Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Training & Nutrition
Reload this Page >

Weight vs Power - Increasing Muscle Mass

Search
Notices
Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

Weight vs Power - Increasing Muscle Mass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-12, 09:39 PM
  #1  
Lover of Old Chrome Moly
Thread Starter
 
Myosmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 2,949
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times in 17 Posts
Weight vs Power - Increasing Muscle Mass

I know that increasing muscle output (watts) does not have a 1:1 correlation with increased muscle mass (hypertrophy) but at some point, gaining strength will require increasing muscle mass. What I want to know is what are the best training principles to follow to assure that increases in muscle output outpaces increases in mass to the greatest extent possible.

BTW, I have a background in powerlifting but several years ago developed weight related health problems and suffered neck, back, shoulder and knee injuries. I have since shifted my emphasis to weight control and cardio/respiratory development. I am seriously hooked on cycling and lean toward endurance/touring but like the challenges of hills and wind. I'm looking to become an overall stronger rider with gains in both strength and endurance. Any knowledgeble training advice would be greatly appreciated.
Myosmith is offline  
Old 03-27-12, 10:32 AM
  #2  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,528

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
You're making it too complicated. Fast cyclists have BMIs between 22 and 25. The best climbers are around 22. TTers are around 23-24. Fat randonneurs like me are up around 25. The thing is that our internal stuff like heart and lungs are fairly similar, so personal perfection lies in getting the fat down to our personal healthy long-term lower limit, then adjusting our protein content to achieve a BMI consistent with our cycling goals. Lance had to lose 7 kilos of protein for his TdF comeback.

In the short term, the first few years of serious training are best focused on increasing power to weight by increasing power-endurance while not gaining weight. More aerobic power is the low hanging fruit in the beginning. Muscle mass doesn't have a heck of a lot to do with that, because those gains are mostly through increases in capilarization, heart stroke volume, and mitochondrial density.
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 03-27-12, 01:26 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,520
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 451 Times in 265 Posts
Originally Posted by Myosmith
What I want to know is what are the best training principles to follow to assure that increases in muscle output outpaces increases in mass to the greatest extent possible.
The principle of specificity. (and drop strength, strong, and stronger from your vocabulary)
asgelle is offline  
Old 03-27-12, 03:34 PM
  #4  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
If you have a background in powerlifting I'd forget about increasing muscle mass, if I were you, you have all you could possibly need. Where you will make gains is in your aerobic efficiency and therefore your ability to maintain a given output over an extended period of time.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 03-27-12, 03:39 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,520
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 451 Times in 265 Posts
Originally Posted by chasm54
Where you will make gains is in your aerobic efficiency and therefore your ability to maintain a given output over an extended period of time.
Improved efficiency does not lead to increased time to failure. (at least using the accepted meaning of efficiency). What you might mean is increased aerobic fitness will increase the ability to maintain an output over a longer duration.
asgelle is offline  
Old 03-27-12, 05:11 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
I suspect you are already significantly stronger than just about any world class cyclist riding in the TDF. Strength is seldom a limiter to increasing your power on the bike. The peak pedal forces involved in riding at 400W (90RPM) are less than 100lbs.
gregf83 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gallo
Training & Nutrition
2
05-11-12 12:39 PM
goose70
Road Cycling
62
07-23-11 11:23 AM
C_Heath
Training & Nutrition
25
01-18-11 03:02 PM
beccii87
Training & Nutrition
16
08-16-10 05:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.