New American Cargo Bike
#1
Champion Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
New American Cargo Bike
Not sure where else to post this, I'm guessing this Utility section is most appropriate. If anyone objects to the "commercial" nature of this thread, let me know and I'll happily remove it. I believe the subject matter is relevant, though.
Pictured here is a prototype for a new Long-John style cargo bike from Eugene, Oregon. It's been a long time coming, but I'm happy to report it's nearly ridable. The frame shown is cro-mo, TIG welded, will be powder-coated, and future models will probably have disc brakes and an internal hub as an option.

The frame style is unique in that the platform is flat and actually part of the frame itself, which I think adds rigidity and may save weight (won't know for sure until it's finished and stressed properly under use). No container needs to be added on top, but can be. A good-lookin' wooden platform will be added soon.

This bike is also unique in that it can be separated in the middle. This means the front can be pre-built and almost any bike can be retrofitted to accommodate it with minor modifying needed. I like the idea that more than one bike could be modified to fit the same front cargo "end". The bi-parting frame also means the front can be finished ahead of time and be ride-ready with only the back end to build/modify as needed.

I'd very much like to hear your opinions regarding this bike.
If anyone's interested, feel free to speak up and I'll post the link to more info here.
Pictured here is a prototype for a new Long-John style cargo bike from Eugene, Oregon. It's been a long time coming, but I'm happy to report it's nearly ridable. The frame shown is cro-mo, TIG welded, will be powder-coated, and future models will probably have disc brakes and an internal hub as an option.

The frame style is unique in that the platform is flat and actually part of the frame itself, which I think adds rigidity and may save weight (won't know for sure until it's finished and stressed properly under use). No container needs to be added on top, but can be. A good-lookin' wooden platform will be added soon.


This bike is also unique in that it can be separated in the middle. This means the front can be pre-built and almost any bike can be retrofitted to accommodate it with minor modifying needed. I like the idea that more than one bike could be modified to fit the same front cargo "end". The bi-parting frame also means the front can be finished ahead of time and be ride-ready with only the back end to build/modify as needed.

I'd very much like to hear your opinions regarding this bike.
If anyone's interested, feel free to speak up and I'll post the link to more info here.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boise,ID
Posts: 517
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
looks good. The adaptability definately seems interesting. I assume you just take the fork off and add the front "kit".
#3
Champion Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Thanks. The top-tube and down-tube would be removed and replaced with two tubes extending straight ahead. The ends of these tubes would have flanges to meet with flanges on the front end.
Powder-coat or paint the rear end to match the front end, bolt them together with grade 8 bolts, connect the rear brake and shifter cables and ride.
Powder-coat or paint the rear end to match the front end, bolt them together with grade 8 bolts, connect the rear brake and shifter cables and ride.
#4
Bicycle Utopian
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 787
Bikes: Bianchi Campione d'Italia, Softride Qualifier, Ritchey Breakaway Cyclocross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Interesting idea. Do you have pictures of how this is retrofitted to an existing frame?
#5
Champion Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Thank you. I have this picture which doesn't show close-up detail, but you can get the idea.

The frame should be powder-coated today and I'll get more photos when it's ready.

The frame should be powder-coated today and I'll get more photos when it's ready.
#6
I spit hot fire
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 167
Bikes: IRO Jamie Roy--Stolen, Specialized SJ, ****-tons of beaters
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I dig it. I'm a fan of Long Johns. I wish I had a a garage, and one of those to put in it.
#7
est'd 1966
Join Date: May 2005
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 273
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i like how the cargo bed adds structure/strength to the subframe, or isn't really distinct from it, rather than being bolted on as dead weight. should help with strength/weight, as you say. larryvharry is another one to take that approach.
just eyeballing it, it looks like the steering geometry (trail) isn't far off of that of, say, the HPM long haul or a couple other bikes in this general format. while you can get used to it, i've seen many a-b tests with people new to these bikes who find much, much lower trail (like ~25mm) to be much easier, particularly at low speeds (think hills and squirming kids). steepen head angle?
the separability seems to me more compelling as a way to get shipping costs down than as a way to conserve resources by recycling rear triangles. if you're wanting to see these in the world, i think you should offer them complete (and separable), shippable within UPS max dimensions ($) rather than having to go freight ($$$).
just eyeballing it, it looks like the steering geometry (trail) isn't far off of that of, say, the HPM long haul or a couple other bikes in this general format. while you can get used to it, i've seen many a-b tests with people new to these bikes who find much, much lower trail (like ~25mm) to be much easier, particularly at low speeds (think hills and squirming kids). steepen head angle?
the separability seems to me more compelling as a way to get shipping costs down than as a way to conserve resources by recycling rear triangles. if you're wanting to see these in the world, i think you should offer them complete (and separable), shippable within UPS max dimensions ($) rather than having to go freight ($$$).
Last edited by tfahrner; 11-11-08 at 06:58 PM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 349
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The steering linkage worries me. The flat hourglass shaped section at the bottom of the steer tube looks like it could be bent pretty easily. The long linkage arm looks like it could easily hit obstructions that would clear the platform, but then you'd go flying as the front wheel abruptly swings right. I wonder if a chain and cable linkage would be more suitable.
#9
You gonna eat that?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 8,921
Bikes: 85 team Miyata (modern 5800 105) , '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1887 Post(s)
Liked 1,726 Times
in
1,032 Posts
While i think the idea of being able to retrofit many bikes to the front module is a good idea....what is described is not my idea of a "simple retrofit"

