Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Training & Nutrition
Reload this Page >

Six more retractions: JAMA, or Acta Retracta?

Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

Six more retractions: JAMA, or Acta Retracta?

Reply

Old 09-20-18, 09:10 PM
  #1  
wgscott
VectorPotential sensitive
Thread Starter
 
wgscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: The Timbers of Fennario (CL77)
Posts: 4,201

Bikes: Steel

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2199 Post(s)
Six more retractions: JAMA, or Acta Retracta?

https://arstechnica.com/science/2018...mon-diet-tips/

Worth a read, just for the puns.
wgscott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-18, 10:14 PM
  #2  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,291

Bikes: Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel, Centurion Ironman Expert

Mentioned: 138 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2503 Post(s)
In an interview on NPR several weeks ago a researcher criticized data dredging, although I don't recall whether he pointed specifically to Wansink.

I'm wondering whether it's a mistake to disregard apparent patterns in data. Sure, it's a mistake to publish findings representing these as statistically significant or indicative of anything that might influence people's health choices.

But the fellow in the interview sounded a bit zealous, as if it were a sin against science to even consider data dredging to look for issues that might merit further study. He sounded a bit like those psychologists who say we're overwhelmed by consumer choices, so we're better off with fewer choices. No, thanks, I'm capable of choosing what I need, want or like without false monopolies being presented as some sort of neo-consumerist advocacy.
canklecat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-18, 10:21 PM
  #3  
wgscott
VectorPotential sensitive
Thread Starter
 
wgscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: The Timbers of Fennario (CL77)
Posts: 4,201

Bikes: Steel

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2199 Post(s)
The problem is expectation bias vs. statistical noise.

Some apparent correlations really are meaningless.

wgscott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 08:05 AM
  #4  
OBoile
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,086
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 620 Post(s)
Originally Posted by wgscott View Post
The problem is expectation bias vs. statistical noise.

Some apparent correlations really are meaningless.

Agreed... but the comparison you showed here makes perfect sense. If you can't have a nice steak, what's the point of it all?
OBoile is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 08:20 AM
  #5  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,806
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1499 Post(s)
Originally Posted by OBoile View Post
Agreed... but the comparison you showed here makes perfect sense. If you can't have a nice steak, what's the point of it all?
I know this is a joke, but the graph doesn't go to zero. Plotted on a full scale axis the dip in beef consumption looks a lot less meaningful. Plenty of steaks would still be consumed at 58lbs
redlude97 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 08:48 AM
  #6  
OBoile
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,086
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 620 Post(s)
Originally Posted by redlude97 View Post
I know this is a joke, but the graph doesn't go to zero. Plotted on a full scale axis the dip in beef consumption looks a lot less meaningful. Plenty of steaks would still be consumed at 58lbs
Ah, but 58 lbs is the average. What if some people are consuming the same amount, but some cut it out entirely... and therefore have no reason to live?
OBoile is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 08:50 AM
  #7  
wgscott
VectorPotential sensitive
Thread Starter
 
wgscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: The Timbers of Fennario (CL77)
Posts: 4,201

Bikes: Steel

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2199 Post(s)
What if the relative rate of suicide by handgun per age group is constant, but more people are living longer because they eat ethically? Then the rise in suicide absolute numbers is a statistical artifact, due to people living longer because they didn't consume cow carcass.
wgscott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 08:56 AM
  #8  
DrIsotope 
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 6,094

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3179 Post(s)
And it only gets worse from here. They stopped eating beef, they starting eating organic, and bam! everybody's got autism.

__________________
DrIsotope is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 09:04 AM
  #9  
wgscott
VectorPotential sensitive
Thread Starter
 
wgscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: The Timbers of Fennario (CL77)
Posts: 4,201

Bikes: Steel

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2199 Post(s)
Here is possibly the most frightening part of the article:

Wansink released a statement to Buzzfeed saying: “I have been tremendously honored and blessed to be a Cornell professor and especially to be the first John S. Dyson Professor of Marketing at the Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management.
So, this guy is a Prof. of Marketing and he is publishing nutritional and dietary statistical studies in JAMA?
wgscott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 09:06 AM
  #10  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,806
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1499 Post(s)
Originally Posted by wgscott View Post
What if the relative rate of suicide by handgun per age group is constant, but more people are living longer because they eat ethically? Then the rise in suicide absolute numbers is a statistical artifact, due to people living longer because they didn't consume cow carcass.
Fake news
redlude97 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 09:07 AM
  #11  
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 5,970

