Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Training & Nutrition
Reload this Page >

1 mile walk test: correlation to cycling VO2max?

Search
Notices
Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

1 mile walk test: correlation to cycling VO2max?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-07, 09:43 PM
  #1  
Blue Light Special
Thread Starter
 
kmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bay Area, Sunny Cali
Posts: 1,467

Bikes: '05 Felt F55, Schwinn Prologue road bike, '86 Centurion DS Iron Man, Sette Flite AM MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
1 mile walk test: correlation to cycling VO2max?

I did the Rockport 1 mile test recently and scored 55 ml/kg/min, which is apparently on the Uber-elite end of the scale for that test. I have been road riding regularly for 9 months and my endurance is much better than when I started, but my speed and power is still horrible, so I am probably on the low end of the "trained" range, which is usually quoted around 50-65 ml/kg/min.

I've read that this test is too easy for anybody who actually does any exercise, and is designed mostly for untrained sedentary individuals. Being a walk test, it is more appropriate for runners than cyclists.

I've also read somewhere (can't find the link now) that since cyclists generally do not use their upper body muscles and don't have to support all their weight like runners, an estimate of running VO2max will be lower (~90%?) than the cycling VO2max for the same person.

Does this mean that I can take the "running/walking" VO2max estimate and divide by 0.9 to get my "cycling" VO2max estimate? Has anybody compared the 1 mile walk test results to results from a submaximal ergometer or complete exhaustion type of "cycling" VO2max test?

Last edited by kmart; 03-05-07 at 10:35 PM.
kmart is offline  
Old 03-05-07, 11:21 PM
  #2  
Videre non videri
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208

Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I've estimated my VO2max using several of those different methods ("run as far as possible in x minutes" and others...). I invariably end up at around 35 no matter which method I use. 35 being, of course, pretty poor for a male. And since I'm one of the slowest cyclists I know, I would be inclined to believe those tests are pretty accurate.
CdCf is offline  
Old 03-06-07, 07:38 PM
  #3  
Blue Light Special
Thread Starter
 
kmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bay Area, Sunny Cali
Posts: 1,467

Bikes: '05 Felt F55, Schwinn Prologue road bike, '86 Centurion DS Iron Man, Sette Flite AM MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Anyone else? I'm still curious about this.
kmart is offline  
Old 03-07-07, 07:59 AM
  #4  
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
OK...I'm game...what where and how does one do this test???? and being slightly asthmatic??? In the summer, the heat & humidity here make me suck on my inhaler periodically...otherwise I scare people when I wheeze up by them and say on your left! But seriously, I've got some "big" (for me!) plans for rides this summer and want to be in the best shape possible...Thanks, k
Ksam is offline  
Old 03-07-07, 11:53 AM
  #5  
Blue Light Special
Thread Starter
 
kmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bay Area, Sunny Cali
Posts: 1,467

Bikes: '05 Felt F55, Schwinn Prologue road bike, '86 Centurion DS Iron Man, Sette Flite AM MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
All the info is here. It helps to have a hear rate monitor and a stop watch but you can count your pulse with your fingers too.

https://www.brianmac.demon.co.uk/rockport.htm
kmart is offline  
Old 03-07-07, 12:30 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by kmart
I've also read somewhere (can't find the link now) that since cyclists generally do not use their upper body muscles and don't have to support all their weight like runners, an estimate of running VO2max will be lower (~90%?) than the cycling VO2max for the same person.

Does this mean that I can take the "running/walking" VO2max estimate and divide by 0.9 to get my "cycling" VO2max estimate? Has anybody compared the 1 mile walk test results to results from a submaximal ergometer or complete exhaustion type of "cycling" VO2max test?
Actually, VO2max absolute and relative, are measurements of the aerobic system's maximum oxygen delivery. How your body uses that oxygen is completely independent of the activity. Running requires higher peak muscle-forces for shorter durations (20% or so) than cycling. Which is a smoother, more continuous application of muscle (40-60%) at lower peak forces.

Since the muscles are pushed to a lower percentage of their maximum in cycling, they're operating more efficiently than in running. So at the SAME VO2-max delivery, you'll generate more power for the oxygen-consumed than with running. How to measure it is a completely different question altogether. Obviously measuring oxygen-delivered and extracted while exercising is the only accurate way to measure VO2-max. However, there are some on-the-road methods that can approximate it close enough for training, especially if you use the same test to gauge progress months later.

What you'll notice is that VO2-max absolute won't change much with training, about +10-20%. However, power-generated at VO2-max or LT will have increased tremendously with training. Something along the lines of +50-100% isn't uncommon with increases in muscular efficiency (making more power with same oxygen delivery).

David Holt - VO2-max interval basics - VO2 max, or Maximum Oxygen Uptake Capacity, to use its formal name, is the amount of oxygen we can absorb into our cells in one minute while working at full capacity. It�s a measure of fitness expressed in milliliters per kilogram per minute.
DannoXYZ is offline  
Old 03-07-07, 12:42 PM
  #7  
Videre non videri
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208

Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by kmart
All the info is here. It helps to have a hear rate monitor and a stop watch but you can count your pulse with your fingers too.

https://www.brianmac.demon.co.uk/rockport.htm
Only problem is finding a windless day and a track. Neither of which is available where I live. Well, it could happen that there's no wind for a few hours a couple of days a year. Can't recall when it last happened, though.
CdCf is offline  
Old 03-08-07, 09:09 PM
  #8  
Blue Light Special
Thread Starter
 
kmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bay Area, Sunny Cali
Posts: 1,467

Bikes: '05 Felt F55, Schwinn Prologue road bike, '86 Centurion DS Iron Man, Sette Flite AM MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
Actually, VO2max absolute and relative, are measurements of the aerobic system's maximum oxygen delivery. How your body uses that oxygen is completely independent of the activity. Running requires higher peak muscle-forces for shorter durations (20% or so) than cycling. Which is a smoother, more continuous application of muscle (40-60%) at lower peak forces.

Since the muscles are pushed to a lower percentage of their maximum in cycling, they're operating more efficiently than in running. So at the SAME VO2-max delivery, you'll generate more power for the oxygen-consumed than with running. How to measure it is a completely different question altogether. Obviously measuring oxygen-delivered and extracted while exercising is the only accurate way to measure VO2-max. However, there are some on-the-road methods that can approximate it close enough for training, especially if you use the same test to gauge progress months later.

What you'll notice is that VO2-max absolute won't change much with training, about +10-20%. However, power-generated at VO2-max or LT will have increased tremendously with training. Something along the lines of +50-100% isn't uncommon with increases in muscular efficiency (making more power with same oxygen delivery).

David Holt - VO2-max interval basics - VO2 max, or Maximum Oxygen Uptake Capacity, to use its formal name, is the amount of oxygen we can absorb into our cells in one minute while working at full capacity. It�s a measure of fitness expressed in milliliters per kilogram per minute.
Thanks for clearing that up. I've realized that I should not be counting to see a 10% VO2max increase anytime soon (that would take years of training in the mountains or air tents I think) and instead focus on increasing my LT.
kmart is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.