Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Training & Nutrition
Reload this Page >

Weight gain/tighter jeans after months of more strenous exercise

Notices
Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

Weight gain/tighter jeans after months of more strenous exercise

Old 07-11-10, 03:36 PM
  #1  
Yen
Surly Girly
Thread Starter
 
Yen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Weight gain/tighter jeans after months of more strenous exercise

I'm a 54-year-old-woman with a sedentary job (other than climbing the stairs to my office several times/day, and walking to/from my car to the office). My regular long weekend ride is on Saturdays with the group, and sometimes on Sunday with my husband or friends.

Earlier this year we joined a gym so I could do spin classes after work (instead of ride in the dark). Soon after we joined, I signed up with a trainer for overall strength training. During this time, my workouts both on and off the bike are a much higher intensity than before. I am much stronger and I notice the benefits on the bike, esp. on hills and trying to catch the faster riders.

However, I weigh about 6 pounds more. I know that muscle gain usually = weight gain, so what really concerns me is that my jeans and summer shorts also fit tighter.

In analyzing this, I'm wondering if this is to due one or a combination of the following:
-- Not eating enough
-- Eating too much (over-compensating after a strenuous workout, as I am very careful other times)
-- More workouts in the higher zones (spin class, heart-pumping strength training, treadmill intervals, etc.) and much fewer lower-impact cardio/fat-burning workouts.

I'm not as concerned about the weight as I am about what appears to be extra fat girth. I worked hard to lose weight and successfully kept it off through a changed lifestyle of healthy eating and regular exercise.

Prior to ramping up earlier this year, I took more long walks and moderate weekend rides. Now, the weekend rides are with a faster group with my heart rate in a higher zone for most of the ride. While I am much stronger, I'm concerned about my heart rate being in a higher zone for most of a long ride (3-4 hours), and the accumulation of additional body fat in spite of being careful of what I eat.

It seems that maintaining one's weight/size is more difficult when training ramps up. I eat a healthy diet with small meals/snacks every 2-3 hours or so throughout the day to maintain my blood sugar, and choose healthy foods. I try to avoid sugar except during and immediately after rides. So, I'm at a loss.

Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
__________________
Specialized Roubaix Expert
Surly Long Haul Trucker
Yen is offline  
Old 07-11-10, 03:47 PM
  #2  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Unlikely that you're putting on so much muscle; if you think you're putting on fat, you're probably right. You must be eating more, so I'd recommend you count calories for a while and see what is happening. And you might consider mixing up the exercise routine so that as well as a couple of intensive workouts a week, you do one or two extensive, fat-burning sessions at lower HR.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 07-11-10, 04:02 PM
  #3  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,151

Bikes: Lots

Liked 600 Times in 332 Posts
Use FitDay or The Daily Plate or one of those to record your calorie intake for 2-3 weeks. It can be very eye opening!!
Machka is offline  
Old 07-11-10, 04:55 PM
  #4  
Single-serving poster
 
electrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,098
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Might/probably will be water retention in your muscles caused by exercising strenuously and continuously without a break to allow the muscles to fully heal themselves.

Regarding calorie counting, most of what i've read and real life experience shows that isn't the way to lose weight. It might be helpful to get an idea of what you're eating... but in terms of body weight that is mostly determined by other factors, the key part of which is how you brain is using leptin to control your metabolism and thus your appetite.

3 years, btw, is the average length of time you must rigorously hold a restricted calorie diet to maintain your new "ideal" body weight. As if that wasn't the only "bad' news... At 54 you won't be putting on any new muscle... it is extreeeeemly hard. After at latest 30 i think, for men they'll start losing muscle mass and it becomes progressively harder to add it back. Of course there are other benefits to weight training such as increasing bone density.
electrik is offline  
Old 07-11-10, 05:31 PM
  #5  
Yen
Surly Girly
Thread Starter
 
Yen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank you.

