynamic as package (with rider) than an wing shaped 44cm bar. Going from an aero 40cm bar to a round might be reasonably similar as you would possibly gain more from the positional change that what you're losing with the bar shape.

As mentioned the Enve aero bars are quite narrow towards the front of the drops, Almost the same width as the considerably cheaper Zipp 36cm bars https://www.pushys.com.au/zipp-servi...hed-black.html
Oooh, good to know. That's what I was curious about. Seems like bar shape is much less important than bar size, which means you can use a stiffer, narrower bar without aero penalty. Thanks for the info!

Originally Posted by spartanKid View Post
If your wallet is really weighing you down these days, you can get these ENVE aero road bars: https://enve.com/products/ses-aero-road-bar-v2/ They're 35 cm at the hoods and flare to 40 in the drops.

These Giant SLR aero bars are 38s: https://bobs-bikes.com/product/giant...r-244230-1.htm

And Bontrager offer 38s for both their alloy and carbon aero road bars: https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/e...lebar/p/11292/ and https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/e...lebar/p/11289/
Thanks! I forgot to mention, I have the Giant bars on my road bike, and they're FLEXY. As in I thought I was going to break them doing hard efforts on the trainer last winter. The drops really move a lot when all 75-78kg of spindly armed me torque them. I'll have to look in to the Bontragers, since their logo is on our team kits!
JimiMimni is offline  
Old 10-28-17, 11:40 AM
  #4613  
southernfox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 275
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 194 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What sort of super cheap brake would work on a track fork?
southernfox is offline  
Old 10-28-17, 01:01 PM
  #4614  
southernfox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 275
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 194 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
...it's drilled. That's why I'm asking in the first place
southernfox is offline  
Old 10-28-17, 01:28 PM
  #4615  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,588
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1215 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by southernfox View Post
...it's drilled. That's why I'm asking in the first place
Just go to a local bike shop. They should have new and used options in stock as well as levers. You may need short or long reach brake calipers.

You'll want a non-shifting lever. A shifting lever from a road bike will work (if it's free). But don't pay extra $$ because you won't need to shift.

Have a look here for options. This is a common thing in the street fixed gear scene.

https://www.retro-gression.com/colle.../brakes-levers
carleton is offline  
Old 10-29-17, 08:59 PM
  #4616  
bartek. 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm looking for an aero stem that can be mounted with positive angle. Something like 3T Integra or similar. Unfortunately it looks like they can are only negative angle compatible.

Seems like Look had C-STEM but they are not available anymore.
Anything in the market?
bartek. is offline  
Old 10-30-17, 06:19 AM
  #4617  
topflightpro
Senior Member
 
topflightpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,352
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1274 Post(s)
Liked 40 Times in 28 Posts
Originally Posted by spartanKid View Post
FWIW I don't remember where I saw this, but I think more headset spacers and a flatter stem angle is "more aero" than fewer spacers with a positive rise stem.
You saw it from Specialized.

They came out with a study that it is more aero to have a -17 stem and their 25mm riser than to go with a stem that is angled up (anything less than -17) and flatter bars.
topflightpro is offline  
Old 10-30-17, 06:53 AM
  #4618  
JimiMimni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 112
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by topflightpro View Post
You saw it from Specialized.

They came out with a study that it is more aero to have a -17 stem and their 25mm riser than to go with a stem that is angled up (anything less than -17) and flatter bars.
I was wondering how they were marketing that abomination of a bar. Riser road bars.
JimiMimni is offline  
Old 10-30-17, 07:43 AM
  #4619  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,588
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1215 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by topflightpro View Post
You saw it from Specialized.

They came out with a study that it is more aero to have a -17 stem and their 25mm riser than to go with a stem that is angled up (anything less than -17) and flatter bars.
The bike manufacturers have all of the wind tunnel studies...and they only publish the ones that move products off of the shelf. That's why when bike company engineers write things on forums, I pay particular attention.

Imagine how many studies they have that say, "That old part that you can get from the corner bike shop is better than the new carbon doo-dad..." that they simply won't publish for obvious reasons.

