Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Utility Cycling
Reload this Page >

catastrophic!

Search
Notices
Utility Cycling Want to haul groceries, beer, maybe even your kids? You don't have to live car free to put your bike to use as a workhorse. Here's the place to share and learn about the bicycle as a utility vehicle.

catastrophic!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-13, 09:17 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 103

Bikes: 1984 Takara 490 Challenge

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
catastrophic!

Catastrophe! Training for our upcoming ride, I had put two gallons of water on the front rack as if low riders, and had four gallons on the back end. We were 3.3 miles from home, coasting a gentle downhill to a stop sign. I down shifted the front end to granny and downshifted the back end to first and WHAM!!! Chainsucked the rear end.
Squeeze drops her load (28 pounds of water) and cycles home to get the VW Bulli for vehicle recovery.
Had to take a chain tool and "cut" the wheel out of the rear end mess. Wheel is at the bike shop. No spokes broken. Don't know if the freewheel survived. At this stage, I don't know if the derailleur caused and/or was destroyed by the event. I just know that my BD just gutted itself a few weeks before its first grand tour ride.
I am prepping the "grocery getter" for a 185 mile tour. Now, I'm scared to take the BD 185 miles. Will it do this again?
Do we know a risk and frequency for chainsucking the rear end of a BD?
I need some input as to whether or not to trust and take the BD or to use my (38,000 mile/1984) grand touring bike.
salek is offline  
Old 03-08-13, 05:39 AM
  #2  
Transportation Cyclist
 
turbo1889's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Montana U.S.A.
Posts: 1,206

Bikes: Too many to list, some I built myself including the frame. I "do" ~ Human-Only-Pedal-Powered-Cycles, Human-Electric-Hybrid-Cycles, Human-IC-Hybrid-Cycles, and one Human-IC-Electric-3way-Hybrid-Cycle

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I hate to mention this but it is a possibility, a real one and a dirty trick at that, but someone that knows what they are doing with bikes and has something against you or has a nasty sense of humor or is just plain twisted. Long story short, if you reach down to someone's rear derailer on their bike and bends the bottom of the derailer inward towards the wheel while it is one of the higher gears. When the unsuspecting rider shifts into the lowest granny gear on the rear shifter while moving the bottom end of the derailer grabs one of the spokes in the wheel and the wheel and the derailer tear themselves mutually apart.

I've had it done to me more then once and finally caught the scum pulling the nasty stunt in the act and put an end to the problem. Someone might have done the same to you. Was your bike ever out of your sight in an area where someone could have done this to you?
turbo1889 is offline  
Old 03-08-13, 07:07 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,589
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 239 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
'chainsuck' refers to the specific phoenomena of a chain failing to disengage smoothly from the front chainrings, thus getting pulled upwards (sucked) and wedged between chainstay and chainrings.
Is this what happened?
or was this actually rear derailer issue? 'chainsucked the rear end' being a misnomer....

chainsuck is comonly caused by worn chainrings -the teeth wear into sharkfin shapes that snag the chain

if it was the rear derailer; could be a couple causes
limit screws not set right, derailer hangar misalignment
xenologer is offline  
Old 03-08-13, 08:32 PM
  #4  
Galveston County Texas
 
10 Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,221

Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1349 Post(s)
Liked 1,243 Times in 621 Posts
Originally Posted by salek
Catastrophe! Training for our upcoming ride, I had put two gallons of water on the front rack as if low riders, and had four gallons on the back end. We were 3.3 miles from home, coasting a gentle downhill to a stop sign. I down shifted the front end to granny and downshifted the back end to first and WHAM!!! Chainsucked the rear end.
Squeeze drops her load (28 pounds of water) and cycles home to get the VW Bulli for vehicle recovery.
Had to take a chain tool and "cut" the wheel out of the rear end mess. Wheel is at the bike shop. No spokes broken. Don't know if the freewheel survived. At this stage, I don't know if the derailleur caused and/or was destroyed by the event. I just know that my BD just gutted itself a few weeks before its first grand tour ride.
I am prepping the "grocery getter" for a 185 mile tour. Now, I'm scared to take the BD 185 miles. Will it do this again?
Do we know a risk and frequency for chainsucking the rear end of a BD?
I need some input as to whether or not to trust and take the BD or to use my (38,000 mile/1984) grand touring bike.
Were you using a spoke protector?
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"

