Show Off your Track Training and Racing Bikes (2014+)
#1026
Senior Member
ahh sorry to hear about the time off the track
I think it's going to be my next ride, I really like the build and geometry. Wish they were a little less spotty with communication, but can't have everything

I think it's going to be my next ride, I really like the build and geometry. Wish they were a little less spotty with communication, but can't have everything

#1027
Newbie
Likes For m@tty:
#1028
Senior Member
417 Reach
494 Stack
532 Eff TT
74.5 ST Angle
Either the Eff TT is really longer, or the ST Angle is really steeper (like old bike), or reach is really shorter, etc.
https://worxbikes.com/track-wx-r/
https://worxbikes.com/product/track-wx-r-frameset/
https://worxbikes.com/wp-content/upl...0-Geometry.png
The geo for the old bike they have adds up correctly:
Old Bike: Trax Worx:
https://worxbikes.com/track-worx/
https://worxbikes.com/wp-content/upl...K-Geometry.png
ex, M:
417 Reach
494 Stack
536 Eff TT
76.5 ST Angle
Thanks!
#1029
Newbie
Awesome, any chance you can measure the reach and/or effective toptube length? The geometry on their site does not check out, for example M (regular reach):
417 Reach
494 Stack
532 Eff TT
74.5 ST Angle
Either the Eff TT is really longer, or the ST Angle is really steeper (like old bike), or reach is really shorter, etc.
https://worxbikes.com/track-wx-r/
https://worxbikes.com/product/track-wx-r-frameset/
https://worxbikes.com/wp-content/upl...0-Geometry.png
The geo for the old bike they have adds up correctly:
Old Bike: Trax Worx:
https://worxbikes.com/track-worx/
https://worxbikes.com/wp-content/upl...K-Geometry.png
ex, M:
417 Reach
494 Stack
536 Eff TT
76.5 ST Angle
Thanks!
417 Reach
494 Stack
532 Eff TT
74.5 ST Angle
Either the Eff TT is really longer, or the ST Angle is really steeper (like old bike), or reach is really shorter, etc.
https://worxbikes.com/track-wx-r/
https://worxbikes.com/product/track-wx-r-frameset/
https://worxbikes.com/wp-content/upl...0-Geometry.png
The geo for the old bike they have adds up correctly:
Old Bike: Trax Worx:
https://worxbikes.com/track-worx/
https://worxbikes.com/wp-content/upl...K-Geometry.png
ex, M:
417 Reach
494 Stack
536 Eff TT
76.5 ST Angle
Thanks!
#1030
Senior Member
Awesome, thanks for confirming! Yeah if stack and reach are good, then STA/Eff-TT don't really matter. Looking through all the sizes: assuming stack, reach, and STA are correct, I get an Eff-TT of +22mm for every size. Ex: M would be 554, not 532. I'm guessing they didn't include one of the tube radius's for their calculation.
Likes For Lectron:
#1032
Newbie
New gearing for F200s. I'm running 60x13 for my max gear on a good day. I'm in purgatory waiting on tires/new front five-spoke, so don't judge me
.




Likes For brian44:
#1035
Full Member
#1036
Newbie
Cost more than the bike? Do you mean the frame? Not sure why that is relevant but ok.
Velobike...did not pay retail FWIW.
Velobike...did not pay retail FWIW.
Last edited by brian44; 08-01-22 at 06:55 AM.
#1037
Full Member
A couple of pictures of a recently acquired Tom Kellogg/Jeff Duser built, 2008 Spectrum frame that previously underwent minimal track fray, originally commissioned by Lane DeCamp.


And the T4 Cervelo has seen a few upgrades since last posted, the Vision TFA Pro extensions are now cut to be Article 1.3.023 UCI legal.


And the T4 Cervelo has seen a few upgrades since last posted, the Vision TFA Pro extensions are now cut to be Article 1.3.023 UCI legal.

Last edited by m_sasso; 09-13-22 at 09:00 PM.
Likes For Lectron:
Likes For Lectron:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Non-Fiction
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
927
01-22-14 06:41 PM
ianf
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
4
02-04-13 03:47 AM