Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Training & Nutrition
Reload this Page >

metric century vs. split century

Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

metric century vs. split century

Old 07-19-06, 09:48 PM
  #1  
bikingbets
loves rail-trails
Thread Starter
 
bikingbets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Western PA
Posts: 154

Bikes: 2009 Kona Sutra, 2010 Kona Dew Plus, 2008 Raleigh Companion Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
metric century vs. split century

I've been moving through my list of goals for the season, and am wondering about the order of a couple of mine. In your opinion, which is easier: a metric century or a split century (back-to-back 50 mile days)? In what order should I accomplish these?
bikingbets is offline  
Old 07-19-06, 09:54 PM
  #2  
'nother
semifreddo amartuerer
 
'nother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599

Bikes: several

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A metric is only a half-century plus 12 or so miles; practically nothing. I would do a metric one day and 50 miles the next and kill two birds with one stone. Or two stones. Or, something like that.
'nother is offline  
Old 08-08-06, 02:53 PM
  #3  
madopal
Light Cyclist
 
madopal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 115

Bikes: Centurion Le Mans RS, Homebuilt Cyclocross (Nashbar frame), Homebuild Surly Disc Trucker Touring Rig

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would think the metric century is easier, especially for newer riders. I'm training up for a full century now, and even though I do 18 miles a day, I pushed pretty hard on my 50 mile ride. I can say that getting back in the saddle for another 50 miles the next day would have been REALLY hard.

So, IMHO, I'd do the metric first, then the back to back second.
__________________
Cycle tracks will abound in Utopia.
~H.G. Wells
madopal is offline  
Old 08-08-06, 03:12 PM
  #4  
cuda2k
Unique Vintage Steel
 
cuda2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 11,524

Bikes: Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Surly Straggler

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have to agree that doing back to back long days is harder to do than one extra long day. I've done 45/35mi weekends that really pushed my endurance the second day. I've also done 64mi rides where I was completely wiped out the next day, all day. I'd probably go for the single long ride, then focus on shortening your bodies recovery time to do the double 50's.
cuda2k is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.