10 Wheels is offline  
Old 03-15-13, 04:32 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 103

Bikes: 1984 Takara 490 Challenge

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ok, maybe I used the wrong word. My BD came to me as a used vehicle and does not have a disk to keep the chain out of the spokes. The chain did suck, wrap, lodge around the rear axle. I had to use a chain tool to break the chain to get the wheel off so that the LBS could use their tool to take off the freewheel. The inches of chain thus freed were destroyed in the wrapping and cannot be re-used.
I think that what happened was that I managed to downshift to granny on the front and first on the back at the same time causing a ripple in the chain. I just don't normally shift left and right at the same time.
I need a protective disk on the front and an anti-suck device on the front. LBS says that I would have to lose first gear to put one on.
salek is offline  
Old 03-15-13, 06:42 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,589
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 239 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
...again your terminology is unclear...

but it sounds like your chain overshifted off the largest cog and wedged between the spokes and freewheel.
typically this occurs if the rear derailer limit screws are not set properly
or if the rear derailer has been misaligned via impact (not necesarially from a crash, can be as minor as someone at the bike racks next to you knocking it by accident)

I'd check those two things: derailer alignment and limit screws
If your LBS is good, they already checked that out when they did your repairs; and you should be fine now.
xenologer is offline  
Old 03-15-13, 06:55 AM
  #7  
Formerly Known as Newbie
 
Juha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 6,249
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
+1 on rear derailleur adjustment / limit screws.

Someone doing what turbo described above, on purpose, is just nasty. You need to know a bit about bikes to even pull that kind of stunt.
__________________
To err is human. To moo is bovine.

Who is this General Failure anyway, and why is he reading my drive?


Become a Registered Member in Bike Forums
Community guidelines
Juha is offline  
Old 03-18-13, 09:56 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 330
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Also replace any spoke that shows the slightest mark from the chain. Even a small scratch causes stress concentration, and that spoke will break soon... Maybe not the next 20 miles, but likely within the next 200.
kevbo is offline  
Old 03-19-13, 10:00 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Posts: 982

Bikes: xtracycle, electric recumbent, downtube folder and more

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Don't shift like that. I haven't owned a bike that would like that. Get your bike tuned up and yes, you can trust it.
crackerdog is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 02:58 PM
  #10  
Full Member
 
swen0171's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 445

Bikes: 1993 Bridgestone XO-3, 1981 Trek 613, 1988 Fisher Montare, 1986 Univega Alpina Uno, 2010 Surly Long Haul trucker, 2004 Rivendell Quickbeam. 1970s Gitane Mixtie (60cm), 1994 Diamond Back Axis TT

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 61 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times in 21 Posts
I agree with the above posters. Avoid shifting both derailleurs at the same time. A properly adjusted rear derailleur will not be able to push the chain further than the gear closest to the spokes. Fine to ride after adjusted.
swen0171 is offline  
Old 05-18-13, 09:22 AM
  #11  
Full Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: The White Mountains of AZ
Posts: 288
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 13 Posts
Late to the party but I totally disagree that it is bad to shift both ends at the same time. In fact the rear, going to a bigger cog, tightens the chain. Shifting the front, which gives up chain length by going to a smaller ring, provides chain slack easier than the derailleur spring and will provide a better shift.

I almost never shift the front without shifting the back at the same time; On my bikes a chainring shift is about the same as two or three cog shifts, thus a shift on the front and rear gives a smaller gear ratio change and is typically what I want.

I do agree with the posters above who suggest that the derailleur/hanger was bent or the low limit screw was improperly adjusted and that spokes need to be replaced after being damaged by the chain.

PS. There are two ways to shift the front and back at the same time: Shifting for big changes (like the OP was doing) requires less chain from the derailleur spring. Partially canceling a ring change by also shifting a cog or two requires more derailleur spring but has the advantages of a smaller gear change and less soft pedaling than for two separate shifts.

Last edited by Bug Shield; 05-18-13 at 10:00 AM. Reason: PS
Bug Shield is offline  
Old 05-19-13, 08:35 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bucks County PA
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
When coasting downhill, always shift to a larger chainring. That is an old habit I learned in the start of MTB in the 80's. Chainsuck was a big deal in the early MTB days, and the bigger chainring, 'wraps up' more chain and moves it away from the rear tire. The chain flapping around would hit the knobby tire, and get sucked between the chainstay and tire and that would start a catastrophic lockup of rear wheel.

So get out of the granny gear, unless you are using it. AND only with the two biggest, maybe three cogs in the back. Then a properly adjusted derailleurs, and lack of loose chain will keep you safe.
Bob E
boberuddy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Meper
Classic & Vintage
21
08-12-18 12:41 PM
7432
Advocacy & Safety
13
08-03-15 10:32 PM
TransitBiker
Commuting
44
06-13-14 07:22 AM
El Cid
Touring
25
04-09-14 07:36 PM
bhagi108
Road Cycling
38
09-27-12 10:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.