Gained weight while cycling
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Gained weight while cycling
Last year I switched from running to cycling because my knees just couldn't take the running any more. Even though I've trained hard with cycling--150 miles or so every weekend for the past 10 months or so--my weight has been creeping up. I stepped on the scale this morning and found that I've gained 20 pounds over the past ten months, although I've kept close tabs on my diet.
I've also noticed that, as a group, a lot of the riders I meet tend to be quite overweight (I'm not racing or anything, just training for charity rides), whereas it was very rare to see overweight runners in the groups I would train with. Any idea why this is? Is it because biking just doesn't burn anywhere near the number of calories we think it does? I've read that I should be estimating 25-30 calories per mile, or about 1500 calories or so for a 50-mile ride, but my friends who wear heart-rate monitors get ridiculous calorie-burn readings (upwards of 3000 for the same ride).
I've also noticed that, as a group, a lot of the riders I meet tend to be quite overweight (I'm not racing or anything, just training for charity rides), whereas it was very rare to see overweight runners in the groups I would train with. Any idea why this is? Is it because biking just doesn't burn anywhere near the number of calories we think it does? I've read that I should be estimating 25-30 calories per mile, or about 1500 calories or so for a 50-mile ride, but my friends who wear heart-rate monitors get ridiculous calorie-burn readings (upwards of 3000 for the same ride).
Last edited by sfo_biker2010; 08-19-10 at 01:21 PM.
#2
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I've also noticed that, as a group, a lot of the riders I meet tend to be quite overweight (I'm not racing or anything, just training for charity rides), whereas it was very rare to see overweight runners in the groups I would train with. Any idea why this is? Is it because biking just doesn't burn anywhere near the number of calories we think it does? I've read that I should be estimating 25-30 calories per mile, or about 1500 calories or so for a 50-mile ride, but my friends who wear heart-rate monitors get ridiculous calorie-burn readings (upwards of 3000 for the same ride).
#3
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Forget the HRM readings. About 30 calories a mile is a reasonable estimate, more if you're doing a lot of climbing or pushing hard. umd is right. Running is brutal. Cycling is only brutal if you push yourself, and because the bike is carrying your weight, it's easy not to. Nonetheless 20 lbs in ten months is quite a lot if you're riding >600 miles per month, so unless your running mileage was very high I'd suggest you look again at whether you are really keeping "close tabs" on your diet.
#4
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
For what it's worth, I did about 45 cal/mile yesterday and about 42 cal/mile today. I still think cal/mile is a bad way to look at it, cal/hr is much better, easier to scale with intensity and less dependent on terrain. Yesterday for me was about 850 cal/hr and today was about 750 cal/hr. Assuming roughly 1 kJ = 1 kCal (work energy to food energy taking efficiency into account) of course

