Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-19-06, 09:48 PM   #1
loves rail-trails
Thread Starter
bikingbets's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Western PA
Bikes: 2009 Kona Sutra, 2010 Kona Dew Plus, 2008 Raleigh Companion Tandem
Posts: 154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
metric century vs. split century

I've been moving through my list of goals for the season, and am wondering about the order of a couple of mine. In your opinion, which is easier: a metric century or a split century (back-to-back 50 mile days)? In what order should I accomplish these?
bikingbets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-06, 09:54 PM   #2
semifreddo amartuerer
'nother's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Bikes: several
Posts: 4,599
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
A metric is only a half-century plus 12 or so miles; practically nothing. I would do a metric one day and 50 miles the next and kill two birds with one stone. Or two stones. Or, something like that.
'nother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-06, 02:53 PM   #3
Light Cyclist
madopal's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Bikes: Centurion Le Mans RS, Homebuilt Cyclocross (Nashbar frame)
Posts: 115
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would think the metric century is easier, especially for newer riders. I'm training up for a full century now, and even though I do 18 miles a day, I pushed pretty hard on my 50 mile ride. I can say that getting back in the saddle for another 50 miles the next day would have been REALLY hard.

So, IMHO, I'd do the metric first, then the back to back second.
Cycle tracks will abound in Utopia.
~H.G. Wells
madopal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-06, 03:12 PM   #4
Unique Vintage Steel
cuda2k's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, TX
Bikes: Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Schwinn Crosscut, All-City Space Horse
Posts: 11,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
I have to agree that doing back to back long days is harder to do than one extra long day. I've done 45/35mi weekends that really pushed my endurance the second day. I've also done 64mi rides where I was completely wiped out the next day, all day. I'd probably go for the single long ride, then focus on shortening your bodies recovery time to do the double 50's.
cuda2k is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:06 PM.

  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.