Bikes: MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 751 Post(s)
So, the Autism "epidemic" has caused an uptick in organic food sales?
bruce19 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 09:08 AM
  #12  
wgscott
VectorPotential sensitive
Thread Starter
 
wgscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: The Timbers of Fennario (CL77)
Posts: 4,201

Bikes: Steel

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2199 Post(s)
Originally Posted by bruce19 View Post
So, the Autism "epidemic" has caused an uptick in organic food sales?
Statistics never lie.
wgscott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 09:10 AM
  #13  
himespau 
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 10,889
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1194 Post(s)
I just got done giving a test (and trying to explain the results) where a whole lot of my students didn't understand that, when faced with data that doesn't support your hypothesis, you can't just make up a new hypothesis that fits your data perfectly and then go and publish that as is. You still need to test your new hypothesis (usually with new/different controls and possibly a new design) if for no other reason than to show your findings are reproducible (but also because you probably didn't control for all the right things perfectly when your first hypothesis was different).
himespau is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 09:11 AM
  #14  
himespau 
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 10,889
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1194 Post(s)
Originally Posted by wgscott View Post
Here is possibly the most frightening part of the article:



So, this guy is a Prof. of Marketing and he is publishing nutritional and dietary statistical studies in JAMA?
Wow, I didn't see that. No wonder he was trolling large datasets for deviations. Isn't that the whole point of directed micromarketing or whatever the hell it is that they call that stuff?
himespau is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 09:24 AM
  #15  
wgscott
VectorPotential sensitive
Thread Starter
 
wgscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: The Timbers of Fennario (CL77)
Posts: 4,201

Bikes: Steel

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2199 Post(s)
Originally Posted by himespau View Post
I just got done giving a test (and trying to explain the results) where a whole lot of my students didn't understand that, when faced with data that doesn't support your hypothesis, you can't just make up a new hypothesis that fits your data perfectly and then go and publish that as is. You still need to test your new hypothesis (usually with new/different controls and possibly a new design) if for no other reason than to show your findings are reproducible (but also because you probably didn't control for all the right things perfectly when your first hypothesis was different).
Why not teach them that they can publish the refutation of the original hypothesis?
wgscott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 10:45 AM
  #16  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 18,452
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6938 Post(s)
Originally Posted by DrIsotope View Post
And it only gets worse from here. They stopped eating beef, they starting eating organic, and bam! everybody's got autism.

Originally Posted by bruce19 View Post
So, the Autism "epidemic" has caused an uptick in organic food sales?
This is absolutely wrong, what that chart is telling us is that organic food causes awareness of autism and increased diagnosability.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 11:58 AM
  #17  
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 5,970

Bikes: MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 751 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest View Post
This is absolutely wrong, what that chart is telling us is that organic food causes awareness of autism and increased diagnosability.
That was supposed to be a joke, right? OTOH, organic food doesn't actually cause autism.
bruce19 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 12:36 PM
  #18  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 18,452
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6938 Post(s)
Yeah, that was supposed to be a joke.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 09:05 PM
  #19  
OBoile
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,086
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 620 Post(s)
Originally Posted by wgscott View Post
What if the relative rate of suicide by handgun per age group is constant, but more people are living longer because they eat ethically? Then the rise in suicide absolute numbers is a statistical artifact, due to people living longer because they didn't consume cow carcass.
Doubtful. The problem with your theory is the association with avoiding beef and living longer.
OBoile is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-18, 09:54 PM
  #20  
wgscott
VectorPotential sensitive
Thread Starter
 
wgscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: The Timbers of Fennario (CL77)
Posts: 4,201

Bikes: Steel

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2199 Post(s)
I've heard the word gullible is not in any dictionary.
wgscott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-19, 09:24 AM
  #21  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 13,867

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
In this thread, Internet Brands should be signing some kind of release with the "Journal of Irreproducible Results!"
Road Fan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-19, 11:24 AM
  #22  
HarborBandS
HarborBandS
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago Western Suburbs
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Originally Posted by wgscott View Post
Here is possibly the most frightening part of the article:



So, this guy is a Prof. of Marketing and he is publishing nutritional and dietary statistical studies in JAMA?
It sounds nuts at first glance, but a lot of modern marketing research is statistical analysis of large data sets.
HarborBandS is offline  
Reply With Quote

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service