Bike Forums > I got ATL, CTL, TSB.... now... BMR, RMR, AMR... help
 Register All Albums Elite Membership Forum Rules Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

 04-24-07, 01:42 AM #1 NomadVW  部門ニ/自転車オタク Thread Starter     Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Yuma, AZ Bikes: 2005 Specialized Roubaix Elite, 2005 Specialized FSR XC Comp, 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, Fetish Cycles Road Bike Posts: 3,172 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s) I got ATL, CTL, TSB.... now... BMR, RMR, AMR... help Alrighty, so I'm trying to do a better job of managing the weight. I'm "hovering" around the 77kg mark, but want to stop "hovering" just above and get to hovering just above 75-76 kg so I don't wake up some mornings at 79kg. I dropped about 15 pounds over the winter base season as much as from eating more sensibly as from riding a lot more. Anyway... I got the RMR measured (Cosmed Fitmate) and it's in the mid-1900's, which corresponds to all the typical calculators which show 1800's on the low side to 2100 (using the lean body mass calculators). I'm considering it to be right @ 1900 for round number usage. I just want to confirm my calorie output formula. Calorie output = BMR or RMR * Activity Factor + Exercise Calories? Or is it just Calorie output = BMR + Exercise Calories The difference is significant - assuming RMR of 1900 : Calorie output = 1900 * 1.725 (activity factor, McArdle et al 1996) + 1800 kCal = 5077 kCal / Day or Calorie output = 1900 + 1800 = 3700 kCal / Day (edited to add: yes, I average around 13500 kCal per week of expenditure on the bike) Does the activity factor basically act as a "coverall" for people who aren't measuring calorie output in an objective method per day? If I were to aim for a 1 pound per week weight loss program (3500 calorie deficit per week), and shot for 3200 kCal per day intake when I should be shooting for 4500 intake, I'd eventually begin to suffer muscle mass depletion - no good. Likewise, Aiming for 4500 intake instead of 3200 intake would result in rapid weight gain. I'm just concerned about is OVER estimating the calorie expenditure as well as UNDER estimating calorie requirements to continue positive fitness gains. If I over estimate the calories, I'll undoubtedly begin to gain weight. If I under estimate, and cut to a healthy deficit amount, I'll actually be cutting too many calories out and end up suffering fitness loss. __________________ Envision, Energize, Enable
 04-24-07, 02:05 AM #2 NomadVW  部門ニ/自転車オタク Thread Starter     Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Yuma, AZ Bikes: 2005 Specialized Roubaix Elite, 2005 Specialized FSR XC Comp, 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, Fetish Cycles Road Bike Posts: 3,172 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s) Answered my own question with my trainingpeaks account. They use RMR + Exercise calories. No adjustments for anything else. They do undershoot the RMR quite a bit though. __________________ Envision, Energize, Enable