Everything you knew about lactic acid is wrong
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 298
Bikes: 2006 Specialized Roubaix, Windsor Clockwork Orange
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Everything you knew about lactic acid is wrong
It is actually fuel that your muscles burn. Interesting read at the NY Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/16/he...CQ5CQ2A6O)agk-
Yes, you will have to register or use bugmenot.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/16/he...CQ5CQ2A6O)agk-
Yes, you will have to register or use bugmenot.
#2
Officially Foul Mouthed
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 228
Bikes: Ti IF PlanetX, etc.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
or try this link
this explains the basic strategy of endurance training in the off season and doing intense intervals during the race season - it's all about the mitochondria - the more the better
this explains the basic strategy of endurance training in the off season and doing intense intervals during the race season - it's all about the mitochondria - the more the better
#3
Bulimic Arsonist.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 393
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Dealing with the pain takes a bit of time, but sooner or later your body just "clicks", I've noticed, and it feels like the more you pedal the less pain their is. So yeah, I've felt my body adjusting to its use a fuel before, mainly when hammering while in a fasted state or just generally in a major calorie deficit.
I've felt that type of training has been useful in quickly allowing my body to learn how to deal with lactic acid/cramps/the pains. Second Wind specificity I guess you'd call it.
I've felt that type of training has been useful in quickly allowing my body to learn how to deal with lactic acid/cramps/the pains. Second Wind specificity I guess you'd call it.
#4
not actually Nickatina
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: OR
Posts: 4,447
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I believe the theory explained in the article is the basis for SportsLegs and how the company purports it to benefit performance.
#6
Officially Foul Mouthed
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 228
Bikes: Ti IF PlanetX, etc.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,794
Bikes: litespeed, cannondale
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Well, lactic acid is the end point of glycolysis or anaerobic metabolism. So in that process, it is a "waste product". However, lactate can be dumped into the KREBs cycle and oxidized so it is a fuel. Lactic acid would build up in the muscles during an all out sprint. The notion used to be that muscle soreness was caused by a build up of lactic acid in the muscles. But most sprints are short and the build up is probably quickly converted into fuel. Muscle soreness probably has more to do with micro tears and things like that.
#9
Senior Member
+1 to Pat- I definitely concur.
Lactate used to be seen as a negative, but recent research shows that with training, even with the buildup of lactate, the body should be able to take in more oxygen and covert that lactate back to pyruvate. The pyruvate can be converted to an important vitamin in the Krebs cycle and drive aerobic respiration. It's so important to do your base training, your interval training, and your endurance training to effectively develop this phenomenon.
Yeah, muscle soreness is most likely DOMS, not lactate buildup. Lactic acid can be shuttled out of the bloodstream as quickly as you snap your fingers, but the microtears and free radicals that build from exercise is that achiness you need time to recover from once you finished your exercise.
koffee
Lactate used to be seen as a negative, but recent research shows that with training, even with the buildup of lactate, the body should be able to take in more oxygen and covert that lactate back to pyruvate. The pyruvate can be converted to an important vitamin in the Krebs cycle and drive aerobic respiration. It's so important to do your base training, your interval training, and your endurance training to effectively develop this phenomenon.
Yeah, muscle soreness is most likely DOMS, not lactate buildup. Lactic acid can be shuttled out of the bloodstream as quickly as you snap your fingers, but the microtears and free radicals that build from exercise is that achiness you need time to recover from once you finished your exercise.
koffee
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 56
Bikes: Klien
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Dr.. Brooks was actually issued a patent on a glycerol-lactate supplement in 2004.
US Patent 6743821 - Glycerol-lactate esters for use as an energy supplement during exercise and recovery
US Patent Issued on June 1, 2004
https://www.patentstorm.us/patents/67...scription.html
After reading through the whole description, which is rather long I came to the conclusion that the doctor is refering to a "lactic acid type" supplement, not lactic acid itself. Here is the a section of the paper:
"However, the use of lactic acid as a fuel in the body carries with it potential penalties. Lactic acid accumulation in the muscle is painful and interferes with contraction processes. Further, large amounts of lactic acid in the blood cause pH to fall which is physically and psychologically distressing to the performer. These disadvantages are associated with the hydrogen ion (H+, or proton) which results when lactic acid dissociates in aqueous solutions. For these reasons lactic acid accumulation has long been suspected as a cause of muscle fatigue (Brooks et al., Exercise Physiology: Human Bioenergetics and its Applications, Chapter 33, Mayfield, Mountainview, Third Edition, 2000).
Therefore, it may be advantageous to provide a carbohydrate derived fuel source to an individual engaged in prolonged, strenuous exercise, and it would be more efficacious to provide the carbohydrate energy in the form of a `lactic acid-like` substance which would provide a more immediate fuel source."
I believe what this is saying is that lactic acid is a double edged sword good and bad. My question is does the good outweigh the bad???? A little more energy with pain and muscle contraction interference? Or use a supplement that clears lactic acid from the system and use carbs as a source of energy?
I vote for clearing lactic acid and using carbs for energy.
US Patent 6743821 - Glycerol-lactate esters for use as an energy supplement during exercise and recovery
US Patent Issued on June 1, 2004
https://www.patentstorm.us/patents/67...scription.html
After reading through the whole description, which is rather long I came to the conclusion that the doctor is refering to a "lactic acid type" supplement, not lactic acid itself. Here is the a section of the paper:
"However, the use of lactic acid as a fuel in the body carries with it potential penalties. Lactic acid accumulation in the muscle is painful and interferes with contraction processes. Further, large amounts of lactic acid in the blood cause pH to fall which is physically and psychologically distressing to the performer. These disadvantages are associated with the hydrogen ion (H+, or proton) which results when lactic acid dissociates in aqueous solutions. For these reasons lactic acid accumulation has long been suspected as a cause of muscle fatigue (Brooks et al., Exercise Physiology: Human Bioenergetics and its Applications, Chapter 33, Mayfield, Mountainview, Third Edition, 2000).
Therefore, it may be advantageous to provide a carbohydrate derived fuel source to an individual engaged in prolonged, strenuous exercise, and it would be more efficacious to provide the carbohydrate energy in the form of a `lactic acid-like` substance which would provide a more immediate fuel source."
I believe what this is saying is that lactic acid is a double edged sword good and bad. My question is does the good outweigh the bad???? A little more energy with pain and muscle contraction interference? Or use a supplement that clears lactic acid from the system and use carbs as a source of energy?
I vote for clearing lactic acid and using carbs for energy.
#11
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charleston,SC
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes, lactic acid is the product of glycolysis, and lactate is used in the Kreb's cycle. So what causes muscle soreness? It's because of all the hydrogen atoms (protons) that are released by lactic acid
Lactic Acid --> Lactate + H(+)
Your body uses the lactate and the H+ causes muscle soreness.
Lactic Acid --> Lactate + H(+)
Your body uses the lactate and the H+ causes muscle soreness.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rural Missouri - mostly central and southeastern
Posts: 3,013
Bikes: 2003 LeMond -various other junk bikes
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 44 Times
in
35 Posts
Everything you knew about lactic acid is wrong
#13
Bulimic Arsonist.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 393
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I still really don't know why things like muscle soreness are big deals to cyclists. We (as a culture) have plenty of things available to us that get rid of it, and we've known of them since the early 1900's if not before then.
Amphetamines anyone?
Amphetamines anyone?