Muscle Fiber Types - Nature or Nurture?
#1
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 5,856
Bikes: Scott Addict R1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2329 Post(s)
Liked 2,321 Times
in
1,175 Posts
Muscle Fiber Types - Nature or Nurture?
Can we learn something about our own potential, or which discipline we are best suited for, by looking at the muscles of top cyclists?
And are those muscle fiber types genetic, or can we train to modify them?
This paper, Lievens E, Bellinger P, Van Vossel K, Vancompernolle J, Bex T, Minahan C, Derave W. Muscle Typology of World-Class Cyclists across Various Disciplines and Events. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Apr 1;53(4):816-824. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002518. PMID: 33105386, is interesting.
It found that road climbers have the highest amount of Type I (slow-twitch) fibers, BMX racers have the highest amount of Type II (fast-twitch), and road sprinters are in between (which may explain why the sprinters suffer so much on a mountain stage).

Climbers need to put out steady power for a long time, so they have the most fatigue-resistant Type I muscle. BMX riders need explosive power at the race start, so they have high-power Type II muscle. Did these athletes develop those fibers to perform best in their discipline, or were they just lucky to be born that way?
The follow-on question: Can you train to preferentially develop Type I?
There are some studies hinting that lower resistance, higher repetition strength training can increase Type I hypertrophy.
This article: Training Muscle Fiber Types, written by Jacob Wilson, PhD, suggests that you can target your training to develop Type I.
"A common refrain is that type 1 fibers do not grow as much as type 2 fibers in response to training. And for a normal training program not attempting to target type 1 fiber growth, that is certainly true. However, from the above discussion, its a strong theory that you can target type 1 fibers with specific training strategies."
There you go, a "strong theory".
And are those muscle fiber types genetic, or can we train to modify them?
This paper, Lievens E, Bellinger P, Van Vossel K, Vancompernolle J, Bex T, Minahan C, Derave W. Muscle Typology of World-Class Cyclists across Various Disciplines and Events. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Apr 1;53(4):816-824. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002518. PMID: 33105386, is interesting.
It found that road climbers have the highest amount of Type I (slow-twitch) fibers, BMX racers have the highest amount of Type II (fast-twitch), and road sprinters are in between (which may explain why the sprinters suffer so much on a mountain stage).

Climbers need to put out steady power for a long time, so they have the most fatigue-resistant Type I muscle. BMX riders need explosive power at the race start, so they have high-power Type II muscle. Did these athletes develop those fibers to perform best in their discipline, or were they just lucky to be born that way?
The follow-on question: Can you train to preferentially develop Type I?
There are some studies hinting that lower resistance, higher repetition strength training can increase Type I hypertrophy.
This article: Training Muscle Fiber Types, written by Jacob Wilson, PhD, suggests that you can target your training to develop Type I.
"A common refrain is that type 1 fibers do not grow as much as type 2 fibers in response to training. And for a normal training program not attempting to target type 1 fiber growth, that is certainly true. However, from the above discussion, its a strong theory that you can target type 1 fibers with specific training strategies."
There you go, a "strong theory".
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat
Ride, Rest, Repeat

Likes For terrymorse:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,274
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3774 Post(s)
Liked 2,132 Times
in
1,098 Posts
It's been known for a long time that muscle fibers are genetic. All humans have a mixture of Type 1 and Type 2 muscle fibers but genetics determine which type of muscle fibers are most dominant in each individual...People with Type 2 fibers gravitate to power sports such as power lifting and olympic lifting, sprinting, bodybuilding, track cycling etc. People who have an abundance of Type 1 fibers gravitate more towards endurance activities...Now that doesn't mean that a person with Type 1 fibers can't lift weights or that a person with Type 2 fibers can't do long distance endurance activities. You can do whatever you want but your performance will be limited by whatever muscle fiber type dominates in your body...There is a theory out there about a third type of muscle fiber which they call a hybrid muscle fiber which is explosive and very resistant to fatigue at the same time and allows you to perform repetitive forms of high intensity efforts over and over for long periods of time. One thing is certain is that ageing has a much greater effect on fast twitch muscle fibers than on slow twitch muscle fibers and the older you get the less explosive you become, you can run marathons when your 70 years old but you can't be an olympic weight lifter at that age.
Last edited by wolfchild; 03-24-23 at 05:34 PM. Reason: spelling grammar correction
#3
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 18,992
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 113 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3632 Post(s)
Liked 1,626 Times
in
1,189 Posts
There was one of the top TdF sprinters - but my memory is crap, don't remember his name. He retrained himself as a climber and did pretty well in GC, way beyond the expectations of others. Maybe someone else remembers him. Maybe like 20 years ago?
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#4
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 5,856
Bikes: Scott Addict R1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2329 Post(s)
Liked 2,321 Times
in
1,175 Posts
This paper, Improved muscular efficiency displayed as Tour de France champion matures, estimates that Armstrongs Type I muscle went from 60% to 80% over 7 years of training, which produced an 8% improvement in muscle efficiency.
Further evidence that one can develop Type I muscle through training.
Further evidence that one can develop Type I muscle through training.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat
Ride, Rest, Repeat

