|
Originally Posted by Hida Yanra
(Post 16303937)
Folks getting ready for Marymoor -
The track record is 10.55 (Mansker, 2013), he has gone sub 10 repeatedly, so take from that what you will. Mansker has the record here as well: Flying 200 m | Kevin Mansker | 11.06 | 2012 Nobody's broken 11 seconds at our track yet, though Mansker's getting close. |
Originally Posted by Hida Yanra
(Post 16303978)
oh I did - just being overly analytical.
Are you headed up this summer? |
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
(Post 16303997)
Nobody's broken 11 seconds at our track yet, though Mansker's getting close.
|
I'll post mine to set the bar low ;). Didn't make a race this season, but hopefully next season.
Current PR from a timed clinic: 13.7 puts me at a goal of a whopping 13.15 *distant golf claps* |
Originally Posted by Quinn8it
(Post 16303630)
if I stalked you correctly- based on the name on your Anchor.. you need 11.67" to win..
i believe mansker and watkins hold the hellyer record for the 200 at 10.3-6 can't quite remember the actual time. |
Great. Now I'm on the hook for an 11.5 at sea level and an 11.2 at altitude.
Sell your Nabisco stock now because Oreo sales will take a dive! |
Current List:
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 250, align: left"]
[TR] [TD]Baby Puke[/TD] [TD]11.40"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Jaytron[/TD] [TD]11.56"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Quinn8it[/TD] [TD]10.95"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Brian Ratliff[/TD] [TD]11.99"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Imprezza_al[/TD] [TD]11.67"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Sisomphone[/TD] [TD]12.95"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Queerpunk[/TD] [TD]12.13"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Hida Yanra[/TD] [TD]pending[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Loverrellik[/TD] [TD]13.15"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Carleton[/TD] [TD]11.50"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]JMR[/TD] [TD]11.20"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] ok- here is the first 10 that are in.. i had to make a few guesses at times- so if yours is wrong, let me know and i will fix it.. Queerpunk i split the difference.. but its up to you |
actually i did some searching through my gmail inbox and my PR is 12.5, so let's put my goal at 12.13.
|
Originally Posted by carleton
(Post 16304185)
Great. Now I'm on the hook for an 11.5 at sea level and an 11.2 at altitude.
Originally Posted by carleton
(Post 16304185)
Sell your Nabisco stock now because Oreo sales will take a dive!
|
Originally Posted by Quinn8it
(Post 16304353)
Carleton- Cheat Days are for "Trader Joe's Vanilla Joe-Joe's"!!!
|
Originally Posted by Quinn8it
(Post 16304317)
ok- here is the first 10 that are in..
i had to make a few guesses at times- so if yours is wrong, let me know and i will fix it.. Queerpunk i split the difference.. but its up to you |
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
(Post 16304417)
Any thoughts on doing this as a function of percentage over the track record? Someone with Alpenrose as their home track should be spotted an extra second ;).
Think of it this way- you have a bigger advantage if you travel to almost any track... My PR was ridden on wood, indoors, with front and rear Disc Wheels! I'm screwed! |
Originally Posted by Impreza_aL
(Post 16303575)
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3806/9...140a4938_z.jpg
granted this was a very good day for a flying 200. hot and no wind everyone achieved a PR. but i'll be shooting for 11.2 without any gym work. (i only race mass starts) http://replygif.net/i/980.gif |
Originally Posted by Hida Yanra
(Post 16303873)
this is false. Our track is.... odd. 400m works out to about 27d banks (if memory serves), so doing a 200 involves coming out of T2 hard, usually trying to hit tangent at T3, then hold black all the way in.
|
I made this a sticky.
|
Originally Posted by Baby Puke
(Post 16304556)
27˚ on a 400 beats 23˚ on a 333 at Hellyer! The 400's in Jpn are around 31˚ which is perfect for that length.
|
Originally Posted by Impreza_aL
(Post 16304174)
ok that sounds more doable without track/gym work.
i believe mansker and watkins hold the hellyer record for the 200 at 10.3-6 can't quite remember the actual time. |
Current PR: 11.41
Goal: 11:2 Outdoor Concrete 333m. That's actually pretty close to what time I am aiming for... :) JMR |
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 250, align: left"]
[TR] [TD]Baby Puke[/TD] [TD]11.40"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Jaytron[/TD] [TD]11.56"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Quinn8it[/TD] [TD]10.95"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Brian Ratliff[/TD] [TD]11.99"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Imprezza_al[/TD] [TD]11.67"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Sisomphone[/TD] [TD]12.95"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Queerpunk[/TD] [TD]12.13"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Hida Yanra[/TD] [TD]pending[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Loverrellik[/TD] [TD]13.15"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Carleton[/TD] [TD]11.50"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]JMR[/TD] [TD]11.20"[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] JMR added |
Agree that low banked tracks improves your skill. On a track with ideal banking the bike dos what you want, on inadequate banking, it doesn't. Nice banking, though, is more fun...
|
right now my current pb is so bad, that i'm caught between the embarrassment of actually publicizing it, and the possibility that because its so bad, and was set before I started training far more seriously I might have a shot at a reasonable improvement :o:o:o
|
Back to the 333 200 line for a minute:
When looking at 200 splits, on a 400 or 250 my 1st 100 is consistently a tiny bit quicker than the 2nd 100, which is how I'm told it should look. However, on my local 333, it flips around, prompting me to think the 1st 100 is too slow. This is what got me thinking about playing with the line. Anybody else experience something like this? It seems to me logical that starting the drop at the mid-point of T1-T2 (instead of the traditional drop point, a beat past the exit of T2) would do two beneficial things: One, it gives you the acceleration of the drop beginning, what 30-40m? before the 200 start line instead of 5-10 m. That would seem to be a good thing. Two, it gets you in the lane quicker and this shortens the true distance you ride for '200' meters. Thoughts? I'd love to hear from people who've experimented with this. |
Originally Posted by Velocirapture
(Post 16305910)
right now my current pb is so bad, that i'm caught between the embarrassment of actually publicizing it, and the possibility that because its so bad, and was set before I started training far more seriously I might have a shot at a reasonable improvement :o:o:o
|
Originally Posted by Baby Puke
(Post 16306567)
Back to the 333 200 line for a minute:
When looking at 200 splits, on a 400 or 250 my 1st 100 is consistently a tiny bit quicker than the 2nd 100, which is how I'm told it should look. However, on my local 333, it flips around, prompting me to think the 1st 100 is too slow. This is what got me thinking about playing with the line. Anybody else experience something like this? It seems to me logical that starting the drop at the mid-point of T1-T2 (instead of the traditional drop point, a beat past the exit of T2) would do two beneficial things: One, it gives you the acceleration of the drop beginning, what 30-40m? before the 200 start line instead of 5-10 m. That would seem to be a good thing. Two, it gets you in the lane quicker and this shortens the true distance you ride for '200' meters. Thoughts? I'd love to hear from people who've experimented with this. |
As you can tell by my numbers I am VERY MUCH not a sprinter, and also on the worst track in the country. PB 14.9 Goal Time: 14.17
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:12 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.