more pedaling or more resistance?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4
Bikes: Trek 7.3 FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
more pedaling or more resistance?
have started riding 2-3x a week for purpose of getting healthier, lowering cholesteral, etc...
i'm wondering which is "better exercise" -- riding in a lower gear and pedlaing more, vs. riding in a higher gear with more resistance. If anyone has knowledge on that, your feedback is appreciated.
Thanks,
ChicagoRed
i'm wondering which is "better exercise" -- riding in a lower gear and pedlaing more, vs. riding in a higher gear with more resistance. If anyone has knowledge on that, your feedback is appreciated.
Thanks,
ChicagoRed
#2
mateo for short
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Either extreme -- spinning too much (cadence too high) or mashing too much (cadence to low) should be avoided. Your goal, I think, should be increasing the miles you can ride comfortably. I know this isn't an answer to your question (I'm not sure there is a good answer).
I'd work toward increasing your base mileage, and just keep your cadence reasonable.
You might consider getting a heart rate monitor -- it's a valuable training tool and useful for tracking your progress. It will also tell you roughly (based on heart rate only) how hard you're working.
I'd work toward increasing your base mileage, and just keep your cadence reasonable.
You might consider getting a heart rate monitor -- it's a valuable training tool and useful for tracking your progress. It will also tell you roughly (based on heart rate only) how hard you're working.
__________________
<< no sig at this time >>
<< no sig at this time >>
#3
Senior Member
have started riding 2-3x a week for purpose of getting healthier, lowering cholesteral, etc...
i'm wondering which is "better exercise" -- riding in a lower gear and pedlaing more, vs. riding in a higher gear with more resistance. If anyone has knowledge on that, your feedback is appreciated.
i'm wondering which is "better exercise" -- riding in a lower gear and pedlaing more, vs. riding in a higher gear with more resistance. If anyone has knowledge on that, your feedback is appreciated.
Gently increase your distances and total mileage about +10% a week and you'll find that using the easier gears helps tremendously. Saves your knees too.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
I was reading about the coach of the USA Olympic team from the '80's...he made a rule against using "hard" gears in training. He felt that the best way to get in shape and avoid injuries was to learn how to spin rapidly and smoothly in an easy gear.
I find that fast spinning in an easy gear gives my heart and lungs a good workout without any problems with soreness from my feet, knees, or legs. I know of some guys who thought "hard" gears would be a good workout...and their knees paid the price.
I find that fast spinning in an easy gear gives my heart and lungs a good workout without any problems with soreness from my feet, knees, or legs. I know of some guys who thought "hard" gears would be a good workout...and their knees paid the price.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
You've got to spin it to win it.
#6
The Endless Tour
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St. Louis MO.
Posts: 27
Bikes: LeMond Poprad Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There's a balance between to two and each effort has a demand on the body, both in a positive direction. Big gear, low cadence relies on muscle strength more than cardiovascular strength and will bring about growth to the involved muscles. High cadence "spinning" requires more cardiovascular strength, but is easier on the muscles and joints. Over time you'll naturally develop a balance between the two. Do you have more leg (Ullrich) or more lung (Armstrong)? Personally I value a stronger cardiovascular system. It's easy to have lots of muscle and a ****ty blood profile, not so with a strong cardiovascular system. In short, find your balance, ride lots, eat your veggies.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Well, I said "spin it" mostly because most new riders tend to mash too big of a gear anyway. I certainly did. And it took me a few years of focusing on increasing my cadence to comfortably ride at 100 rpm. This is certainly easier on my knees and much more efficient.
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
spin it first nothing under 85 rpm get a good bike fit add base miles slowly easy on the hills in the begining and you will not find yourself in my office my fall
#10
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4
Bikes: Trek 7.3 FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Some great feedback here, thanks for your responses.
I guess what I had thought from common sense -- the more times you move your legs, the better the exercise you're getting -- was pretty much on target.
I guess what I had thought from common sense -- the more times you move your legs, the better the exercise you're getting -- was pretty much on target.
#11
mateo for short
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Unless you're climbing, of course.
