One last question on strength!
#1
taking the piss
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: albury
Posts: 380
Bikes: avanti vivace, repco piece of $#IT and a raleigh mtn bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
One last question on strength!
Can you gain strength in your upper body, lower body, abs etc and still maintain body weight if not lose weight? Do strength exercises in some small way always increase the weight of a muscle...I think if someone could clarify this for me I would be more confident either way on the strength training issue!
#2
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: southern california
Posts: 424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
strength training breaks muscle down. the muscle becomes stronger and larger in the healing process. you can engage in strength training and limit the amount of mass you take on by making sure the weight you work with isn't to heavy... light weight (well, not TOO light) and high amounts of reps...
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY midstate
Posts: 394
Bikes: 85 Ross Mt Rainier(for winter road use), 86 Centurion Ironman Master, 92 trek 2300,2005 Iron Horse HollowPoint Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
and dont forget muscle weighs more than fat
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So, this is how it usually comes down.
Heavy weights, low (4-6) reps + recovery = mass gain and more one-rep power
Lower weights, higher amount (12+) reps = endurance (more to a cyclist's liking, I'd assume)
Anything in between is a bit of a mix. To get that really ripped, vascular (veiny!!) look, you have to have at least a little bit of mass and very low body fat.
And to answer your first question, yes. But it's all a little vague, if you want you can pm me for more explanation.
Heavy weights, low (4-6) reps + recovery = mass gain and more one-rep power
Lower weights, higher amount (12+) reps = endurance (more to a cyclist's liking, I'd assume)
Anything in between is a bit of a mix. To get that really ripped, vascular (veiny!!) look, you have to have at least a little bit of mass and very low body fat.
And to answer your first question, yes. But it's all a little vague, if you want you can pm me for more explanation.
#5
Tom (ex)Builder
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 2,814
Bikes: Specialized Allez
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Making the muscle stronger won't necessarily increase the weight, but muscle weighs more than fat. Lean muscle will also burn help burn fat. If you concentrate more on doing reps than pushing a lot of weight, you will strengthen the muscle without bulking it up. Regular frequent light workouts are going to be better for a cyclist that wants to be stronger without gaining weight, and increasing core strength in the ab and back muscles will help you be able to ride more comfortably.
Nothing fancy here, just basic observations.
Nothing fancy here, just basic observations.
__________________
Tom
"It hurts so good..."
Tom
"It hurts so good..."
#6
taking the piss
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: albury
Posts: 380
Bikes: avanti vivace, repco piece of $#IT and a raleigh mtn bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Seems like strength training isn't worth the effort. I can understand why it would be useful for a big fat guy because they can lose weight in fat but for someone like me strength training might make it impossible to get down to my goal weight of 52kg's and for what? a bit better stability on the bike, more comfortable ride....bahhh I am still unconvinced it will improve my cycling instead weakening my performance.
This IS the most intriguing training debate in cycling...I wish there was a black and white answer!
This IS the most intriguing training debate in cycling...I wish there was a black and white answer!
#8
taking the piss
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: albury
Posts: 380
Bikes: avanti vivace, repco piece of $#IT and a raleigh mtn bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bone density? is that like bone strength? I dont have any worries there...I was once diagnosed with over calciumitisatosis lol. I probably drink a litre of milk a day minimum....too much i know, he he he.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 4,850
Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How tall are you, Macca? 52kg is awfully light for anyone above 5' 4". At that point, you aren't generating enough power for your light weight to even help you. You don't have the strength in the strength to weight ratio to make it work. Even for climbing, let alone a crit or TT. Muscle is
Also, how old are you? You really shouldn't be worrying about your weight that much at this point in time. Watching/limiting it too much will hinder your growth.
Also, how old are you? You really shouldn't be worrying about your weight that much at this point in time. Watching/limiting it too much will hinder your growth.
#10
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 6,959
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3298 Post(s)
Liked 3,389 Times
in
1,714 Posts
Originally Posted by macca123
Do strength exercises in some small way always increase the weight of a muscle...I think if someone could clarify this for me I would be more confident either way on the strength training issue!
We have just seen the importance of doing strength workouts that are relevant to one's sport. A related point is that the "explosive" strength training techniques employed by Paavolainen et al. develop neuromuscular strength without causing the marked muscle hypertrophy characteristic of high-resistance weight training...Therefore, high-velocity, low-resistance exercises may help runners get stronger without putting on lots of extra muscle mass. (from this web page)
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 4,850
Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah I can speak first hand about the fast, low rep type stuff. This was for 800/1500/3k and some 5kers. We did cleans with pretty light weights, emphasis on EXPLOSION. Good form and technique, throw it up, bring 'er down, and do that 5-6 times. 3 sets of that. Didn't gain a pound, and knocked .6s off my flying 150m time (i was 1500m runner myself). That translated to better economy at speed, a little faster turnover, and better change of pace.