#5
Senior Member
Laurent Jalabert. Though he wasn't really a climbing specialist. He won the TdF climbers jersey twice, but that was more through long breakaways than climbing prowess.
#6
Version 3.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 12,897
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 296 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1185 Post(s)
Liked 1,977 Times
in
1,155 Posts
This paper, Improved muscular efficiency displayed as Tour de France champion matures, estimates that Armstrongs Type I muscle went from 60% to 80% over 7 years of training, which produced an 8% improvement in muscle efficiency.
Further evidence that one can develop Type I muscle through training.
Further evidence that one can develop Type I muscle through training.
#7
Version 3.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 12,897
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 296 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1185 Post(s)
Liked 1,977 Times
in
1,155 Posts
Thanks Terry for the topic and article. 6 decades ago, as a kid I ran track. The coach divided us up into the fast kids and the slow kids. Not too politically correct but accurate. The fast kids did short distances and the slower kids did longer. Slower kids that exhibited endurance with some speed excelled in the mid to longer distances.
For some time time, I was doing the 100 meters. The coach decided that I would move to the 400 meters. So I was fast but not quite as fast as the other kids. I excelled at the 400 meters and 1600 meter relay. Over the decades, nothing has changed. I do really well as sprinting and 500 meters unless a really fast specialist shows up. If I do 30 second to 1 minute efforts, I can do those without a problem and it is like sitting down with a bowl of potato chips. I eat the entire bowl and want more.
Longer distances kill me but that does not mean I cannot do them. It is a lot harder and the kids that were slow, now have their way with me.
Back to training type I fibers. Over the years, I have become a fan of using different cadence to strength train on the bicycle. Standing starts build type 1 and type II muscle fiber and low cadence intervals at tempo build type I. If one believes that high repetition at 30% one rep max builds type I fibers then it follows that low cadence 55 rpm at higher power will generate enough torque to build type I.
For some time time, I was doing the 100 meters. The coach decided that I would move to the 400 meters. So I was fast but not quite as fast as the other kids. I excelled at the 400 meters and 1600 meter relay. Over the decades, nothing has changed. I do really well as sprinting and 500 meters unless a really fast specialist shows up. If I do 30 second to 1 minute efforts, I can do those without a problem and it is like sitting down with a bowl of potato chips. I eat the entire bowl and want more.
Longer distances kill me but that does not mean I cannot do them. It is a lot harder and the kids that were slow, now have their way with me.