__________________
<< no sig at this time >>
<< no sig at this time >>
#12
staring at the mountains
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Castle Pines, CO
Posts: 4,560
Bikes: Obed GVR, Fairdale Goodship, Salsa Timberjack 29
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 197 Times
in
112 Posts
I will throw in that after a sufficient amount of base miles, strength training on the bike by intentionally using a big gear/lower cadence is okay. Not for everyday riding, mind you, and not before you have a good base under you...
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
What happens on a ride is that you watch the speedometer and after you're warmed up, you notice that the lower gears don't necessarily make you go faster. So then you try upping the gears and presto the speed goes up. You are lured into thinking this is easy. Then you try to maintain the same cadence with the higher gear.
This is where it gets tricky. If you can stay with a high cadence and a higher gear, you think that you somehow got it, got the base miles, and have finally reached some kind of aerobic enlightenment. If you can maintain this new level, then maybe you are in. If not, better back off.
Biking is like constantly seeking that improvement and daring to push yourself towards it. On certain days things work well. On others, due to wind and terrain, or borderline bonking, its back to square one.
This is where it gets tricky. If you can stay with a high cadence and a higher gear, you think that you somehow got it, got the base miles, and have finally reached some kind of aerobic enlightenment. If you can maintain this new level, then maybe you are in. If not, better back off.
Biking is like constantly seeking that improvement and daring to push yourself towards it. On certain days things work well. On others, due to wind and terrain, or borderline bonking, its back to square one.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It depends. For the same speed, a higher cadence puts more stress on your cardio system, lower cadence puts more stress on your leg muscles. Some like Armstrong went with high cadence because he was most endowed with heart/lung capacity, others like Ulrich felt they had better performance with strength and had a much lower cadence.
Al
Al
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 90
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"have started riding 2-3x a week for purpose of getting healthier, lowering cholesteral"
for your purposes of lowering cholesterol and getting healthier (assuming you mean cardiovascular health), you should be leaning more towards the spinning--lower gearing--type of riding.
for your purposes of lowering cholesterol and getting healthier (assuming you mean cardiovascular health), you should be leaning more towards the spinning--lower gearing--type of riding.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
have started riding 2-3x a week for purpose of getting healthier, lowering cholesteral, etc...
i'm wondering which is "better exercise" -- riding in a lower gear and pedlaing more, vs. riding in a higher gear with more resistance. If anyone has knowledge on that, your feedback is appreciated.
i'm wondering which is "better exercise" -- riding in a lower gear and pedlaing more, vs. riding in a higher gear with more resistance. If anyone has knowledge on that, your feedback is appreciated.
If you can measure your cadence (number of pedal strokes per minute), I'd recommend aiming to ride at 80 RPM (ish).
__________________
Eric
2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)
Read my cycling blog at https://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
Like climbing? Goto https://www.bicycleclimbs.com
Eric
2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)
Read my cycling blog at https://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
Like climbing? Goto https://www.bicycleclimbs.com
#17
Surly Girly
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,116
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm curious about the cadence. My husband says a higher cadence wears out his legs so he tries to keep it at 60. When I suggested raising it to 80 tonight on our easy ride around the neighborhood, he thought that seemed too fast.... and I have to admit he looked a little goofy (I think he felt goofy too). I should add that we ride hybrids, so does that make a difference in the recommended RPM?
(I don't want to hijack this thread so I hope the answers benefit the OP.)
(I don't want to hijack this thread so I hope the answers benefit the OP.)
__________________
Specialized Roubaix Expert
Surly Long Haul Trucker
Specialized Roubaix Expert
Surly Long Haul Trucker
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm curious about the cadence. My husband says a higher cadence wears out his legs so he tries to keep it at 60. When I suggested raising it to 80 tonight on our easy ride around the neighborhood, he thought that seemed too fast.... and I have to admit he looked a little goofy (I think he felt goofy too). I should add that we ride hybrids, so does that make a difference in the recommended RPM?
(I don't want to hijack this thread so I hope the answers benefit the OP.)
(I don't want to hijack this thread so I hope the answers benefit the OP.)