I'm not really following a restricted calorie diet, at least not a low-calorie one. I lost weight eating 1600-1800 calories/day while exercising only moderately ---- walking at a moderate pace 1/2-1 hour most days of the week ---- and lost about 1 lb./month. That's VERY slow but was consistent and I have kept it off. When I began ramping up my exercise with cycling, and riding more and more miles, and subsequently with weight training, I started eating more calories because, of course, I need more calories to support the additional exercise.

If I am not putting on any new muscle, then what are those things taking shape on the front of my legs?
__________________
Specialized Roubaix Expert
Surly Long Haul Trucker
Yen is offline  
Old 07-11-10, 07:33 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
jayvo86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bellevue, NE
Posts: 245

Bikes: '06 Trek 1000, '09 Gary Fisher Supercaliber, '10 Trek XO2

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You should do a body fat check. This would be a good idea of where you are. You can do it yourself if you learn how to use a fat calliper. (You can get one for about 5-10 bucks) Or you can have it professionally done.
jayvo86 is offline  
Old 07-11-10, 07:36 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
ericm979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains
Posts: 6,169
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It's not impossible for older athletes to gain muscle, it's just more difficult than it is for younger ones. If you're faster on the bike and can feel new muscle, you're gaining it. If you were not very active before then it's likely that you are gaining muscle. That's good!

You don't gain weight by not eating enough, that's a myth. So is the "fat burning zone". While lower intensity exercise burns a higher percentage of fat than higher intensity does, higher intensity burns as much fat and more calories. Lower intensity exercise only burns more calories if you do more of it, i.e. you may be able to ride 3 hours @ 400 cal/hr but only one at 750 (because that's a really hard effort for you). If you only have an hour the short intense ride is preferable for weight loss.


If you're actually gaining fat then you're eating a little too much to compensate for your increased activity and would need to cut back a bit if you want to lose fat. No need to count calories, just eat a little less.
ericm979 is offline  
Old 07-11-10, 07:39 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
ericm979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains
Posts: 6,169
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by jayvo86
You should do a body fat check. This would be a good idea of where you are. You can do it yourself if you learn how to use a fat calliper. (You can get one for about 5-10 bucks) Or you can have it professionally done.
A body fat check would be great if she'd done one earlier to have something to compare with. Even the electronic body fat scales work for that, though they are bad for finding absolute body fat (mine says I'm 5.5% while my doctor's says 11%. I think both are wrong).

Still, she could check now and use the data going forward. Whatever method you use, use the same one and be consistent about it.
ericm979 is offline  
Old 07-11-10, 08:09 PM
  #9  
Single-serving poster
 
electrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,098
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Yen
Thank you.

I'm not really following a restricted calorie diet, at least not a low-calorie one. I lost weight eating 1600-1800 calories/day while exercising only moderately ---- walking at a moderate pace 1/2-1 hour most days of the week ---- and lost about 1 lb./month. That's VERY slow but was consistent and I have kept it off. When I began ramping up my exercise with cycling, and riding more and more miles, and subsequently with weight training, I started eating more calories because, of course, I need more calories to support the additional exercise.

If I am not putting on any new muscle, then what are those things taking shape on the front of my legs?
Like ericm979 says, it isn't impossible to add muscle and i should clarify that also... but you will have to work a lot harder to gain just a quarter of the mass somebody half your age would gain by working 25% as hard. There was a chart around but, i think you get what we're saying.

It is also possible that those things on your legs are your muscles. I hope!! Goodness knows what else it might be. When you burn fat of course it has to be burnt from somewhere and that is primarily determined by sex and genetics. Perhaps your body is eating the fat in the legs first?
electrik is offline  
Old 07-11-10, 08:15 PM
  #10  
Yen
Surly Girly
Thread Starter
 
Yen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ericm979
...
If you're actually gaining fat then you're eating a little too much to compensate for your increased activity and would need to cut back a bit if you want to lose fat. No need to count calories, just eat a little less.
I try to make healthy choices and not overeat or under-eat. If I feel hungry between meals/snacks, then I tend to think I should eat something; since I don't need to lose weight (I am not overweight), then I select some type of healthy snack. I might be choosing the wrong snacks ------ in particular, nuts. Almonds are my go-to snack of choice because of their carb/protein balance, healthy fat, and other nutrients they contain. I'm also prone to low blood sugar if I eat high-glycemic carbs, so almonds are a solution to that as well.