#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
On the other hand, my legs are sore two days after a 43min run. It will be a long time before I could run for a couple of hours with no pain. And that 43 min run burned less than 400 Cals. On a bike ride I can comfortably burn 2400 cals in a 3 hr ride with zero residual pain.
#6
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
This. Well expressed.
Yes, but to be fair, this is a consequence not merely of running being more intense than cycling, but of you being untrained as a runner but trained as a cyclist.
I too have recently returned to running after several years because I was stupid enough to agree to be part of a team on a bike/run/kayak event. (An excellent illustration of why one should not drink too much, btw). I was forced to ease myself into it very gingerly because my muscles were so unused to it, and like you I got serious DOMS the first few times. But I didn't find my HR soaring - jogging along at ten-minute mile pace barely got it out of the 120s, except uphill. Interestingly, now my leg muscles are getting used to it I am slowly getting faster without trying to speed up, and my HR is still down in the 120s as I approach 9-minute mile pace. Not exactly Usain Bolt, though. LOL. The guy who sold me my running shoes had it right. After videoing me on a treadmill he said, tactfully he thought, "cyclists tend to run like...cyclists."
I went for a run for the first time in two years the other day and my avg HR was 143. I was running as slow as I could because I wanted to be gentle on my legs. On an easy recovery bike ride my HR would be between 100 and 110. There is no way to run with my HR that low so running is in general a more intense workout.
On the other hand, my legs are sore two days after a 43min run. It will be a long time before I could run for a couple of hours with no pain. And that 43 min run burned less than 400 Cals. On a bike ride I can comfortably burn 2400 cals in a 3 hr ride with zero residual pain.
On the other hand, my legs are sore two days after a 43min run. It will be a long time before I could run for a couple of hours with no pain. And that 43 min run burned less than 400 Cals. On a bike ride I can comfortably burn 2400 cals in a 3 hr ride with zero residual pain.
I too have recently returned to running after several years because I was stupid enough to agree to be part of a team on a bike/run/kayak event. (An excellent illustration of why one should not drink too much, btw). I was forced to ease myself into it very gingerly because my muscles were so unused to it, and like you I got serious DOMS the first few times. But I didn't find my HR soaring - jogging along at ten-minute mile pace barely got it out of the 120s, except uphill. Interestingly, now my leg muscles are getting used to it I am slowly getting faster without trying to speed up, and my HR is still down in the 120s as I approach 9-minute mile pace. Not exactly Usain Bolt, though. LOL. The guy who sold me my running shoes had it right. After videoing me on a treadmill he said, tactfully he thought, "cyclists tend to run like...cyclists."
#7
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
True and I probably wasn't running as slow as I could. I started out at 8min/mile pace and slowed. My heart and lungs were good but my legs need some conditioning.
#9
DON'T PANIC!
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Capital District, NY
Posts: 497
Bikes: Fuji Absolute 3.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Weight is, primarily, controlled by diet; fitness by exercise. Not that it's impossible to lose weight with "just exercise", but you miss out on a large part of the equation. If you need to reduce your body fat the best way is through a combination of diet, strength training, and cardio. You have the cardio well covered, you just need to work on the other two.
#10
Insane cycling cook
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Central CA, IE Hell's Basement
Posts: 154
Bikes: Trek 7100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In the past two months I went from the equivalent of a couch potato (whats the term if your in front of the 'puter?) , to getting out and riding 10 miles a night. I also started eating real foods and cut out processed foods. Even with being full all the time I've lost 18 pounds so far. I feel great
but I can already see where allot of the weight gain can come from. We think we are burning more than we are and tend to treat ourselves more that we burn. I have to keep on top of my urges when on the ride as I ride by a few In and Out burger places on my rides and they are a huge weakness for me
I love burgers
Now I only eat a few a month and make them myself so I know whats in them. Helps being a trained cook 
Be aware of the quality of calories and the real amount burned, if you still gain check for muscle mass changes.





Be aware of the quality of calories and the real amount burned, if you still gain check for muscle mass changes.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I generally creep up a tiny bit during summer then loose during winter. I would rather stay fed, focus on getting stronger, and enjoy my rides instead of watching what I am eating. I start calorie counting in fall and drop a few lbs, put on a few during the holiday, and drop them in Jan and Feb. Such is life.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 488
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
There's a reason why sprinters look like sprinters and marathoners look like marathoners. The former are nothing but lean muscle, the latter often sport a good pouch of fat on their belly.
Untra endurance (3+ hour cardio) will put your body in energy preservation mode; it will do all it can to stop burning fuel in case whatever was chasing you starts getting faster. Last month I finished training for a double metric, and even with a super clean diet I barely managed to shed 3 pounds. This month I'm probably putting a third of the effort and will end up losing twice the weight
For what's left of the year I'm done with the long distance. I'll first lose the last 14 pounds I want to shed, then I'll be ready to build up for the 300k in one day challenge.
Untra endurance (3+ hour cardio) will put your body in energy preservation mode; it will do all it can to stop burning fuel in case whatever was chasing you starts getting faster. Last month I finished training for a double metric, and even with a super clean diet I barely managed to shed 3 pounds. This month I'm probably putting a third of the effort and will end up losing twice the weight

For what's left of the year I'm done with the long distance. I'll first lose the last 14 pounds I want to shed, then I'll be ready to build up for the 300k in one day challenge.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mwalsh5757
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
3
07-06-17 02:53 PM
WonderMonkey
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
30
04-10-15 03:16 PM
CyclistforLife
Training & Nutrition
11
06-27-11 11:43 PM