Back to training type I fibers. Over the years, I have become a fan of using different cadence to strength train on the bicycle. Standing starts build type 1 and type II muscle fiber and low cadence intervals at tempo build type I. If one believes that high repetition at 30% one rep max builds type I fibers then it follows that low cadence 55 rpm at higher power will generate enough torque to build type I.
Likes For Hermes:
#8
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 18,992
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 113 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3632 Post(s)
Liked 1,626 Times
in
1,189 Posts
#9
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,148
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 740 Post(s)
Liked 838 Times
in
356 Posts
This paper, Improved muscular efficiency displayed as Tour de France champion matures, estimates that Armstrongs Type I muscle went from 60% to 80% over 7 years of training, which produced an 8% improvement in muscle efficiency.
Further evidence that one can develop Type I muscle through training.
Further evidence that one can develop Type I muscle through training.
Likes For RChung:
#10
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 5,856
Bikes: Scott Addict R1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2329 Post(s)
Liked 2,321 Times
in
1,175 Posts
Another interesting paper to us aging athletes that found strength training produced an increase in efficiency in masters cyclists (but no similar efficiency increase in young cyclists).
Louis et al, Strength training improves cycling efficiency in master endurance athletes, Eur J Appl Physiol (2012). PDF
They put young and masters cyclists through an identical 3-week leg strength program, with some interesting results:
Louis et al, Strength training improves cycling efficiency in master endurance athletes, Eur J Appl Physiol (2012). PDF
They put young and masters cyclists through an identical 3-week leg strength program, with some interesting results:
- before strength training, youngs max strength was 17.9% higher than masters, but only 7.8% higher after
- fatigue index (decrease of strength during exercise) of masters was significantly lower than youngs, both before and after strength training
- cycling efficiency was higher in youngs before strength training, but this age-related difference disappeared after strength training
- training increased only max strength in youngs
- training increased max strength, endurance power, and cycling efficiency in masters
- training significantly reduced masters heart rate and breathing volume during submaximal cycling exercise
- muscle fibers became stronger and more resistant to fatigue, "since the efficiency of a muscle fiber is reduced following a moderate level of fatigue"
- "could be partly explained by the increase in maximal strength capacity...would effectuate a reduction of the relative torque needed"
- "a reduced recruitment of type II fibers during cycling would result in a higher economy because cycling economy is related to the percentage of type I fibers in the active muscle"
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat
Ride, Rest, Repeat

Likes For terrymorse:
#11
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 11,171
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9194 Post(s)
Liked 5,097 Times
in
2,716 Posts
Good review on fiber type change with training. The type I/ll dichotomy is an oversimplification.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473039/
Likes For MoAlpha:
#12
Version 3.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 12,897
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 296 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1185 Post(s)
Liked 1,977 Times
in
1,155 Posts
I have the Actn3 gene variant - likely sprinter.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles...017.01080/full
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles...017.01080/full
#13
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 18,992
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 113 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3632 Post(s)
Liked 1,626 Times
in
1,189 Posts
Good review on fiber type change with training. The type I/ll dichotomy is an oversimplification.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473039/
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#14
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 5,856
Bikes: Scott Addict R1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2329 Post(s)
Liked 2,321 Times
in
1,175 Posts
Maybe short term strength training works, also. At least for older men (a club of which I am a member).
One of the cited studies had untrained older men (70+ y.o.) do progressive resistance training. Their strength increased 52%, their type I muscle increased 10.4%, but their fast/hybrid muscle decreased or stayed the same.
This is a similar result to the study of masters athletes, above, who increased their cycling efficiency after strength training (type I is credited with improving efficiency).
It's already known that older athletes are more fatigue resistant and have a higher percentage of Type I, so it seems sensible that they (we) respond to strength training by adding more Type I than the youngs do.
(I think it's time to get more serious about strength training.)
One of the cited studies had untrained older men (70+ y.o.) do progressive resistance training. Their strength increased 52%, their type I muscle increased 10.4%, but their fast/hybrid muscle decreased or stayed the same.
This is a similar result to the study of masters athletes, above, who increased their cycling efficiency after strength training (type I is credited with improving efficiency).
It's already known that older athletes are more fatigue resistant and have a higher percentage of Type I, so it seems sensible that they (we) respond to strength training by adding more Type I than the youngs do.
(I think it's time to get more serious about strength training.)
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat
Ride, Rest, Repeat