I tend to think that if I feel hungry, then I should eat to maintain my current strength. But, I may be overcompensating somewhere.

I'll take the advice above to chart what I eat --- that may reveal something interesting!
__________________
Specialized Roubaix Expert
Surly Long Haul Trucker
Yen is offline  
Old 07-12-10, 12:58 AM
  #11  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by electrik
At 54 you won't be putting on any new muscle... it is extreeeeemly hard. After at latest 30 i think, for men they'll start losing muscle mass and it becomes progressively harder to add it back.
Only partly true. Men can continue to build/maintain muscle mass to quite an advanced age, though it does get progressively harder as testosterone levels drop, and this is why body fat percentages climb into old age even among men who are not overweight. Women find it much more difficult to build bulky muscle at any age, for obvious hormonal reasons, and six pounds of muscle would be a lot to put on. But the good news is that with training the muscles get stronger without getting bigger because they respond more efficiently to stimulus.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 07-12-10, 02:55 AM
  #12  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,151

Bikes: Lots

Liked 600 Times in 332 Posts
Originally Posted by Yen
I try to make healthy choices and not overeat or under-eat. If I feel hungry between meals/snacks, then I tend to think I should eat something; since I don't need to lose weight (I am not overweight), then I select some type of healthy snack. I might be choosing the wrong snacks ------ in particular, nuts. Almonds are my go-to snack of choice because of their carb/protein balance, healthy fat, and other nutrients they contain. I'm also prone to low blood sugar if I eat high-glycemic carbs, so almonds are a solution to that as well.

I tend to think that if I feel hungry, then I should eat to maintain my current strength. But, I may be overcompensating somewhere.

I'll take the advice above to chart what I eat --- that may reveal something interesting!
Many people do this ... they're exercising so they figure they can eat more. It's not a bad thing to feel a bit hungry at different times throughout the day.
Machka is offline  
Old 07-12-10, 03:01 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Weight gain after consecutive days training/hard training rides is something I experience too. I don't gain 6lbs, perhaps 2-3 max, but after a few days riding, or after a hard race, my muscles and rear will be a bit "swollen" and cause my jeans to be a bit tighter than normal. It seems the muscles are holding onto excess water, as after a couple of days rest or light recovery, the water is shed and I feel thin again One thing i've noticed - drinking too much coffee/tea makes the problem worse. I'm not sure if this is due to the diruetic effect of caffeine, or whether the caffeine made you push harder in the first place on the training ride, resulting in more muscle damage and causing more fluid retention than normal.
paulclaude is offline  
Old 07-12-10, 07:41 AM
  #14  
Yen
Surly Girly
Thread Starter
 
Yen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Machka
Many people do this ... they're exercising so they figure they can eat more. It's not a bad thing to feel a bit hungry at different times throughout the day.
I wondered if someone might say that. However, note that I said I think I should eat more, not can. Meaning, I don't go hog wild and eat a lot more just because I exercise more. I reason that harder training should be supported by an increase in calories (assuming higher output requires higher intake), but that's the tricky part ---- how many more?

I'm not concerned about feeling hungry, just eating enough to provide energy for the activity and build/repair afterward.
__________________
Specialized Roubaix Expert
Surly Long Haul Trucker
Yen is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johngwheeler
Training & Nutrition
62
06-09-17 06:52 AM
stevelewis
Training & Nutrition
20
03-12-16 12:53 PM
Jed19
Training & Nutrition
18
01-05-16 08:05 AM
squatchy
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
7
10-16-14 08:06 AM
mattkime
Road Cycling
30
10-09-13 08:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.