That's why I took particular interest in the "Mavic IO vs Zipp 808" thread on Slowtwitch.

Most of us will never own most (or any) of the high-end gear we see at the highest levels of racing. So, we assume that the latest-greatest doodads are faster than normal doodads...with little or no proof. This is a reasonable assumption. But, the most reasonable assumption we should make is that the latest-greatest doodads are not slower than normal doodads.


...maybe it makes us faster because our wallets are lighter

Last edited by carleton; 10-30-17 at 02:19 PM.
carleton is offline  
Old 10-30-17, 03:50 PM
  #4620  
bartek. 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spartanKid View Post
FWIW I don't remember where I saw this, but I think more headset spacers and a flatter stem angle is "more aero" than fewer spacers with a positive rise stem.
There is actually a thread about it on this forum :-)
Stem rise/drop, length and steer tube height

Anyway, I was more interested in the esthetic overview than pros/cons ;-)
In fact, I read about the Look C-Stem and this is not an option for a regular steerer tube. It works only with specifically designed ones (provided by Look )

Originally Posted by topflightpro
They came out with a study that it is more aero to have a -17 stem and their 25mm riser than to go with a stem that is angled up (anything less than -17) and flatter bars
Hmmmm haven't seen the Specs data (so maybe they also mentioned about it) but wondering how someone can judge -17 stem as more aero then any other value if not taking head tube angle in calculation?

Last edited by bartek.; 10-30-17 at 03:55 PM.
bartek. is offline  
Old 10-30-17, 05:13 PM
  #4621  
taras0000
Senior Member
 
taras0000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 43.2330941,-79.8022037,17
Posts: 1,674
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by bartek. View Post
Hmmmm haven't seen the Specs data (so maybe they also mentioned about it) but wondering how someone can judge -17 stem as more aero then any other value if not taking head tube angle in calculation?
That's because on road/track bikes, the headtube angles are within 2-3 degrees of each other, (72-74/75). So you're not going to be far off from perfectly horizontal with a -17 degree stem. Perfectly horizontal is the most aerodynamic stem set up. Deviate from this and it gets worse the more you go. Obviously of you have a 72* head tube, then -18 is going to be perfect, and 74* would need -16. As 73 degrees is right down the middle, this is what works best.
taras0000 is offline  
Old 10-31-17, 03:29 PM
  #4622  
JuiceWillis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Interval Training

During the offseason, those focused on points and scratch races, how much of your on the bike training is doing high intensity intervals (power zone 6, and Vo2 Max)?
JuiceWillis is offline  
Old 10-31-17, 06:34 PM
  #4623  
tobukog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 198
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
None. I'll get some efforts in naturally during some of my rides, but no formal intervals. The break is psychological as much as it is physiological.
tobukog is offline  
Old 10-31-17, 07:28 PM
  #4624  
queerpunk
aka mattio
 
queerpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,502
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 304 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JuiceWillis View Post
During the offseason, those focused on points and scratch races, how much of your on the bike training is doing high intensity intervals (power zone 6, and Vo2 Max)?
I'm an enduro. I work on my sprint throughout the offseason - what better time to improve it? And Vo2max work (Z5) is a key part of aerobic development that I do in the offseason. I do less Z6 stuff in the winter. Some, but not much. That comes into my schedule more during spring builds.

There's a traditional approach of taking a big chunk of time off and starting from a clean slate with a lot of endurance work and foundational miles, but I'm a proponent of a very flipped approach - that the offseason is a great time to build power, even if you're letting some endurance wither.
queerpunk is offline  
Old 11-01-17, 09:45 AM
  #4625  
gl98115
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 631
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JuiceWillis View Post
During the offseason, those focused on points and scratch races, how much of your on the bike training is doing high intensity intervals (power zone 6, and Vo2 Max)?
What do you mean by off-season? The reduced training after the racing season or the entire period between racing seasons? Many racers will take a break and then start building in a training season for the next racing season.
gl98115 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.