#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Posts: 1,781
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3193 Post(s)
Liked 792 Times
in
595 Posts
My go-to answer whenever the Nature vs Nurture questions pop up, is: Both. We all have natural strengths/weaknesses and thru training we can do amazing things with our weaknesses, but also our strengths can become our weaknesses with lack of training.
.
.
#16
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 18,992
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 113 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3632 Post(s)
Liked 1,626 Times
in
1,189 Posts
Maybe short term strength training works, also. At least for older men (a club of which I am a member).
One of the cited studies had untrained older men (70+ y.o.) do progressive resistance training. Their strength increased 52%, their type I muscle increased 10.4%, but their fast/hybrid muscle decreased or stayed the same.
This is a similar result to the study of masters athletes, above, who increased their cycling efficiency after strength training (type I is credited with improving efficiency).
It's already known that older athletes are more fatigue resistant and have a higher percentage of Type I, so it seems sensible that they (we) respond to strength training by adding more Type I than the youngs do.
(I think it's time to get more serious about strength training.)
One of the cited studies had untrained older men (70+ y.o.) do progressive resistance training. Their strength increased 52%, their type I muscle increased 10.4%, but their fast/hybrid muscle decreased or stayed the same.
This is a similar result to the study of masters athletes, above, who increased their cycling efficiency after strength training (type I is credited with improving efficiency).
It's already known that older athletes are more fatigue resistant and have a higher percentage of Type I, so it seems sensible that they (we) respond to strength training by adding more Type I than the youngs do.
(I think it's time to get more serious about strength training.)
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#17
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 18,992
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 113 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3632 Post(s)
Liked 1,626 Times
in
1,189 Posts
The most fascinating thing for me in all this is . . .DNA. The general theory is that evolutionary pressure stops at the upper age for reproduction. The vast, vast part of our evolution was in pre-history, so that limit would be at about 40. But then this. Therefore there was evolutionary pressure to make sure that the older folks could still march with the tribe. We increased survival among the youngers who were willing to be taught. We drew the pictures of the beasts to be hunted and we knew what mushrooms were safe to eat. We couldn't kill the beasts but we could carry them home. Etc. I don't see another explanation. Except for what Darwin called "sports", DNA.is quite consistent. It's the way it is for a reason. I think autism is just "sports." We're good enough physically, but we have to get smarter. There's always both nature and nurture.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#18
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 11,171
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9194 Post(s)
Liked 5,097 Times
in
2,716 Posts
Maybe short term strength training works, also. At least for older men (a club of which I am a member).
One of the cited studies had untrained older men (70+ y.o.) do progressive resistance training. Their strength increased 52%, their type I muscle increased 10.4%, but their fast/hybrid muscle decreased or stayed the same.
This is a similar result to the study of masters athletes, above, who increased their cycling efficiency after strength training (type I is credited with improving efficiency).
It's already known that older athletes are more fatigue resistant and have a higher percentage of Type I, so it seems sensible that they (we) respond to strength training by adding more Type I than the youngs do.
(I think it's time to get more serious about strength training.)
One of the cited studies had untrained older men (70+ y.o.) do progressive resistance training. Their strength increased 52%, their type I muscle increased 10.4%, but their fast/hybrid muscle decreased or stayed the same.
This is a similar result to the study of masters athletes, above, who increased their cycling efficiency after strength training (type I is credited with improving efficiency).
It's already known that older athletes are more fatigue resistant and have a higher percentage of Type I, so it seems sensible that they (we) respond to strength training by adding more Type I than the youngs do.
(I think it's time to get more serious about strength training.)
Likes For MoAlpha:
#19
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 11,171
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9194 Post(s)
Liked 5,097 Times
in
2,716 Posts
The most fascinating thing for me in all this is . . .DNA. The general theory is that evolutionary pressure stops at the upper age for reproduction. The vast, vast part of our evolution was in pre-history, so that limit would be at about 40. But then this. Therefore there was evolutionary pressure to make sure that the older folks could still march with the tribe. We increased survival among the youngers who were willing to be taught. We drew the pictures of the beasts to be hunted and we knew what mushrooms were safe to eat. We couldn't kill the beasts but we could carry them home. Etc. I don't see another explanation. Except for what Darwin called "sports", DNA.is quite consistent. It's the way it is for a reason. I think autism is just "sports." We're good enough physically, but we have to get smarter. There's always both nature and nurture.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2107621118
i buy it!
Likes For MoAlpha:
#20
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 11,171
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9194 Post(s)
Liked 5,097 Times
in
2,716 Posts
This is always the right answer, since our genes determine our response to the environment.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 5,327
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2705 Post(s)
Liked 2,931 Times
in
1,840 Posts
In the current peloton, there's Wout Van Aert who can both sprint and climb with the very best (simultaneously!). But he's probably not human.
#23
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 18,992
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 113 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3632 Post(s)
Liked 1,626 Times
in
1,189 Posts
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Last edited by Carbonfiberboy; 03-27-23 at 12:04 PM.
#24
Version 3.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 12,897
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 296 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1185 Post(s)
Liked 1,977 Times
in
1,155 Posts
#25
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 11,171
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9194 Post(s)
Liked 5,097 Times
in
2,716 Posts