#11
bike wannabee
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ozzy
Posts: 144
Bikes: road, mountain, tourer, and spares
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nice job, I was wondering what you estimate the retail to be if you have got that far into the plan? I might revise the frame joint too. you might increase strength by making the joint on the actual steering tube? But I'm sure there are a thousand different ways to do this.
#13
Champion Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
...while you can get used to it, i've seen many a-b tests with people new to these bikes who find much, much lower trail (like ~25mm) to be much easier, particularly at low speeds (think hills and squirming kids). steepen head angle?
...if you're wanting to see these in the world, i think you should offer them complete (and separable), shippable within UPS max dimensions ($) rather than having to go freight ($$$).
...if you're wanting to see these in the world, i think you should offer them complete (and separable), shippable within UPS max dimensions ($) rather than having to go freight ($$$).
New rear "ends" are in the works. These will be UPSable, happy to say.
#14
Champion Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
The steering linkage worries me. The flat hourglass shaped section at the bottom of the steer tube looks like it could be bent pretty easily. The long linkage arm looks like it could easily hit obstructions that would clear the platform, but then you'd go flying as the front wheel abruptly swings right. I wonder if a chain and cable linkage would be more suitable.
#16
Champion Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
We're getting closer. The frame was powder-coated yesterday. A double-sided kickstand has been added as well as the cable bosses, a couple "loops" for bungees, and a unique no-skid platform.

This bike is unbelievably beautiful in person. The contrast between the platform and the neon-green coating of the frame is incredibly striking. It's hard to not look at it. It'll be assembled and ride-ready by Monday. More pictures and "test" results coming soon.


This bike is unbelievably beautiful in person. The contrast between the platform and the neon-green coating of the frame is incredibly striking. It's hard to not look at it. It'll be assembled and ride-ready by Monday. More pictures and "test" results coming soon.

#17
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 7,944
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 870 Post(s)
Liked 494 Times
in
284 Posts
I think you will likely find your frame design requires one more structural member running diagonally between the top and bottom tubes joining the front and rear. Otherwise, I think it's a great design.
#18
Champion Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Interesting. It's hard to know for sure. The material and wall thickness of those two tubes though makes me think a third tube won't be necessary.
#19
est'd 1966
Join Date: May 2005
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 273
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
it's chocolate mint. if the rear were mixte-like, you wouldn't have that parallelogram to worry about folding at the corners, you'd gain step-through, fit more riders, and pick up torsional rigidity. would also reiterate the pretty structural/visual logic of the triangles in the front.
Last edited by tfahrner; 11-16-08 at 07:51 PM.
#20
Champion Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
The rear triangle pictured in these photos was reclaimed. New rear "ends" will surely feature lower top tubes, aesthetic consideration, and beefier construction.
#21
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 7,944
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 870 Post(s)
Liked 494 Times
in
284 Posts
Just my opinion, mind you.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Posts: 389
Bikes: Surly 1x1 with Nexux 8 "Red line"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How do you bend these tubes by the way ? I have a friend who does custom bikes but he says he'd need some machinery to do it, correct ?
#23
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 3
Bikes: WorkCycles Secret Service, Bakfiets Cargobike, '80 DeRosa road, Bianchi Reparto Corsa fixie, Castle track, Snel touring, Daedalus ATB, '73 Libertas tandem, Brompton, '60 Schwinn cruiser, '57 Swiss Military, several 30's Dutch transport bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Looking very good.
Concerning the durability of the steering linkage bits, we mostly see these get bent by mechanics; for example, while trying to remove a frozen stem from the steering tube. The flat pieces you've made here look at least as strong and as ours and your bikes will probably see much less abusive lives (indoors at night etc).
-Henry
(WorkCycles)
Concerning the durability of the steering linkage bits, we mostly see these get bent by mechanics; for example, while trying to remove a frozen stem from the steering tube. The flat pieces you've made here look at least as strong and as ours and your bikes will probably see much less abusive lives (indoors at night etc).
-Henry
(WorkCycles)
#24
Where´s the payload?
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9
Bikes: Van Andel "Filibus", Kona Jake, among others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Looks good! I like the mint green color! The cargo bay certainly looks versatile!
#25
Champion Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Mixte frame, perhaps.