In my experience, it takes time to adapt to a different way of pedaling. I trained myself to spin 90 to 100 over 70 to 75 miles when I was more into road riding. That said, I do better at something closer to 80.
Even on single track, if I get really tired, I'll drop down a gear or two and spin higher.
Al
Last edited by Al.canoe; 08-06-07 at 12:52 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What happens on a ride is that you watch the speedometer and after you're warmed up, you notice that the lower gears don't necessarily make you go faster. So then you try upping the gears and presto the speed goes up. You are lured into thinking this is easy. Then you try to maintain the same cadence with the higher gear.
This is where it gets tricky. If you can stay with a high cadence and a higher gear, you think that you somehow got it, got the base miles, and have finally reached some kind of aerobic enlightenment. If you can maintain this new level, then maybe you are in. If not, better back off.
Biking is like constantly seeking that improvement and daring to push yourself towards it. On certain days things work well. On others, due to wind and terrain, or borderline bonking, its back to square one.
This is where it gets tricky. If you can stay with a high cadence and a higher gear, you think that you somehow got it, got the base miles, and have finally reached some kind of aerobic enlightenment. If you can maintain this new level, then maybe you are in. If not, better back off.
Biking is like constantly seeking that improvement and daring to push yourself towards it. On certain days things work well. On others, due to wind and terrain, or borderline bonking, its back to square one.
I get exactly the same effect mountain biking. If I go to a higher gear even though the gear I was in did not appear too low, I get a speed increase and generally have no problem maintaining it. I used this approach a couple of years ago to help cut my time on an 18 mile single-track loop by almost 25%. Too high a cadance in too low a gear appears to have artifically limited my speed.
Al
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
#22
Surly Girly
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,116
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The term hybrid invokes an image in my mind of an erect riding position. If true, it's very difficult to apply power to the pedals or even to spin fast if sitting erect. Something like a 45-degree back-angle (elbows slightly bent) is far better. What made me think of this is that yesterday riding single track (mountain bike) I passed (blew by) three folks who sitting erect and felt so sorry for them. They were straining, but hardly moving.
Now that I got that off my chest.... thanks for the additional information about pedaling and cadence.
__________________
Specialized Roubaix Expert
Surly Long Haul Trucker
Specialized Roubaix Expert
Surly Long Haul Trucker
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The image many people have of riding a hybrid is a completely upright position and the ability to go no more than a few miles. Someone in another forum said they are good for a short ride to Starbuck's and nothing more. I'd like to debunk that myth. My husband and I are both 50+ and re-entered cycling in March. We chose hybrids because of some upper-extremity joint issues and thought the hybrids would be best for us. At the time, we planned to go out once a week or so and ride around the neighborhood. Well, we're now up to 28+ miles (way beyond our neighborhood) and we add a few miles each week. Sure, the trip is slower than on a road bike, but it is certainly do-able. The folks you saw straining on the upright bikes were either in a gear too high for the terrain or their physical condition, or their bikes don't have enough gears. The only time I strain is if I forget to shift into a lower gear when preparing to stop (and I rarely do that). Otherwise, I don't strain because I keep it in the proper gear. Also, I do not ride in a completely upright position; not quite 45 degrees forward, but not 90-degrees upright either. These bikes have served us very well. We're not very fast and I doubt we'll ever blow by anyone (no, wait, we dropped a guy and a couple of gals straining up a hill on a mountain bike one day....), but we're still getting into shape and having a blast and spending quality time together while we do it.
Now that I got that off my chest.... thanks for the additional information about pedaling and cadence.
Now that I got that off my chest.... thanks for the additional information about pedaling and cadence.
I have never understood hybrids. A road bike can be set-up as comfortably as a hybrid, even an upright position if desired, and it's just so much more fun. My wife and I started with the equivalent of hybrids about 1970. In four or five months we got rid of them and went to road bikes. We now ride mid-priced ($2500?) full suspension mountain bikes in the woods and about that value road bikes. We do use a little wider tires (25mm) for the rougher roads in our area.
Those poor young folks sitting up-right I blew-by yesturday were on true mountain bikes and not hybrids. I'm 68 and the wife is 66.
Al