#12
taking the piss
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: albury
Posts: 380
Bikes: avanti vivace, repco piece of $#IT and a raleigh mtn bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Duke of Kent
How tall are you, Macca? 52kg is awfully light for anyone above 5' 4". At that point, you aren't generating enough power for your light weight to even help you. You don't have the strength in the strength to weight ratio to make it work. Even for climbing, let alone a crit or TT. Muscle is
Also, how old are you? You really shouldn't be worrying about your weight that much at this point in time. Watching/limiting it too much will hinder your growth.
Also, how old are you? You really shouldn't be worrying about your weight that much at this point in time. Watching/limiting it too much will hinder your growth.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have heard that the professional racers all weight train in the off season. I think one of the must important areas to train is your abs because your legs need a firm platform to push against and once your abs go your power to the pedals will decrease.
#14
taking the piss
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: albury
Posts: 380
Bikes: avanti vivace, repco piece of $#IT and a raleigh mtn bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I can understand that lower ab and back exercises will help but surely it isn't necessary to do any upper body. These professional's you talk about do they just work on abs and back or do they still do some upper body
NOTE: I'm not talking trackies or even big sprinters like petacchi here I am more interested in the climbing/trialist type riders. Obviously the track riders would need upper body to get them started and weight isn't an issue.
NOTE: I'm not talking trackies or even big sprinters like petacchi here I am more interested in the climbing/trialist type riders. Obviously the track riders would need upper body to get them started and weight isn't an issue.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
When i was speaking about the pros i was thinking about road racers in general and some of them work out their shoulders and triceps. But if you were a climbing specialist I could not see how upper body strength could help, unless the grade was so steep you had to stand and pull on the bars for a large portion of the climb.
#16
Senior Member
The pros tend to do more weight-training than the casual cyclists. Check out Lance's and Carmichael's book, The Lance Armstrong Performance Program. Some of it's just to build up muscles that have been consumed during long rides.
Abs and back are very important when you build more leg strength and fitness. Ultimate test of strength is sprints, like McEwen's 1700-watt output. To generate that kind of power, you need some high-strength muscles. With that kind of strength, when just cruising along at 200-watts, your muscles will be much more efficient and use less oxygen than someone who can only put out 400-watts max. You'll also be able to go farther and longer with less muscle-fatigue.
Again, it's a balance of power vs. weight. The most efficient muscles I ever saw at the OTC was a football-player, highest power-output for the least amount of oxygen consumed. But he also weighed 200lbs+, and required a higher-output to keep up with lighter cyclists, pretty much negating his efficiency.
Abs and back are very important when you build more leg strength and fitness. Ultimate test of strength is sprints, like McEwen's 1700-watt output. To generate that kind of power, you need some high-strength muscles. With that kind of strength, when just cruising along at 200-watts, your muscles will be much more efficient and use less oxygen than someone who can only put out 400-watts max. You'll also be able to go farther and longer with less muscle-fatigue.
Again, it's a balance of power vs. weight. The most efficient muscles I ever saw at the OTC was a football-player, highest power-output for the least amount of oxygen consumed. But he also weighed 200lbs+, and required a higher-output to keep up with lighter cyclists, pretty much negating his efficiency.
Last edited by DannoXYZ; 12-23-05 at 02:34 AM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,616
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Strength training (not weight training) will tone your muscles and not cause you to gain weight.
Upper body muscle tone is important for cyclists. I did the 6-Gap century last September (10,000+ climbing) and afterward the sorest part of my body were my arms.
During the past 8 weeks I've been doing leg-building exercises, and high-rep crunches and pushups (100 total per day), while at the same time I've lost 10 pounds. What's left of me is nicely toned, but not bulky.
Bob
Upper body muscle tone is important for cyclists. I did the 6-Gap century last September (10,000+ climbing) and afterward the sorest part of my body were my arms.
During the past 8 weeks I've been doing leg-building exercises, and high-rep crunches and pushups (100 total per day), while at the same time I've lost 10 pounds. What's left of me is nicely toned, but not bulky.
Bob
#18
Lets Ride
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Biking Country, USA
Posts: 1,102
Bikes: Trek 1200, Lemond Sarthe, Gary Fisher Tass
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PenguinDeD
if anything, weight training is important for keeping your bone density up.
#19
Lets Ride
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Biking Country, USA
Posts: 1,102
Bikes: Trek 1200, Lemond Sarthe, Gary Fisher Tass
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by macca123
Seems like strength training isn't worth the effort. I can understand why it would be useful for a big fat guy because they can lose weight in fat but for someone like me strength training might make it impossible to get down to my goal weight of 52kg's and for what? a bit better stability on the bike, more comfortable ride....bahhh I am still unconvinced it will improve my cycling instead weakening my performance.
This IS the most intriguing training debate in cycling...I wish there was a black and white answer!
This IS the most intriguing training debate in cycling...I wish there was a black and white answer!
Overall physical health should include a variety of exercise and cross training. A little weight training would do every cyclist good, especially in the off season.